CVE-2026-29777: Traefik Kubernetes Gateway Rule Injection Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-8q2w-wr49-whqj
CWE-74
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-29777 is a MODERATE kubernetes gateway rule injection vulnerability (CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')) affecting Traefik libraries in the Go ecosystem. The issue involves kubernetes gateway rule injection via unescaped backticks in httproute match values. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.6.10.

CVE-2026-29777 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-29777
GHSA Identifier GHSA-8q2w-wr49-whqj
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score N/A
CWE Classification CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
Affected Product Traefik
Package Ecosystem Go
Published Date
Last Updated

How to Fix CVE-2026-29777

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Traefik dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 fixed: 3.6.10
Upgrade github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 to 3.6.10
github.com/traefik/traefik fixed: Latest secure release
Upgrade github.com/traefik/traefik to Latest secure release
github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 fixed: Latest secure release
Upgrade github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 to Latest secure release
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

inspect dependencies for github.com/traefik/traefik/v3

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-29777, inspect your project dependencies for Traefik:

inspect dependencies for github.com/traefik/traefik/v3

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Traefik in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.6.10), your application is affected.

Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & RFC 5280 Specification

Under RFC 5280 specifications for X.509 certificates, the Name Constraints extension defines a namespace within which all subsequent subject names in a certification path must be located. Constraints apply to various name forms including directory names, IP addresses, rfc822Name (email addresses), and uniformResourceIdentifier (URI) entries. Specifically, during certificate path validation, affected versions of Traefik failed to properly normalize or enforce boundary checks when domain names contained trailing dot (.) characters. Because domain names with a trailing dot signify fully qualified domain names (FQDNs), this omission allowed non-conforming certificates to be improperly validated as compliant with the defined name constraints.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik's Kubernetes Gateway provider related to rule injection. A tenant with write access to an HTTPRoute resource can inject backtick-delimited rule tokens into Traefik's router rule language via unsanitized header or query parameter match values. In shared gateway deployments, this can bypass listener hostname constraints and redirect traffic for victim hostnames to attacker-controlled backends. ## Patches - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.10 ## For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please [open an issue](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues). <details> <summary>Original Description</summary> hey Traefik, repo: https://github.com/traefik/traefik commit: a4a91344edcdd6276c1b766ca19ee3f0e346480f (as-of 2026-03-02) traefik's kubernetes gateway provider builds router rules by interpolating HTTPRoute match values into the traefik rule language using backtick-delimited string literals (e.g., `Header(`name`,`value`)`, `Query(`name`,`value`)`) without escaping or validation. because backtick is a delimiter in the rule language, a tenant-controlled backtick can terminate the literal and inject additional rule tokens (for example `) || HostRegexp(`.\*`) || ...`). this changes the parsed ast so that an injected OR branch is not gated by the intended `Host(...)` constraint due to operator precedence, and can result in end-to-end routing hijack (victim host routed to attacker backends). in shared gateway deployments that rely on gateway API listener hostname constraints to isolate tenants, this can enable cross-tenant routing hijack to attacker-controlled backends. ## expected vs actual expected: provider-generated rules must be injection-safe; tenant-controlled match values must not be able to change the rule parse tree beyond literal argument content, especially across listener hostname-constraint boundaries in shared gateway deployments. actual: a backtick inside a header/query match value can inject an OR branch into the generated rule, changing the ast root from `and` to `or` and enabling hostname-constraint bypass. ## severity HIGH (impact