Vulnerabilities in pkg:pypi/starlette

PACKAGE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-48710 is a MODERATE (CVSS 6.5) starlette has missing host header vulnerability (CWE-1289: Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input) affecting Starlette libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves starlette has missing host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.0.1.

12 Known Advisory Record(s)
Package Vulnerability Intelligence

pkg:pypi/starlette

12 Known Advisory Record(s)

Vulnerability advisories affecting package pkg:pypi/starlette. Select an advisory below to view technical details or fixes.

Advisory ID CVE / NVD Severity Summary
GHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr CVE-2026-48710 MODERATE Starlette has missing Host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks
GHSA-x746-7m8f-x49c CVE-2026-48817 MODERATE Starlette: Arbitrary HTTP method dispatched to `HTTPEndpoint` attributes via `getattr`
GHSA-82w8-qh3p-5jfq CVE-2026-54283 HIGH Starlette: request.form() limits silently ignored for application/x-www-form-urlencoded enable DoS
GHSA-wqp7-x3pw-xc5r CVE-2026-48818 HIGH Starlette: SSRF and NTLM credential theft via UNC paths in StaticFiles on Windows
GHSA-7f5h-v6xp-fcq8 CVE-2025-62727 HIGH Starlette vulnerable to O(n^2) DoS via Range header merging in ``starlette.responses.FileResponse``
GHSA-2c2j-9gv5-cj73 CVE-2025-54121 MODERATE Starlette has possible denial-of-service vector when parsing large files in multipart forms
GHSA-74m5-2c7w-9w3x CVE-2023-30798 HIGH MultipartParser denial of service with too many fields or files
GHSA-3qj8-93xh-pwh2 - HIGH Duplicate Advisory: Starlette allows an unauthenticated and remote attacker to specify any number of form fields or files
GHSA-v5gw-mw7f-84px CVE-2023-29159 MODERATE Starlette has Path Traversal vulnerability in StaticFiles
GHSA-f96h-pmfr-66vw CVE-2024-47874 HIGH Starlette Denial of service (DoS) via multipart/form-data
GHSA-93gm-qmq6-w238 - HIGH Duplicate Advisory: Starlette Content-Type Header ReDoS
GHSA-qj8w-rv5x-2v9h - HIGH Duplicate Advisory: Starlette vulnerable to directory traversal

CVE-2026-48710 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-48710
GHSA Identifier GHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 6.5
CWE Classification CWE-1289: Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input
Affected Product Starlette
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 6.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality Low (C:L)
Integrity Low (I:L)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-48710

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Starlette dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

starlette fixed: 1.0.1
pip install starlette>=1.0.1
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show starlette

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-48710, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show starlette

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Starlette in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.0.1), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show starlette command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-1289: Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input, where the product receives an input value that is used as a resource identifier or other type of reference, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input is equivalent to a potentially-unsafe value. In Starlette, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Summary In affected versions, the HTTP `Host` request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct `request.url`. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while `request.url` is rebuilt from the `Host` header, a malformed header could make `request.url.path` differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on `request.url` (rather than the raw `scope` path) could therefore be bypassed. ### Details When a client requests `http://example.com/foo`, it sends: ```http GET /foo HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com ``` Affected versions reconstructed the URL by concatenating `http://{host}{path}` and re-parsing the result. The `Host` value is only valid as a `uri-host [ ":" port ]` per [RFC 9112 §3.2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#section-3.2-6), where `uri-host` follows the restricted `host` grammar of [RFC 3986 §3.2.2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986.html#section-3.2.2). When it contains characters outside that grammar - notably `/`, `?`, or `#` - those characters move the path/query/fragment boundaries during re-parsing, so the parsed `request.url.path` no longer matches the path the server actually received. For example: ```http GET /foo HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com/abc?bar= ``` reconstructs to `http://example.com/abc?bar=/foo`, whose parsed `path` is `/abc` - even though routing used the real path `/foo`. The router still dispatches to `/foo` and the endpoint executes, but any middleware or code that reads `request.url.path` sees `/abc`, so path-based authorization checks can be bypassed. ### Impact Any application running an affected version that relies on `request.url` (or `request.url.path`) for security-sensitive decisions is affected. The most common case is middleware that gates access to certain path prefixes based on `request.url.path`. Deployments fronted by a proxy or load balancer are mitigated only if that proxy rejects or normalizes the malformed `Host` header before forwarding and the application does not trust attacker-controlled host headers (e.g. `X-Forwarded-Host`) elsewhere. ### Mitigation Upgrade to a patched version, which validates the `Host` header against the grammar of [RFC 9112 §3.2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#section-3.2-6) / [RFC 3986 §3.2.2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986.html#section-3.2.2) when constructing `request.url` and falls back to `scope["server"]` for malformed values.

