CVE-2026-28791: Tina Path Traversal Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-28791 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.4) path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')) affecting Tina libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves path traversal in media upload handle. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 2.1.7.
CVE-2026-28791 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.4
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-28791
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Tina dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install tinacms@2.1.7
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls tinacms
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-28791, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls tinacms
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Tina in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 2.1.7), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls tinacms command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), where the product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. In Tina, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-28791 Affected Tina Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
tinacms
|
npm |
< 2.1.7
|
2.1.7
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-28791?
Which Tina versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-28791?
Is tinacms affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-28791?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-28791?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-28791?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-5hxf-c7j4-279c",
"modified" : "2026-03-12T18:32:38Z",
"published" : "2026-03-12T18:32:38Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-28791" ],
"summary" : "Tina: Path Traversal in Media Upload Handle",
"details" : "## Affected Package\n\n| Field | Value |\n|-------|-------|\n| **Package** | `@tinacms/cli` |\n| **Version** | `2.0.5` (latest at time of discovery) |\n| **Vulnerable File** | `packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/commands/dev-command/server/media.ts` |\n| **Vulnerable Lines** | 42-43 |\n\n---\n\n## Summary\n\nA **path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22)** exists in the TinaCMS development server's media upload handler. The code at `media.ts:42-43` joins user-controlled path segments using `path.join()` without validating that the resulting path stays within the intended media directory. This allows writing files to arbitrary locations on the filesystem.\n\n**Attack Vector**: Network (HTTP POST request) \n**Impact**: Arbitrary file write, potential Remote Code Execution\n\n---\n\n## Details\n\n### Vulnerable Code Location\n\n**File**: `packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/commands/dev-command/server/media.ts` \n**Lines**: 42-43\n\n```typescript\nbb.on('file', async (_name, file, _info) => {\n const fullPath = decodeURI(req.url?.slice('/media/upload/'.length)); // Line 42\n const saveTo = path.join(mediaFolder, ...fullPath.split('/')); // Line 43\n // make sure the directory exists before writing the file\n await fs.ensureDir(path.dirname(saveTo));\n file.pipe(fs.createWriteStream(saveTo));\n});\n```\n\n### Root Cause\n\nThe `path.join()` function resolves `..` (parent directory) segments in the path. When the user-supplied path contains traversal sequences like `../../../etc/passwd`, these are resolved relative to the media folder, allowing escape to arbitrary filesystem locations.\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\nconst mediaFolder = '/app/public/uploads';\nconst maliciousInput = '../../../tmp/evil.txt';\nconst saveTo = path.join(mediaFolder, ...maliciousInput.split('/'));\n// Result: '/tmp/evil.txt' - OUTSIDE the media folder!\n```\n\n### Additional Affected Endpoints\n\nThe same vulnerability pattern exists in:\n\n1. **Delete Handler** (`handleDelete`, lines 29-33) - Arbitrary file deletion\n2. **List Handler** (`handleList`, lines 16-27) + `MediaModel.listMedia` - Directory enumeration\n3. **MediaModel.deleteMedia** (lines 201-217) - Arbitrary file deletion\n\nSimilar code also exists in the Express version at:\n- `packages/@tinacms/cli/src/server/routes/index.ts`\n- `packages/@tinacms/cli/src/server/models/media.ts`\n\n---\n\n## PoC\n\n### Quick Verification (No Server Required)\n\nThis Node.js script directly tests the vulnerable code logic:\n\n```javascript\n#!