CVE-2026-56675: 9router 9router /v1 APIs Has Unauthenticated Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-56675 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.3) 9router /v1 apis has unauthenticated vulnerability (CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')) affecting 9router libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves 9router /v1 apis has unauthenticated access via reverse proxy locality collapse. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.5.2.
CVE-2026-56675 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 8.3
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L).
How to Fix CVE-2026-56675
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected 9router dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install 9router@0.5.2
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls 9router
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-56675, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls 9router
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of 9router in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.5.2), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls 9router command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy'), where the product receives a request, message, or directive from an upstream component, but the product does not sufficiently preserve the original source of the request before forwarding the request to an external actor that is outside of the product's control sphere. this causes the product to appear to be the source of the request, leading it to act as a proxy or other intermediary between the upstream component and the external actor. In 9router, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-56675 Affected 9router Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
9router
|
npm |
< 0.5.2
|
0.5.2
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-56675?
Which 9router versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-56675?
Is 9router affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-56675?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-56675?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-56675?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-x5c9-v98j-722r",
"modified" : "2026-09-23T18:12:26Z",
"published" : "2026-09-23T18:12:26Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-56675" ],
"summary" : "9router /v1 APIs has unauthenticated access via reverse proxy locality collapse",
"details" : "## Summary\n\n9router treats local loopback requests as trusted and allows access to `/v1/*` without an\nAPI key. In a documented/common reverse-proxy deployment where nginx forwards public\ntraffic to the backend via `127.0.0.1`, external non-`Origin` requests are misclassified as\nlocal. This allows unauthenticated access to `/v1` APIs such as `/v1/models`, and may allow\nabuse of configured upstream provider credentials depending on the enabled providers.\n\n## Details\n\n- **Affected version / commit:** 9router `v0.4.80` @ `b282f05`.\n- **Deployment precondition:** a same-host reverse proxy (e.g. nginx) forwarding public\n traffic to the backend on `127.0.0.1` / `localhost`. This mirrors the documented cloud\n deployment (`proxy_pass http://localhost:20128` with `X-Real-IP` / `X-Forwarded-For`).\n- **Observed behaviour:**\n - The **direct backend** (`direct-backend`, port `18081`) returns `401` for `/v1/models`\n without an API key.\n - A **direct request that spoofs** `X-9r-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1` still returns `401`: the\n custom server deletes the client-supplied header and overwrites it with the real socket\n address, so naive header spoofing does not work against the direct backend.\n - The **proxied path** (`reverse-proxy`, port `18080`) returns `200` with the full model\n catalog for the same `/v1/models` request **without any API key**.\n - A **proxied request that carries an `Origin` header** returns `401`. The bypass\n therefore primarily affects curl / SDK / server-side / non-browser clients, which do\n not send `Origin`.\n- **Root cause:** the backend's local/remote decision relies on perceived socket/loopback\n locality after reverse proxying. Because nginx connects to the backend from `127.0.0.1`,\n the backend stamps a loopback client address for **every** internet client and treats the\n request as local, skipping the `/v1` API-key requirement. The forwarded `X-Real-IP` /\n `X-Forwarded-For` headers that carry the true client IP are ignored for this decision.\n- This is **not** a simple client header-spoofing issue (the direct-spoof control above\n proves header spoofing is rejected); it is a property of how loopback proxy traffic is\n trusted.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\nThis repository is a self-contained Docker Compose reproduction. No real provider is called\nand no real API key is required.\n\n1. Build and start the stack:\n ```bash\n docker compose up --build\n ```\n2. Direct baseline (no API key):\n ```bash\n curl -i http://127.0.0.1:18081/v1/models\n ```\n3. Direct spoof control:\n ```bash\n curl -i -H \"X-9r-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1\" http://127.0.0.1:18081/v1/models\n ```\n4. Reverse-proxy bypass (no API key):\n ```bash\n curl -i http://127.0.0.1:18080/v1/models\n ```\n5. Reverse-proxy `Origin` control:\n ```bash\n curl -i -H \"Origin: http://evil.example\" http://127.0.0.1:18080/v1/models\n ```\n\n### Expected evidence\n\n| Request | Result |\n|---------|--------|\n| Direct `18081`, no key | `401 Unauthorized` (`{\"error\":\"API key required for remote API access\"}`) |\n| Direct `18081`, `X-9r-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1` spoof | `401 Unauthorized` |\n| Proxied `18080`, no key | `200 OK` with the full model catalog |\n| Proxied `18080`, with `Origin` | `401 Unauthorized` |\n\n## Impact\n\n- Unauthenticated access to the `/v1` API surface in the affected reverse-proxy deployment.\n- Model enumeration via `/v1/models`.\n- Possible abuse of the operator's configured upstream provider credentials through\n `/v1/chat/completions` and other `/v1` proxy endpoints (the attacker spends the operator's\n provider quota/keys without holding any key of their own).\n- Actual impact depends on which providers are configured and how the instance is exposed\n to the public internet.\n- The attacker requires **no API key**.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\n- Do not use client/proxy/socket IP locality as an authentication bypass.\n- Require an API key by default for `/v1/*` on public listeners.\n- If local trust is genuinely needed, bind it to an unguessable server-generated secret or\n to a Unix domain socket that is only accessible locally — not to \"the connection looks\n like loopback\".\n- When running behind reverse proxies, use an explicit trusted-proxy configuration and a\n real client-IP derivation (e.g. a vetted `X-Forwarded-For` chain), and never treat all\n loopback proxy traffic as end-user-local.\n- Document a secure reverse-proxy configuration for operators.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "9router"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.5.2"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 0.4.80"
}
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router/security/advisories/GHSA-x5c9-v98j-722r"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56675"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router/commit/da667836cc7584bea0edd893de1d590c9ea279dc"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router/releases/tag/v0.5.2"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-287", "CWE-290", "CWE-306", "CWE-441" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-09-23T18:12:26Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-07-10T17:17:01Z"
}
}