Vulnerabilities in pkg:pypi/crawlee

PACKAGE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-3r75-xc34-5f44
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-46497 is a LOW ssrf vulnerability (CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)) affecting Crawlee for Python libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves ssrf via sitemap-derived urls. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.7.0.

1 Known Advisory Record(s)
Package Vulnerability Intelligence

pkg:pypi/crawlee

1 Known Advisory Record(s)

Vulnerability advisories affecting package pkg:pypi/crawlee. Select an advisory below to view technical details or fixes.

Advisory ID CVE / NVD Severity Summary
GHSA-3r75-xc34-5f44 CVE-2026-46497 LOW Crawlee for Python: SSRF via sitemap-derived URLs

CVE-2026-46497 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-46497
GHSA Identifier GHSA-3r75-xc34-5f44
Severity LOW
CVSS v3.1 Base Score N/A
CWE Classification CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Affected Product Crawlee for Python
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

How to Fix CVE-2026-46497

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Crawlee for Python dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

crawlee fixed: 1.7.0
pip install crawlee>=1.7.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show crawlee

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-46497, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show crawlee

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Crawlee for Python in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.7.0), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show crawlee command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the web server receives a url or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this url, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. In Crawlee for Python, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Overview - **Vulnerability type:** Blind SSRF - **Affected components:** `src/crawlee/_utils/sitemap.py`, `src/crawlee/_utils/robots.py`, `src/crawlee/request_loaders/_sitemap_request_loader.py`, and all built-in HTTP clients. - **Trigger:** an attacker-controlled sitemap or `robots.txt` containing a URL that points to an internal host (layer 1) or uses a non-http scheme (layer 2). Two-layer SSRF via sitemap-derived URLs: ### 1) Cross-host HTTP SSRF Base case, affects every HTTP client.** Sitemap entries and `robots.txt` `Sitemap:` directives were accepted regardless of the host they pointed to. A sitemap on `example.com` could push `http://internal.corp/admin` into the crawler's queue, and the configured HTTP client would dispatch the request. ### 2) Non-HTTP scheme SSRF Escalation, only `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`.** Nested-sitemap fetching dispatches the URL straight to the HTTP client, bypassing the `Request` construction step where Pydantic enforces `http(s)`. Combined with the libcurl-backed `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`, this lets `gopher://`, `file://`, `dict://`, `ftp://`, etc., through. ## Root cause Crawlee already validates URL schemes through Pydantic's `AnyHttpUrl` (via `validate_http_url` in `src/crawlee/_utils/urls.py`) wherever a crawl target is materialised as a `Request`: the `Request.url` field is declared as `Annotated[str, BeforeValidator(validate_http_url), Field(frozen=True)]`. Anything that becomes a `Request` is therefore guaranteed to be `http(s)`. Two parts of the sitemap pipeline sidestepped this property in different ways: ### 1) Sitemap-derived URLs were enqueued without any host policy `SitemapRequestLoader` took every `<urlset><url><loc>` entry, wrapped it in `Request.from_url` (which accepts any valid `http(s)` URL), and pushed the result into the request queue. `RobotsTxtFile.get_sitemaps()` returned every `Sitemap:` directive verbatim. Neither imposed any host check against the parent sitemap or `robots.txt` URL, so an attacker controlling that content could push internal-network HTTP URLs into the queue and have them crawled by whichever HTTP client was configured. ### 2) Nested sitemap fetching bypassed the `Request` chokepoint entirely When `_XmlSitemapParser` encountered `<sitemapindex><sitemap><loc>…</loc></sitemap></sitemapindex>`, or when `RobotsTxtFile.parse_sitemaps` forwarded `Sitemap:` directives into the same pipeline, `_fetch_and_process_sitemap` dispatched the URL directly to the HTTP client: ```python async with http_client.stream( sitemap_url, method='GET', headers=SITEMAP_HEADERS, proxy_info=proxy_info, timeout=timeout, ) as response: ... ``` No `Request` was constructed, so the Pydantic validator never ran. Before the fix, the HTTP clients' own `send_request()` and `stream()` methods did not call `validate_http_url` either, so a non-`http(s)` scheme could pass straight through to the backend client. The non-HTTP escalation in layer 2 is **specific to** `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`, which is backed by `curl-cffi` / libcurl and speaks `gopher`, `file`, `dict`, `ftp`, and other non-HTTP protocols. The other clients shipped with Crawlee (`HttpxHttpClient`, `ImpitHttpClient`, `PlaywrightHttpClient`) reject non-`http(s)` schemes at their own backend layer, regardless of what Crawlee passes in, so they were only affected by layer 1. ## Vulnerable paths ### Layer 1 — cross-host HTTP (all HTTP clients) - *Source:* an attacker-controlled sitemap that lists internal URLs under `<urlset><url><loc>` or `<sitemapindex><sitemap><loc>`, or an attacker-controlled `robots.txt` that lists internal URLs under `Sitemap:`. - *Sink:* the configured HTTP client issues `GET` requests against those URLs — either via `client.request(url=request.url, …)` inside `crawl()` for regular sitemap URLs, or via `client.stream(url, …)` inside the nested-sitemap fetch. ### Layer 2 — non-HTTP schemes (`CurlImpersonateHttpClient` only) - *Source:* a nested `<sitemap><loc>` entry or a `robots.txt` `Sitemap:` directive pointing to a non-`http(s)` URL. - *Sink:* `CurlImpersonateHttpClient.stream(...)