CVE-2025-38525: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-6x2c-jc67-wp74
CVSS 5.5
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2025-38525 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.5) security vulnerability vulnerability (General Security Weakness) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2025-38525 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2025-38525
GHSA Identifier GHSA-6x2c-jc67-wp74
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 5.5
CWE Classification General Security Weakness
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 5.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Local (AV:L)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2025-38525

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2025-38525, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under General Security Weakness. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix irq-disabled in local_bh_enable() The rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() function calls down into the IP layer to find out the MTU size for a route. When accepting an incoming call, this is called from rxrpc_new_incoming_call() which holds interrupts disabled across the code that calls down to it. Unfortunately, the IP layer uses local_bh_enable() which, config dependent, throws a warning if IRQs are enabled: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5544 at kernel/softirq.c:387 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0 ... RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0 ... Call Trace: <TASK> rt_cache_route+0x7e/0xa0 rt_set_nexthop.isra.0+0x3b3/0x3f0 __mkroute_output+0x43a/0x460 ip_route_output_key_hash+0xf7/0x140 ip_route_output_flow+0x1b/0x90 rxrpc_assess_MTU_size.isra.0+0x2a0/0x590 rxrpc_new_incoming_peer+0x46/0x120 rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call+0x1b1/0x400 rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x1da/0x5e0 rxrpc_input_packet+0x827/0x900 rxrpc_io_thread+0x403/0xb60 kthread+0x2f7/0x310 ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ... hardirqs last enabled at (23): _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 hardirqs last disabled at (24): _raw_read_lock_irq+0x17/0x70 softirqs last enabled at (0): copy_process+0xc61/0x2730 softirqs last disabled at (25): rt_add_uncached_list+0x3c/0x90 Fix this by moving the call to rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() out of rxrpc_init_peer() and further up the stack where it can be done without interrupts disabled. It shouldn't be a problem for rxrpc_new_incoming_call() to do it after the locks are dropped as pmtud is going to be performed by the I/O thread - and we're in the I/O thread at this point.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2025-38525?
CVE-2025-38525 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under General Security Weakness.
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2025-38525?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-38525?
CVE-2025-38525 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2025-38525?
CVE-2025-38525 is classified under General Security Weakness.
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2025-38525?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-6x2c-jc67-wp74",
  "modified" : "2026-08-10T15:32:35Z",
  "published" : "2025-08-16T12:30:32Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2025-38525" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrxrpc: Fix irq-disabled in local_bh_enable()\n\nThe rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() function calls down into the IP layer to find\nout the MTU size for a route.  When accepting an incoming call, this is\ncalled from rxrpc_new_incoming_call() which holds interrupts disabled\nacross the code that calls down to it.  Unfortunately, the IP layer uses\nlocal_bh_enable() which, config dependent, throws a warning if IRQs are\nenabled:\n\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5544 at kernel/softirq.c:387 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0\n...\nRIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0\n...\nCall Trace:\n <TASK>\n rt_cache_route+0x7e/0xa0\n rt_set_nexthop.isra.0+0x3b3/0x3f0\n __mkroute_output+0x43a/0x460\n ip_route_output_key_hash+0xf7/0x140\n ip_route_output_flow+0x1b/0x90\n rxrpc_assess_MTU_size.isra.0+0x2a0/0x590\n rxrpc_new_incoming_peer+0x46/0x120\n rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call+0x1b1/0x400\n rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x1da/0x5e0\n rxrpc_input_packet+0x827/0x900\n rxrpc_io_thread+0x403/0xb60\n kthread+0x2f7/0x310\n ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n...\nhardirqs last  enabled at (23): _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50\nhardirqs last disabled at (24): _raw_read_lock_irq+0x17/0x70\nsoftirqs last  enabled at (0): copy_process+0xc61/0x2730\nsoftirqs last disabled at (25): rt_add_uncached_list+0x3c/0x90\n\nFix this by moving the call to rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() out of\nrxrpc_init_peer() and further up the stack where it can be done without\ninterrupts disabled.\n\nIt shouldn't be a problem for rxrpc_new_incoming_call() to do it after the\nlocks are dropped as pmtud is going to be performed by the I/O thread - and\nwe're in the I/O thread at this point.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38525"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2029f21f10dedb88c0f86abffcf8d6c21dcf6040"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ac0b3baa7d8f732bd9e5cbf1d8b57e4802c6b36"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d94b82d452ca27a200cd67660dc48476386651d8"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4d2878369d590bf8455e3678a644e503172eafa"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2025-08-16T12:15:27Z"
  }
}