CVE-2026-46702: russh Post-decompression SSH Packet Size Was Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-wwx6-x28x-8259
CVSS 7.5
CWE-770
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-46702 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) post-decompression ssh packet size was vulnerability (CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) affecting russh libraries in the crates.io ecosystem. The issue involves post-decompression ssh packet size was not bounded, allowing remote oversized compressed packets. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.61.1.

CVE-2026-46702 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-46702
GHSA Identifier GHSA-wwx6-x28x-8259
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.5
CWE Classification CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Affected Product russh
Package Ecosystem crates.io
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-46702

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected russh dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

russh fixed: 0.61.1
Upgrade russh to 0.61.1
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

inspect dependencies for russh

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-46702, inspect your project dependencies for russh:

inspect dependencies for russh

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of russh in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.61.1), your application is affected.

Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling, where the product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated. In russh, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Summary When SSH compression is enabled, `russh` accepted compressed packets whose on-wire size passed the normal transport packet-length checks but whose decompressed size was much larger. This allowed a remote peer to send oversized post-decompression packets that should have been rejected. In current releases, this is a remote denial-of-service / resource-exhaustion issue in the post-decompression receive path. In older releases before `0.58.0`, the same remote decompression path used `CryptoVec`, which appears to make the historical impact worse. ### Details The normal SSH transport read path enforces a packet-length limit before the packet body is read: - `russh/src/cipher/mod.rs` However, RFC 4253 compression is applied to the SSH `payload` field only. The `packet_length` field and MAC are computed over the compressed payload, so a packet that is reasonably sized on the wire can still expand to a much larger message body after decompression. In `russh`, compressed packet bodies are later decompressed in: - `russh/src/compression.rs` - `russh/src/client/mod.rs` - `russh/src/server/session.rs` Before the fix, `Decompress::decompress()` grew its output buffer by repeated doubling and did not enforce a separate post-decompression ceiling. That meant a peer could send a small compressed packet that passed the normal on-wire transport length checks and then inflate it into a much larger packet after decompression. It was verified that an attacker-crafted compressed payload can stay below the normal `256 KiB` implementation transport packet cap while still inflating above the intended post-decompression bound. In other words, this is not only a "large on-wire packet" issue. Version detail: - The underlying post-decompression bounds bug appears to affect `russh` as far back as `0.34.0`. - In historical releases `>= 0.34.0, < 0.58.0`, the remote decompression path still used `CryptoVec`. Remote compressed SSH traffic could drive that path, and under constrained memory that historical code path could abort the process. - In current-style releases `>= 0.58.0`, non-secret packet/decompression buffers were moved off `CryptoVec` and onto `Vec<u8>`, but the post-decompression size still remained unbounded. So the bug class remained reachable remotely, but the maintained-line impact is a current remote DoS / oversized-packet-acceptance issue rather than the older `CryptoVec`-based abort story. - The maintained-line fix was verified against `0.60.2`. Compression is not selected in a default-vs-default `russh` session because the default preference order puts `none` first. However, the default server configuration still advertises `zlib` and `zlib@openssh.com`, and server-side negotiation follows the client's preference order for common algorithms. A client that prefers compression can therefore negotiate it with a default `russh` server. OpenSSH portable was checked at `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable` commit `45b30e0a5`. OpenSSH enforces a `256 KiB` transport packet cap before decompression, but it does not reuse that cap after decompression. Instead, decompression writes to an `sshbuf`, which is indirectly bounded by OpenSSH's `SSHBUF_SIZE_MAX` hard maximum of `0x8000000` bytes (`128 MiB`). The patch direction should follow that model: add an explicit post-decompression ceiling of `128 MiB`, rather than assuming the compressed transport packet cap also bounds decompressed payload size. Relevant OpenSSH reference points: - `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable/packet.c`: `PACKET_MAX_SIZE (256 * 1024)` - `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable/packet.c`: `uncompress_buffer()` inflates into `compression_buffer` - `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable/sshbuf.h`: `SSHBUF_SIZE_MAX 0x8000000` ### RFC / OpenSSH Comparison RFC 4253 section 6 defines the binary packet format: - `packet_length` - `padding_length` - `payload` - random padding - MAC RFC 4253 section 6.2 says that, when compression is negotiated, the `payload` field is compressed, and that `packet_length` and MAC are computed from the compressed payload. The RFC also says implementations should check that packet length is reasonable to avoid denial-of-service and buffer-overflow attacks. That means the pre-decompression transport packet length check is necessary but not sufficient. A correct implementation still needs a reasonable bound on the decompressed payload that becomes parser input. OpenSSH provides such a bound indirectly through `sshbuf`'s