` hands the URL string verbatim to `client.request(url=…, …)`, which dispatches via libcurl. Hardening in 1.7.0 was added at both producer and consumer ends — see *Remediation*. ## Exploitation preconditions 1. The crawler uses sitemap loading: any of `SitemapRequestLoader`, `Sitemap.load` / `parse_sitemap`, `discover_valid_sitemaps`, or `RobotsTxtFile.parse_sitemaps`. 2. The attacker controls the body of a sitemap or `robots.txt` that the crawler fetches — typically by being the target site, or by getting a target site to publish a malicious sitemap. 3. The crawler's network egress can reach the attacker-chosen destination (e.g., internal services on the same network). 4. The targeted endpoint accepts unauthenticated requests. Crawlee does not supply credentials to the forged destination, so authenticated services (IMDSv2 with token, password-protected Redis, protected admin panels) are not reachable through this path. For layer 2 (non-HTTP), the configured HTTP client must additionally be `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`. ## Impact ### Layer 1 — cross-host HTTP (any client) The crawler can be coerced into issuing `GET` requests against internal HTTP services on its own network: admin panels, unauthenticated internal APIs, cloud metadata endpoints, etc. Read-back is blind — Crawlee surfaces fetched content only through its local `Dataset` / `KeyValueStore` (`push_data()` etc.) and does not natively forward scraped bodies anywhere external — so direct impact is mostly existence/timing probing and occasional state changes via side-effecting `GET` endpoints. Read-side leakage of internal content is only exploitable end-to-end if the deployer's own application separately exposes scraped data (for example, a public summariser or aggregator built on top of Crawlee). ### Layer 2 — non-HTTP escalation (only `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`) Under the affected client, attackers gain the libcurl scheme set: - `gopher://` is the canonical RESP-injection vector: pipeline `FLUSHALL`, `CONFIG SET dir`, `CONFIG SET dbfilename`, `SAVE` to an unauthenticated Redis on the crawler's network — enough to write attacker-controlled bytes to disk and, in the standard escalation, achieve remote code execution on the Redis host. - `file://` allows the crawler to read local files (application secrets, configuration) on the crawler host. - `dict://` and `ftp://` permit fingerprinting and limited interaction with text-protocol services. In both layers, the SSRF is blind in the default configuration. Write-side impact (`gopher://` → Redis) and timing-based internal probing do not depend on read-back and remain viable regardless of whether the deployer surfaces scraped content. ## Remediation Both layers are fixed in `crawlee==1.7.0`. The fix is split across two PRs, applied at the two complementary boundaries of the affected pipeline: 1. **Producer-side filtering — sitemap and robots.txt loaders (PR #1864).** `SitemapRequestLoader` and `RobotsTxtFile.get_sitemaps()` now run every nested-sitemap entry, every regular sitemap URL, and every `Sitemap:` directive through `crawlee._utils.urls.filter_url`. This applies to an `EnqueueStrategy` (default `'same-hostname'`) against the parent sitemap / `robots.txt` URL — cross-host entries are dropped — and rejects non-`http(s)` schemes. The strategy is stamped onto the emitted `Request`s, so `BasicCrawler._check_url_after_redirects` continues policing the policy across redirects. 2. **Consumer-side validation — HTTP-client boundary (PR #1862).** `validate_http_url(url)` is now called at the top of `send_request()` and `stream()` in `ImpitHttpClient`, `HttpxHttpClient`, `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`, and `PlaywrightHttpClient`. Non-`http(s)` schemes raise `pydantic.ValidationError` before any backend call. `crawl()` was already covered, because `Request.url` is validated by Pydantic on construction. After these changes, validation is enforced both where sitemap-derived HTTP requests are produced (sitemap and robots.txt loaders) and where they are consumed (HTTP clients). A regression at either layer is caught by the other. ### Behaviour change for upgraders `SitemapRequestLoader` and `RobotsTxtFile.get_sitemaps()` now default to `enqueue_strategy='same-hostname'`. Deployers that legitimately relied on cross-host sitemap entries (e.g., a sitemap index on `sitemaps.example.com` that points to content on `www.example.com`) must opt in explicitly with `enqueue_strategy='same-domain'` or `enqueue_strategy='all'`. ## Finder credits - [@r0otsu](https://github.com/r0otsu) - [@Yuremin](https://github.com/Yuremin) (Zhengmin Yu) - [@FORIMOC](https://github.com/FORIMOC) - [@invoke1442](https://github.com/invoke1442) (Ethan Carter) - [@Arturo0x90](https://github.com/Arturo0x90) (Arturo Melgarejo)

