CVE-2026-45617: Liquidjs Denial of Service Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-r7g9-xpmj-5fcq
CVSS 7.5
CWE-1333
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-45617 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) denial of service vulnerability (CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity) affecting Liquidjs libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves liquidjs vulnerable to redos via quadratic backtracking in `strip_html` filter regex. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 10.26.0.

CVE-2026-45617 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-45617
GHSA Identifier GHSA-r7g9-xpmj-5fcq
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.5
CWE Classification CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
Affected Product Liquidjs
Package Ecosystem npm
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-45617

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Liquidjs dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

liquidjs fixed: 10.26.0
npm install liquidjs@10.26.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

npm ls liquidjs

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-45617, inspect your project dependencies using npm:

npm ls liquidjs

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Liquidjs in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 10.26.0), your application is affected.

Note: The npm ls liquidjs command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity, where the product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential. In Liquidjs, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary The built-in `strip_html` filter in liquidjs uses a regex containing four lazy-quantified alternatives. When the input contains many `<script`, `<style`, or `<!--` opener tokens without matching closers, the V8 regex engine performs O(N²) backtracking, blocking the Node.js event loop. A single ~350 KB request (`'<script'.repeat(50000)`) stalls the process for ~10 seconds; cost grows quadratically with input size. The default `memoryLimit: Infinity` does not bound regex CPU, and even when configured `strip_html` only charges `str.length` to the limit — the regex itself runs unbounded. ## Details The vulnerable filter is at `src/filters/html.ts:45-49`: ```ts export function strip_html (this: FilterImpl, v: string) { const str = stringify(v) this.context.memoryLimit.use(str.length) return str.replace(/<script[\s\S]*?<\/script>|<style[\s\S]*?<\/style>|<.*?>|<!--[\s\S]*?-->/g, '') } ``` The regex contains four lazy patterns: 1. `<script[\s\S]*?<\/script>` 2. `<style[\s\S]*?<\/style>` 3. `<.*?>` 4. `<!--[\s\S]*?-->` For an input like `'<script'.repeat(N)`, the engine encounters N starting `<` positions. At each one it must lazily expand `[\s\S]*?` (and `.*?`) all the way to end-of-input searching for a closer that never appears, then fail and backtrack. Because each of the O(N) starts performs O(N) lazy-expansion work, total work is O(N²). Reachability: 1. `strip_html` is a default-registered filter (exported from `src/filters/html.ts`, wired up via `src/filters/index.ts`), invocable from any template via `{{ x | strip_html }}`. 2. The filter calls `String.prototype.replace` with the vulnerable regex directly on the caller-supplied string, with no length cap and no timeout. 3. The default `memoryLimit` is `Infinity` (`src/liquid-options.ts:198`); the filter only charges `str.length` against memory (line 47), which does not bound CPU work for regex backtracking. This is distinct from `GHSA-45rm-2893-5f49` (prototype property leak, CWE-200) and from any prior `replace`/`strip_html` issues — the mechanism here is regex backtracking CPU consumption on a different filter. ## PoC Empirical scaling confirmed against a freshly built `liquidjs@10.25.7` bundle on Node 22 / Linux: ```bash node -e " const { Liquid } = require('liquidjs'); const e = new Liquid(); (async () => { for (const n of [1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000]) { const payload = '<script'.repeat(n); const t0 = Date.now(); await e.parseAndRender('{{ x | strip_html }}', { x: payload }); console.log('n=' + n + ' inputLen=' + payload.length + ' ms=' + (Date.now() - t0)); } })(); " ``` Verified output: ``` n=1000 inputLen=7000 ms=5 n=2000 inputLen=14000 ms=12 (2.4x for 2x size) n=4000 inputLen=28000 ms=46 (3.8x for 2x size) n=8000 inputLen=56000 ms=187 (4.0x for 2x size) n=16000 inputLen=112000 ms=737 (3.9x for 2x size) ``` A larger payload extrapolates straightforwardly: ```bash node -e " const { Liquid } = require('liquidjs'); const e = new Liquid(); (async () => { const payload = '<script'.repeat(50000); // 350 KB const t0 = Date.now(); await e.parseAndRender('{{ x | strip_html }}', { x: payload }); console.log('elapsed ms:', Date.now() - t0); })(); " # elapsed ms: ~10000+ (Node single-threaded event loop fully blocked) ``` The same pathology applies to `<style` and `<!--` openers. ## Impact - **Single-request DoS:** A 350 KB request body stalls the Node.js event loop for ~10 seconds; 700 KB takes ~40 s; 1.4 MB takes ~160 s. All other requests on the process queue behind the regex. - **Trivial amplification:** Quadratic scaling means small attacker bandwidth produces large server CPU consumption. A handful of concurrent requests fully saturates the worker. - **No authentication required:** The typical use case for `strip_html` is sanitizing untrusted input (comments, posts, profile bios, product descriptions). Any endpoint that renders user content through `strip_html` is exposed. - **memoryLimit doesn't help:** Even applications that opt into `memoryLimit` are not protected, because (a) the regex CPU runs to completion before any output is produced, and (b) only `str.length` is charged, not the cost of the regex traversal. ## Recommended Fix Replace the backtracking regex with an atomic / non-overlapping pattern, and/or perform a single linear pass. Option 1 — anchor each alternative so lazy expansion fails fast on chunked content (no `[\s\S]*?` over the full tail): ```ts return str.replace( /<script\b[^<]*(?:<(?!\/script>)[^<]*)*<\/script>|<style\b[^<]*(?:<(?!\/style>)[^<]*)*<\/style>|<!--[^-]*(?:-(?!->)[^-]*)*-->|<[^>]*>/g, '' ) ``` This unrolls each lazy quantifier so each `<` is visited at most a constant number of times overall — linear total work. Option 2 — single-pass tokenizer in plain code; iterate over the string once, tracking whether you are inside `<script>`, `<style>`, comment, or generic tag, and emit nothing for those ranges. Either fix should be combined with charging the regex output cost honestly to `memoryLimit` and (defensively) capping input length up front: ```ts export function strip_html (this: FilterImpl, v: string) { const str = stringify(v) this.context.memoryLimit.use(str.length) // ... linear-time strip implementation here } ```

