CVE-2026-22870: Guarddog Denial of Service Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-ffj4-jq7m-9g6v
CWE-409
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-22870 is a HIGH denial of service vulnerability (CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)) affecting Guarddog libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves guarddog zip bomb vulnerability in safe_extract() allows dos. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 2.7.1.

CVE-2026-22870 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-22870
GHSA Identifier GHSA-ffj4-jq7m-9g6v
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score N/A
CWE Classification CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)
Affected Product Guarddog
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

How to Fix CVE-2026-22870

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Guarddog dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

guarddog fixed: 2.7.1
pip install guarddog>=2.7.1
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show guarddog

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-22870, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show guarddog

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Guarddog in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 2.7.1), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show guarddog command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification), where the product does not handle or incorrectly handles a compressed input with a very high compression ratio that produces a large output. In Guarddog, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary GuardDog's `safe_extract()` function does not validate decompressed file sizes when extracting ZIP archives (wheels, eggs), allowing attackers to cause denial of service through zip bombs. A malicious package can consume gigabytes of disk space from a few megabytes of compressed data. ## Vulnerability Details **Affected Component:** `guarddog/utils/archives.py` - `safe_extract()` function **Vulnerability Type:** CWE-409 - Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Zip Bomb) **Severity:** HIGH (CVSS ~8) **Attack Vector:** Network (malicious package uploaded to PyPI/npm) or local ### Root Cause The `safe_extract()` function handles TAR files securely using the `tarsafe` library, but ZIP file extraction has no size validation: ```python elif zipfile.is_zipfile(source_archive): with zipfile.ZipFile(source_archive, "r") as zip: for file in zip.namelist(): zip.extract(file, path=os.path.join(target_directory, file)) ``` **Missing protections:** - ❌ No decompressed size limit - ❌ No compression ratio validation - ❌ No file count limits - ❌ No total extracted size validation ## Impact ### Denial of Service Scenarios **1. CI/CD Pipeline Disruption** - Attacker publishes malicious package to PyPI - Developer adds package to requirements.txt - CI/CD runs GuardDog scan - Disk fills (GitHub Actions: standard 14GB limit) - All deployments blocked **2. Resource Exhaustion** - Local development environments - Security scanning infrastructure - Automated scanning systems - Docker containers with limited disk **3. Supply Chain Attack Amplification** - Single malicious package blocks security scanning - Prevents detection of other malicious packages - Forces manual intervention - Increases security team workload ## Recommended Fix Add size validation for ZIP files similar to what `tarsafe` provides for TAR files ### Configuration Options Make limits configurable via environment variables or config file ## Additional Improvements 1. **Add warning logs** when archives approach limits 2. **Provide clear error messages** for users 3. **Document limits** in user-facing documentation 4. **Add tests** for zip bomb detection 5. **Consider using a safe ZIP library** (similar to tarsafe) ## Credit Reported by: Charbel (dwbruijn)

CVE-2026-22870 Affected Guarddog Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
2.7.1
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
guarddog
PyPI
< 2.7.1
2.7.1

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-22870?
CVE-2026-22870 is a security vulnerability in Guarddog involving GuardDog Zip Bomb Vulnerability in safe_extract() Allows DoS under CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification).
Which Guarddog versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 2.7.1 across affected packages: guarddog.
What version fixes CVE-2026-22870?
Upgrading to 2.7.1 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is guarddog affected?
Yes, guarddog is affected in releases prior to 2.7.1. Upgrade your dependency to 2.7.1 or later.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-22870?
CVE-2026-22870 is classified under CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) (The product does not handle or incorrectly handles a compressed input with a very high compression ratio that produces a large output.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-22870?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show guarddog'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-ffj4-jq7m-9g6v",
  "modified" : "2026-01-13T21:54:42Z",
  "published" : "2026-01-13T21:54:41Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-22870" ],
  "summary" : "GuardDog Zip Bomb Vulnerability in safe_extract() Allows DoS",
  "details" : "## Summary\n\nGuardDog's `safe_extract()` function does not validate decompressed file sizes when extracting ZIP archives (wheels, eggs), allowing attackers to cause denial of service through zip bombs. A malicious package can consume gigabytes of disk space from a few megabytes of compressed data.\n\n## Vulnerability Details\n\n**Affected Component:** `guarddog/utils/archives.py` - `safe_extract()` function  \n**Vulnerability Type:** CWE-409 - Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Zip Bomb)  \n**Severity:** HIGH (CVSS ~8)  \n**Attack Vector:** Network (malicious package uploaded to PyPI/npm) or local\n\n### Root Cause\n\nThe `safe_extract()` function handles TAR files securely using the `tarsafe` library, but ZIP file extraction has no size validation:\n```python\nelif zipfile.is_zipfile(source_archive):\n    with zipfile.ZipFile(source_archive, \"r\") as zip:\n        for file in zip.namelist():\n            zip.extract(file, path=os.path.join(target_directory, file))\n```\n\n**Missing protections:**\n- ❌ No decompressed size limit\n- ❌ No compression ratio validation  \n- ❌ No file count limits\n- ❌ No total extracted size validation\n\n## Impact\n\n### Denial of Service Scenarios\n\n**1. CI/CD Pipeline Disruption**\n- Attacker publishes malicious package to PyPI\n- Developer adds package to requirements.txt\n- CI/CD runs GuardDog scan\n- Disk fills (GitHub Actions: standard 14GB limit)\n- All deployments blocked\n\n**2. Resource Exhaustion**\n- Local development environments\n- Security scanning infrastructure  \n- Automated scanning systems\n- Docker containers with limited disk\n\n**3. Supply Chain Attack Amplification**\n- Single malicious package blocks security scanning\n- Prevents detection of other malicious packages\n- Forces manual intervention\n- Increases security team workload\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nAdd size validation for ZIP files similar to what `tarsafe` provides for TAR files\n\n### Configuration Options\n\nMake limits configurable via environment variables or config file\n\n## Additional Improvements\n\n1. **Add warning logs** when archives approach limits\n2. **Provide clear error messages** for users\n3. **Document limits** in user-facing documentation\n4. **Add tests** for zip bomb detection\n5. **Consider using a safe ZIP library** (similar to tarsafe)\n\n## Credit\n\nReported by: Charbel (dwbruijn)",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V4",
    "score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "guarddog"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "2.7.1"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/DataDog/guarddog/security/advisories/GHSA-ffj4-jq7m-9g6v"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22870"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/DataDog/guarddog/commit/c3fb07b4838945f42497e78b7a02bcfb1e63969b"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/DataDog/guarddog"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-409" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-01-13T21:54:41Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-01-13T21:15:55Z"
  }
}