Vulnerabilities in pkg:npm/@budibase/backend-core
PACKAGECVE-2026-54353 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.5) @budibase/backend-core has potential ssrf dns vulnerability (CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition) affecting @budibase/backend core libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves @budibase/backend-core has potential ssrf dns rebinding bypass in outbound fetch validation. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.39.9.
pkg:npm/@budibase/backend-core
Vulnerability advisories affecting package pkg:npm/@budibase/backend-core. Select an advisory below to view technical details or fixes.
| Advisory ID | CVE / NVD | Severity | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf | CVE-2026-54353 | HIGH | @budibase/backend-core has potential SSRF DNS rebinding bypass in outbound fetch validation |
| GHSA-wxq7-x3qp-vcr8 | CVE-2026-48147 | MODERATE | Budibase: Unanchored Regex in `matchers.ts` Allows CSRF Bypass via Query String Injection in Budibase Worker |
| GHSA-6vp2-6r7m-2jvx | CVE-2026-46424 | MODERATE | Budibase: Missing Cache Invalidation on Public API Role Unassignment Allows Revoked Users to Retain Privileges for Up to 1 Hour |
| GHSA-4f9j-vr4p-642r | CVE-2026-42239 | HIGH | Budibase auth session cookies are set with httpOnly:false — any XSS can lead to full account takeover |
| GHSA-8783-3wgf-jggf | CVE-2026-41428 | CRITICAL | Budibase: Authentication Bypass via Unanchored Regex in Public Endpoint Matcher — Unauthenticated Access to Protected Endpoints |
| GHSA-7r9j-r86q-7g45 | CVE-2026-31818 | CRITICAL | Budibase: Server-Side Request Forgery via REST Connector with Empty Default Blacklist |
CVE-2026-54353 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 8.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2026-54353
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected @budibase/backend core dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install @budibase/backend-core@3.39.9
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls @budibase/backend-core
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-54353, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls @budibase/backend-core
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of @budibase/backend core in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.39.9), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls @budibase/backend-core command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition, where the product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check. In @budibase/backend core, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-54353 Affected @budibase/backend core Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
@budibase/backend-core
|
npm |
< 3.39.9
|
3.39.9
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-54353?
Which @budibase/backend core versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-54353?
Is @budibase/backend-core affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54353?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-54353?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-54353?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf",
"modified" : "2026-08-12T18:57:24Z",
"published" : "2026-06-22T23:39:24Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-54353" ],
"summary" : "@budibase/backend-core has potential SSRF DNS rebinding bypass in outbound fetch validation",
"details" : "Summary\n\nAuthenticated users with automation permissions can bypass Budibase's SSRF blacklist through DNS rebinding.\n\nThe outbound fetch flow validates a hostname against the blacklist before the request is sent, but the actual socket connection later performs a separate DNS lookup through node-fetch. Since the validated IPs are never pinned to the connection, an attacker-controlled hostname can return a public IP during validation and a private/internal IP during the real connection.\n\nThis results in a non-blind SSRF primitive against internal services reachable from the Budibase host, including loopback, RFC1918 ranges, and cloud metadata endpoints.\n\nDetails\n\nThe issue comes from the outbound fetch validation flow resolving DNS twice:\n\nDuring blacklist validation\nAgain during the real socket connection\n\nThe first lookup result is discarded after validation, so the second lookup is free to resolve to a different IP.\n\nThis creates a classic TOCTOU DNS rebinding issue.\n\nAffected flow in:\n\npackages/backend-core/src/utils/outboundFetch.ts\n```\nasync function throwIfUnsafe(url: string): Promise<void> {\n const parsed = parseUrl(url)\n\n if (await isBlacklisted(parsed.hostname)) {\n throw new Error(\"URL is blocked or could not be resolved safely.\")\n }\n}\n\nfor (let redirects = 0; redirects <= MAX_REDIRECTS; redirects++) {\n await throwIfUnsafe(nextUrl)\n\n const response = await fetchFn(nextUrl, nextRequest)\n\n // ...\n}\n```\nfetchFn uses plain node-fetch with no custom http.Agent / https.Agent, so the underlying socket performs its own independent dns.lookup after validation completes.\n\nThe same pattern also exists in:\n\npackages/server/src/automations/steps/utils.ts\n```\nawait throwIfBlacklisted(nextUrl)\n\nconst response = await fetch(nextUrl, nextRequest)\n```\nThe blacklist implementation resolves hostnames but only returns a boolean:\n\npackages/backend-core/src/blacklist/blacklist.ts\n```\nasync function lookup(address: string): Promise<string[]> {\n address = parseAddress(address)\n\n const addresses = await performLookup(address, { all: true })\n\n return addresses.map(addr => addr.address)\n}\n\nexport async function isBlacklisted(address: string): Promise<boolean> {\n // ...\n\n if (!net.isIP(address)) {\n try {\n ips = await lookup(address)\n } catch (e) {\n /* ... */\n }\n } else {\n ips = [address]\n }\n\n return ips.some(ip => blackList!.check(ip, getIpVersion(ip)))\n}\n```\nThe resolved IPs are discarded, so callers cannot pin the later socket connection to the validated addresses.\n\nAn attacker controlling authoritative DNS for a hostname can therefore return:\n\na public IP during validation\na private/internal IP during the actual connection\n\nAnything routing through these helpers inherits the issue, including:\n\noutgoing webhook\nSlack\nDiscord\nMake\nZapier\nn8n\nAI extract\nobject-store fetches\n\nSeveral of these steps return upstream response content directly into automation output, which makes the SSRF non-blind.\n\nPoC\n\nTested locally against a self-hosted build from master.\nNo Budibase-operated infrastructure was touched.\n\nRun Budibase locally.\n\nStart a harmless local HTTP listener:\n\npython3 -m http.server 8080 --bind 127.0.0.1\n\nUse a rebinding hostname such as:\n\n7f000001.cb007264.rbndr.us\n\nwhich rotates between:\n\n127.0.0.1\n203.0.113.100\n\nSteps to reproduce:\n\nLog into Budibase with automation permissions.\nCreate an automation using the Outgoing Webhook step.\nSet the URL to:\nhttp://<rebinding-host>:8080/\nTrigger the automation.\n\nObserved result:\n\nThe blacklist validation resolves the hostname to the public IP and allows the request.\nnode-fetch performs a second DNS lookup during socket creation.\nThe second lookup resolves to 127.0.0.1.\nThe TCP connection lands on the local service.\nThe local server response body appears directly in the automation output.\nImpact\n\nThis produces a non-blind read-SSRF primitive against anything reachable from the Budibase host process, including:\n\nloopback services (127.0.0.1)\nRFC1918 ranges\ninternal Kubernetes/VPC services\ncloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254)\n\nOn cloud deployments without IMDSv2 enforcement, this may expose temporary IAM credentials via:\n\n/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role>\n\nOn multi-tenant hosted deployments, this may also create potential cross-tenant access paths through shared internal infrastructure.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "@budibase/backend-core"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "3.39.9"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/security/advisories/GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54353"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-367", "CWE-918" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-06-22T23:39:24Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-06-26T21:16:35Z"
}
}