CVE-2026-46497 Affected Crawlee for Python Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
1.7.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
crawlee
PyPI
≥ 1.0.0
< 1.7.0
1.7.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-46497?
CVE-2026-46497 is a security vulnerability in Crawlee for Python involving SSRF via sitemap-derived URLs under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
Which Crawlee for Python versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 1.7.0 across affected packages: crawlee.
What version fixes CVE-2026-46497?
Upgrading to 1.7.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is crawlee affected?
Yes, crawlee is affected in releases prior to 1.7.0. Upgrade your dependency to 1.7.0 or later.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-46497?
CVE-2026-46497 is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-46497?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show crawlee'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-3r75-xc34-5f44",
  "modified" : "2026-06-10T18:41:20Z",
  "published" : "2026-05-21T19:28:10Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-46497" ],
  "summary" : "Crawlee for Python: SSRF via sitemap-derived URLs",
  "details" : "## Overview\n\n- **Vulnerability type:** Blind SSRF\n- **Affected components:** `src/crawlee/_utils/sitemap.py`, `src/crawlee/_utils/robots.py`, `src/crawlee/request_loaders/_sitemap_request_loader.py`, and all built-in HTTP clients.\n- **Trigger:** an attacker-controlled sitemap or `robots.txt` containing a URL that points to an internal host (layer 1) or uses a non-http scheme (layer 2).\n\nTwo-layer SSRF via sitemap-derived URLs:\n\n### 1) Cross-host HTTP SSRF\n\nBase case, affects every HTTP client.** Sitemap entries and `robots.txt` `Sitemap:` directives were accepted regardless of the host they pointed to. A sitemap on `example.com` could push `http://internal.corp/admin` into the crawler's queue, and the configured HTTP client would dispatch the request.\n\n### 2) Non-HTTP scheme SSRF\n\nEscalation, only `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`.** Nested-sitemap fetching dispatches the URL straight to the HTTP client, bypassing the `Request` construction step where Pydantic enforces `http(s)`. Combined with the libcurl-backed `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`, this lets `gopher://`, `file://`, `dict://`, `ftp://`, etc., through.\n\n\n\n## Root cause\n\nCrawlee already validates URL schemes through Pydantic's `AnyHttpUrl` (via `validate_http_url` in `src/crawlee/_utils/urls.py`) wherever a crawl target is materialised as a `Request`: the `Request.url` field is declared as `Annotated[str, BeforeValidator(validate_http_url), Field(frozen=True)]`. Anything that becomes a `Request` is therefore guaranteed to be `http(s)`.\n\nTwo parts of the sitemap pipeline sidestepped this property in different ways:\n\n### 1) Sitemap-derived URLs were enqueued without any host policy\n\n`SitemapRequestLoader` took every `<urlset><url><loc>` entry, wrapped it in `Request.from_url` (which accepts any valid `http(s)` URL), and pushed the result into the request queue. `RobotsTxtFile.get_sitemaps()` returned every `Sitemap:` directive verbatim. Neither imposed any host check against the parent sitemap or `robots.txt` URL, so an attacker controlling that content could push internal-network HTTP URLs into the queue and have them crawled by whichever HTTP client was configured.