CVE-2026-87995: Open WebUI Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-jmc6-2wr8-h3wj
CVSS 8.7
CWE-79 CWE-1021
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-87995 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.7) cross-site scripting vulnerability (CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')) affecting Open WebUI libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves same-origin xss to account takeover via terminal port-preview iframe hardcoding allow-same-origin. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.11.1.

CVE-2026-87995 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-87995
GHSA Identifier GHSA-jmc6-2wr8-h3wj
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 8.7
CWE Classification CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Affected Product Open WebUI
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 8.7

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction Required (UI:R)
Scope Changed (S:C)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-87995

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Open WebUI dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

open-webui fixed: 0.11.1
pip install open-webui>=0.11.1
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show open-webui

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-87995, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show open-webui

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Open WebUI in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.11.1), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show open-webui command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'), where the product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. In Open WebUI, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary Any authenticated user with access to a shared terminal server could get script of their choosing to run in the Open WebUI origin itself. The in-app port preview rendered the content of a previewed port in an iframe whose sandbox always granted `allow-same-origin` alongside `allow-scripts`, and that content is served from a path on the application's own origin, so the sandbox provided no isolation at all. Script served on a previewed port could read the victim's session token and take over the account. ## Preconditions - At least one terminal server configured by an admin (`TERMINAL_SERVER_CONNECTIONS`, empty by default) and reachable by both the attacker and the victim. Deployments with no terminal server configured are not affected. - The attacker needs a normal authenticated account with access to that terminal connection, no admin rights, plus the ability to start a process listening on a port there. - Personal terminals a user configures for themselves are not affected. Those carry an external URL, so the previewed document is cross-origin and the sandbox held. - The victim has to open the port list and click the attacker's port. - `TERMINAL_PROXY_HEADERS` unset and no `CONTENT_SECURITY_POLICY` set, which are the defaults. An operator who had already set a restrictive Content-Security-Policy through either was not exposed, since those headers apply to the proxied response. - The `iframeSandboxAllowSameOrigin` user setting is off by default, but the affected branch ignored it entirely. ## Impact The previewed page runs in the application origin, so it can reach the parent window, read the session token out of `localStorage` and exfiltrate it, which is full account takeover of the victim. If the victim is an admin, or any user holding `workspace.functions`, that takeover extends to server-side code execution through Functions. Serving the page costs the attacker nothing beyond the terminal access they already hold, so the only real barrier is getting the victim to open that port. Instances with no terminal server configured were never affected, and neither were personal terminals pointed at an external URL. ## Fix Fixed in 0.11.1 by 54d7a2237. The port preview now gates `allow-same-origin` behind a `terminalPreviewAllowSameOrigin` user setting that is off by default, so the preview loads at an opaque origin and cannot reach the parent context. Upgrading is sufficient and no configuration change is required. Previews of pages that need same-origin access still work if a user turns that setting on, and doing so re-enables the behaviour described here for that user. ## Root cause - `src/lib/components/chat/FileNav/PortPreview.svelte`, the preview iframe, reached by clicking a port in the file navigator's port list. - Present from 0.8.11, the first release containing the component, through 0.11.0. Every other iframe in the application had already been moved to an opt-in same-origin setting. The port preview kept a static sandbox string with `allow-same-origin` baked into it, and it was missed when the equivalent problem was fixed in the file preview for 0.11.0. Because the terminal proxy is mounted under the application's own origin and forwards the upstream response and its content type without adding a Content-Security-Policy of its own unless the operator configured one, and no global CSP is set, the sandbox was the only isolation boundary left, and it was granting precisely the permission that dissolved it. ## Proof of concept On a terminal server the victim can also reach, serve an HTML page containing a script that reads `window.parent.localStorage.token` and sends it to a host the attacker controls. The victim opens the file navigator, switches to the port list and clicks that port. The preview opens, the script executes at the application origin, and the token is exfiltrated. ## Credits Reported by @manus-use (researcher zx / Jace).

