CWE-350 Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action
Description
The product performs reverse DNS resolution on an IP address to obtain the hostname and make a security decision, but it does not properly ensure that the IP address is truly associated with the hostname.
Associated Reviewed Advisories
Vulnerabilities classified under CWE-350 ordered by modification date.
| Advisory ID | NVD ID | Severity | PURLs | Summary | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-q2xc-rrxj-58x9 | CVE-2026-107292 | MODERATE |
Pydantic AI Web chat UI (`Agent.to_web()`, `clai web`): the local chat endpoint does not validate the `Host` header |
2026-10-08 | |
| GHSA-vmp7-252j-cwp7 | CVE-2026-61568 | CRITICAL |
@zereight/mcp-gitlab: DNS rebinding reaches local Streamable HTTP MCP transport |
2026-09-15 | |
| GHSA-x44h-65qv-cw74 | CVE-2026-55526 | HIGH |
praisonaiagents has an SSRF protection bypass in `spider_tools._host_is_blocked()` via DNS-resolved hostnames (`127.0.0.1.nip.io`) |
2026-08-25 | |
| GHSA-9hgc-g3w5-67cm | CVE-2026-53708 | MODERATE |
ContextForge: DNS TOCTOU race condition causes SSRF protection bypass (`/admin/gateways/test`) |
2026-08-14 | |
| GHSA-rjr6-rcgv-9m7m | CVE-2026-63118 | MODERATE |
MCP Ruby SDK: Streamable HTTP transport lacks DNS-rebinding (Host/Origin) protection |
2026-07-30 | |
| GHSA-vx7x-vcc2-c44g | CVE-2026-55391 | HIGH |
datamodel-code-generator vulnerable to SSRF protection bypass via DNS rebinding |
2026-07-28 | |
| GHSA-w856-8p3r-p338 | CVE-2026-46611 | MODERATE |
Glances: XML-RPC Server Missing Host Header Validation Enables DNS Rebinding Attack |
2026-07-21 | |
| GHSA-x227-pf99-vffg | CVE-2026-57123 | CRITICAL |
PraisonAI: MCP SSE transport binds 0.0.0.0 with no authentication and no Origin validation; bundled SecurityConfig is never wired in |
2026-07-20 | |
| GHSA-9h52-p55h-vw2f | CVE-2025-66416 | HIGH |
Model Context Protocol (MCP) Python SDK does not enable DNS rebinding protection by default |
2026-07-16 | |
| GHSA-89vp-x53w-74fx | CVE-2026-42559 | HIGH | - |
rmcp Streamable HTTP server transport has a DNS rebinding vulnerability |
2026-05-19 |
| GHSA-fvh2-gm75-j4j7 | - | HIGH |
dynoxide: DNS rebinding and cross-origin CSRF via MCP HTTP transport |
2026-05-18 | |
| GHSA-xq94-r468-qwgj | CVE-2026-43582 | MODERATE |
OpenClaw: Browser SSRF hostname validation could be bypassed by DNS rebinding |
2026-05-12 | |
| GHSA-3vr4-cvmg-7fx4 | CVE-2026-6874 | LOW |
copilot-api has Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action |
2026-04-30 | |
| GHSA-q9w8-cf67-r238 | CVE-2026-41393 | HIGH |
OpenClaw: macOS Tailnet DNS Spoofing & Credential Exfiltration |
2026-04-28 | |
| GHSA-phhv-63fh-rrc8 | CVE-2026-33002 | HIGH |
Jenkins has a DNS rebinding vulnerability in WebSocket CLI origin validation |
2026-03-19 | |
| GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w | CVE-2025-66414 | HIGH |
Model Context Protocol (MCP) TypeScript SDK does not enable DNS rebinding protection by default |
2025-12-02 | |
| GHSA-w64r-2g3w-w8w4 | CVE-2025-59956 | MODERATE |
Coder AgentAPI exposed user chat history via a DNS rebinding attack |
2025-10-23 | |
| GHSA-6q9c-m9fr-865m | CVE-2025-59163 | LOW |
vet MCP Server SSE Transport DNS Rebinding Vulnerability |
2025-10-23 | |
| GHSA-5jx5-hqx5-2vrj | CVE-2024-28224 | HIGH |
Ollama DNS rebinding vulnerability |
2025-03-27 | |
| GHSA-vg6x-rcgg-rjx6 | CVE-2025-24010 | MODERATE |
Websites were able to send any requests to the development server and read the response in vite |
2025-02-07 | |
| GHSA-4jcv-vp96-94xr | CVE-2024-24759 | HIGH |
MindsDB Vulnerable to Bypass of SSRF Protection with DNS Rebinding |
2024-11-18 | |
| GHSA-pmxq-pj47-j8j4 | CVE-2023-41329 | LOW |
Domain restrictions bypass via DNS Rebinding in WireMock and WireMock Studio webhooks, proxy and recorder modes |
2023-09-08 | |
| GHSA-wp3j-rvfp-624h | CVE-2015-3900 | HIGH |
RubyGems vulnerable to DNS hijack attack |
2023-03-10 | |
| GHSA-73w7-6w9g-gc8w | CVE-2017-0902 | HIGH |
RubyGems has Origin Validation Error vulnerability |
2023-03-09 | |
| GHSA-59qg-grp7-5r73 | CVE-2020-11091 | MODERATE |
Weave Net clusters susceptible to MitM attacks via IPv6 rogue router advertisements |
2021-05-24 |