Vulnerabilities in pkg:npm/@agenticmail/api
PACKAGECVE-2026-57494 is a HIGH cross-agent task authorization bypass vulnerability (CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key) affecting AgenticMail libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves cross-agent task authorization bypass in agenticmail api. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.9.64.
pkg:npm/@agenticmail/api
Vulnerability advisories affecting package pkg:npm/@agenticmail/api. Select an advisory below to view technical details or fixes.
| Advisory ID | CVE / NVD | Severity | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-hjwc-26pj-v3pm | CVE-2026-57494 | HIGH | AgenticMail: Cross-agent task authorization bypass in AgenticMail API |
| GHSA-wjjv-3mj2-39hf | CVE-2026-47255 | HIGH | AgenticMail API/storage and outbound relay hardening fixes |
CVE-2026-57494 at a Glance
How to Fix CVE-2026-57494
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected AgenticMail dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install @agenticmail/api@0.9.64
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls @agenticmail/api
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-57494, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls @agenticmail/api
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of AgenticMail in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.9.64), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls @agenticmail/api command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key, where the system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. In AgenticMail, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-57494 Affected AgenticMail Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
@agenticmail/api
|
npm |
< 0.9.64
|
0.9.64
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-57494?
Which AgenticMail versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-57494?
Is @agenticmail/api affected?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-57494?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-57494?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-hjwc-26pj-v3pm",
"modified" : "2026-07-20T22:00:53Z",
"published" : "2026-06-18T17:20:55Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-57494" ],
"summary" : "AgenticMail: Cross-agent task authorization bypass in AgenticMail API",
"details" : "## Summary\n\nA low-privileged authenticated AgenticMail agent can enumerate another agent's pending/claimed tasks by supplying the target agent name to `GET /api/agenticmail/tasks/pending?assignee=<name>`. The returned task objects include the task IDs and payloads. The same task IDs can then be used with the capability-style task mutation endpoints (`/tasks/:id/claim`, `/tasks/:id/result`, `/tasks/:id/complete`, `/tasks/:id/fail`) to claim, complete, or fail tasks assigned to a different agent.\n\nBecause ordinary authenticated agents can discover agent names through `GET /api/agenticmail/accounts/directory`, the task ID effectively stops being a secret capability. This turns the intended capability model into a cross-agent authorization bypass.\n\n## Affected component\n\nPackage: `@agenticmail/api`\nObserved version: `0.9.62`\nRepository: `agenticmail/agenticmail`\n\nRelevant code paths:\n\n- `packages/api/src/app.ts`: `createAuthMiddleware(...)` is mounted before `createAccountRoutes(...)` and `createTaskRoutes(...)`, so these routes are reachable by any valid bearer token.\n- `packages/api/src/routes/accounts.ts`: `GET /accounts/directory` is available to any authenticated user and returns agent names.\n- `packages/api/src/routes/tasks.ts`: `GET /tasks/pending?assignee=name` resolves arbitrary agent names and returns that agent's pending/claimed tasks.\n- `packages/api/src/routes/tasks.ts`: `/tasks/:id/claim`, `/tasks/:id/result`, `/tasks/:id/complete`, `/tasks/:id/fail`, and `/tasks/:id` do not check whether the authenticated caller is the task assignee, assigner, or otherwise authorized for the task.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker only needs a valid agent API key. They can:\n\n1. List agent names using `/accounts/directory`.\n2. Query another agent's task queue using `/tasks/pending?assignee=<victimName>`.\n3. Read sensitive task payloads intended for the victim agent.\n4. Use the disclosed task ID to complete/fail/claim the victim's task or submit attacker-controlled results.\n\n## Local reproduction\n\nI reproduced this locally with a focused Vitest test mounted directly on `createTaskRoutes`. The test creates two agents, Alice and Bob, and one pending task assigned to Bob. Alice authenticates with her own agent key and performs the following sequence:\n\n1. `GET /api/agenticmail/tasks/pending?assignee=Bob` with `Authorization: Bearer ak_alice`.\n2. The response is HTTP 200 and includes Bob's task ID and payload: `task-for-bob`, `{ \"task\": \"secret task intended for Bob\" }`.\n3. Alice then sends `POST /api/agenticmail/tasks/task-for-bob/complete` with her own bearer token and an attacker-controlled result.\n4. The task status becomes `completed` and the stored result is controlled by Alice.\n\nThe local verification command was:\n\n```bash\nnpm run test --workspace=@agenticmail/api -- task-routes-authz.test.ts\n```\n\nResult:\n\n```text\nPASS src/__tests__/task-routes-authz.test.ts (1 test)\n```\n\n## Expected behavior\n\nTask listing and task mutation endpoints should enforce an authorization relationship between the authenticated caller and the task. For example:\n\n- `GET /tasks/pending?assignee=<name>` should either be restricted to the current agent, master/admin callers, or an explicit delegated relationship.\n- `/tasks/:id/claim`, `/tasks/:id/result`, `/tasks/:id/complete`, `/tasks/:id/fail`, and `/tasks/:id` should verify that the caller is the assignee, assigner, master/admin, or otherwise explicitly authorized.\n- If capability-based task IDs are retained, the API should not expose those IDs to unrelated agents through the assignee-name listing path.\n\n## Credit\n\nPlease credit the finder as: Yaohui Wang",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "@agenticmail/api"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.9.64"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/agenticmail/agenticmail/security/advisories/GHSA-hjwc-26pj-v3pm"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/agenticmail/agenticmail"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-639", "CWE-862" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-06-18T17:20:55Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}