CVE-2026-87995 Affected Open WebUI Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
0.11.1
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
open-webui
PyPI
≥ 0.8.11
< 0.11.1
0.11.1

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-87995?
CVE-2026-87995 is a security vulnerability in Open WebUI involving Same-origin XSS to account takeover via terminal port-preview iframe hardcoding allow-same-origin under CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting').
Which Open WebUI versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 0.11.1 across affected packages: open-webui.
What version fixes CVE-2026-87995?
Upgrading to 0.11.1 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is open-webui affected?
Yes, open-webui is affected in releases prior to 0.11.1. Upgrade your dependency to 0.11.1 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-87995?
CVE-2026-87995 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.7 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-87995?
CVE-2026-87995 is classified under CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-87995?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show open-webui'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-jmc6-2wr8-h3wj",
  "modified" : "2026-09-10T15:10:20Z",
  "published" : "2026-09-10T15:10:20Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-87995" ],
  "summary" : "Open WebUI: Same-origin XSS to account takeover via terminal port-preview iframe hardcoding allow-same-origin",
  "details" : "## Summary\nAny authenticated user with access to a shared terminal server could get script of their choosing to run in the Open WebUI origin itself. The in-app port preview rendered the content of a previewed port in an iframe whose sandbox always granted `allow-same-origin` alongside `allow-scripts`, and that content is served from a path on the application's own origin, so the sandbox provided no isolation at all. Script served on a previewed port could read the victim's session token and take over the account.\n\n## Preconditions\n- At least one terminal server configured by an admin (`TERMINAL_SERVER_CONNECTIONS`, empty by default) and reachable by both the attacker and the victim. Deployments with no terminal server configured are not affected.\n- The attacker needs a normal authenticated account with access to that terminal connection, no admin rights, plus the ability to start a process listening on a port there.\n- Personal terminals a user configures for themselves are not affected. Those carry an external URL, so the previewed document is cross-origin and the sandbox held.\n- The victim has to open the port list and click the attacker's port.\n- `TERMINAL_PROXY_HEADERS` unset and no `CONTENT_SECURITY_POLICY` set, which are the defaults. An operator who had already set a restrictive Content-Security-Policy through either was not exposed, since those headers apply to the proxied response.\n- The `iframeSandboxAllowSameOrigin` user setting is off by default, but the affected branch ignored it entirely.\n\n## Impact\nThe previewed page runs in the application origin, so it can reach the parent window, read the session token out of `localStorage` and exfiltrate it, which is full account takeover of the victim. If the victim is an admin, or any user holding `workspace.functions`, that takeover extends to server-side code execution through Functions. Serving the page costs the attacker nothing beyond the terminal access they already hold, so the only real barrier is getting the victim to open that port. Instances with no terminal server configured were never affected, and neither were personal terminals pointed at an external URL.\n\n## Fix\nFixed in 0.11.1 by 54d7a2237. The port preview now gates `allow-same-origin` behind a `terminalPreviewAllowSameOrigin` user setting that is off by default, so the preview loads at an opaque origin and cannot reach the parent context. Upgrading is sufficient and no configuration change is required. Previews of pages that need same-origin access still work if a user turns that setting on, and doing so re-enables the behaviour described here for that user.\n\n## Root cause\n- `src/lib/components/chat/FileNav/PortPreview.svelte`, the preview iframe, reached by clicking a port in the file navigator's port list.\n- Present from 0.8.11, the first release containing the component, through 0.11.0.\n\nEvery other iframe in the application had already been moved to an opt-in same-origin setting. The port preview kept a static sandbox string with `allow-same-origin` baked into it, and it was missed when the equivalent problem was fixed in the file preview for 0.11.0. Because the terminal proxy is mounted under the application's own origin and forwards the upstream response and its content type without adding a Content-Security-Policy of its own unless the operator configured one, and no global CSP is set, the sandbox was the only isolation boundary left, and it was granting precisely the permission that dissolved it.\n\n## Proof of concept\nOn a terminal server the victim can also reach, serve an HTML page containing a script that reads `window.parent.localStorage.token` and sends it to a host the attacker controls. The victim opens the file navigator, switches to the port list and clicks that port. The preview opens, the script executes at the application origin, and the token is exfiltrated.\n\n## Credits\nReported by @manus-use (researcher zx / Jace).",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "open-webui"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0.8.11"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "0.11.1"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 0.11.0"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-jmc6-2wr8-h3wj"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-87995"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/54d7a223707f03172efbb9e754db6e69709956d0"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.11.1"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-1021", "CWE-79" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-09-10T15:10:20Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-09-09T22:18:47Z"
  }
}