CVE-2019-16785: HTTP Request Smuggling LF Vs CRLF Handling Vulnerability
MODERATECVE-2019-16785 is a MODERATE (CVSS 7.1) lf vs crlf handling vulnerability (CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')) affecting HTTP Request Smuggling libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves lf vs crlf handling in waitress. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.4.0.
CVE-2019-16785 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.1
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2019-16785
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected HTTP Request Smuggling dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install waitress>=1.4.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show waitress
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2019-16785, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show waitress
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of HTTP Request Smuggling in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.4.0), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show waitress command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling'), where the product acts as an intermediary http agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed http requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination. In HTTP Request Smuggling, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2019-16785 Affected HTTP Request Smuggling Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
waitress
|
PyPI |
< 1.4.0
|
1.4.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2019-16785?
Which HTTP Request Smuggling versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2019-16785?
Is waitress affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-16785?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2019-16785?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2019-16785?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-pg36-wpm5-g57p",
"modified" : "2024-11-19T13:55:58Z",
"published" : "2019-12-20T23:03:57Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2019-16785" ],
"summary" : "HTTP Request Smuggling: LF vs CRLF handling in Waitress",
"details" : "### Impact\n\nWaitress implemented a &quot;MAY&quot; part of the RFC7230 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-3.5) which states:\n\n Although the line terminator for the start-line and header fields is\n the sequence CRLF, a recipient MAY recognize a single LF as a line\n terminator and ignore any preceding CR.\n\nUnfortunately if a front-end server does not parse header fields with an LF the same way as it does those with a CRLF it can lead to the front-end and the back-end server parsing the same HTTP message in two different ways. This can lead to a potential for HTTP request smuggling/splitting whereby Waitress may see two requests while the front-end server only sees a single HTTP message.\n\nExample:\n\n```\nContent-Length: 100[CRLF]\nX-Header: x[LF]Content-Length: 0[CRLF]\n```\n\nWould get treated by Waitress as if it were:\n\n```\nContent-Length: 100\nX-Header: x\nContent-Length: 0\n```\n\nThis could potentially get used by attackers to split the HTTP request and smuggle a second request in the body of the first.\n\n\n### Patches\n\nThis issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0. This brings a range of changes to harden Waitress against potential HTTP request confusions, and may change the behaviour of Waitress behind non-conformist proxies. \n\nWaitress no longer implements the MAY part of the specification and instead requires that all lines are terminated correctly with CRLF. If any lines are found with a bare CR or LF a 400 Bad Request is sent back to the requesting entity.\n\nThe Pylons Project recommends upgrading as soon as possible, while validating that the changes in Waitress don&#39;t cause any changes in behavior.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nVarious reverse proxies may have protections against sending potentially bad HTTP requests to the backend, and or hardening against potential issues like this. If the reverse proxy doesn&#39;t use HTTP/1.1 for connecting to the backend issues are also somewhat mitigated, as HTTP pipelining does not exist in HTTP/1.0 and Waitress will close the connection after every single request (unless the Keep Alive header is explicitly sent... so this is not a fool proof security method)\n\n### Issues/more security issues:\n\n* open an issue at https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/issues (if not sensitive or security related)\n* email the Pylons Security mailing list: pylons-project-security@googlegroups.com (if security related)",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N"
}, {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "waitress"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.4.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/security/advisories/GHSA-pg36-wpm5-g57p"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16785"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/commit/8eba394ad75deaf9e5cd15b78a3d16b12e6b0eba"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0720"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/waitress/en/latest/#security-fixes"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/Pylons/waitress"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/waitress/PYSEC-2019-136.yaml"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00011.html"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GVDHR2DNKCNQ7YQXISJ45NT4IQDX3LJ7"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LYEOTGWJZVKPRXX2HBNVIYWCX73QYPM5"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-444" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2019-12-20T23:01:44Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2019-12-20T23:15:00Z"
}
}