CVE-2026-69246: Guzzle Noncanonical Host Can Bypass Host-based Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-69246 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.2) noncanonical host can bypass host-based vulnerability (CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict) affecting Guzzle libraries in the Packagist ecosystem. The issue involves noncanonical host can bypass host-based checks. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 7.15.2, 8.0.1.
CVE-2026-69246 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.2
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2026-69246
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Guzzle dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade guzzlehttp/guzzle to 7.15.2
Upgrade guzzlehttp/guzzle to 8.0.1
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for guzzlehttp/guzzle
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-69246, inspect your project dependencies for Guzzle:
inspect dependencies for guzzlehttp/guzzle
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Guzzle in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 7.15.2), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & RFC 5280 Specification
Under RFC 5280 specifications for X.509 certificates, the Name Constraints extension defines a namespace within which all subsequent subject names in a certification path must be located. Constraints apply to various name forms including directory names, IP addresses, rfc822Name (email addresses), and uniformResourceIdentifier (URI) entries. Specifically, during certificate path validation, affected versions of Guzzle failed to properly normalize or enforce boundary checks when domain names contained trailing dot (.) characters. Because domain names with a trailing dot signify fully qualified domain names (FQDNs), this omission allowed non-conforming certificates to be improperly validated as compliant with the defined name constraints.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-69246 Affected Guzzle Versions
2 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
guzzlehttp/guzzle
|
Packagist |
< 7.15.2
|
7.15.2
|
|
guzzlehttp/guzzle
|
Packagist |
≥ 8.0.0
< 8.0.1
|
8.0.1
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-69246?
Which Guzzle versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-69246?
Is guzzlehttp/guzzle affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-69246?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-69246?
How can I check Packagist dependencies for CVE-2026-69246?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-v5mv-p594-2x33",
"modified" : "2026-08-03T21:07:26Z",
"published" : "2026-08-03T21:07:26Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-69246" ],
"summary" : "Guzzle: Noncanonical host can bypass host-based checks",
"details" : "### Impact\n\nIn affected versions, Guzzle gives a transport the request URI as text and supplies the `Host` header separately. The cURL handlers set `CURLOPT_URL` to the URI exactly as written and push that `Host` into `CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER`; `StreamHandler` does the same through `fopen()`. libcurl then parses the authority itself, percent-decoding it and, on an IDN-capable build, applying IDNA mapping, and uses the result to resolve, connect, name the TLS peer and address a proxy `CONNECT`, while the supplied `Host` suppresses the aligned one it would have generated. In `http://127.0.0.%31/` the URI host is one `filter_var()` rejects as an IP literal, yet libcurl decodes it to `127.0.0.1` and reaches loopback with no DNS lookup while the server receives `Host: 127.0.0.%31`.\n\nAn attacker who influences a fetched URI can therefore reach a host the application's checks excluded and read whatever it exposes of the response. The same divergence moves Guzzle's own decisions onto a spelling the transport does not use: `no_proxy` selects proxy routing from the literal host, and `RedirectMiddleware` decides from it whether to strip `Authorization` and `Cookie`. The cookie middleware extracts `Set-Cookie` against the URI Guzzle produced, not the authority contacted, so for a raw divergent URI the cookie is stored under the URI host as written. Where Guzzle rewrote that URI but left a divergent `Host`, or where the caller supplied one, the cookie is stored under the canonical name and replayed by ordinary later requests to it. With a third-party `UriInterface`, a host of `blocked.example.com@127.0.0.1` reaches `127.0.0.1` through all three handlers and generates `Authorization: Basic` from userinfo the application never wrote.\n\nExploitation requires the application to build a request URI from untrusted input and to make a host decision before handing it to Guzzle. Applications that only fetch URIs they construct themselves are not affected, and an exact allowlist of canonical names ordinarily fails closed; the exposure is to denylists, private-range and IP-literal checks, and any check that treats an unresolvable name as safe. The raw Unicode class needs an IDNA transformation somewhere: either a libcurl built with IDN support or Guzzle's own `idn_conversion`, off by default on both branches, which rewrites the URI in `Client::buildUri()` before a handler sees it and leaves a prebuilt request's explicit `Host` as written, while a request the client builds derives that header from the rewritten URI and produces no divergence. Noncanonical numeric spellings such as `127.1`, `2130706433`, `0x7f000001` and `0177.0.0.1` remain accepted after the patch and reach whatever the transport reads them as, loopback or a routable public host, and the cURL and stream handlers can differ, so a check comparing a host against an address as text stays bypassable. Guzzle does not offer SSRF protection, and neither cache poisoning nor cross-tenant compromise was established.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis is a summary; the patches are the authority. The issue is fixed in `7.15.2` and `8.0.1`, which validate the request host in all three built-in handlers before any network I/O. A URI host is rejected for a byte outside `0x21` to `0x7E`, a percent escape, a URI authority delimiter, unbalanced brackets, or numeric-looking parts followed by a trailing dot. That last rule is deliberately conservative and also refuses out-of-range forms libcurl keeps as names, such as `256.0.0.1.`. An explicit `Host` header must be printable ASCII, and on `7.15.2` free of percent escapes. The client also regenerates a derived `Host` when it rewrites the request URI. Versions before `7.15.2` and version `8.0.0` are affected.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf you cannot upgrade, constrain the host yourself before handing a URI to Guzzle, and constrain any explicit `Host` header separately, on every redirect hop. The URI rule assumes `$uri` is a validated `GuzzleHttp\\Psr7\\Uri`, so re-parse a third-party `UriInterface` with `new Uri((string) $uri)` first.\n\n```php\n$host = $uri->getHost();\n\nif (\n preg_match('/\\A[\\x21-\\x7E]*\\z/D', $host) !== 1\n || strpbrk($host, '%@/?#\\\\') !== false\n || substr($host, -1) === '.'\n) {\n throw new RuntimeException('Refusing to fetch this URI host.');\n}\n\nif (\n preg_match('/\\A[\\x21-\\x7E]*\\z/D', $hostHeader) !== 1\n || strpos($hostHeader, '%') !== false\n) {\n throw new RuntimeException('Refusing to send this Host header.');\n}\n```\n\nIt differs from the patch in both directions: it refuses `example.com.`, which the patch accepts, and it does not canonicalize `127.1` or `0x7f000001`. Reparsing the URI separates a valid port from the host and rejects malformed bracket forms, so the snippet checks the host component alone. `idn_conversion => true` is not an access control, since IDNA maps `127。0。0。1` onto `127.0.0.1` and direct handler use bypasses it, and `Uri::getHost()` is not an SSRF boundary: it is the host as written, not the host a transport connects to. Where the destination matters, resolve the host and check the addresses, and use a separate cookie jar for untrusted origins.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Packagist",
"name" : "guzzlehttp/guzzle"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "7.15.2"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Packagist",
"name" : "guzzlehttp/guzzle"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "8.0.0"
}, {
"fixed" : "8.0.1"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle/security/advisories/GHSA-v5mv-p594-2x33"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle/pull/3907"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle/pull/3908"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle/commit/3aeea0406aab88cbbd86531313d7cebf8ae149a4"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle/commit/744101956d78b7c1384d0cbf379db13e859167bf"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle/releases/tag/7.15.2"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle/releases/tag/8.0.1"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-180", "CWE-436", "CWE-918", "CWE-941" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-08-03T21:07:26Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}