CVE-2026-48710 Affected Starlette Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
1.0.1
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
starlette
PyPI
< 1.0.1
1.0.1

References

GitHub Advisory / Wiki ADVISORY
https://github.com/Kludex/starlette/security/advisories/GHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr
NVD — CVE-2026-48710 NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48710
Security Fix Commit FIX COMMIT
https://github.com/Kludex/starlette/commit/764dab0dcfb9033d75442d7a359645c9f94648c6
www.x41-dsec.de/lab/advisories/x41-... WEB
https://www.x41-dsec.de/lab/advisories/x41-2026-002-starlette
badhost.org WEB
https://badhost.org
www.secwest.net/starlette WEB
https://www.secwest.net/starlette
CVE Official Record — CVE-2026-48710 CVE
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48710
Starlette Security Information SECURITY
https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-48710.json
ostif.org/disclosing-the-badh... WEB
https://ostif.org/disclosing-the-badhost-vulnerability-in-starlette
Starlette Source Repository REPOSITORY
https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/starlette/PYSEC-2026-161.yaml
Starlette Source Repository REPOSITORY
https://github.com/Kludex/starlette
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi WEB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481742
Starlette Security Information SECURITY
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48710
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:60... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:60520
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:51... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:51357
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:44... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:44696
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:43... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:43038
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:37... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:37275
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:34... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34532
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:34... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34526
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:34... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34456
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:30... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30089
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:30... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30088
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:26... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26226
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:24... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24866
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:23... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23346
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:22... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22993
access.redhat.com/errata/rhsa-2026:22... WEB
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22992

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-48710?
CVE-2026-48710 is a security vulnerability in Starlette involving Starlette has missing Host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks under CWE-1289: Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input.
Which Starlette versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 1.0.1 across affected packages: starlette.
What version fixes CVE-2026-48710?
Upgrading to 1.0.1 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is starlette affected?
Yes, starlette is affected in releases prior to 1.0.1. Upgrade your dependency to 1.0.1 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48710?
CVE-2026-48710 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-48710?
CVE-2026-48710 is classified under CWE-1289: Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input (The product receives an input value that is used as a resource identifier or other type of reference, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input is equivalent to a potentially-unsafe value.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-48710?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show starlette'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr",
  "modified" : "2026-08-28T18:30:59Z",
  "published" : "2026-06-04T13:15:17Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-48710" ],
  "summary" : "Starlette has missing Host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks",
  "details" : "### Summary\nIn affected versions, the HTTP `Host` request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct `request.url`. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while `request.url` is rebuilt from the `Host` header, a malformed header could make `request.url.path` differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on `request.url` (rather than the raw `scope` path) could therefore be bypassed.\n\n### Details\nWhen a client requests `http://example.com/foo`, it sends:\n\n```http\nGET /foo HTTP/1.1\nHost: example.com\n```\n\nAffected versions reconstructed the URL by concatenating `http://{host}{path}` and re-parsing the result. The `Host` value is only valid as a `uri-host [ \":\" port ]` per [RFC 9112 §3.2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#section-3.2-6), where `uri-host` follows the restricted `host` grammar of [RFC 3986 §3.2.2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986.html#section-3.2.2). When it contains characters outside that grammar - notably `/`, `?`, or `#` - those characters move the path/query/fragment boundaries during re-parsing, so the parsed `request.url.path` no longer matches the path the server actually received. For example:\n\n```http\nGET /foo HTTP/1.1\nHost: example.com/abc?bar=\n```\n\nreconstructs to `http://example.com/abc?bar=/foo`, whose parsed `path` is `/abc` - even though routing used the real path `/foo`. The router still dispatches to `/foo` and the endpoint executes, but any middleware or code that reads `request.url.path` sees `/abc`, so path-based authorization checks can be bypassed.\n\n### Impact\nAny application running an affected version that relies on `request.url` (or `request.url.path`) for security-sensitive decisions is affected. The most common case is middleware that gates access to certain path prefixes based on `request.url.path`. Deployments fronted by a proxy or load balancer are mitigated only if that proxy rejects or normalizes the malformed `Host` header before forwarding and the application does not trust attacker-controlled host headers (e.g. `X-Forwarded-Host`) elsewhere.\n\n### Mitigation\nUpgrade to a patched version, which validates the `Host` header against the grammar of [RFC 9112 §3.2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#section-3.2-6) / [RFC 3986 §3.2.2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986.html#section-3.2.2) when constructing `request.url` and falls back to `scope[\"server\"]` for malformed values.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "starlette"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "1.0.1"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 1.0.0"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Kludex/starlette/security/advisories/GHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48710"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Kludex/starlette/commit/764dab0dcfb9033d75442d7a359645c9f94648c6"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://www.x41-dsec.de/lab/advisories/x41-2026-002-starlette"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://www.secwest.net/starlette"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48710"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-48710.json"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://ostif.org/disclosing-the-badhost-vulnerability-in-starlette"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/starlette/PYSEC-2026-161.yaml"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Kludex/starlette"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481742"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://badhost.org"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48710"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:60520"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:51357"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:44696"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:43038"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:37275"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34532"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34526"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34456"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30089"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30088"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26226"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24866"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23346"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22993"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22992"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-1289", "CWE-444" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-06-04T13:15:17Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-05-26T22:16:44Z"
  }
}