CVE-2026-33682: Streamlit Unauthenticated SSRF Vulnerability Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-7p48-42j8-8846
CVSS 4.7
CWE-918
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-33682 is a MODERATE (CVSS 4.7) unauthenticated ssrf vulnerability vulnerability (CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)) affecting Streamlit libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves unauthenticated ssrf vulnerability in streamlit on windows (ntlm credential exposure). Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.54.0.

CVE-2026-33682 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-33682
GHSA Identifier GHSA-7p48-42j8-8846
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 4.7
CWE Classification CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Affected Product Streamlit
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 4.7

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).

Attack Vector Adjacent (AV:A)
Attack Complexity High (AC:H)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Changed (S:C)
Confidentiality Low (C:L)
Integrity Low (I:L)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-33682

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Streamlit dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Streamlit fixed: 1.54.0
pip install Streamlit>=1.54.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show Streamlit

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-33682, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show Streamlit

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Streamlit in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.54.0), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show Streamlit command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the web server receives a url or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this url, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. In Streamlit, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

# Streamlit Open Source Security Advisory ## 1. Impacted Products Streamlit Open Source versions prior to 1.54.0 running on Windows hosts. ## 2. Introduction Snowflake Streamlit Open Source addressed a security vulnerability affecting Windows deployments related to improper handling and validation of filesystem paths within component request handling. The vulnerability was reported through the responsible disclosure program and has been remediated in Streamlit Open Source version 1.54.0. This issue affects only Streamlit deployments running on Windows operating systems. ## 3. Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and NTLM Credential Exposure ### 3.1 Description Streamlit was informed by a security researcher of an unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The vulnerability arises from improper validation of attacker-supplied filesystem paths. In certain code paths, including within the `ComponentRequestHandler`, filesystem paths are resolved using `os.path.realpath()` or `Path.resolve()` before sufficient validation occurs. On Windows systems, supplying a malicious UNC path (e.g., `\\attacker-controlled-host\share`) can cause the Streamlit server to initiate outbound SMB connections over port 445. When Windows attempts to authenticate to the remote SMB server, NTLMv2 challenge-response credentials of the Windows user running the Streamlit process may be transmitted. This behavior may allow an attacker to: - Perform NTLM relay attacks against other internal services - Identify internally reachable SMB hosts via timing analysis > **Note:** The issue is unauthenticated and does not require user interaction. Captured NTLMv2 challenge-response hashes could be subjected to offline brute-force attacks in an attempt to recover the associated plaintext account password. While NTLMv2 incorporates a server challenge (nonce) that mitigates the use of precomputed rainbow tables, it does not prevent targeted offline password cracking against weak credentials. Additionally, Microsoft has publicly discouraged the continued use of NTLM in favor of Kerberos and is actively progressing toward disabling NTLM by default in future Windows releases. Organizations that enforce NTLM restrictions, disable outbound NTLM authentication, require SMB signing, or block NTLM authentication to remote servers can reduce or eliminate the risk associated with credential relay or hash exposure scenarios. As NTLM is considered legacy and increasingly deprecated (though not fully sunset), environments that have already implemented Microsoft-recommended NTLM hardening controls are less likely to be materially impacted. The overall risk therefore depends on the organization's authentication configuration and network security posture. ### 3.2 Scenarios and Attack Vectors Streamlit applications running on Windows were vulnerable if component endpoints were exposed to untrusted networks. By appending an attacker-controlled SMB hostname to the URI path and issuing a GET request, the Streamlit server could be coerced into initiating an outbound SMB authentication attempt. This could result in the leakage of NTLMv2 credential hashes for the Windows account running the Streamlit process. ### 3.3 Resolution - The vulnerability has been fixed in Streamlit Open Source version 1.54.0. - It is recommended that all Streamlit deployments on Windows be upgraded immediately to version 1.54.0 or later. ## 4. Contact Please contact [security@snowflake.com](mailto:security@snowflake.com) for any questions regarding this advisory. If a security vulnerability is discovered in a Streamlit product or website, it should be reported through the responsible disclosure program. For more information, see the [Vulnerability Disclosure Policy](https://hackerone.com/snowflake).

