CVE-2026-81889: elFinder SSRF Protection Bypass Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-8x3q-jpjh-qh5c
CVSS 8.6
CWE-918
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-81889 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.6) ssrf protection bypass vulnerability (CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)) affecting elFinder libraries in the Packagist ecosystem. The issue involves ssrf protection bypass via dns rebinding in the `fsock_get_contents()` fallback. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 2.1.70.

CVE-2026-81889 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-81889
GHSA Identifier GHSA-8x3q-jpjh-qh5c
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 8.6
CWE Classification CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Affected Product elFinder
Package Ecosystem Packagist
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 8.6

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Changed (S:C)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-81889

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected elFinder dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

studio-42/elfinder fixed: 2.1.70
Upgrade studio-42/elfinder to 2.1.70
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

inspect dependencies for studio-42/elfinder

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-81889, inspect your project dependencies for elFinder:

inspect dependencies for studio-42/elfinder

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of elFinder in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 2.1.70), your application is affected.

Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the web server receives a url or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this url, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. In elFinder, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

[poc.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/30352020/poc.zip) ## Summary elFinder 2.1.69 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass when PHP cURL is unavailable and URL uploads use the `fsock_get_contents()` fallback. An attacker who can submit a URL for server-side upload can use an attacker-controlled DNS hostname that initially resolves to an allowed public IP address and subsequently resolves to a loopback or private IP address. The URL validation checks the first resolved IP, but `fsock_get_contents()` opens the actual connection using the original hostname. This causes a second DNS resolution and allows the connection to reach an address different from the one that was validated. The response from the internal service is saved as an uploaded file and can be read through elFinder. This makes the demonstrated issue a non-blind SSRF. The most accurate classification is: * Vulnerability: SSRF protection bypass * Exploitation technique: DNS rebinding * Root cause: TOCTOU/double DNS resolution without IP pinning ## Affected versions Confirmed affected: * elFinder 2.1.69, commit `8f2c3ffafcdd52cf4515f1eec172f4eee44552ad` * the current `master` branch inspected on 24 July 2026 The earliest affected version has not been determined. ## Preconditions The demonstrated readback path requires: * PHP without the cURL extension (`curl_exec()` unavailable); * access to the URL upload functionality; * permission to upload a MIME type returned by the target service; * network connectivity from the PHP process to the internal target; * DNS resolution behavior compatible with low or zero TTL responses. Authentication requirements depend on the application integrating the elFinder connector. The attached reproduction connector is intentionally minimal and unauthenticated. ## Technical details `validate_address()` resolves the supplied hostname with `gethostbyname()`, rejects loopback and private ranges, and stores the accepted address in `$info['ip']`: https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2587-L2655 `get_remote_contents()` then selects cURL when available, otherwise `fsock_get_contents()`: https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2673-L2689 The cURL implementation correctly pins the validated IP using `CURLOPT_RESOLVE`: https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2709-L2736 However, the socket fallback ignores `$info['ip']` and connects using `$arr['host']`: ```php $fp = fsockopen( $ssl . $arr['host'], $arr['port'], $errno, $errstr, $connect_timeout ); ``` Relevant code: https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2762-L2866 Consequently, the address checked by `validate_address()` is not necessarily the address used by the socket connection. The same problem is present after redirects: the redirect URL is validated, but the recursive socket request again connects using the hostname rather than the validated IP. ## Proof of concept A Docker-based reproduction is attached as `poc.zip`. The laboratory: * downloads the official elFinder 2.1.69 release during the build; * verifies that the package version is 2.1.69; * verifies that `curl_exec()` is unavailable; * does not modify the elFinder core; * runs a deterministic DNS server and an HTTP service bound only to loopback. Build and run: ```sh docker build -t elfinder-ssrf-repro poc docker run --rm -p 127.0.0.1:8081:8081 elfinder-ssrf-repro ``` Open: ```text http://127.0.0.1:8081/poc/index.html ``` In the elFinder interface: 1. Select "Upload". 2. Paste the following URL: ```text http://rebind.test:9001/secret.txt ``` 3. Wait for the upload to complete. 4. Open the resulting `secret.txt` file. Observed content: ```text INTERNAL_SECRET_MANUAL ``` The PoC DNS server responds as follows: ```text first A resolution -> 203.0.113.10 subsequent A resolutions -> 127.0.0.1 ``` Expected logs include: ```text DNS rebind.test type=1 answer=203.0.113.10 count=1 DNS rebind.test type=1 answer=127.0.0.1 count=2 GET /secret.txt ``` `203.0.113.10` is used only as a deterministic laboratory address that passes the current private-address checks. The actual connection reaches `127.0.0.1:9001`. A redirect variant is also included: ```text http://rebind.test:9001/redirect-secret ``` It produces the same readable internal content. ## Security impact An attacker may cause the elFinder server to issue HTTP GET requests to services reachable from the PHP process, including: * loopback services; * private network services; * link-local services where reachable; * internal administrative or application endpoints. Because the response body is saved and exposed through elFinder, sensitive internal information may be disclosed. The demonstrated primitive is limited to HTTP GET requests and does not provide arbitrary request methods, bodies, or headers. Integrity and availability impact would depend on the behavior of reachable internal endpoints and are not claimed by this PoC. ## Suggested CVSS For an exposed connector matching the attached PoC: ```text CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N ``` Base score: 8.6 High. This assumes: * no authentication is required by the connector; * the internal service represents a separate security scope; * disclosure may include highly sensitive internal data. If authenticated user access is considered an inherent prerequisite, `PR:L` would result in a score of 7.7 High. ## Suggested remediation The socket connection should use the IP address returned by `validate_address()` rather than resolving the hostname again. For HTTPS, the original hostname should still be used for: * the HTTP `Host` header; * TLS SNI; * certificate hostname validation. This may require replacing `fsockopen()` with a connection mechanism that supports connecting to the validated IP while explicitly configuring the TLS peer name. Every redirect destination should be independently validated and its validated IP pinned to that specific connection. Revalidating the hostname immediately before connecting is not sufficient because it would still leave a validation-to-connection DNS resolution gap. As a temporary mitigation, URL uploads could be rejected when cURL is unavailable, or deployments could configure `urlUploadFilter` to reject URL uploads. ## Additional observation After a successful URL fetch, the upload path calls: ```php get_headers($url, true) ``` Relevant code: https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L3356-L3374 This performs another request using the original hostname without reusing the validated and pinned connection. It may therefore introduce an additional blind SSRF request, potentially even when the cURL download path is selected. This additional request is not required for the attached non-blind `fsock_get_contents()` PoC. It should nevertheless be reviewed during remediation. Ideally, filename and response-header information should be collected from the already validated HTTP response instead of issuing a separate request. ## Disclosure Initial private report date: `24/07/2026` Reporter contact: `Marco Lunardi - marcolunardi90@gmail.com`