hard maximum. The `russh` fix should make the corresponding post-decompression bound explicit. ### PoC There were two kinds of proof: - a wire-cap sanity test showing an attacker-crafted best-compressed `DEBUG` payload can stay below the normal SSH transport packet cap while still inflating beyond the intended post-decompression bound - direct client and server receive-path tests that exercise the oversized post-decompression behavior itself The current in-tree regression tests are: - `tests::compress::oversized_debug_payload_can_stay_below_wire_cap` - `compression::tests::oversized_decompressed_packet_is_rejected` - `client::tests::compressed_debug_is_ignored_after_client_parses_it` - `client::tests::oversized_compressed_debug_is_rejected_before_client_ignores_it` - `server::session::tests::compressed_debug_is_ignored_after_server_parses_it` - `server::session::tests::oversized_compressed_debug_is_rejected_before_server_ignores_it` The important behavior is: 1. An attacker-crafted best-compressed `DEBUG` payload can stay below the normal `256 KiB` transport packet cap while still inflating beyond `128 MiB`. 2. In the direct client and server receive paths, small compressed `DEBUG` packets are still ignored normally after parsing. 3. In the direct client and server receive paths, oversized compressed `DEBUG` packets are rejected before the implementation reaches the normal "ignore DEBUG" behavior. The strongest PoC for severity is the unauthenticated server-side case. A malicious client can choose `zlib` in the initial key exchange, because the default server advertises it and server-side negotiation follows the client's preference order for common algorithms. After `NEWKEYS`, but before authentication, the client can send a transport-layer `SSH_MSG_DEBUG` packet whose compressed body is below the transport packet cap but whose decompressed body exceeds the post-decompression cap. That demonstrates the `AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N` case directly: the attacker is a remote SSH client and does not need a successfully authenticated session. ```rust fn compressed_debug_payload(payload_len: usize) -> Vec<u8> { let mut payload = vec![b'A'; payload_len]; payload[0] = crate::msg::DEBUG; let mut encoder = flate2::write::ZlibEncoder::new(Vec::new(), flate2::Compression::best()); encoder.write_all(&payload).unwrap(); let compressed = encoder.finish().unwrap(); assert!( compressed.len() < 256 * 1024, "oversized post-decompression payload still fits under the wire cap" ); compressed } fn incoming_packet(compressed: Vec<u8>) -> SSHBuffer { let mut buffer = SSHBuffer::new(); // maybe_decompress() receives the clear SSHBuffer after packet framing, // and decompresses bytes after packet_length + padding_length. buffer.buffer.extend_from_slice(&[0; 5]); buffer.buffer.extend_from_slice(&compressed); buffer } #[test] fn unauthenticated_client_zlib_debug_is_rejected_by_server_before_auth() { let mut server = preauth_server_session_after_newkeys_with_zlib_decompressor(); let oversized = MAXIMUM_DECOMPRESSED_PACKET_LEN + 1024; let buffer = incoming_packet(compressed_debug_payload(oversized)); let err = server.maybe_decompress(&buffer).unwrap_err(); assert!( matches!(err, crate::Error::PacketSize(len) if len > MAXIMUM_DECOMPRESSED_PACKET_LEN) ); } ``` The equivalent wire-level attack shape is: ```text 1. Connect to a russh server using the default compression advertisement. 2. Send SSH_MSG_KEXINIT with compression client-to-server preference: zlib,zlib@openssh.com,none 3. Complete key exchange and send SSH_MSG_NEWKEYS. 4. Before any SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST, send a compressed SSH_MSG_DEBUG packet: - compressed packet body: < 256 KiB - decompressed packet body: > 128 MiB 5. Vulnerable behavior: russh accepts and inflates the packet, then reaches the normal DEBUG ignore path. 6. Fixed behavior: russh rejects during decompression with Error::PacketSize. ``` The direct receive-path client/server regression tests are still useful because they isolate the bug precisely. They construct the post-decryption compressed packet body passed to `maybe_decompress()` and prove that the oversized packet is rejected before normal `DEBUG` ignore handling. The server-side pre-auth variant above is the one that justifies the highest CVSS framing for this bug. The most important targeted checks are: ```bash cargo test -p russh oversized_debug_payload_can_stay_below_wire_cap -- --nocapture cargo test -p russh oversized_compressed_debug_is_rejected_before_client_ignores_it -- --nocapture cargo test -p russh oversized_compressed_debug_is_rejected_before_server_ignores_it -- --nocapture ``` Before the fix, both the direct client and direct server receive-path oversized checks went red because the compressed payload was accepted and decompressed instead of being rejected at the post-decompression boundary. After the fix, they pass. ### Impact Suggested CVSS v3.1 for current maintained releases: - `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H` - Score: `7.5` Reasoning: - `AV:N`: reachable by a remote SSH peer - `AC:L`: straightforward once compression is enabled - `PR:N`, `UI:N`: no prior auth or user interaction required - `C:N`, `I:N`: confidentiality or integrity impact was not demonstrated - `A:H`: remote peer can cause oversized post-decompression packet processing and disconnect / denial of service Affected versions: - historical stronger case: `russh >= 0.34.0, < 0.58.0` - current maintained remote DoS case: `russh >= 0.58.0`, including `0.60.3` ### Fix / Patch Direction Add an explicit maximum decompressed SSH packet size and enforce it inside `Decompress::decompress()` before returning decompressed bytes to the client or server packet parser. The intended ceiling is `128 MiB`, matching OpenSSH portable's effective `sshbuf` hard maximum for post-decompression packet storage. The fix should reject decompression output larger than that bound with a packet-size error before normal message dispatch. The fix should preserve normal compressed packet behavior below the cap, including `DEBUG` packets that are decompressed and then ignored through the existing normal path. Patch branch: ```text fix/zlib-decompression-cap ```