\n\n### 2) Nested sitemap fetching bypassed the `Request` chokepoint entirely\n\nWhen `_XmlSitemapParser` encountered `<sitemapindex><sitemap><loc>…</loc></sitemap></sitemapindex>`, or when `RobotsTxtFile.parse_sitemaps` forwarded `Sitemap:` directives into the same pipeline, `_fetch_and_process_sitemap` dispatched the URL directly to the HTTP client:\n\n```python\nasync with http_client.stream(\n    sitemap_url, \n    method='GET', \n    headers=SITEMAP_HEADERS, \n    proxy_info=proxy_info, \n    timeout=timeout,\n) as response:\n    ...\n```\n\nNo `Request` was constructed, so the Pydantic validator never ran. Before the fix, the HTTP clients' own `send_request()` and `stream()` methods did not call `validate_http_url` either, so a non-`http(s)` scheme could pass straight through to the backend client.\n\nThe non-HTTP escalation in layer 2 is **specific to** `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`, which is backed by `curl-cffi` / libcurl and speaks `gopher`, `file`, `dict`, `ftp`, and other non-HTTP protocols. The other clients shipped with Crawlee (`HttpxHttpClient`, `ImpitHttpClient`, `PlaywrightHttpClient`) reject non-`http(s)` schemes at their own backend layer, regardless of what Crawlee passes in, so they were only affected by layer 1.\n\n## Vulnerable paths\n\n### Layer 1 — cross-host HTTP (all HTTP clients)\n\n- *Source:* an attacker-controlled sitemap that lists internal URLs under `<urlset><url><loc>` or `<sitemapindex><sitemap><loc>`, or an attacker-controlled `robots.txt` that lists internal URLs under `Sitemap:`.\n- *Sink:* the configured HTTP client issues `GET` requests against those URLs — either via `client.request(url=request.url, …)` inside `crawl()` for regular sitemap URLs, or via `client.stream(url, …)` inside the nested-sitemap fetch.\n\n### Layer 2 — non-HTTP schemes (`CurlImpersonateHttpClient` only)\n\n- *Source:* a nested `<sitemap><loc>` entry or a `robots.txt` `Sitemap:` directive pointing to a non-`http(s)` URL.\n- *Sink:* `CurlImpersonateHttpClient.stream(...)` hands the URL string verbatim to `client.request(url=…, …)`, which dispatches via libcurl.\n\nHardening in 1.7.0 was added at both producer and consumer ends — see *Remediation*.\n\n## Exploitation preconditions\n\n1. The crawler uses sitemap loading: any of `SitemapRequestLoader`, `Sitemap.load` / `parse_sitemap`, `discover_valid_sitemaps`, or `RobotsTxtFile.parse_sitemaps`.\n2. The attacker controls the body of a sitemap or `robots.txt` that the crawler fetches — typically by being the target site, or by getting a target site to publish a malicious sitemap.\n3. The crawler's network egress can reach the attacker-chosen destination (e.g., internal services on the same network).\n4. The targeted endpoint accepts unauthenticated requests. Crawlee does not supply credentials to the forged destination, so authenticated services (IMDSv2 with token, password-protected Redis, protected admin panels) are not reachable through this path.\n\nFor layer 2 (non-HTTP), the configured HTTP client must additionally be `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`.\n\n## Impact\n\n### Layer 1 — cross-host HTTP (any client)\n\nThe crawler can be coerced into issuing `GET` requests against internal HTTP services on its own network: admin panels, unauthenticated internal APIs, cloud metadata endpoints, etc. Read-back is blind — Crawlee surfaces fetched content only through its local `Dataset` / `KeyValueStore` (`push_data()` etc.) and does not natively forward scraped bodies anywhere external — so direct impact is mostly existence/timing probing and occasional state changes via side-effecting `GET` endpoints. Read-side leakage of internal content is only exploitable end-to-end if the deployer's own application separately exposes scraped data (for example, a public summariser or aggregator built on top of Crawlee).