CVE-2026-63989: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-5x9q-485p-2v5m
CVSS 5.5
CWE-667
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-63989 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.5) security vulnerability vulnerability (CWE-667: Improper Locking) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. The weakness occurs when the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2026-63989 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-63989
GHSA Identifier GHSA-5x9q-485p-2v5m
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 5.5
CWE Classification CWE-667: Improper Locking
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 5.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Local (AV:L)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-63989

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-63989, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-667: Improper Locking, where the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bridge: Fix sleep in atomic context in netlink path Since the introduction of the netlink configuration path for bridge ports in commit 25c71c75ac87 ("bridge: bridge port parameters over netlink"), br_setport() was always called with the bridge lock held around it. Back then this decision made sense: The bridge lock protects the STP state of the bridge and its ports and at that time the function only processed three STP related netlink attributes (cost, priority and state). Nowadays, br_setport() processes a lot more attributes and most of them do not need the bridge lock: * Bridge flags: Only require RTNL. Read locklessly by the data path. Annotations can be added in net-next. * FDB port flushing: Only requires the FDB lock. * Multicast attributes: Only require the multicast lock. * Group forward mask: Only requires RTNL. Read locklessly by the data path. Annotations can be added in net-next. * Backup port and NHID: Only require RTNL. Read locklessly by the data path. This is a problem as the bridge calls dev_set_promiscuity() when certain bridge port flags change and this function can sleep since the commit cited below, resulting in a splat such as [1]. Fix this by reducing the scope of the bridge lock and only take it when processing the three STP related attributes that require it. This is consistent with the multicast attributes where each attribute acquires the multicast lock instead of having one critical section for all relevant attributes. [1] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:1262 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 356, name: bridge preempt_count: 201, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 2 locks held by bridge/356: #0: ffffffff919473a0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:80 net/core/rtnetlink.c:7002) #1: ffff888115072d58 (&br->lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: br_setlink (./include/linux/spinlock.h:348 net/bridge/br_netlink.c:1117) Preemption disabled at: 0x0 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:94 lib/dump_stack.c:120) __might_resched.cold (kernel/sched/core.c:9163) netif_rx_mode_run (net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:1262) netif_rx_mode_sync (net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:1428) dev_set_promiscuity (net/core/dev_api.c:289) br_manage_promisc (net/bridge/br_if.c:135 net/bridge/br_if.c:172) br_port_flags_change (net/bridge/br_if.c:242 net/bridge/br_if.c:747) br_setport (net/bridge/br_netlink.c:1000) br_setlink (net/bridge/br_netlink.c:1118) rtnl_bridge_setlink (net/core/rtnetlink.c:5572) rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:7005) netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550) netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1318 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344) netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1894) __sock_sendmsg (net/socket.c:787 (discriminator 4) net/socket.c:802 (discriminator 4)) ____sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2698) ___sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2752) __sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2784) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-63989?
CVE-2026-63989 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under CWE-667: Improper Locking.
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2026-63989?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63989?
CVE-2026-63989 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-63989?
CVE-2026-63989 is classified under CWE-667: Improper Locking (The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.).
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-63989?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-5x9q-485p-2v5m",
  "modified" : "2026-10-08T15:32:32Z",
  "published" : "2026-07-19T18:31:48Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-63989" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbridge: Fix sleep in atomic context in netlink path\n\nSince the introduction of the netlink configuration path for bridge\nports in commit 25c71c75ac87 (\"bridge: bridge port parameters over\nnetlink\"), br_setport() was always called with the bridge lock held\naround it. Back then this decision made sense: The bridge lock protects\nthe STP state of the bridge and its ports and at that time the function\nonly processed three STP related netlink attributes (cost, priority and\nstate).\n\nNowadays, br_setport() processes a lot more attributes and most of them\ndo not need the bridge lock:\n\n* Bridge flags: Only require RTNL. Read locklessly by the data path.\n  Annotations can be added in net-next.\n\n* FDB port flushing: Only requires the FDB lock.\n\n* Multicast attributes: Only require the multicast lock.\n\n* Group forward mask: Only requires RTNL. Read locklessly by the data\n  path. Annotations can be added in net-next.\n\n* Backup port and NHID: Only require RTNL. Read locklessly by the data\n  path.\n\nThis is a problem as the bridge calls dev_set_promiscuity() when certain\nbridge port flags change and this function can sleep since the commit\ncited below, resulting in a splat such as [1].\n\nFix this by reducing the scope of the bridge lock and only take it when\nprocessing the three STP related attributes that require it. This is\nconsistent with the multicast attributes where each attribute acquires\nthe multicast lock instead of having one critical section for all\nrelevant attributes.\n\n[1]\nBUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:1262\nin_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 356, name: bridge\npreempt_count: 201, expected: 0\nRCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0\n2 locks held by bridge/356:\n#0: ffffffff919473a0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:80 net/core/rtnetlink.c:7002)\n#1: ffff888115072d58 (&br->lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: br_setlink (./include/linux/spinlock.h:348 net/bridge/br_netlink.c:1117)\nPreemption disabled at:\n 0x0\nHardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011\nCall Trace:\n<TASK>\ndump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:94 lib/dump_stack.c:120)\n__might_resched.cold (kernel/sched/core.c:9163)\nnetif_rx_mode_run (net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:1262)\nnetif_rx_mode_sync (net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:1428)\ndev_set_promiscuity (net/core/dev_api.c:289)\nbr_manage_promisc (net/bridge/br_if.c:135 net/bridge/br_if.c:172)\nbr_port_flags_change (net/bridge/br_if.c:242 net/bridge/br_if.c:747)\nbr_setport (net/bridge/br_netlink.c:1000)\nbr_setlink (net/bridge/br_netlink.c:1118)\nrtnl_bridge_setlink (net/core/rtnetlink.c:5572)\nrtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:7005)\nnetlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550)\nnetlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1318 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344)\nnetlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1894)\n__sock_sendmsg (net/socket.c:787 (discriminator 4) net/socket.c:802 (discriminator 4))\n____sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2698)\n___sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2752)\n__sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2784)\ndo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94)\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63989"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5eec4427b89c2fb2beac54920101e55a2f1c0c21"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/803d39accfbdf223ccbb49684d5b5069b4c44586"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9c2e609e8397bb57b4d73675f33a99183c4a0bd"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-667" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-07-19T16:17:18Z"
  }
}