CVE-2026-46702 Affected russh Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
0.61.1
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
russh
crates.io
≥ 0.34.0
< 0.61.1
0.61.1

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-46702?
CVE-2026-46702 is a security vulnerability in russh involving Post-decompression SSH packet size was not bounded, allowing remote oversized compressed packets under CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling.
Which russh versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 0.61.1 across affected packages: russh.
What version fixes CVE-2026-46702?
Upgrading to 0.61.1 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is russh affected?
Yes, russh is affected in releases prior to 0.61.1. Upgrade your dependency to 0.61.1 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46702?
CVE-2026-46702 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-46702?
CVE-2026-46702 is classified under CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.).
How can I check crates.io dependencies for CVE-2026-46702?
Run the dependency tree command: 'inspect dependencies for russh'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-wwx6-x28x-8259",
  "modified" : "2026-06-11T14:06:26Z",
  "published" : "2026-05-29T19:37:14Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-46702" ],
  "summary" : "russh: Post-decompression SSH packet size was not bounded, allowing remote oversized compressed packets",
  "details" : "### Summary\n\nWhen SSH compression is enabled, `russh` accepted compressed packets whose on-wire size passed the normal transport packet-length checks but whose decompressed size was much larger. This allowed a remote peer to send oversized post-decompression packets that should have been rejected.\n\nIn current releases, this is a remote denial-of-service / resource-exhaustion issue in the post-decompression receive path.\n\nIn older releases before `0.58.0`, the same remote decompression path used `CryptoVec`, which appears to make the historical impact worse.\n\n### Details\n\nThe normal SSH transport read path enforces a packet-length limit before the packet body is read:\n\n- `russh/src/cipher/mod.rs`\n\nHowever, RFC 4253 compression is applied to the SSH `payload` field only. The `packet_length` field and MAC are computed over the compressed payload, so a packet that is reasonably sized on the wire can still expand to a much larger message body after decompression.\n\nIn `russh`, compressed packet bodies are later decompressed in:\n\n- `russh/src/compression.rs`\n- `russh/src/client/mod.rs`\n- `russh/src/server/session.rs`\n\nBefore the fix, `Decompress::decompress()` grew its output buffer by repeated doubling and did not enforce a separate post-decompression ceiling. That meant a peer could send a small compressed packet that passed the normal on-wire transport length checks and then inflate it into a much larger packet after decompression.\n\nIt was verified that an attacker-crafted compressed payload can stay below the normal `256 KiB` implementation transport packet cap while still inflating above the intended post-decompression bound. In other words, this is not only a \"large on-wire packet\" issue.\n\nVersion detail:\n\n- The underlying post-decompression bounds bug appears to affect `russh` as far back as `0.34.0`.\n- In historical releases `>= 0.34.0, < 0.58.0`, the remote decompression path still used `CryptoVec`. Remote compressed SSH traffic could drive that path, and under constrained memory that historical code path could abort the process.\n- In current-style releases `>= 0.58.0`, non-secret packet/decompression buffers were moved off `CryptoVec` and onto `Vec<u8>`, but the post-decompression size still remained unbounded. So the bug class remained reachable remotely, but the maintained-line impact is a current remote DoS / oversized-packet-acceptance issue rather than the older `CryptoVec`-based abort story.\n- The maintained-line fix was verified against `0.60.2`.\n\nCompression is not selected in a default-vs-default `russh` session because the default preference order puts `none` first. However, the default server configuration still advertises `zlib` and `zlib@openssh.com`, and server-side negotiation follows the client's preference order for common algorithms. A client that prefers compression can therefore negotiate it with a default `russh` server.