/usr/bin/env node\n/**\n * TinaCMS Path Traversal Vulnerability - Direct Code Test\n * Run: node test-vulnerability.js\n */\n\nconst path = require('path');\nconst fs = require('fs');\n\n// Simulated configuration (matches typical TinaCMS setup)\nconst rootPath = '/tmp/tinacms-test';\nconst publicFolder = 'public';\nconst mediaRoot = 'uploads';\nconst mediaFolder = path.join(rootPath, publicFolder, mediaRoot);\n\n// Setup test directories\nfs.mkdirSync(path.join(rootPath, publicFolder, mediaRoot), { recursive: true });\nfs.mkdirSync('/tmp/target-dir', { recursive: true });\n\nconsole.log(`Media folder: ${mediaFolder}`);\n\n// Simulate vulnerable code from media.ts:42-43\nfunction vulnerableUpload(reqUrl) {\n const fullPath = decodeURI(reqUrl.slice('/media/upload/'.length));\n const saveTo = path.join(mediaFolder, ...fullPath.split('/'));\n return saveTo;\n}\n\n// Test cases\nconst tests = [\n { url: '/media/upload/image.png', desc: 'Normal upload' },\n { url: '/media/upload/../../../tmp/target-dir/evil.txt', desc: 'Path traversal' },\n];\n\ntests.forEach(test => {\n const result = vulnerableUpload(test.url);\n const isVuln = !path.resolve(result).startsWith(path.resolve(mediaFolder));\n \n console.log(`\\n${test.desc}:`);\n console.log(` Input: ${test.url}`);\n console.log(` Result: ${result}`);\n console.log(` Vulnerable: ${isVuln ? 'YES ⚠️' : 'No ✓'}`);\n \n if (isVuln) {\n // Actually write the file to prove it works\n fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(result), { recursive: true });\n fs.writeFileSync(result, `PWNED at ${new Date().toISOString()}`);\n console.log(` File written: ${fs.existsSync(result)}`);\n }\n});\n\n// Cleanup\nfs.rmSync(rootPath, { recursive: true, force: true });\n```\n\n### Output\n\n```\nMedia folder: /tmp/tinacms-test/public/uploads\n\nNormal upload:\n Input: /media/upload/image.png\n Result: /tmp/tinacms-test/public/uploads/image.png\n Vulnerable: No ✓\n\nPath traversal:\n Input: /media/upload/../../../tmp/target-dir/evil.txt\n Result: /tmp/tmp/target-dir/evil.txt\n Vulnerable: YES ⚠️\n File written: true\n```\n\nThe file was successfully written to `/tmp/tmp/target-dir/evil.txt`, which is **completely outside** the intended media folder at `/tmp/tinacms-test/public/uploads`.\n\n### Important Note: HTTP Layer vs Code Vulnerability\n\nI want to be transparent about my findings:\n\n**What I observed:**\n- When testing via HTTP requests against the Vite dev server, path traversal sequences (`../`) are normalized by Node.js/Vite's HTTP layer *before* reaching the vulnerable code\n- This means direct HTTP exploitation like `curl POST /media/upload/../../../tmp/evil.txt` is mitigated in the default configuration\n\n**Why this is still a valid vulnerability that should be fixed:**\n\n1. **The code itself has no validation** - If the path reaches the handler (via any vector), it will be exploited\n2. **Defense-in-depth principle** - Security should not rely solely on HTTP normalization\n3. **Inconsistent protection** - Your GraphQL layer (`addPendingDocument`) explicitly validates paths and rejects `../` (see test at `packages/@tinacms/graphql/tests/pending-document-validation/index.test.ts:59`), but the media endpoints don't have equivalent protection\n4. **Different deployment contexts**:\n - Reverse proxies (nginx, Apache) with `proxy_pass` may preserve raw paths\n - Custom server configurations\n - Future refactoring that uses this code differently\n5. **The `parseMediaFolder` helper** (line 66-74) shows intent to restrict paths - the upload handler should have similar restrictions\n6. **Express version also affected** - `packages/@tinacms/cli/src/server/routes/index.ts` has the same pattern\n\n---\n\n### Evidence That Path Traversal Should Be Blocked\n\nYour codebase already shows that path traversal is considered a security issue:\n\n```typescript\n// From: packages/@tinacms/graphql/tests/pending-document-validation/index.test.ts:52-70\nit('handles validation error for invalid path format', async () => {\n const { query } = await setupMutation(__dirname, config);\n\n const invalidPathMutation = `\n mutation {\n addPendingDocument(\n collection: \"post\"\n relativePath: \"../invalid-path.md\" // <-- Path traversal is rejected!