CVE-2026-62982: Glances Incomplete Fix Of CVE-2026-32608: Action-template Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-62982 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.8) incomplete fix of cve-2026-32608: action-template vulnerability (CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')) affecting Glances libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves incomplete fix of cve-2026-32608: action-template sanitizer is bypassed by nested stat values (process 'cmdline') → os command injection. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 4.5.6.
CVE-2026-62982 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 8.8
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-62982
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Glances dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install glances>=4.5.6
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show glances
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-62982, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show glances
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Glances in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 4.5.6), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show glances command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'), where the product constructs all or part of an os command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended os command when it is sent to a downstream component. In Glances, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-62982 Affected Glances Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
glances
|
PyPI |
≥ 4.5.2
< 4.5.6
|
4.5.6
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-62982?
Which Glances versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-62982?
Is glances affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-62982?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-62982?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-62982?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-73wf-9vmv-5pv9",
"modified" : "2026-08-17T17:20:24Z",
"published" : "2026-08-17T17:20:24Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-62982" ],
"summary" : "Glances: Incomplete fix of CVE-2026-32608: action-template sanitizer is bypassed by nested stat values (process 'cmdline') → OS command injection",
"details" : "## Summary\nCVE-2026-32608 (\"Command Injection via Process Names in Action Command Templates\") was fixed (commit `5680a5d`) by adding `_sanitize_mustache_dict`, which replaces the shell operators `&&`, `|`, `>>`, `>` with spaces in the values rendered into action command templates.\n\nThe sanitizer only processes **top-level string** values (`if isinstance(v, str)`). Attacker-controlled **nested** values — most notably a process's **`cmdline`, which Glances exposes as a `list`** and which is fully attacker-controlled via argv — are passed through **unsanitized**. Because the Mustache renderer (`chevron`) does **not** HTML-escape the pipe character `|`, a `|` embedded in such a nested value survives into the rendered command and is then interpreted by `secure_popen` (which still interprets `&&`/`|`/`>` by default, `allow_operators=True`), re-introducing the exact command injection the CVE was meant to close.\n\n## Details\nThe fix (`glances/actions.py`):\n```python\n_SHELL_OPERATORS = ('&&', '|', '>>', '>') # line 25\n\ndef _sanitize_mustache_dict(mustache_dict): # line 28\n ...\n for k, v in mustache_dict.items():\n if isinstance(v, str): # line 40 <-- ONLY top-level strings\n for op in _SHELL_OPERATORS:\n v = v.replace(op, ' ')\n safe[k] = v\n else:\n safe[k] = v # nested list/dict passed VERBATIM\n return safe\n```\nRender + sink (`glances/actions.py:104-111`):\n```python\nsafe_dict = _sanitize_mustache_dict(mustache_dict)\ncmd_full = chevron.render(cmd, safe_dict) # chevron does NOT escape '|'\n...\nret = secure_popen(cmd_full) # secure_popen(cmd, allow_operators=True)\n```\n`secure_popen` (`glances/secure.py:17`, default `allow_operators=True`) splits the command by `&&`, then `__secure_popen` interprets `|` (pipe to a new process) and `>` (write output to a file). A surviving `|` therefore launches an attacker-named second process.\n\n**The attacker-controlled nested value — `cmdline`.** The action `mustache_dict` is the per-item plugin stat (`glances/plugins/plugin/model.py:931` `mustache_dict = item`, then `:943` `self.actions.run(..., mustache_dict=mustache_dict)`). For the processlist plugin, each `item` contains `cmdline`, a **list** of the process arguments, set by the attacker simply by launching a process with chosen argv. The sanitizer's `isinstance(v, str)` test skips the list, so its elements reach `chevron.render` unmodified.\n\n**Why the operator survives render.** `chevron`/Mustache HTML-escapes `& < > \" '` for `{{var}}` (so `>` and `&&` are neutralized) but **does not escape `|`**. A pipe in the (unsanitized) nested value therefore reaches `secure_popen` intact and is interpreted.\n\n**Parent-fix attribution (verified against the real diff of commit `5680a5d` / CVE-2026-32608):** that fix added exactly `_SHELL_OPERATORS`, `_sanitize_mustache_dict`, and the `_sanitize_mustache_dict(mustache_dict)` call — and the sanitizer's docstring explicitly claims to neutralize \"user-controllable data (process names, container names, mount points, etc.)\". It does so only for top-level strings; the list/dict case (`else: safe[k] = v`) was left unsanitized. This is therefore a genuine incomplete-fix gap, not a re-report of the patched (top-level string) vector.\n\n## Proof of Concept\nLab-only, harmless (touches a marker file; non-destructive). Runs the real `glances` chain (`_sanitize_mustache_dict` → `chevron.render` → `secure_popen`) — see `poc/glances_nested_mustache_poc.py`.\n\nAttacker process argv (the only attacker input): `cmdline = ['x', '|touch /tmp/glances_poc_marker', '#']`.\nAdmin action template (renders the offending process's cmdline): `echo ALERT {{#cmdline}}{{.}} {{/cmdline}}`.\n\nObserved (confirmed on develop HEAD `92156d0`/4.5.6 and verified code-identical on v4.5.5):\n```\ncmdline after sanitizer : ['x', '|touch /tmp/glances_poc_marker', '#'] <- pipe survives\ncmd_full -> secure_popen : 'echo ALERT x |touch /tmp/glances_poc_marker # '\n[VULNERABLE] marker created -> /tmp/glances_poc_marker (command injection executed)\n```\nReplacing `touch /tmp/...` with any command yields arbitrary execution in the Glances process context.\n\n## Preconditions (stated honestly)\n- A configured alert **action** whose command template **renders a nested stat field** (e.g. the process `cmdline` via a `{{#cmdline}}…{{/cmdline}}` section). Templates that render only **flat string** fields (`{{name}}`, `{{value}}`, `{{username}}`, `{{mnt_point}}`) are **not** affected — those values *are* sanitized.\n- Glances running with privilege to enumerate the attacker's process (typically **root** in server/agent monitoring deployments) → privilege boundary crossed (`S:C`).\n\n## Impact\nA local unprivileged user gains OS command execution in the Glances security context (commonly root) — the same impact and threat model as the parent CVE-2026-32608, re-enabled for any action template that renders a nested stat field. The injection is reliable once the (admin-set) template references such a field.\n\n## Suggested fix\n- Sanitize **recursively** — apply the operator stripping to strings inside lists and dicts, not only top-level `str` values.\n- And/or build the templated action as an argument list and run it via `secure_popen(..., allow_operators=False)` / `shell=False` without operator interpretation.\n- And/or also strip the pipe `|` (and treat all `_SHELL_OPERATORS`) on every rendered string regardless of nesting; do not rely on Mustache HTML-escaping (it does not escape `|`).\n\n## Credit\nTa Duc Thien",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "glances"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "4.5.2"
}, {
"fixed" : "4.5.6"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/security/advisories/GHSA-73wf-9vmv-5pv9"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/commit/ea4cf2f54f0d961e24aa0b24fff9584bab39db93"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/nicolargo/glances"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/releases/tag/v4.5.6"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-78" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-08-17T17:20:24Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}