Vulnerabilities in pkg:pypi/vyper
PACKAGEGHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf is a MODERATE memory corruption using function calls vulnerability (CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index) affecting Vyper libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves memory corruption using function calls within tuples / nested calls. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.2.6.
pkg:pypi/vyper
Vulnerability advisories affecting package pkg:pypi/vyper. Select an advisory below to view technical details or fixes.
| Advisory ID | CVE / NVD | Severity | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf | - | MODERATE | Vyper: Memory corruption using function calls within tuples / nested calls |
| GHSA-4v7v-gqf9-ww2g | - | MODERATE | Vyper: Call stack corruption when passing complex type containing non-base type members as argument |
| GHSA-vg88-3v92-rjx2 | - | MODERATE | Vyper: Return inside for loop more than 1 level deep |
| GHSA-4hg4-9mf5-wxxq | CVE-2023-41052 | MODERATE | incorrect order of evaluation of side effects for some builtins |
| GHSA-g2xh-c426-v8mf | CVE-2023-40015 | MODERATE | Vyper: reversed order of side effects for some operations |
| GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm | CVE-2025-47774 | LOW | Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0 |
| GHSA-qhr6-mgqr-mchm | CVE-2025-47285 | LOW | Vyper's `concat()` builtin may elide side-effects for zero-length arguments |
| GHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3 | CVE-2025-21607 | LOW | Vyper Does Not Check the Success of Certain Precompile Calls |
| GHSA-4w26-8p97-f4jp | CVE-2025-27105 | LOW | AugAssign evaluation order causing OOB write within the object in Vyper |
| GHSA-h33q-mhmp-8p67 | CVE-2025-27104 | LOW | Vyper has a double eval in For List Iter |
| GHSA-2p94-8669-xg86 | CVE-2025-26622 | LOW | Vyper's sqrt doesn't define rounding behavior |
| GHSA-4hwq-4cpm-8vmx | CVE-2024-24564 | LOW | Vyper's `extract32` can ready dirty memory |
| GHSA-xchq-w5r3-4wg3 | CVE-2024-32645 | MODERATE | vyper performs incorrect topic logging in raw_log |
| GHSA-r56x-j438-vw5m | CVE-2024-32646 | MODERATE | vyper performs double eval of the slice start/length args in certain cases |
| GHSA-3whq-64q2-qfj6 | CVE-2024-32647 | MODERATE | vyper performs double eval of raw_args in create_from_blueprint |
| GHSA-5jrj-52x8-m64h | CVE-2024-32649 | MODERATE | vyper performs multiple eval of `sqrt()` argument built in |
| GHSA-9p8r-4xp4-gw5w | CVE-2024-26149 | LOW | Vyper's `_abi_decode` vulnerable to Memory Overflow |
| GHSA-m2v9-w374-5hj9 | CVE-2024-32648 | MODERATE | vyper default functions don't respect nonreentrancy keys |
| GHSA-x2c2-q32w-4w6m | CVE-2024-24567 | MODERATE | Vyper's raw_call `value=` kwargs not disabled for static and delegate calls |
| GHSA-52xq-j7v9-v4v2 | CVE-2024-24563 | CRITICAL | Vyper negative array index bounds checks |
| GHSA-9x7f-gwxq-6f2c | CVE-2024-24561 | CRITICAL | Vyper's bounds check on built-in `slice()` function can be overflowed |
| GHSA-gp3w-2v2m-p686 | CVE-2024-24560 | LOW | Vyper's external calls can overflow return data to return input buffer |
| GHSA-6845-xw22-ffxv | CVE-2024-24559 | LOW | Vyper sha3 codegen bug |
| GHSA-6m97-7527-mh74 | CVE-2023-46247 | HIGH | incorrect storage layout for contracts containing large arrays |
| GHSA-c647-pxm2-c52w | CVE-2023-42443 | HIGH | Vyper vulnerable to memory corruption in certain builtins utilizing `msize` |
| GHSA-3hg2-r75x-g69m | CVE-2023-42441 | MODERATE | Vyper has incorrect re-entrancy lock when key is empty string |
| GHSA-cx2q-hfxr-rj97 | CVE-2023-42460 | MODERATE | Vyper's `_abi_decode` input not validated in complex expressions |
| GHSA-f5x6-7qgp-jhf3 | CVE-2023-37902 | MODERATE | ecrecover can return undefined data if signature does not verify |
| GHSA-vxmm-cwh2-q762 | CVE-2023-32675 | MODERATE | Vyper's nonpayable default functions are sometimes payable |
| GHSA-ph9x-4vc9-m39g | CVE-2023-32059 | HIGH | Vyper vulnerable to incorrect ordering of arguments for kwargs passed to internal calls |
| GHSA-6r8q-pfpv-7cgj | CVE-2023-32058 | HIGH | Vyper vulnerable to integer overflow in loop |
| GHSA-3p37-3636-q8wv | CVE-2023-31146 | HIGH | Vyper vulnerable to OOB DynArray access when array is on both LHS and RHS of an assignment |
| GHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6 | CVE-2023-30837 | HIGH | vyper vulnerable to storage allocator overflow |
| GHSA-w9g2-3w7p-72g9 | CVE-2023-30629 | HIGH | Incorrect success value returned in vyper |
| GHSA-4v9q-cgpw-cf38 | CVE-2022-29255 | HIGH | Multiple evaluation of contract address in call in vyper |
| GHSA-4mrx-6fxm-8jpg | CVE-2022-24788 | HIGH | Buffer Overflow in vyper |
| GHSA-c7pr-343r-5c46 | CVE-2021-41122 | MODERATE | missing clamps for decimal args in external functions |
| GHSA-xv8x-pr4h-73jv | CVE-2021-41121 | HIGH | Memory corruption when returning a literal struct with a private call inside of it |
| GHSA-5824-cm3x-3c38 | CVE-2023-39363 | CRITICAL | Vyper has incorrectly allocated named re-entrancy locks |
| GHSA-2q8v-3gqq-4f8p | CVE-2024-22419 | HIGH | concat built-in can corrupt memory in vyper |
| GHSA-ppx5-q359-pvwj | CVE-2024-32481 | MODERATE | vyper's range(start, start + N) reverts for negative numbers |
| GHSA-j2x6-9323-fp7h | CVE-2022-24845 | HIGH | Integer bounds error in Vyper |
| GHSA-7vrm-3jc8-5wwm | - | HIGH | Incorrect Comparison in Vyper |
| GHSA-7f92-rr6w-cq64 | - | HIGH | Storage corruption due to variables overwritten by re-entrancy locks |
| GHSA-375m-5fvv-xq23 | - | LOW | VVE-2021-0002: Incorrect `returndatasize` when using simple forwarder proxies deployed prior to EIP-1167 adoption |
| GHSA-22wc-c9wj-6q2v | - | MODERATE | VVE-2021-0001: Memory corruption using function calls within arrays |
| GHSA-mr6r-mvw4-736g | - | LOW | Vyper interfaces returning integer types less than 256 bits can be manipulated if uint256 is used |
GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf at a Glance
How to Fix GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Vyper dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install vyper>=0.2.6
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show vyper
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show vyper
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Vyper in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.2.6), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show vyper command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index, where the product uses untrusted input when calculating or using an array index, but the product does not validate or incorrectly validates the index to ensure the index references a valid position within the array. In Vyper, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf Affected Vyper Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
vyper
|
PyPI |
< 0.2.6
|
0.2.6
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf?
Which Vyper versions are affected?
What version fixes GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf?
Is vyper affected?
What CWE is associated with GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf",
"modified" : "2026-10-06T15:22:29Z",
"published" : "2026-10-06T15:22:29Z",
"aliases" : [ ],
"summary" : "Vyper: Memory corruption using function calls within tuples / nested calls",
"details" : "### Impact\nWhen performing a function call inside a tuple or as an argument inside another function call, there is a memory corruption issue that occurs because of an incorrect pointer to the the tip of the stack.\n\nExample code:\n```python\n@internal\ndef _foo(a: uint256, b: uint256, c: uint256) -> (uint256, uint256, uint256, uint256, uint256):\n return 1, a, b, c, 5\n\n@internal\ndef _foo2() -> uint256:\n a: uint256[10] = [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,15,16]\n return 4\n\n@external\ndef foo() -> (uint256, uint256, uint256, uint256, uint256):\n return self._foo(2, 3, self._foo2())\n```\n\nPlease see #2186 for further information\n\n### Patches\nThis problem was fixed in #2186, and released as a part of [`v0.2.6`](https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/releases/tag/v0.2.6).",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "vyper"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.2.6"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2186"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/74ba67d4bec5f8be4f05759e37d2bfb1463e0441"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/releases/tag/v0.2.6"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-129" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-10-06T15:22:29Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}