CVE-2020-26263: Tlslite ng RSA Weakness Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2020-26263 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) rsa weakness vulnerability (CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength) affecting Tlslite ng libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves rsa weakness in tslite-ng. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.7.6.
CVE-2020-26263 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2020-26263
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Tlslite ng dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install tlslite-ng>=0.7.6
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show tlslite-ng
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2020-26263, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show tlslite-ng
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Tlslite ng in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.7.6), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show tlslite-ng command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength, where the product stores or transmits sensitive data using an encryption scheme that is theoretically sound, but is not strong enough for the level of protection required. In Tlslite ng, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2020-26263 Affected Tlslite ng Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
tlslite-ng
|
PyPI |
< 0.7.6
|
0.7.6
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2020-26263?
Which Tlslite ng versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2020-26263?
Is tlslite-ng affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-26263?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2020-26263?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2020-26263?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-wvcv-832q-fjg7",
"modified" : "2024-11-13T23:01:33Z",
"published" : "2020-12-21T16:56:37Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2020-26263" ],
"summary" : "RSA weakness in tslite-ng",
"details" : "### Impact\nThe code that performs decryption and padding check in RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decryption is data dependant.\nIn particular, code in current (as of 0.8.0-alpha38) master\nhttps://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng/blob/0812ed60860fa61a6573b2c0e18771414958f46d/tlslite/utils/rsakey.py#L407-L441\nand code in 0.7.5 branch\nhttps://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng/blob/acdde3161124d6ae37c506b3476aea9996d12e97/tlslite/utils/rsakey.py#L394-L425\nhas multiple ways in which it leaks information (for one, it aborts as soon as the plaintext doesn't start with 0x00, 0x02) about the decrypted ciphertext (both the bit length of the decrypted message as well as where the first unexpected byte lays).\n\nAll TLS servers that enable RSA key exchange as well as applications that use the RSA decryption API directly are vulnerable.\n\nAll previous versions of tlslite-ng are vulnerable.\n\n### Patches\nThe patches to fix it are proposed in \nhttps://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng/pull/438\nhttps://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng/pull/439\n\nNote: the patches depend on Python processing the individual bytes in side-channel free manner, this is known to not be the case: https://securitypitfalls.wordpress.com/2018/08/03/constant-time-compare-in-python/\nAs such, users that require side-channel resistance are recommended to use different TLS implementations, as stated in the [security policy](https://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng/blob/master/SECURITY.md) of tlslite-ng.\n\n### Workarounds\nThere is no way to workaround this issue.\n\n### References\nhttps://securitypitfalls.wordpress.com/2018/08/03/constant-time-compare-in-python/\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory please open an issue in [tlslite-ng](https://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng/issues).",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N"
}, {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "tlslite-ng"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.7.6"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng/security/advisories/GHSA-wvcv-832q-fjg7"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-26263"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng/pull/438"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng/pull/439"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng/commit/c28d6d387bba59d8bd5cb3ba15edc42edf54b368"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/tlslite-ng/PYSEC-2020-143.yaml"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://pypi.org/project/tlslite-ng"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://securitypitfalls.wordpress.com/2018/08/03/constant-time-compare-in-python"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-326" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2020-12-21T16:55:47Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}