CVE-2026-45617 Affected Liquidjs Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
10.26.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
liquidjs
npm
< 10.26.0
10.26.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-45617?
CVE-2026-45617 is a security vulnerability in Liquidjs involving LiquidJS Vulnerable to ReDoS via Quadratic Backtracking in `strip_html` Filter Regex under CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity.
Which Liquidjs versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 10.26.0 across affected packages: liquidjs.
What version fixes CVE-2026-45617?
Upgrading to 10.26.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is liquidjs affected?
Yes, liquidjs is affected in releases prior to 10.26.0. Upgrade your dependency to 10.26.0 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45617?
CVE-2026-45617 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-45617?
CVE-2026-45617 is classified under CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity (The product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential.).
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-45617?
Run the dependency tree command: 'npm ls liquidjs'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-r7g9-xpmj-5fcq",
  "modified" : "2026-07-09T21:06:36Z",
  "published" : "2026-05-27T18:08:19Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-45617" ],
  "summary" : "LiquidJS Vulnerable to ReDoS via Quadratic Backtracking in `strip_html` Filter Regex",
  "details" : "## Summary\n\nThe built-in `strip_html` filter in liquidjs uses a regex containing four lazy-quantified alternatives. When the input contains many `<script`, `<style`, or `<!--` opener tokens without matching closers, the V8 regex engine performs O(N²) backtracking, blocking the Node.js event loop. A single ~350 KB request (`'<script'.repeat(50000)`) stalls the process for ~10 seconds; cost grows quadratically with input size. The default `memoryLimit: Infinity` does not bound regex CPU, and even when configured `strip_html` only charges `str.length` to the limit — the regex itself runs unbounded.\n\n## Details\n\nThe vulnerable filter is at `src/filters/html.ts:45-49`:\n\n```ts\nexport function strip_html (this: FilterImpl, v: string) {\n  const str = stringify(v)\n  this.context.memoryLimit.use(str.length)\n  return str.replace(/<script[\\s\\S]*?<\\/script>|<style[\\s\\S]*?<\\/style>|<.*?>|<!--[\\s\\S]*?-->/g, '')\n}\n```\n\nThe regex contains four lazy patterns:\n1. `<script[\\s\\S]*?<\\/script>`\n2. `<style[\\s\\S]*?<\\/style>`\n3. `<.*?>`\n4. `<!--[\\s\\S]*?-->`\n\nFor an input like `'<script'.repeat(N)`, the engine encounters N starting `<` positions. At each one it must lazily expand `[\\s\\S]*?` (and `.*?`) all the way to end-of-input searching for a closer that never appears, then fail and backtrack. Because each of the O(N) starts performs O(N) lazy-expansion work, total work is O(N²).\n\nReachability:\n1. `strip_html` is a default-registered filter (exported from `src/filters/html.ts`, wired up via `src/filters/index.ts`), invocable from any template via `{{ x | strip_html }}`.\n2. The filter calls `String.prototype.replace` with the vulnerable regex directly on the caller-supplied string, with no length cap and no timeout.\n3. The default `memoryLimit` is `Infinity` (`src/liquid-options.ts:198`); the filter only charges `str.length` against memory (line 47), which does not bound CPU work for regex backtracking.\n\nThis is distinct from `GHSA-45rm-2893-5f49` (prototype property leak, CWE-200) and from any prior `replace`/`strip_html` issues — the mechanism here is regex backtracking CPU consumption on a different filter.