\n\n### Layer 2 — non-HTTP escalation (only `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`)\n\nUnder the affected client, attackers gain the libcurl scheme set:\n\n- `gopher://` is the canonical RESP-injection vector: pipeline `FLUSHALL`, `CONFIG SET dir`, `CONFIG SET dbfilename`, `SAVE` to an unauthenticated Redis on the crawler's network — enough to write attacker-controlled bytes to disk and, in the standard escalation, achieve remote code execution on the Redis host.\n- `file://` allows the crawler to read local files (application secrets, configuration) on the crawler host.\n- `dict://` and `ftp://` permit fingerprinting and limited interaction with text-protocol services.\n\nIn both layers, the SSRF is blind in the default configuration. Write-side impact (`gopher://` → Redis) and timing-based internal probing do not depend on read-back and remain viable regardless of whether the deployer surfaces scraped content.\n\n## Remediation\n\nBoth layers are fixed in `crawlee==1.7.0`. The fix is split across two PRs, applied at the two complementary boundaries of the affected pipeline:\n\n1. **Producer-side filtering — sitemap and robots.txt loaders (PR #1864).** `SitemapRequestLoader` and `RobotsTxtFile.get_sitemaps()` now run every nested-sitemap entry, every regular sitemap URL, and every `Sitemap:` directive through `crawlee._utils.urls.filter_url`. This applies to an `EnqueueStrategy` (default `'same-hostname'`) against the parent sitemap / `robots.txt` URL — cross-host entries are dropped — and rejects non-`http(s)` schemes. The strategy is stamped onto the emitted `Request`s, so `BasicCrawler._check_url_after_redirects` continues policing the policy across redirects.\n2. **Consumer-side validation — HTTP-client boundary (PR #1862).** `validate_http_url(url)` is now called at the top of `send_request()` and `stream()` in `ImpitHttpClient`, `HttpxHttpClient`, `CurlImpersonateHttpClient`, and `PlaywrightHttpClient`. Non-`http(s)` schemes raise `pydantic.ValidationError` before any backend call. `crawl()` was already covered, because `Request.url` is validated by Pydantic on construction.\n\nAfter these changes, validation is enforced both where sitemap-derived HTTP requests are produced (sitemap and robots.txt loaders) and where they are consumed (HTTP clients). A regression at either layer is caught by the other.\n\n### Behaviour change for upgraders\n\n`SitemapRequestLoader` and `RobotsTxtFile.get_sitemaps()` now default to `enqueue_strategy='same-hostname'`. Deployers that legitimately relied on cross-host sitemap entries (e.g., a sitemap index on `sitemaps.example.com` that points to content on `www.example.com`) must opt in explicitly with `enqueue_strategy='same-domain'` or `enqueue_strategy='all'`.\n\n## Finder credits\n\n- [@r0otsu](https://github.com/r0otsu)\n- [@Yuremin](https://github.com/Yuremin) (Zhengmin Yu)\n- [@FORIMOC](https://github.com/FORIMOC)\n- [@invoke1442](https://github.com/invoke1442) (Ethan Carter)\n- [@Arturo0x90](https://github.com/Arturo0x90) (Arturo Melgarejo)",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V4",
    "score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "crawlee"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "1.0.0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "1.7.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/apify/crawlee-python/security/advisories/GHSA-3r75-xc34-5f44"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46497"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/apify/crawlee-python"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/apify/crawlee-python/releases/tag/v1.7.0"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-918" ],
    "severity" : "LOW",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-21T19:28:10Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-06-10T16:17:08Z"
  }
}