CVE-2026-45617: Liquidjs Denial of Service Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-45617 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) denial of service vulnerability (CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity) affecting Liquidjs libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves liquidjs vulnerable to redos via quadratic backtracking in `strip_html` filter regex. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 10.26.0.
CVE-2026-45617 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-45617
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Liquidjs dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install liquidjs@10.26.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls liquidjs
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-45617, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls liquidjs
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Liquidjs in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 10.26.0), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls liquidjs command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity, where the product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential. In Liquidjs, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-45617 Affected Liquidjs Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
liquidjs
|
npm |
< 10.26.0
|
10.26.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-45617?
Which Liquidjs versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-45617?
Is liquidjs affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45617?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-45617?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-45617?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-r7g9-xpmj-5fcq",
"modified" : "2026-07-09T21:06:36Z",
"published" : "2026-05-27T18:08:19Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-45617" ],
"summary" : "LiquidJS Vulnerable to ReDoS via Quadratic Backtracking in `strip_html` Filter Regex",
"details" : "## Summary\n\nThe built-in `strip_html` filter in liquidjs uses a regex containing four lazy-quantified alternatives. When the input contains many `<script`, `<style`, or `<!--` opener tokens without matching closers, the V8 regex engine performs O(N²) backtracking, blocking the Node.js event loop. A single ~350 KB request (`'<script'.repeat(50000)`) stalls the process for ~10 seconds; cost grows quadratically with input size. The default `memoryLimit: Infinity` does not bound regex CPU, and even when configured `strip_html` only charges `str.length` to the limit — the regex itself runs unbounded.\n\n## Details\n\nThe vulnerable filter is at `src/filters/html.ts:45-49`:\n\n```ts\nexport function strip_html (this: FilterImpl, v: string) {\n const str = stringify(v)\n this.context.memoryLimit.use(str.length)\n return str.replace(/<script[\\s\\S]*?<\\/script>|<style[\\s\\S]*?<\\/style>|<.*?>|<!--[\\s\\S]*?-->/g, '')\n}\n```\n\nThe regex contains four lazy patterns:\n1. `<script[\\s\\S]*?<\\/script>`\n2. `<style[\\s\\S]*?<\\/style>`\n3. `<.*?>`\n4. `<!--[\\s\\S]*?-->`\n\nFor an input like `'<script'.repeat(N)`, the engine encounters N starting `<` positions. At each one it must lazily expand `[\\s\\S]*?` (and `.*?`) all the way to end-of-input searching for a closer that never appears, then fail and backtrack. Because each of the O(N) starts performs O(N) lazy-expansion work, total work is O(N²).\n\nReachability:\n1. `strip_html` is a default-registered filter (exported from `src/filters/html.ts`, wired up via `src/filters/index.ts`), invocable from any template via `{{ x | strip_html }}`.\n2. The filter calls `String.prototype.replace` with the vulnerable regex directly on the caller-supplied string, with no length cap and no timeout.\n3. The default `memoryLimit` is `Infinity` (`src/liquid-options.ts:198`); the filter only charges `str.length` against memory (line 47), which does not bound CPU work for regex backtracking.\n\nThis is distinct from `GHSA-45rm-2893-5f49` (prototype property leak, CWE-200) and from any prior `replace`/`strip_html` issues — the mechanism here is regex backtracking CPU consumption on a different filter.\n\n## PoC\n\nEmpirical scaling confirmed against a freshly built `liquidjs@10.25.7` bundle on Node 22 / Linux:\n\n```bash\nnode -e \"\nconst { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');\nconst e = new Liquid();\n(async () => {\n for (const n of [1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000]) {\n const payload = '<script'.repeat(n);\n const t0 = Date.now();\n await e.parseAndRender('{{ x | strip_html }}', { x: payload });\n console.log('n=' + n + ' inputLen=' + payload.length + ' ms=' + (Date.now() - t0));\n }\n})();\n\"\n```\n\nVerified output:\n```\nn=1000 inputLen=7000 ms=5\nn=2000 inputLen=14000 ms=12 (2.4x for 2x size)\nn=4000 inputLen=28000 ms=46 (3.8x for 2x size)\nn=8000 inputLen=56000 ms=187 (4.0x for 2x size)\nn=16000 inputLen=112000 ms=737 (3.9x for 2x size)\n```\n\nA larger payload extrapolates straightforwardly:\n```bash\nnode -e \"\nconst { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');\nconst e = new Liquid();\n(async () => {\n const payload = '<script'.repeat(50000); // 350 KB\n const t0 = Date.now();\n await e.parseAndRender('{{ x | strip_html }}', { x: payload });\n console.log('elapsed ms:', Date.now() - t0);\n})();\n\"\n# elapsed ms: ~10000+ (Node single-threaded event loop fully blocked)\n```\n\nThe same pathology applies to `<style` and `<!--` openers.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Single-request DoS:** A 350 KB request body stalls the Node.js event loop for ~10 seconds; 700 KB takes ~40 s; 1.4 MB takes ~160 s. All other requests on the process queue behind the regex.\n- **Trivial amplification:** Quadratic scaling means small attacker bandwidth produces large server CPU consumption. A handful of concurrent requests fully saturates the worker.\n- **No authentication required:** The typical use case for `strip_html` is sanitizing untrusted input (comments, posts, profile bios, product descriptions). Any endpoint that renders user content through `strip_html` is exposed.\n- **memoryLimit doesn't help:** Even applications that opt into `memoryLimit` are not protected, because (a) the regex CPU runs to completion before any output is produced, and (b) only `str.length` is charged, not the cost of the regex traversal.\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nReplace the backtracking regex with an atomic / non-overlapping pattern, and/or perform a single linear pass.\n\nOption 1 — anchor each alternative so lazy expansion fails fast on chunked content (no `[\\s\\S]*?` over the full tail):\n```ts\nreturn str.replace(\n /<script\\b[^<]*(?:<(?!\\/script>)[^<]*)*<\\/script>|<style\\b[^<]*(?:<(?!\\/style>)[^<]*)*<\\/style>|<!--[^-]*(?:-(?!->)[^-]*)*-->|<[^>]*>/g,\n ''\n)\n```\nThis unrolls each lazy quantifier so each `<` is visited at most a constant number of times overall — linear total work.\n\nOption 2 — single-pass tokenizer in plain code; iterate over the string once, tracking whether you are inside `<script>`, `<style>`, comment, or generic tag, and emit nothing for those ranges.\n\nEither fix should be combined with charging the regex output cost honestly to `memoryLimit` and (defensively) capping input length up front:\n```ts\nexport function strip_html (this: FilterImpl, v: string) {\n const str = stringify(v)\n this.context.memoryLimit.use(str.length)\n // ... linear-time strip implementation here\n}\n```",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "liquidjs"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "10.26.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-r7g9-xpmj-5fcq"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45617"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/3616a744b9abeb425c217b340a2397d46176afb8"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/v10.26.0"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-1333" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-27T18:08:19Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-06-17T23:17:04Z"
}
}