CVE-2022-49943: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability
MODERATECVE-2022-49943 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.5) security vulnerability vulnerability (CWE-667: Improper Locking) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. The weakness occurs when the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.
CVE-2022-49943 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 5.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2022-49943
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
mvn dependency:tree
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2022-49943, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:
mvn dependency:tree
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.
Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-667: Improper Locking, where the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2022-49943?
Which Software versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2022-49943?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49943?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2022-49943?
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2022-49943?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-6cpq-cwgw-5g63",
"modified" : "2025-11-14T21:30:27Z",
"published" : "2025-06-18T12:30:35Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2022-49943" ],
"details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: gadget: Fix obscure lockdep violation for udc_mutex\n\nA recent commit expanding the scope of the udc_lock mutex in the\ngadget core managed to cause an obscure and slightly bizarre lockdep\nviolation. In abbreviated form:\n\n======================================================\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n5.19.0-rc7+ #12510 Not tainted\n------------------------------------------------------\nudevadm/312 is trying to acquire lock:\nffff80000aae1058 (udc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: usb_udc_uevent+0x54/0xe0\n\nbut task is already holding lock:\nffff000002277548 (kn->active#4){++++}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x34/0xe0\n\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n\n-> #3 (kn->active#4){++++}-{0:0}:\n lock_acquire+0x68/0x84\n __kernfs_remove+0x268/0x380\n kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x58/0xac\n sysfs_remove_file_ns+0x18/0x24\n device_del+0x15c/0x440\n\n-> #2 (device_links_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n lock_acquire+0x68/0x84\n __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430\n mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64\n device_link_remove+0x3c/0xa0\n _regulator_put.part.0+0x168/0x190\n regulator_put+0x3c/0x54\n devm_regulator_release+0x14/0x20\n\n-> #1 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n lock_acquire+0x68/0x84\n __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430\n mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64\n regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x284\n regulator_enable+0x34/0x80\n phy_power_on+0x24/0x130\n __dwc2_lowlevel_hw_enable+0x100/0x130\n dwc2_lowlevel_hw_enable+0x18/0x40\n dwc2_hsotg_udc_start+0x6c/0x2f0\n gadget_bind_driver+0x124/0x1f4\n\n-> #0 (udc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n __lock_acquire+0x1298/0x20cc\n lock_acquire.part.0+0xe0/0x230\n lock_acquire+0x68/0x84\n __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430\n mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64\n usb_udc_uevent+0x54/0xe0\n\nEvidently this was caused by the scope of udc_mutex being too large.\nThe mutex is only meant to protect udc->driver along with a few other\nthings. As far as I can tell, there's no reason for the mutex to be\nheld while the gadget core calls a gadget driver's ->bind or ->unbind\nroutine, or while a UDC is being started or stopped. (This accounts\nfor link #1 in the chain above, where the mutex is held while the\ndwc2_hsotg_udc is started as part of driver probing.)\n\nGadget drivers' ->disconnect callbacks are problematic. Even though\nusb_gadget_disconnect() will now acquire the udc_mutex, there's a\nwindow in usb_gadget_bind_driver() between the times when the mutex is\nreleased and the ->bind callback is invoked. If a disconnect occurred\nduring that window, we could call the driver's ->disconnect routine\nbefore its ->bind routine. To prevent this from happening, it will be\nnecessary to prevent a UDC from connecting while it has no gadget\ndriver. This should be done already but it doesn't seem to be;\ncurrently usb_gadget_connect() has no check for this. Such a check\nwill have to be added later.\n\nSome degree of mutual exclusion is required in soft_connect_store(),\nwhich can dereference udc->driver at arbitrary times since it is a\nsysfs callback. The solution here is to acquire the gadget's device\nlock rather than the udc_mutex. Since the driver core guarantees that\nthe device lock is always held during driver binding and unbinding,\nthis will make the accesses in soft_connect_store() mutually exclusive\nwith any changes to udc->driver.\n\nLastly, it turns out there is one place which should hold the\nudc_mutex but currently does not: The function_show() routine needs\nprotection while it dereferences udc->driver. The missing lock and\nunlock calls are added.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49943"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1016fc0c096c92dd0e6e0541daac7a7868169903"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a065e4673cbdd9f222a05f85e17d78ea50c8d9c"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-667" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : false,
"github_reviewed_at" : null,
"nvd_published_at" : "2025-06-18T11:15:21Z"
}
}