CVE-2026-33682 Affected Streamlit Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
1.54.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
Streamlit
PyPI
< 1.54.0
1.54.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-33682?
CVE-2026-33682 is a security vulnerability in Streamlit involving Unauthenticated SSRF Vulnerability in Streamlit on Windows (NTLM Credential Exposure) under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
Which Streamlit versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 1.54.0 across affected packages: Streamlit.
What version fixes CVE-2026-33682?
Upgrading to 1.54.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is Streamlit affected?
Yes, Streamlit is affected in releases prior to 1.54.0. Upgrade your dependency to 1.54.0 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-33682?
CVE-2026-33682 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 4.7 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-33682?
CVE-2026-33682 is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-33682?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show Streamlit'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-7p48-42j8-8846",
  "modified" : "2026-03-27T21:36:34Z",
  "published" : "2026-03-25T21:20:52Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-33682" ],
  "summary" : "Unauthenticated SSRF Vulnerability in Streamlit on Windows (NTLM Credential Exposure)",
  "details" : "# Streamlit Open Source Security Advisory\n\n## 1. Impacted Products\n\nStreamlit Open Source versions prior to 1.54.0 running on Windows hosts.\n\n## 2. Introduction\n\nSnowflake Streamlit Open Source addressed a security vulnerability affecting Windows deployments related to improper handling and validation of filesystem paths within component request handling. The vulnerability was reported through the responsible disclosure program and has been remediated in Streamlit Open Source version 1.54.0. This issue affects only Streamlit deployments running on Windows operating systems.\n\n## 3. Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and NTLM Credential Exposure\n\n### 3.1 Description\n\nStreamlit was informed by a security researcher of an unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The vulnerability arises from improper validation of attacker-supplied filesystem paths. In certain code paths, including within the `ComponentRequestHandler`, filesystem paths are resolved using `os.path.realpath()` or `Path.resolve()` before sufficient validation occurs.\n\nOn Windows systems, supplying a malicious UNC path (e.g., `\\\\attacker-controlled-host\\share`) can cause the Streamlit server to initiate outbound SMB connections over port 445. When Windows attempts to authenticate to the remote SMB server, NTLMv2 challenge-response credentials of the Windows user running the Streamlit process may be transmitted.\n\nThis behavior may allow an attacker to:\n\n- Perform NTLM relay attacks against other internal services\n- Identify internally reachable SMB hosts via timing analysis\n\n> **Note:** The issue is unauthenticated and does not require user interaction.\n\nCaptured NTLMv2 challenge-response hashes could be subjected to offline brute-force attacks in an attempt to recover the associated plaintext account password. While NTLMv2 incorporates a server challenge (nonce) that mitigates the use of precomputed rainbow tables, it does not prevent targeted offline password cracking against weak credentials.\n\nAdditionally, Microsoft has publicly discouraged the continued use of NTLM in favor of Kerberos and is actively progressing toward disabling NTLM by default in future Windows releases. Organizations that enforce NTLM restrictions, disable outbound NTLM authentication, require SMB signing, or block NTLM authentication to remote servers can reduce or eliminate the risk associated with credential relay or hash exposure scenarios.\n\nAs NTLM is considered legacy and increasingly deprecated (though not fully sunset), environments that have already implemented Microsoft-recommended NTLM hardening controls are less likely to be materially impacted. The overall risk therefore depends on the organization's authentication configuration and network security posture.\n\n### 3.2 Scenarios and Attack Vectors\n\nStreamlit applications running on Windows were vulnerable if component endpoints were exposed to untrusted networks. By appending an attacker-controlled SMB hostname to the URI path and issuing a GET request, the Streamlit server could be coerced into initiating an outbound SMB authentication attempt.\n\nThis could result in the leakage of NTLMv2 credential hashes for the Windows account running the Streamlit process.\n\n### 3.3 Resolution\n\n- The vulnerability has been fixed in Streamlit Open Source version 1.54.0.\n- It is recommended that all Streamlit deployments on Windows be upgraded immediately to version 1.54.0 or later.\n\n## 4. Contact\n\nPlease contact [security@snowflake.com](mailto:security@snowflake.com) for any questions regarding this advisory.\n\nIf a security vulnerability is discovered in a Streamlit product or website, it should be reported through the responsible disclosure program. For more information, see the [Vulnerability Disclosure Policy](https://hackerone.com/snowflake).",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "Streamlit"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "1.54.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit/security/advisories/GHSA-7p48-42j8-8846"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33682"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit/commit/23692ca70b2f2ac720c72d1feb4f190c9d6eed76"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit/releases/tag/1.54.0"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-918" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-03-25T21:20:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-03-26T22:16:30Z"
  }
}