CVE-2026-81889 Affected elFinder Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
2.1.70
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
studio-42/elfinder
Packagist
< 2.1.70
2.1.70

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-81889?
CVE-2026-81889 is a security vulnerability in elFinder involving SSRF protection bypass via DNS rebinding in the `fsock_get_contents()` fallback under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
Which elFinder versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 2.1.70 across affected packages: studio-42/elfinder.
What version fixes CVE-2026-81889?
Upgrading to 2.1.70 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is studio-42/elfinder affected?
Yes, studio-42/elfinder is affected in releases prior to 2.1.70. Upgrade your dependency to 2.1.70 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-81889?
CVE-2026-81889 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.6 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-81889?
CVE-2026-81889 is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.).
How can I check Packagist dependencies for CVE-2026-81889?
Run the dependency tree command: 'inspect dependencies for studio-42/elfinder'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-8x3q-jpjh-qh5c",
  "modified" : "2026-08-31T20:28:06Z",
  "published" : "2026-08-31T20:28:06Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-81889" ],
  "summary" : "elFinder: SSRF protection bypass via DNS rebinding in the `fsock_get_contents()` fallback",
  "details" : "[poc.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/30352020/poc.zip)\n## Summary\n\nelFinder 2.1.69 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass when PHP cURL is unavailable and URL uploads use the `fsock_get_contents()` fallback.\n\nAn attacker who can submit a URL for server-side upload can use an attacker-controlled DNS hostname that initially resolves to an allowed public IP address and subsequently resolves to a loopback or private IP address.\n\nThe URL validation checks the first resolved IP, but `fsock_get_contents()` opens the actual connection using the original hostname. This causes a second DNS resolution and allows the connection to reach an address different from the one that was validated.\n\nThe response from the internal service is saved as an uploaded file and can be read through elFinder. This makes the demonstrated issue a non-blind SSRF.\n\nThe most accurate classification is:\n\n* Vulnerability: SSRF protection bypass \n* Exploitation technique: DNS rebinding\n* Root cause: TOCTOU/double DNS resolution without IP pinning\n\n## Affected versions\n\nConfirmed affected:\n\n* elFinder 2.1.69, commit `8f2c3ffafcdd52cf4515f1eec172f4eee44552ad`\n* the current `master` branch inspected on 24 July 2026\n\nThe earliest affected version has not been determined.\n\n## Preconditions\n\nThe demonstrated readback path requires:\n\n* PHP without the cURL extension (`curl_exec()` unavailable);\n* access to the URL upload functionality;\n* permission to upload a MIME type returned by the target service;\n* network connectivity from the PHP process to the internal target;\n* DNS resolution behavior compatible with low or zero TTL responses.\n\nAuthentication requirements depend on the application integrating the elFinder connector. The attached reproduction connector is intentionally minimal and unauthenticated.\n\n## Technical details\n\n`validate_address()` resolves the supplied hostname with `gethostbyname()`, rejects loopback and private ranges, and stores the accepted address in `$info['ip']`:\n\nhttps://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2587-L2655\n\n`get_remote_contents()` then selects cURL when available, otherwise `fsock_get_contents()`:\n\nhttps://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2673-L2689\n\nThe cURL implementation correctly pins the validated IP using `CURLOPT_RESOLVE`:\n\nhttps://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2709-L2736\n\nHowever, the socket fallback ignores `$info['ip']` and connects using `$arr['host']`:\n\n```php\n$fp = fsockopen(\n    $ssl . $arr['host'],\n    $arr['port'],\n    $errno,\n    $errstr,\n    $connect_timeout\n);\n```\n\nRelevant code:\n\nhttps://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2762-L2866\n\nConsequently, the address checked by `validate_address()` is not necessarily the address used by the socket connection.\n\nThe same problem is present after redirects: the redirect URL is validated, but the recursive socket request again connects using the hostname rather than the validated IP.\n\n## Proof of concept\n\nA Docker-based reproduction is attached as `poc.zip`.\n\nThe laboratory:\n\n* downloads the official elFinder 2.1.69 release during the build;\n* verifies that the package version is 2.1.69;\n* verifies that `curl_exec()` is unavailable;\n* does not modify the elFinder core;\n* runs a deterministic DNS server and an HTTP service bound only to loopback.