\n ) {\n __typename\n }\n }\n `;\n\n const result = await query({ query: invalidPathMutation, variables: {} });\n\n expect(result.errors).toBeDefined();\n expect(result.errors?.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);\n});\n```\n\nThis test explicitly verifies that `../invalid-path.md` is rejected in the GraphQL layer. The media upload endpoints should have the same protection.\n\n---\n\n## Impact\n\n### Who is Affected\n\n- Developers running TinaCMS in development mode\n- Any deployment exposing the TinaCMS dev server API\n- Particularly concerning if dev servers are exposed to networks (common for mobile testing)\n\n### Potential Attack Scenarios\n\n1. **Remote Code Execution**: Write malicious files to executable locations\n - Overwrite `~/.ssh/authorized_keys` for SSH access\n - Modify application source code\n - Create cron jobs or systemd services\n\n2. **Denial of Service**: Delete critical application or system files\n\n3. **Information Disclosure**: List directory contents outside the media folder\n\n### CVSS Score Estimate\n\n**CVSS 3.1 Base Score: 8.1 (High)**\n- Attack Vector: Network (AV:N)\n- Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L) \n- Privileges Required: None (PR:N)\n- User Interaction: None (UI:N)\n- Scope: Unchanged (S:U)\n- Confidentiality: None (C:N)\n- Integrity: High (I:H)\n- Availability: High (A:H)\n\n---\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nAdd path validation to ensure the resolved path stays within the media directory:\n\n```typescript\nimport path from 'path';\n\nconst handlePost = async function (req, res) {\n const bb = busboy({ headers: req.headers });\n\n bb.on('file', async (_name, file, _info) => {\n const fullPath = decodeURI(req.url?.slice('/media/upload/'.length));\n const saveTo = path.join(mediaFolder, ...fullPath.split('/'));\n\n // ✅ SECURITY FIX: Validate path stays within media folder\n const resolvedPath = path.resolve(saveTo);\n const resolvedMediaFolder = path.resolve(mediaFolder);\n\n if (!resolvedPath.startsWith(resolvedMediaFolder + path.sep)) {\n res.statusCode = 403;\n res.end(JSON.stringify({ error: 'Invalid file path' }));\n return;\n }\n\n await fs.ensureDir(path.dirname(saveTo));\n file.pipe(fs.createWriteStream(saveTo));\n });\n \n // ... rest of handler\n};\n```\n\nThe same fix should be applied to:\n- `handleDelete` function\n- `handleList` function \n- `MediaModel.listMedia` method\n- `MediaModel.deleteMedia` method\n- Express router in `packages/@tinacms/cli/src/server/`\n\n### Alternative: Create a Validation Helper\n\n```typescript\nfunction validateMediaPath(userPath: string, mediaFolder: string): string {\n const resolved = path.resolve(path.join(mediaFolder, ...userPath.split('/')));\n const resolvedBase = path.resolve(mediaFolder);\n \n if (!resolved.startsWith(resolvedBase + path.sep) && resolved !== resolvedBase) {\n throw new Error('Path traversal detected');\n }\n \n return resolved;\n}\n```\n\n---\n\n## References\n\n- [CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/22.html)\n- [OWASP Path Traversal](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Path_Traversal)\n- [Node.js path.join() Documentation](https://nodejs.org/api/path.html#pathjoinpaths)\n- [OWASP Testing Guide - Path Traversal](https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/latest/4-Web_Application_Security_Testing/05-Authorization_Testing/01-Testing_Directory_Traversal_File_Include)",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "tinacms"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "2.1.7"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/security/advisories/GHSA-5hxf-c7j4-279c"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28791"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-22" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-03-12T18:32:38Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-03-12T17:16:50Z"
}
}