CVE-2026-54654: Datamodel code generator `datamodel-code-generator` Vulnerable To Code Injection Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-54654 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.8) `datamodel-code-generator` vulnerable to code injection vulnerability (CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')) affecting Datamodel code generator libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves `datamodel-code-generator` vulnerable to code injection via unescaped carriage return in `--extra-template-data` `comment` field. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.60.2.
CVE-2026-54654 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.8
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-54654
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Datamodel code generator dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install datamodel-code-generator>=0.60.2
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show datamodel-code-generator
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-54654, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show datamodel-code-generator
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Datamodel code generator in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.60.2), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show datamodel-code-generator command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'), where the product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. In Datamodel code generator, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-54654 Affected Datamodel code generator Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
datamodel-code-generator
|
PyPI |
≥ 0.14.1
< 0.60.2
|
0.60.2
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-54654?
Which Datamodel code generator versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-54654?
Is datamodel-code-generator affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54654?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-54654?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-54654?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-wjv6-jcfj-mf9r",
"modified" : "2026-07-28T21:50:09Z",
"published" : "2026-07-28T21:50:09Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-54654" ],
"summary" : "`datamodel-code-generator` vulnerable to code injection via unescaped carriage return in `--extra-template-data` `comment` field",
"details" : "### Summary\n\n`datamodel-code-generator` is vulnerable to code injection when a developer passes an `--extra-template-data` file whose `comment` value contains a literal `\\r` (carriage return). The `comment` variable is rendered into a Python `#` comment in six built-in templates with **no** line-terminator escaping. Python's tokenizer treats a bare CR as a physical-line terminator (see [Python language reference — Physical lines](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#physical-lines)), so the comment ends at the `\\r` and the text after it is parsed as Python, including, when the CR is followed by suitable indentation, as a statement within the class body that follows on the next template line.\n\n### Details\n\nThe vulnerable templates each contain `# {{ comment }}` with no escaping:\n\n- `src/datamodel_code_generator/model/template/TypeAliasAnnotation.jinja2:12` and `:19`\n- `src/datamodel_code_generator/model/template/TypeAliasType.jinja2:12` and `:19`\n- `src/datamodel_code_generator/model/template/TypeStatement.jinja2:12` and `:19`\n- `src/datamodel_code_generator/model/template/pydantic_v2/BaseModel.jinja2:4`\n- `src/datamodel_code_generator/model/template/pydantic_v2/RootModel.jinja2:19`\n- `src/datamodel_code_generator/model/template/pydantic_v2/RootModelTypeAlias.jinja2:13`\n\nThe `pydantic_v2/BaseModel.jinja2:4` site is representative:\n\n```jinja2\nclass {{ class_name }}({{ base_class }}):{% if comment is defined %} # {{ comment }}{% endif %}\n```\n\nWhen the developer-supplied extras file populates `comment` for a model, the value reaches the template via `DataModel.extra_template_data` (set in `src/datamodel_code_generator/model/base.py:736-742`) and Jinja2 interpolates it raw. None of the templates use `comment_safe`, `escape_docstring`, or any other line-terminator filter.\n\n### PoC\nComplete self contained POC is available at my secret gist: https://gist.github.com/thegr1ffyn/8ad6b8cb3cc2be9d3a0144aeb6896a3f\n\n### Impact\n\n- **Who's affected**: any developer or CI pipeline that runs `datamodel-codegen --extra-template-data <file>` where the extras file is influenced by attacker-controlled input. Realistic scenarios include:\n - Extras file generated from a third-party schema-annotation system.\n - Extras file vendored from an upstream repository.\n - Extras file produced by a script that merges multiple `comment` sources.\n - Build pipelines that template the extras file from environment variables, ticket descriptions, or commit metadata.\n- **What it gains**: arbitrary Python code execution in the importer's process at `import` time.\n- **What it does NOT need**: the schema itself can be entirely benign; only the extras file needs to contain the malicious `comment`.\n- **What does block it**: not passing `--extra-template-data`, or rejecting extras files whose `comment` values contain `\\r`, `\\x0b`, or `\\x0c` before invocation.\n\n### Resolution\n\nThe fix normalizes `comment` values from built-in `--extra-template-data` before template rendering. Inline comments now convert CRLF, bare CR, vertical tab, and form feed into LF and prefix continuation lines with `# `, so attacker-controlled text stays inside the generated Python comment block.\n\n### Remediation\n\nUpgrade to `datamodel-code-generator` `0.60.2` or later.\n\nThis issue affects `datamodel-code-generator` versions `>= 0.14.1, <= 0.60.1` and is fixed in `0.60.2`.\n\nSubmitted by: Hamza Haroon (thegr1ffyn)",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "datamodel-code-generator"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0.14.1"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.60.2"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 0.60.1"
}
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator/security/advisories/GHSA-wjv6-jcfj-mf9r"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator/commit/b73abb5cd703a50471b8950bbd3bd0b82ad71de7"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator/releases/tag/0.60.2"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-1336", "CWE-94" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-28T21:50:09Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}