\n\n## PoC\n\nEmpirical scaling confirmed against a freshly built `liquidjs@10.25.7` bundle on Node 22 / Linux:\n\n```bash\nnode -e \"\nconst { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');\nconst e = new Liquid();\n(async () => {\n  for (const n of [1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000]) {\n    const payload = '<script'.repeat(n);\n    const t0 = Date.now();\n    await e.parseAndRender('{{ x | strip_html }}', { x: payload });\n    console.log('n=' + n + ' inputLen=' + payload.length + ' ms=' + (Date.now() - t0));\n  }\n})();\n\"\n```\n\nVerified output:\n```\nn=1000  inputLen=7000   ms=5\nn=2000  inputLen=14000  ms=12     (2.4x for 2x size)\nn=4000  inputLen=28000  ms=46     (3.8x for 2x size)\nn=8000  inputLen=56000  ms=187    (4.0x for 2x size)\nn=16000 inputLen=112000 ms=737    (3.9x for 2x size)\n```\n\nA larger payload extrapolates straightforwardly:\n```bash\nnode -e \"\nconst { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');\nconst e = new Liquid();\n(async () => {\n  const payload = '<script'.repeat(50000);  // 350 KB\n  const t0 = Date.now();\n  await e.parseAndRender('{{ x | strip_html }}', { x: payload });\n  console.log('elapsed ms:', Date.now() - t0);\n})();\n\"\n# elapsed ms: ~10000+ (Node single-threaded event loop fully blocked)\n```\n\nThe same pathology applies to `<style` and `<!--` openers.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Single-request DoS:** A 350 KB request body stalls the Node.js event loop for ~10 seconds; 700 KB takes ~40 s; 1.4 MB takes ~160 s. All other requests on the process queue behind the regex.\n- **Trivial amplification:** Quadratic scaling means small attacker bandwidth produces large server CPU consumption. A handful of concurrent requests fully saturates the worker.\n- **No authentication required:** The typical use case for `strip_html` is sanitizing untrusted input (comments, posts, profile bios, product descriptions). Any endpoint that renders user content through `strip_html` is exposed.\n- **memoryLimit doesn't help:** Even applications that opt into `memoryLimit` are not protected, because (a) the regex CPU runs to completion before any output is produced, and (b) only `str.length` is charged, not the cost of the regex traversal.\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nReplace the backtracking regex with an atomic / non-overlapping pattern, and/or perform a single linear pass.\n\nOption 1 — anchor each alternative so lazy expansion fails fast on chunked content (no `[\\s\\S]*?` over the full tail):\n```ts\nreturn str.replace(\n  /<script\\b[^<]*(?:<(?!\\/script>)[^<]*)*<\\/script>|<style\\b[^<]*(?:<(?!\\/style>)[^<]*)*<\\/style>|<!--[^-]*(?:-(?!->)[^-]*)*-->|<[^>]*>/g,\n  ''\n)\n```\nThis unrolls each lazy quantifier so each `<` is visited at most a constant number of times overall — linear total work.\n\nOption 2 — single-pass tokenizer in plain code; iterate over the string once, tracking whether you are inside `<script>`, `<style>`, comment, or generic tag, and emit nothing for those ranges.\n\nEither fix should be combined with charging the regex output cost honestly to `memoryLimit` and (defensively) capping input length up front:\n```ts\nexport function strip_html (this: FilterImpl, v: string) {\n  const str = stringify(v)\n  this.context.memoryLimit.use(str.length)\n  // ... linear-time strip implementation here\n}\n```",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "npm",
      "name" : "liquidjs"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "10.26.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-r7g9-xpmj-5fcq"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45617"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/3616a744b9abeb425c217b340a2397d46176afb8"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/v10.26.0"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-1333" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-27T18:08:19Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-06-17T23:17:04Z"
  }
}