ceiling may reach the top severity tier in shared gateway threat models; end-to-end kubernetes reproduction is recommended to demonstrate cross-tenant routing impact). CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N = 8.7 cwe: CWE-74 (improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component) ## affected versions - confirmed vulnerable at: a4a91344edcdd6276c1b766ca19ee3f0e346480f (pinned commit) - release matrix: not yet confirmed (needs version mapping for gateway api provider in v3) ## affected code - `pkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/httproute.go`: `buildHeaderRules` and `buildQueryParamRules` build `Header(`%s`,`%s`)` / `Query(`%s`,`%s`)` without escaping - `pkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/grpcroute.go`: `buildGRPCHeaderRules` builds `Header(`%s`,`%s`)` / `HeaderRegexp(`%s`,`%s`)` without escaping - `pkg/provider/kubernetes/knative/kubernetes.go`: `buildRule` builds `Header(`%s`,`%s`)` without escaping - the generated rule string is parsed by `pkg/muxer/http/parser.go` (predicate-based rule parser) - github permalinks (pinned): - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/blob/a4a91344edcdd6276c1b766ca19ee3f0e346480f/pkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/httproute.go#L742 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/blob/a4a91344edcdd6276c1b766ca19ee3f0e346480f/pkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/httproute.go#L761 ## root cause the kubernetes gateway provider formats rule strings using backticks as string delimiters: ```go rules = append(rules, fmt.Sprintf("Header(`%s`,`%s`)", header.Name, header.Value)) rules = append(rules, fmt.Sprintf("Query(`%s`,`%s`)", qp.Name, qp.Value)) ``` if `header.Value` (or `qp.Value`) contains a backtick and operator tokens, it can terminate the literal and inject additional rule-language tokens, changing the parse tree. ## attacker control attacker-controlled input is the kubernetes control plane object `HTTPRoute` in a tenant namespace. the attacker controls: 1. `HTTPRoute.Spec.Rules[].Matches[].Headers[].Value` and/or `QueryParams[].Value` (string) 2. the payload content, including backticks and rule tokens ## impact in shared gateway setups, this can bypass gateway API listener hostname constraints, causing requests for victim hostnames to be routed to attacker backends. downstream effects can include credential/token capture and request forgery, depending on the workload behind the gateway. traefik's documentation frames gateway API as providing safer multi-tenant primitives via listener constraints (see https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/security/multi-tenant-kubernetes/). rule injection breaks those constraints when they are relied upon as a boundary. ## reproduction (attachment: poc.zip) attachment includes `poc.zip` with an integration PoC that: - shows canonical behavior where injection changes the parsed ast root to `or` and routes `victim.com` to the attacker handler (emits `[PROOF_MARKER]`) - shows a negative control using injection-safe quoting (`%q`) where the ast root remains `and` and routes `victim.com` to the victim handler (emits `[NC_MARKER]`) run canonical: ```bash unzip poc.zip -d poc cd poc make canonical ``` canonical output excerpt: ``` [CALLSITE_HIT] [PROOF_MARKER] ``` run control: ```bash unzip poc.zip -d poc cd poc make control ``` control output excerpt: ``` [NC_MARKER] ``` ## recommended fix encode rule arguments using injection-safe quoting (for example `fmt.Sprintf("Header(%q,%q)", name, value)`), or otherwise reject/escape backticks and other rule-language metacharacters before interpolation. add regression tests that include backticks and operator tokens inside header/query match values and assert they cannot change the parse tree. **fix accepted when:** tenant-controlled HTTPRoute match values cannot inject operators into the generated rule string and cannot change the resulting parsed ast structure. [[poc.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698814/poc.zip)](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698814/poc.zip) [[PR_DESCRIPTION.md](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698815/PR_DESCRIPTION.md)](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698815/PR_DESCRIPTION.md) [[attack_scenario.md](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698816/attack_scenario.md)](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698816/attack_scenario.md) cheers, Oleh Konko </details>

CVE-2026-29777 Affected Traefik Versions

3 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
3.6.10
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
github.com/traefik/traefik/v3
Go
< 3.6.10
3.6.10
github.com/traefik/traefik
Go
≤ 1.7.34
github.com/traefik/traefik/v2
Go
≤ 2.11.40

