CVE-2022-49943: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-6cpq-cwgw-5g63
CVSS 5.5
CWE-667
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2022-49943 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.5) security vulnerability vulnerability (CWE-667: Improper Locking) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. The weakness occurs when the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2022-49943 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2022-49943
GHSA Identifier GHSA-6cpq-cwgw-5g63
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 5.5
CWE Classification CWE-667: Improper Locking
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 5.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Local (AV:L)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2022-49943

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2022-49943, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-667: Improper Locking, where the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: USB: gadget: Fix obscure lockdep violation for udc_mutex A recent commit expanding the scope of the udc_lock mutex in the gadget core managed to cause an obscure and slightly bizarre lockdep violation. In abbreviated form: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.19.0-rc7+ #12510 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ udevadm/312 is trying to acquire lock: ffff80000aae1058 (udc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: usb_udc_uevent+0x54/0xe0 but task is already holding lock: ffff000002277548 (kn->active#4){++++}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x34/0xe0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (kn->active#4){++++}-{0:0}:        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84        __kernfs_remove+0x268/0x380        kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x58/0xac        sysfs_remove_file_ns+0x18/0x24        device_del+0x15c/0x440 -> #2 (device_links_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84        __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430        mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64        device_link_remove+0x3c/0xa0        _regulator_put.part.0+0x168/0x190        regulator_put+0x3c/0x54        devm_regulator_release+0x14/0x20 -> #1 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84        __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430        mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64        regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x284        regulator_enable+0x34/0x80        phy_power_on+0x24/0x130        __dwc2_lowlevel_hw_enable+0x100/0x130        dwc2_lowlevel_hw_enable+0x18/0x40        dwc2_hsotg_udc_start+0x6c/0x2f0        gadget_bind_driver+0x124/0x1f4 -> #0 (udc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:        __lock_acquire+0x1298/0x20cc        lock_acquire.part.0+0xe0/0x230        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84        __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430        mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64        usb_udc_uevent+0x54/0xe0 Evidently this was caused by the scope of udc_mutex being too large. The mutex is only meant to protect udc->driver along with a few other things. As far as I can tell, there's no reason for the mutex to be held while the gadget core calls a gadget driver's ->bind or ->unbind routine, or while a UDC is being started or stopped. (This accounts for link #1 in the chain above, where the mutex is held while the dwc2_hsotg_udc is started as part of driver probing.) Gadget drivers' ->disconnect callbacks are problematic. Even though usb_gadget_disconnect() will now acquire the udc_mutex, there's a window in usb_gadget_bind_driver() between the times when the mutex is released and the ->bind callback is invoked. If a disconnect occurred during that window, we could call the driver's ->disconnect routine before its ->bind routine. To prevent this from happening, it will be necessary to prevent a UDC from connecting while it has no gadget driver. This should be done already but it doesn't seem to be; currently usb_gadget_connect() has no check for this. Such a check will have to be added later. Some degree of mutual exclusion is required in soft_connect_store(), which can dereference udc->driver at arbitrary times since it is a sysfs callback. The solution here is to acquire the gadget's device lock rather than the udc_mutex. Since the driver core guarantees that the device lock is always held during driver binding and unbinding, this will make the accesses in soft_connect_store() mutually exclusive with any changes to udc->driver. Lastly, it turns out there is one place which should hold the udc_mutex but currently does not: The function_show() routine needs protection while it dereferences udc->driver. The missing lock and unlock calls are added.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2022-49943?
CVE-2022-49943 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under CWE-667: Improper Locking.
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2022-49943?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49943?
CVE-2022-49943 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2022-49943?
CVE-2022-49943 is classified under CWE-667: Improper Locking (The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.).
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2022-49943?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-6cpq-cwgw-5g63",
  "modified" : "2025-11-14T21:30:27Z",
  "published" : "2025-06-18T12:30:35Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2022-49943" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: gadget: Fix obscure lockdep violation for udc_mutex\n\nA recent commit expanding the scope of the udc_lock mutex in the\ngadget core managed to cause an obscure and slightly bizarre lockdep\nviolation.  In abbreviated form:\n\n======================================================\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n5.19.0-rc7+ #12510 Not tainted\n------------------------------------------------------\nudevadm/312 is trying to acquire lock:\nffff80000aae1058 (udc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: usb_udc_uevent+0x54/0xe0\n\nbut task is already holding lock:\nffff000002277548 (kn->active#4){++++}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x34/0xe0\n\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n\n-> #3 (kn->active#4){++++}-{0:0}:\n        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84\n        __kernfs_remove+0x268/0x380\n        kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x58/0xac\n        sysfs_remove_file_ns+0x18/0x24\n        device_del+0x15c/0x440\n\n-> #2 (device_links_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84\n        __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430\n        mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64\n        device_link_remove+0x3c/0xa0\n        _regulator_put.part.0+0x168/0x190\n        regulator_put+0x3c/0x54\n        devm_regulator_release+0x14/0x20\n\n-> #1 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84\n        __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430\n        mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64\n        regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x284\n        regulator_enable+0x34/0x80\n        phy_power_on+0x24/0x130\n        __dwc2_lowlevel_hw_enable+0x100/0x130\n        dwc2_lowlevel_hw_enable+0x18/0x40\n        dwc2_hsotg_udc_start+0x6c/0x2f0\n        gadget_bind_driver+0x124/0x1f4\n\n-> #0 (udc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n        __lock_acquire+0x1298/0x20cc\n        lock_acquire.part.0+0xe0/0x230\n        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84\n        __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430\n        mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64\n        usb_udc_uevent+0x54/0xe0\n\nEvidently this was caused by the scope of udc_mutex being too large.\nThe mutex is only meant to protect udc->driver along with a few other\nthings.  As far as I can tell, there's no reason for the mutex to be\nheld while the gadget core calls a gadget driver's ->bind or ->unbind\nroutine, or while a UDC is being started or stopped.  (This accounts\nfor link #1 in the chain above, where the mutex is held while the\ndwc2_hsotg_udc is started as part of driver probing.)\n\nGadget drivers' ->disconnect callbacks are problematic.  Even though\nusb_gadget_disconnect() will now acquire the udc_mutex, there's a\nwindow in usb_gadget_bind_driver() between the times when the mutex is\nreleased and the ->bind callback is invoked.  If a disconnect occurred\nduring that window, we could call the driver's ->disconnect routine\nbefore its ->bind routine.  To prevent this from happening, it will be\nnecessary to prevent a UDC from connecting while it has no gadget\ndriver.  This should be done already but it doesn't seem to be;\ncurrently usb_gadget_connect() has no check for this.  Such a check\nwill have to be added later.\n\nSome degree of mutual exclusion is required in soft_connect_store(),\nwhich can dereference udc->driver at arbitrary times since it is a\nsysfs callback.  The solution here is to acquire the gadget's device\nlock rather than the udc_mutex.  Since the driver core guarantees that\nthe device lock is always held during driver binding and unbinding,\nthis will make the accesses in soft_connect_store() mutually exclusive\nwith any changes to udc->driver.\n\nLastly, it turns out there is one place which should hold the\nudc_mutex but currently does not: The function_show() routine needs\nprotection while it dereferences udc->driver.  The missing lock and\nunlock calls are added.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49943"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1016fc0c096c92dd0e6e0541daac7a7868169903"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a065e4673cbdd9f222a05f85e17d78ea50c8d9c"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-667" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2025-06-18T11:15:21Z"
  }
}