\n\nBuild and run:\n\n```sh\ndocker build -t elfinder-ssrf-repro poc\ndocker run --rm -p 127.0.0.1:8081:8081 elfinder-ssrf-repro\n```\n\nOpen:\n\n```text\nhttp://127.0.0.1:8081/poc/index.html\n```\n\nIn the elFinder interface:\n\n1. Select \"Upload\".\n2. Paste the following URL:\n\n```text\nhttp://rebind.test:9001/secret.txt\n```\n\n3. Wait for the upload to complete.\n4. Open the resulting `secret.txt` file.\n\nObserved content:\n\n```text\nINTERNAL_SECRET_MANUAL\n```\n\nThe PoC DNS server responds as follows:\n\n```text\nfirst A resolution       -> 203.0.113.10\nsubsequent A resolutions -> 127.0.0.1\n```\n\nExpected logs include:\n\n```text\nDNS rebind.test type=1 answer=203.0.113.10 count=1\nDNS rebind.test type=1 answer=127.0.0.1 count=2\nGET /secret.txt\n```\n\n`203.0.113.10` is used only as a deterministic laboratory address that passes the current private-address checks. The actual connection reaches `127.0.0.1:9001`.\n\nA redirect variant is also included:\n\n```text\nhttp://rebind.test:9001/redirect-secret\n```\n\nIt produces the same readable internal content.\n\n## Security impact\n\nAn attacker may cause the elFinder server to issue HTTP GET requests to services reachable from the PHP process, including:\n\n* loopback services;\n* private network services;\n* link-local services where reachable;\n* internal administrative or application endpoints.\n\nBecause the response body is saved and exposed through elFinder, sensitive internal information may be disclosed.\n\nThe demonstrated primitive is limited to HTTP GET requests and does not provide arbitrary request methods, bodies, or headers. Integrity and availability impact would depend on the behavior of reachable internal endpoints and are not claimed by this PoC.\n\n## Suggested CVSS\n\nFor an exposed connector matching the attached PoC:\n\n```text\nCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\n```\n\nBase score: 8.6 High.\n\nThis assumes:\n\n* no authentication is required by the connector;\n* the internal service represents a separate security scope;\n* disclosure may include highly sensitive internal data.\n\nIf authenticated user access is considered an inherent prerequisite, `PR:L` would result in a score of 7.7 High.\n\n## Suggested remediation\n\nThe socket connection should use the IP address returned by `validate_address()` rather than resolving the hostname again.\n\nFor HTTPS, the original hostname should still be used for:\n\n* the HTTP `Host` header;\n* TLS SNI;\n* certificate hostname validation.\n\nThis may require replacing `fsockopen()` with a connection mechanism that supports connecting to the validated IP while explicitly configuring the TLS peer name.\n\nEvery redirect destination should be independently validated and its validated IP pinned to that specific connection.\n\nRevalidating the hostname immediately before connecting is not sufficient because it would still leave a validation-to-connection DNS resolution gap.\n\nAs a temporary mitigation, URL uploads could be rejected when cURL is unavailable, or deployments could configure `urlUploadFilter` to reject URL uploads.\n\n## Additional observation\n\nAfter a successful URL fetch, the upload path calls:\n\n```php\nget_headers($url, true)\n```\n\nRelevant code:\n\nhttps://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L3356-L3374\n\nThis performs another request using the original hostname without reusing the validated and pinned connection. It may therefore introduce an additional blind SSRF request, potentially even when the cURL download path is selected.\n\nThis additional request is not required for the attached non-blind `fsock_get_contents()` PoC. It should nevertheless be reviewed during remediation. Ideally, filename and response-header information should be collected from the already validated HTTP response instead of issuing a separate request.\n\n## Disclosure\n\nInitial private report date: `24/07/2026`\n\nReporter contact: `Marco Lunardi - marcolunardi90@gmail.com`",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "Packagist",
      "name" : "studio-42/elfinder"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "2.1.70"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 2.1.69"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/security/advisories/GHSA-8x3q-jpjh-qh5c"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/commit/191372c1bbebbd36fb55af79a84b9984861390ff"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/commit/6d997386cd0f1abab4706c220b46b0aea0ecff51"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/releases/tag/2.1.70"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-918" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-08-31T20:28:06Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}