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-29777?
CVE-2026-29777 is a security vulnerability in Traefik involving kubernetes gateway rule injection via unescaped backticks in HTTPRoute match values under CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection').
Which Traefik versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 3.6.10 across affected packages: github.com/traefik/traefik/v3, github.com/traefik/traefik, github.com/traefik/traefik/v2.
What version fixes CVE-2026-29777?
Upgrading to 3.6.10 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 affected?
Yes, github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 is affected in releases prior to 3.6.10. Upgrade your dependency to 3.6.10 or later.
Is github.com/traefik/traefik affected?
Yes, github.com/traefik/traefik is affected in releases prior to Latest secure release. Upgrade your dependency to Latest secure release or later.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-29777?
CVE-2026-29777 is classified under CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') (The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.).
How can I check Go dependencies for CVE-2026-29777?
Run the dependency tree command: 'inspect dependencies for github.com/traefik/traefik/v3'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-8q2w-wr49-whqj",
  "modified" : "2026-03-13T13:32:45Z",
  "published" : "2026-03-11T14:49:44Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-29777" ],
  "summary" : "Traefik: kubernetes gateway rule injection via unescaped backticks in HTTPRoute match values",
  "details" : "## Summary\n\nThere is a potential vulnerability in Traefik's Kubernetes Gateway provider related to rule injection.\n\nA tenant with write access to an HTTPRoute resource can inject backtick-delimited rule tokens into Traefik's router rule language via unsanitized header or query parameter match values. In shared gateway deployments, this can bypass listener hostname constraints and redirect traffic for victim hostnames to attacker-controlled backends.\n\n## Patches\n\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.10\n\n## For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please [open an issue](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues).\n\n<details>\n<summary>Original Description</summary>\n\nhey Traefik,\n\n\nrepo: https://github.com/traefik/traefik\ncommit: a4a91344edcdd6276c1b766ca19ee3f0e346480f (as-of 2026-03-02)\n\ntraefik's kubernetes gateway provider builds router rules by interpolating HTTPRoute match values into the traefik rule language using backtick-delimited string literals (e.g., `Header(`name`,`value`)`, `Query(`name`,`value`)`) without escaping or validation.\n\nbecause backtick is a delimiter in the rule language, a tenant-controlled backtick can terminate the literal and inject additional rule tokens (for example `) || HostRegexp(`.\\*`) || ...`). this changes the parsed ast so that an injected OR branch is not gated by the intended `Host(...)` constraint due to operator precedence, and can result in end-to-end routing hijack (victim host routed to attacker backends).\n\nin shared gateway deployments that rely on gateway API listener hostname constraints to isolate tenants, this can enable cross-tenant routing hijack to attacker-controlled backends.\n\n## expected vs actual\n\nexpected: provider-generated rules must be injection-safe; tenant-controlled match values must not be able to change the rule parse tree beyond literal argument content, especially across listener hostname-constraint boundaries in shared gateway deployments.\n\nactual: a backtick inside a header/query match value can inject an OR branch into the generated rule, changing the ast root from `and` to `or` and enabling hostname-constraint bypass.\n\n## severity\n\nHIGH (impact ceiling may reach the top severity tier in shared gateway threat models; end-to-end kubernetes reproduction is recommended to demonstrate cross-tenant routing impact).\n\nCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N = 8.7\n\ncwe: CWE-74 (improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component)\n\n## affected versions\n\n- confirmed vulnerable at: a4a91344edcdd6276c1b766ca19ee3f0e346480f (pinned commit)\n- release matrix: not yet confirmed (needs version mapping for gateway api provider in v3)\n\n## affected code\n\n- `pkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/httproute.go`: `buildHeaderRules` and `buildQueryParamRules` build `Header(`%s`,`%s`)` / `Query(`%s`,`%s`)` without escaping\n- `pkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/grpcroute.go`: `buildGRPCHeaderRules` builds `Header(`%s`,`%s`)` / `HeaderRegexp(`%s`,`%s`)` without escaping\n- `pkg/provider/kubernetes/knative/kubernetes.go`: `buildRule` builds `Header(`%s`,`%s`)` without