CVE-2020-11093: Indy node Hyperledger Indy's Update Process Of Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2020-11093 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) hyperledger indy's update process of vulnerability (CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature) affecting Indy node libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves hyperledger indy's update process of a did does not check who signs the request. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.12.4.
CVE-2020-11093 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2020-11093
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Indy node dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install indy-node>=1.12.4
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show indy-node
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2020-11093, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show indy-node
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Indy node in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.12.4), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show indy-node command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature, where the product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data. In Indy node, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2020-11093 Affected Indy node Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
indy-node
|
PyPI |
< 1.12.4
|
1.12.4
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2020-11093?
Which Indy node versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2020-11093?
Is indy-node affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-11093?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2020-11093?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2020-11093?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-wh2w-39f4-rpv2",
"modified" : "2024-08-30T18:41:16Z",
"published" : "2024-08-30T18:41:16Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2020-11093" ],
"summary" : "Hyperledger Indy's update process of a DID does not check who signs the request",
"details" : "# Name\nUpdating a DID with a nym transaction will be written to the ledger if neither ROLE or VERKEY are being changed, regardless of sender.\n\n# Description\nA malicious DID with no particular role can ask an update for another DID (but cannot modify its verkey or role). This is bad because:\n1. Any DID can write a nym transaction to the ledger (i.e., any DID can spam the ledger with nym transactions).\n1. Any DID can change any other DID's alias. \n1. The update transaction modifies the ledger metadata associated with a DID. \n\n# Expected vs Observed\nWe expect that if a DID (with no role) wants to update another DID (not its own or one it is the endorser), then the nodes should refuse the request. We can see that requirements in the [Indy default auth_rules](https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node/blob/master/docs/source/auth_rules.md) in Section \"Who is the owner\" in the last point of \"Endorser using\". \n\nWe observe that with a normal DID, we can update the field `from` for a random DID, for example, the one of a TRUSTEE. It creates then a new transaction on the ledger.\n\n# Explanation of the attack\nWe first begin to connect to the pool and open a wallet. Then, we will use a TRUSTEE (but can also be a STEWARD or an ENDORSER) DID `V4SGRU86Z58d6TV7PBUe6f`. We ask the information about `V4SGRU86Z58d6TV7PBUe6f` with a get-nym. We create a new DID `V4SGRU86Z58d6TV7PBUe1a` signed by `V4SGRU86Z58d6TV7PBUe6f` with no role. For the rest of the attack, we will use `V4SGRU86Z58d6TV7PBUe1a` to sign new transactions. We send a `ledger nym did=V4SGRU86Z58d6TV7PBUe6f extra=hello` to see if `V4SGRU86Z58d6TV7PBUe1a` can send an update of a TRUSTEE identity. When we ask information to the ledger about `V4SGRU86Z58d6TV7PBUe6f`, it answers that the `from` field is `V4SGRU86Z58d6TV7PBUe1a` (to compare with the first get-nym we did with `from` field = `V4SGRU86Z58d6TV7PBUe6f`). To see the log of the attack, I modified my indy-cli to print the json request and the json response directly on the terminal. You can find the log file `indy.log` in this archive.\n\n# Implementation notes\n[NymHandler](https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node/blob/e5676b703d625e42c9547333bd03bb8307ed534c/indy_node/server/request_handlers/domain_req_handlers/nym_handler.py) method `update_state`, line 62. I think that we need to check if the DID which signs the transaction, owns the DID or is its endorser.\n\n# Steps to Reproduce\n\n## Environment\nUbuntu 18.04\nDocker version 19.03.8\n[indy-cli](https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-sdk/tree/master/cli)\n[indy-ci](https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-sdk/tree/master/ci) Dockerfile is copied in this archive\nTo install indy-cli, run `./install_indy_cli.sh`\n\n\n## Command\nHere is the script to create the container, run the attack and remove the container and the image. Find below the command to execute each step separately.\n```\n./full_attack.sh\n```\n\n### Installation of the environment\nInstall indy-cli and create an image with tag `test` from Dockerfile\n```\n./install.sh\n```\n\n### Exploit\n```\nindy-cli proof_of_concept\n```\n\n### Uninstallation of the environment\nSuppress the container `test` and remove the image `test`\n```\n./uninstall.sh\n```\n# Analysis\nWe are grateful to @alexandredeleze for discovering and responsibly disclosing the issue.\n\nWe were previously aware that any DID on the ledger can \"update\" the state (seqNo + txnTime) if it doesn't change the state data itself. We considered this a minor bug because only the seqNo and txnTime changed. But seeing that this can also affect the \"parent\" DID means that it has a higher severity.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N"
}, {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "indy-node"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.12.4"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node/security/advisories/GHSA-wh2w-39f4-rpv2"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-11093"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node/commit/55056f22c83b7c3520488b615e1577e0f895d75a"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#1124"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node/blob/master/docs/source/auth_rules.md"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/indy-node/PYSEC-2020-48.yaml"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-347" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2024-08-30T18:41:16Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2020-12-24T20:15:00Z"
}
}