CVE-2026-98473: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

UNKNOWN
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-67g9-vc6v-4v6c
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-98473 is a security vulnerability vulnerability (General Security Weakness) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2026-98473 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-98473
GHSA Identifier GHSA-67g9-vc6v-4v6c
Severity N/A
CVSS v3.1 Base Score N/A
CWE Classification General Security Weakness
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

How to Fix CVE-2026-98473

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-98473, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under General Security Weakness. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/vfio-ap: fix KVM GISC and page leak when queue removed from host config Three related problems exist in the handling of KVM interrupt and page resources when a queue is removed from the host's AP configuration while assigned to a mediated device (mdev). Problem 1: ~~~~~~~~~ AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL not handled in vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue() When the AP bus removes a queue device whose adapter or domain has been removed from the host's AP configuration, vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue() is called. If the queue is still in the host's AP configuration at that point, it calls vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(), which issues a PQAP(ZAPQ). Since the adapter is already gone from the host configuration, ap_zapq() returns AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL (0x01). This response code is not handled in vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue()'s switch statement and falls through to the default case, which issues a WARN but does not call vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(). As a result, if IRQ handling was enabled for the queue by the guest, the KVM GISC registration and the pinned guest page holding the notification indicator byte (NIB) are both leaked. This is fixed by adding AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL to the same case as AP_RESPONSE_DECONFIGURED and AP_RESPONSE_CHECKSTOPPED in vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(). Like those response codes, Q_NOT_AVAIL indicates the queue is not operational and no further reset attempts are possible; the correct action is to free the IRQ resources immediately. Problem 2: ~~~~~~~~~ AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL not handled in apq_status_check() In vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(), there are four cases that indicate a queue reset has not yet completed, in which case apq_reset_check() is queued to a work queue to verify completion of the reset operation. This function uses the PQAP(TAPQ) function to get the queue's status and calls apq_status_check() to verify whether the reset has completed, failed or needs to be executed again. As described in Problem #1 above, apq_reset_check() does not specifically check for AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL, thereby potentially leaking KVM GISC registration and the pinned guest page holding the NIB. This is fixed by adding a case statement for AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL to apq_status_check() and returning -ENODEV for that case. The caller, apq_reset_check() will then check for this return code and call vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources() to prevent the leak. Problem 3: ~~~~~~~~~ vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources() leaks saved_isc when kvm is NULL vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources() guards the call to kvm_s390_gisc_unregister() with: if (q->saved_isc != VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID && !WARN_ON(!(q->matrix_mdev && q->matrix_mdev->kvm))) If matrix_mdev->kvm is NULL -- which can happen when vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm() has already run and cleared kvm before a subsequent cleanup path reaches this function -- the WARN_ON fires and the entire block is skipped. This leaves q->saved_isc set to a non-invalid value, creating a potential double-free on any subsequent call to this function. When kvm is NULL the KVM guest is already torn down, so kvm_s390_gisc_unregister() need not and cannot be called; however, q->saved_isc must always be cleared. Fix this by separating the kvm_s390_gisc_unregister() call from the q->saved_isc reset. The WARN_ON now guards only the genuinely impossible case of matrix_mdev being NULL. A NULL kvm is handled gracefully by skipping only the unregister call, and q->saved_isc = VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID is set unconditionally whenever saved_isc was not already invalid. Additionally, add an else clause to the host-config check in vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue() to call vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources() directly when the queue is not in the host's AP configuration. This serves as a backstop: when the AP bus fires the driver .remove callback after an adapter is removed from the host config, the queue is by definition no longer addressable, so vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue ---truncated---