escaping\n- the generated rule string is parsed by `pkg/muxer/http/parser.go` (predicate-based rule parser)\n- github permalinks (pinned):\n  - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/blob/a4a91344edcdd6276c1b766ca19ee3f0e346480f/pkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/httproute.go#L742\n  - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/blob/a4a91344edcdd6276c1b766ca19ee3f0e346480f/pkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/httproute.go#L761\n\n## root cause\n\nthe kubernetes gateway provider formats rule strings using backticks as string delimiters:\n\n```go\nrules = append(rules, fmt.Sprintf(\"Header(`%s`,`%s`)\", header.Name, header.Value))\nrules = append(rules, fmt.Sprintf(\"Query(`%s`,`%s`)\", qp.Name, qp.Value))\n```\n\nif `header.Value` (or `qp.Value`) contains a backtick and operator tokens, it can terminate the literal and inject additional rule-language tokens, changing the parse tree.\n\n## attacker control\n\nattacker-controlled input is the kubernetes control plane object `HTTPRoute` in a tenant namespace. the attacker controls:\n\n1. `HTTPRoute.Spec.Rules[].Matches[].Headers[].Value` and/or `QueryParams[].Value` (string)\n2. the payload content, including backticks and rule tokens\n\n## impact\n\nin shared gateway setups, this can bypass gateway API listener hostname constraints, causing requests for victim hostnames to be routed to attacker backends. downstream effects can include credential/token capture and request forgery, depending on the workload behind the gateway.\n\ntraefik's documentation frames gateway API as providing safer multi-tenant primitives via listener constraints (see https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/security/multi-tenant-kubernetes/). rule injection breaks those constraints when they are relied upon as a boundary.\n\n## reproduction (attachment: poc.zip)\n\nattachment includes `poc.zip` with an integration PoC that:\n\n- shows canonical behavior where injection changes the parsed ast root to `or` and routes `victim.com` to the attacker handler (emits `[PROOF_MARKER]`)\n- shows a negative control using injection-safe quoting (`%q`) where the ast root remains `and` and routes `victim.com` to the victim handler (emits `[NC_MARKER]`)\n\nrun canonical:\n\n```bash\nunzip poc.zip -d poc\ncd poc\nmake canonical\n```\n\ncanonical output excerpt:\n\n```\n[CALLSITE_HIT]\n[PROOF_MARKER]\n```\n\nrun control:\n\n```bash\nunzip poc.zip -d poc\ncd poc\nmake control\n```\n\ncontrol output excerpt:\n\n```\n[NC_MARKER]\n```\n\n## recommended fix\n\nencode rule arguments using injection-safe quoting (for example `fmt.Sprintf(\"Header(%q,%q)\", name, value)`), or otherwise reject/escape backticks and other rule-language metacharacters before interpolation. add regression tests that include backticks and operator tokens inside header/query match values and assert they cannot change the parse tree.\n\n**fix accepted when:** tenant-controlled HTTPRoute match values cannot inject operators into the generated rule string and cannot change the resulting parsed ast structure.\n\n\n[[poc.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698814/poc.zip)](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698814/poc.zip)\n[[PR_DESCRIPTION.md](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698815/PR_DESCRIPTION.md)](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698815/PR_DESCRIPTION.md)\n[[attack_scenario.md](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698816/attack_scenario.md)](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698816/attack_scenario.md)\n\n\ncheers,\nOleh Konko\n\n</details>",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V4",
    "score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "Go",
      "name" : "github.com/traefik/traefik/v3"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "3.6.10"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 3.6.9"
    }
  }, {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "Go",
      "name" : "github.com/traefik/traefik"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "last_affected" : "1.7.34"
      } ]
    } ]
  }, {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "Go",
      "name" : "github.com/traefik/traefik/v2"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "last_affected" : "2.11.40"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-8q2w-wr49-whqj"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29777"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/traefik/traefik"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.10"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-74" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-03-11T14:49:44Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-03-11T16:16:40Z"
  }
}