\n\nOpenSSH portable was checked at `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable` commit `45b30e0a5`. OpenSSH enforces a `256 KiB` transport packet cap before decompression, but it does not reuse that cap after decompression. Instead, decompression writes to an `sshbuf`, which is indirectly bounded by OpenSSH's `SSHBUF_SIZE_MAX` hard maximum of `0x8000000` bytes (`128 MiB`).\n\nThe patch direction should follow that model: add an explicit post-decompression ceiling of `128 MiB`, rather than assuming the compressed transport packet cap also bounds decompressed payload size.\n\nRelevant OpenSSH reference points:\n\n- `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable/packet.c`: `PACKET_MAX_SIZE (256 * 1024)`\n- `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable/packet.c`: `uncompress_buffer()` inflates into `compression_buffer`\n- `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable/sshbuf.h`: `SSHBUF_SIZE_MAX 0x8000000`\n\n### RFC / OpenSSH Comparison\n\nRFC 4253 section 6 defines the binary packet format:\n\n- `packet_length`\n- `padding_length`\n- `payload`\n- random padding\n- MAC\n\nRFC 4253 section 6.2 says that, when compression is negotiated, the `payload` field is compressed, and that `packet_length` and MAC are computed from the compressed payload. The RFC also says implementations should check that packet length is reasonable to avoid denial-of-service and buffer-overflow attacks.\n\nThat means the pre-decompression transport packet length check is necessary but not sufficient. A correct implementation still needs a reasonable bound on the decompressed payload that becomes parser input.\n\nOpenSSH provides such a bound indirectly through `sshbuf`'s hard maximum. The `russh` fix should make the corresponding post-decompression bound explicit.\n\n### PoC\n\nThere were two kinds of proof:\n\n- a wire-cap sanity test showing an attacker-crafted best-compressed `DEBUG` payload can stay below the normal SSH transport packet cap while still inflating beyond the intended post-decompression bound\n- direct client and server receive-path tests that exercise the oversized post-decompression behavior itself\n\nThe current in-tree regression tests are:\n\n- `tests::compress::oversized_debug_payload_can_stay_below_wire_cap`\n- `compression::tests::oversized_decompressed_packet_is_rejected`\n- `client::tests::compressed_debug_is_ignored_after_client_parses_it`\n- `client::tests::oversized_compressed_debug_is_rejected_before_client_ignores_it`\n- `server::session::tests::compressed_debug_is_ignored_after_server_parses_it`\n- `server::session::tests::oversized_compressed_debug_is_rejected_before_server_ignores_it`\n\nThe important behavior is:\n\n1. An attacker-crafted best-compressed `DEBUG` payload can stay below the normal `256 KiB` transport packet cap while still inflating beyond `128 MiB`.\n2. In the direct client and server receive paths, small compressed `DEBUG` packets are still ignored normally after parsing.\n3. In the direct client and server receive paths, oversized compressed `DEBUG` packets are rejected before the implementation reaches the normal \"ignore DEBUG\" behavior.\n\nThe strongest PoC for severity is the unauthenticated server-side case. A malicious client can choose `zlib` in the initial key exchange, because the default server advertises it and server-side negotiation follows the client's preference order for common algorithms. After `NEWKEYS`, but before authentication, the client can send a transport-layer `SSH_MSG_DEBUG` packet whose compressed body is below the transport packet cap but whose decompressed body exceeds the post-decompression cap.\n\nThat demonstrates the `AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N` case directly: the attacker is a remote SSH client and does not need a successfully authenticated session.\n\n```rust\nfn compressed_debug_payload(payload_len: usize) -> Vec<u8> {\n    let mut payload = vec![b'A'; payload_len];\n    payload[0] = crate::msg::DEBUG;\n\n    let mut encoder =\n        flate2::write::ZlibEncoder::new(Vec::new(), flate2::Compression::best());\n    encoder.write_all(&payload).unwrap();\n    let compressed = encoder.finish().unwrap();\n\n    assert!(\n        compressed.len() < 256 * 1024,\n        \"oversized post-decompression payload still fits under the wire cap\"\n    );\n    compressed\n}\n\nfn incoming_packet(compressed: Vec<u8>) -> SSHBuffer {\n    let mut buffer = SSHBuffer::new();\n    // maybe_decompress() receives the clear SSHBuffer after packet framing,\n    // and decompresses bytes after packet_length + padding_length.