CVE-2026-46290: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-qr7g-p698-q8wm
CVSS 5.5
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-46290 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.5) security vulnerability vulnerability (General Security Weakness) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2026-46290 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-46290
GHSA Identifier GHSA-qr7g-p698-q8wm
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 5.5
CWE Classification General Security Weakness
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 5.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Local (AV:L)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-46290

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-46290, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under General Security Weakness. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/efi: Fix graceful fault handling after FPU softirq changes Since commit d02198550423 ("x86/fpu: Improve crypto performance by making kernel-mode FPU reliably usable in softirqs"), kernel_fpu_begin() calls fpregs_lock() which uses local_bh_disable() instead of the previous preempt_disable(). This sets SOFTIRQ_OFFSET in preempt_count during the entire EFI runtime service call, causing in_interrupt() to return true in normal task context. The graceful page fault handler efi_crash_gracefully_on_page_fault() uses in_interrupt() to bail out for faults in real interrupt context. With SOFTIRQ_OFFSET now set, the handler always bails out, leaving EFI firmware page faults unhandled. This escalates to die() which also sees in_interrupt() as true and calls panic("Fatal exception in interrupt"), resulting in a hard system freeze. On systems with buggy firmware that triggers page faults during EFI runtime calls (e.g., accessing unmapped memory in GetTime()), this causes an unrecoverable hang instead of the expected graceful EFI_ABORTED recovery. Fix by replacing in_interrupt() with !in_task(). This preserves the original intent of bailing for interrupts or NMI faults, while no longer falsely triggering from the FPU code path's local_bh_disable(). [ardb: Sashiko spotted that using 'in_hardirq() || in_nmi()' leaves a window where a softirq may be taken before fpregs_lock() is called, but after efi_rts_work.efi_rts_id has been assigned, and any page faults occurring in that window will then be misidentified as having been caused by the firmware. Instead, use !in_task(), which incorporates in_serving_softirq(). ]

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-46290?
CVE-2026-46290 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under General Security Weakness.
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2026-46290?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46290?
CVE-2026-46290 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-46290?
CVE-2026-46290 is classified under General Security Weakness.
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-46290?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-qr7g-p698-q8wm",
  "modified" : "2026-07-08T21:30:21Z",
  "published" : "2026-06-08T18:31:52Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-46290" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/efi: Fix graceful fault handling after FPU softirq changes\n\nSince commit d02198550423 (\"x86/fpu: Improve crypto performance by\nmaking kernel-mode FPU reliably usable in softirqs\"), kernel_fpu_begin()\ncalls fpregs_lock() which uses local_bh_disable() instead of the\nprevious preempt_disable(). This sets SOFTIRQ_OFFSET in preempt_count\nduring the entire EFI runtime service call, causing in_interrupt() to\nreturn true in normal task context.\n\nThe graceful page fault handler efi_crash_gracefully_on_page_fault()\nuses in_interrupt() to bail out for faults in real interrupt context.\nWith SOFTIRQ_OFFSET now set, the handler always bails out, leaving EFI\nfirmware page faults unhandled. This escalates to die() which also sees\nin_interrupt() as true and calls panic(\"Fatal exception in interrupt\"),\nresulting in a hard system freeze. On systems with buggy firmware that\ntriggers page faults during EFI runtime calls (e.g., accessing unmapped\nmemory in GetTime()), this causes an unrecoverable hang instead of the\nexpected graceful EFI_ABORTED recovery.\n\nFix by replacing in_interrupt() with !in_task(). This preserves the\noriginal intent of bailing for interrupts or NMI faults, while no longer\nfalsely triggering from the FPU code path's local_bh_disable().\n\n[ardb: Sashiko spotted that using 'in_hardirq() || in_nmi()' leaves a\n       window where a softirq may be taken before fpregs_lock() is\n       called, but after efi_rts_work.efi_rts_id has been assigned,\n       and any page faults occurring in that window will then be\n       misidentified as having been caused by the firmware. Instead,\n       use !in_task(), which incorporates in_serving_softirq(). ]",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46290"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/088f65e206087bf903743bd18417261d7a4c9644"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22b365ba1af3d8c6036b8e5112fffe80998b85a0"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db155b86d1523e85941f61efd7d7ffb594cc9a29"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-06-08T17:16:47Z"
  }
}