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-98473?
CVE-2026-98473 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under General Security Weakness.
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2026-98473?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-98473?
CVE-2026-98473 is classified under General Security Weakness.
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-98473?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-67g9-vc6v-4v6c",
  "modified" : "2026-10-18T18:31:50Z",
  "published" : "2026-10-18T18:31:50Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-98473" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/vfio-ap: fix KVM GISC and page leak when queue removed from host config\n\nThree related problems exist in the handling of KVM interrupt and page\nresources when a queue is removed from the host's AP configuration\nwhile assigned to a mediated device (mdev).\n\nProblem 1:\n~~~~~~~~~\nAP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL not handled in vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue()\n\nWhen the AP bus removes a queue device whose adapter or domain has\nbeen removed from the host's AP configuration,\nvfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue() is called. If the queue is still in the\nhost's AP configuration at that point, it calls\nvfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(), which issues a PQAP(ZAPQ). Since the\nadapter is already gone from the host configuration, ap_zapq() returns\nAP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL (0x01). This response code is not handled in\nvfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue()'s switch statement and falls through to\nthe default case, which issues a WARN but does not call\nvfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(). As a result, if IRQ handling was\nenabled for the queue by the guest, the KVM GISC registration and\nthe pinned guest page holding the notification indicator byte (NIB)\nare both leaked.\n\nThis is fixed by adding AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL to the same case as\nAP_RESPONSE_DECONFIGURED and AP_RESPONSE_CHECKSTOPPED in\nvfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(). Like those response codes, Q_NOT_AVAIL\nindicates the queue is not operational and no further reset attempts\nare possible; the correct action is to free the IRQ resources\nimmediately.\n\nProblem 2:\n~~~~~~~~~\n AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL not handled in apq_status_check()\n\nIn vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(), there are four cases that indicate a queue\nreset has not yet completed, in which case apq_reset_check() is queued to\na work queue to verify completion of the reset operation. This function\nuses the PQAP(TAPQ) function to get the queue's status and calls\napq_status_check() to verify whether the reset has completed, failed or\nneeds to be executed again. As described in Problem #1 above,\napq_reset_check() does not specifically check for AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL,\nthereby potentially leaking KVM GISC registration and the pinned guest page\nholding the NIB.\n\nThis is fixed by adding a case statement for AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL to\napq_status_check() and returning -ENODEV for that case. The caller,\napq_reset_check() will then check for this return code and call\nvfio_ap_free_aqic_resources() to prevent the leak.\n\nProblem 3:\n~~~~~~~~~\nvfio_ap_free_aqic_resources() leaks saved_isc when kvm is NULL\n\nvfio_ap_free_aqic_resources() guards the call to\nkvm_s390_gisc_unregister() with:\n\n    if (q->saved_isc != VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID &&\n        !WARN_ON(!(q->matrix_mdev && q->matrix_mdev->kvm)))\n\nIf matrix_mdev->kvm is NULL -- which can happen when\nvfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm() has already run and cleared kvm before a\nsubsequent cleanup path reaches this function -- the WARN_ON fires\nand the entire block is skipped. This leaves q->saved_isc set to a\nnon-invalid value, creating a potential double-free on any subsequent\ncall to this function.\n\nWhen kvm is NULL the KVM guest is already torn down, so\nkvm_s390_gisc_unregister() need not and cannot be called; however,\nq->saved_isc must always be cleared. Fix this by separating the\nkvm_s390_gisc_unregister() call from the q->saved_isc reset. The\nWARN_ON now guards only the genuinely impossible case of matrix_mdev\nbeing NULL. A NULL kvm is handled gracefully by skipping only the\nunregister call, and q->saved_isc = VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID is set\nunconditionally whenever saved_isc was not already invalid.\n\nAdditionally, add an else clause to the host-config check in\nvfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue() to call vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources()\ndirectly when the queue is not in the host's AP configuration. This\nserves as a backstop: when the AP bus fires the driver .remove\ncallback after an adapter is removed from the host config, the queue\nis by definition no longer addressable, so vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue\n---truncated---",
  "severity" : [ ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98473"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c3433657c82f200dae36c29e2b80681c81b85be"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/65e05ec252a9b79e75930d3c4dd42d8877db04c5"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cf441a0db681dfad5e89b015d6be11365159d7a9"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/da69d3ac53490724eba0ade9deb4e539a6ae9034"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ ],
    "severity" : null,
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-10-18T16:16:57Z"
  }
}