CVE-2026-14440: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-14440 is a HIGH security vulnerability vulnerability (General Security Weakness) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.
CVE-2026-14440 at a Glance
How to Fix CVE-2026-14440
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
mvn dependency:tree
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-14440, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:
mvn dependency:tree
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.
Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under General Security Weakness. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-14440?
Which Software versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-14440?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-14440?
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-14440?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-vrv9-rjp4-w93c",
"modified" : "2026-07-02T00:31:42Z",
"published" : "2026-07-02T00:31:42Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-14440" ],
"details" : "Description:\n\n\n\n\nTo issue and renew TLS certificates on behalf of customers, Cloudflare's Universal SSL feature automatically manages the CAA RRset for the customer's zone. This auto-managed RRset is permissive by design (e.g. 'issue \"letsencrypt.org\"' without parameters). On Universal SSL zones, Cloudflare's authoritative DNS serves this auto-managed RRset at query time, superseding any customer-configured CAA records on the zone. When a customer publishes a stricter CAA record using the RFC 8657 accounturi or validationmethods parameters, the Certificate Authority does not observe those parameters when evaluating the served RRset under RFC 8659. As a result, the RFC 8657 account-binding and validation-method-binding protections are not enforced end-to-end on Universal SSL zones. Successful exploitation could result in issuance of a browser-trusted TLS certificate to an attacker, enabling MITM against the affected domain.\n\n\n\n\nExploitation is non-trivial in practice: an attacker would need to hold an ACME account at one of the Certificate Authorities in the served CAA RRset and to simultaneously satisfy domain control validation across the multiple geographically distinct Network Perspectives the CA relies on for Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration. Cloudflare prefixes are anycast-announced from hundreds of locations globally, raising the bar against single-vantage-point BGP hijacks. Any resulting misissuance of a browser-trusted certificate is subject to Certificate Transparency logging required by major browsers, and would be visible to CT monitoring.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nMitigation: \n\n\n\nCustomers requiring strict RFC 8657 enforcement need to disable Universal SSL on the affected zone.\n\n\n\nUniversal SSL's automatic CAA management and customer-set RFC 8657 accounturi and validationmethods enforcement are mutually exclusive by the nature of the issue, so there is no in-product workaround that preserves both. \n\n\n\nCertificate Transparency monitoring is recommended for all customers as a general detection control.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCredits:\n\n\n\nDavid Osipov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2713-9242), independent researcher",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X"
} ],
"affected" : [ ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14440"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://developers.cloudflare.com/ssl/edge-certificates/caa-records"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://developers.cloudflare.com/ssl/edge-certificates/universal-ssl/limitations"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8657"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8659"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : false,
"github_reviewed_at" : null,
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-07-01T23:16:52Z"
}
}