CVE-2024-27014: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-gj8m-4ccw-v82h
CVSS 5.5
CWE-667
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2024-27014 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.5) security vulnerability vulnerability (CWE-667: Improper Locking) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. The weakness occurs when the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2024-27014 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2024-27014
GHSA Identifier GHSA-gj8m-4ccw-v82h
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 5.5
CWE Classification CWE-667: Improper Locking
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 5.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Local (AV:L)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2024-27014

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2024-27014, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-667: Improper Locking, where the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Prevent deadlock while disabling aRFS When disabling aRFS under the `priv->state_lock`, any scheduled aRFS works are canceled using the `cancel_work_sync` function, which waits for the work to end if it has already started. However, while waiting for the work handler, the handler will try to acquire the `state_lock` which is already acquired. The worker acquires the lock to delete the rules if the state is down, which is not the worker's responsibility since disabling aRFS deletes the rules. Add an aRFS state variable, which indicates whether the aRFS is enabled and prevent adding rules when the aRFS is disabled. Kernel log: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Tainted: G I ------------------------------------------------------ ethtool/386089 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810f21ce68 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x80/0xc90 arfs_handle_work+0x4b/0x3b0 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x4a0 worker_thread+0x1bf/0x3c0 kthread+0xd7/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80 lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0 __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0 arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core] ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0 ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120 genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x1a1/0x270 netlink_sendmsg+0x214/0x460 __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60 __sys_sendto+0x113/0x170 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&priv->state_lock); lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)); lock(&priv->state_lock); lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by ethtool/386089: #0: ffffffff82ea7210 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 #1: ffffffff82e94c88 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ethnl_default_set_doit+0xd3/0x240 #2: ffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core] stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 386089 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G I 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x144/0x160 __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80 lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 ? save_trace+0x3e/0x360 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 ? __lock_acquire+0xa78/0x2c80 ? lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core] ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0 ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120 genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0 ? ethn ---truncated---

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2024-27014?
CVE-2024-27014 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under CWE-667: Improper Locking.
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2024-27014?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-27014?
CVE-2024-27014 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2024-27014?
CVE-2024-27014 is classified under CWE-667: Improper Locking (The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.).
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2024-27014?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-gj8m-4ccw-v82h",
  "modified" : "2024-06-03T18:55:52Z",
  "published" : "2024-05-01T06:31:43Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2024-27014" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5e: Prevent deadlock while disabling aRFS\n\nWhen disabling aRFS under the `priv->state_lock`, any scheduled\naRFS works are canceled using the `cancel_work_sync` function,\nwhich waits for the work to end if it has already started.\nHowever, while waiting for the work handler, the handler will\ntry to acquire the `state_lock` which is already acquired.\n\nThe worker acquires the lock to delete the rules if the state\nis down, which is not the worker's responsibility since\ndisabling aRFS deletes the rules.\n\nAdd an aRFS state variable, which indicates whether the aRFS is\nenabled and prevent adding rules when the aRFS is disabled.\n\nKernel log:\n\n======================================================\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Tainted: G          I\n------------------------------------------------------\nethtool/386089 is trying to acquire lock:\nffff88810f21ce68 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n\nbut task is already holding lock:\nffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n\n-> #1 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n       __mutex_lock+0x80/0xc90\n       arfs_handle_work+0x4b/0x3b0 [mlx5_core]\n       process_one_work+0x1dc/0x4a0\n       worker_thread+0x1bf/0x3c0\n       kthread+0xd7/0x100\n       ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50\n       ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n\n-> #0 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:\n       __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80\n       lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n       __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0\n       __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0\n       arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]\n       mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n       mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n       ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0\n       ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240\n       genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120\n       genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0\n       netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100\n       genl_rcv+0x24/0x40\n       netlink_unicast+0x1a1/0x270\n       netlink_sendmsg+0x214/0x460\n       __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60\n       __sys_sendto+0x113/0x170\n       __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30\n       do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0\n       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n       CPU0                    CPU1\n       ----                    ----\n  lock(&priv->state_lock);\n                               lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work));\n                               lock(&priv->state_lock);\n  lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work));\n\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n3 locks held by ethtool/386089:\n #0: ffffffff82ea7210 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40\n #1: ffffffff82e94c88 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ethnl_default_set_doit+0xd3/0x240\n #2: ffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 15 PID: 386089 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G          I        6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n <TASK>\n dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0\n check_noncircular+0x144/0x160\n __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80\n lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n ? save_trace+0x3e/0x360\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n ? __lock_acquire+0xa78/0x2c80\n ? lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70\n __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0\n ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70\n arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0\n ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240\n genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120\n genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0\n ? ethn\n---truncated---",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27014"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0080bf99499468030248ebd25dd645e487dcecdc"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46efa4d5930cf3c2af8c01f75e0a47e4fc045e3b"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48c4bb81df19402d4346032353d0795260255e3b"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fef965764cf562f28afb997b626fc7c3cec99693"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4EZ6PJW7VOZ224TD7N4JZNU6KV32ZJ53"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DAMSOZXJEPUOXW33WZYWCVAY7Z5S7OOY"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GCBZZEC7L7KTWWAS2NLJK6SO3IZIL4WW"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-667" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2024-05-01T06:15:20Z"
  }
}