\n    buffer.buffer.extend_from_slice(&[0; 5]);\n    buffer.buffer.extend_from_slice(&compressed);\n    buffer\n}\n\n#[test]\nfn unauthenticated_client_zlib_debug_is_rejected_by_server_before_auth() {\n    let mut server = preauth_server_session_after_newkeys_with_zlib_decompressor();\n    let oversized = MAXIMUM_DECOMPRESSED_PACKET_LEN + 1024;\n    let buffer = incoming_packet(compressed_debug_payload(oversized));\n\n    let err = server.maybe_decompress(&buffer).unwrap_err();\n    assert!(\n        matches!(err, crate::Error::PacketSize(len) if len > MAXIMUM_DECOMPRESSED_PACKET_LEN)\n    );\n}\n```\n\nThe equivalent wire-level attack shape is:\n\n```text\n1. Connect to a russh server using the default compression advertisement.\n2. Send SSH_MSG_KEXINIT with compression client-to-server preference:\n   zlib,zlib@openssh.com,none\n3. Complete key exchange and send SSH_MSG_NEWKEYS.\n4. Before any SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST, send a compressed SSH_MSG_DEBUG packet:\n   - compressed packet body: < 256 KiB\n   - decompressed packet body: > 128 MiB\n5. Vulnerable behavior: russh accepts and inflates the packet, then reaches the\n   normal DEBUG ignore path.\n6. Fixed behavior: russh rejects during decompression with Error::PacketSize.\n```\n\nThe direct receive-path client/server regression tests are still useful because they isolate the bug precisely. They construct the post-decryption compressed packet body passed to `maybe_decompress()` and prove that the oversized packet is rejected before normal `DEBUG` ignore handling. The server-side pre-auth variant above is the one that justifies the highest CVSS framing for this bug.\n\nThe most important targeted checks are:\n\n```bash\ncargo test -p russh oversized_debug_payload_can_stay_below_wire_cap -- --nocapture\ncargo test -p russh oversized_compressed_debug_is_rejected_before_client_ignores_it -- --nocapture\ncargo test -p russh oversized_compressed_debug_is_rejected_before_server_ignores_it -- --nocapture\n```\n\nBefore the fix, both the direct client and direct server receive-path oversized checks went red because the compressed payload was accepted and decompressed instead of being rejected at the post-decompression boundary. After the fix, they pass.\n\n### Impact\n\nSuggested CVSS v3.1 for current maintained releases:\n\n- `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H`\n- Score: `7.5`\n\nReasoning:\n\n- `AV:N`: reachable by a remote SSH peer\n- `AC:L`: straightforward once compression is enabled\n- `PR:N`, `UI:N`: no prior auth or user interaction required\n- `C:N`, `I:N`: confidentiality or integrity impact was not demonstrated\n- `A:H`: remote peer can cause oversized post-decompression packet processing and disconnect / denial of service\n\nAffected versions:\n\n- historical stronger case: `russh >= 0.34.0, < 0.58.0`\n- current maintained remote DoS case: `russh >= 0.58.0`, including `0.60.3`\n\n### Fix / Patch Direction\n\nAdd an explicit maximum decompressed SSH packet size and enforce it inside `Decompress::decompress()` before returning decompressed bytes to the client or server packet parser.\n\nThe intended ceiling is `128 MiB`, matching OpenSSH portable's effective `sshbuf` hard maximum for post-decompression packet storage. The fix should reject decompression output larger than that bound with a packet-size error before normal message dispatch.\n\nThe fix should preserve normal compressed packet behavior below the cap, including `DEBUG` packets that are decompressed and then ignored through the existing normal path.\n\nPatch branch:\n\n```text\nfix/zlib-decompression-cap\n```",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "crates.io",
      "name" : "russh"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0.34.0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "0.61.1"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Eugeny/russh/security/advisories/GHSA-wwx6-x28x-8259"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46702"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Eugeny/russh"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-770" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-29T19:37:14Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-06-10T22:17:00Z"
  }
}