CVE-2025-24895: CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication AspNetCore Remote Authenticator For CIE3.0 Vulnerability
CRITICALCVE-2025-24895 is a CRITICAL (CVSS 9.1) aspnetcore remote authenticator for cie3.0 vulnerability (CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing) affecting CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication libraries in the NuGet ecosystem. The issue involves aspnetcore remote authenticator for cie3.0 allows saml response signature verification bypass. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 2.1.0.
CVE-2025-24895 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 9.1
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2025-24895
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication to 2.1.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2025-24895, inspect your project dependencies for CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication:
inspect dependencies for CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 2.1.0), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing, where this attack-focused weakness is caused by incorrectly implemented authentication schemes that are subject to spoofing attacks. In CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2025-24895 Affected CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication
|
NuGet |
< 2.1.0
|
2.1.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2025-24895?
Which CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2025-24895?
Is CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-24895?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2025-24895?
How can I check NuGet dependencies for CVE-2025-24895?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-vq63-8f72-f486",
"modified" : "2025-02-18T19:25:19Z",
"published" : "2025-02-18T19:25:19Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2025-24895" ],
"summary" : "AspNetCore Remote Authenticator for CIE3.0 Allows SAML Response Signature Verification Bypass",
"details" : "### Description\n\nAuthentication using Spid and CIE is based on the SAML2 standard which provides for two entities:\n\nIdentity Provider (IdP): the system that authenticates users and provides identity information ( SAML assertions ) to the Service Provider, essentially, it is responsible for managing user credentials and identity;\nService Provider (SP): The system that provides a service to the user and relies on the Identity Provider to authenticate the user, receives SAML assertions from the IdP to grant access to resources.\nThe library `cie-aspnetcorerefers` to the second entity, i.e. the SP, and implements the validation logic of the SAML assertions present within the SAML response . The following is a summary diagram of an authentication flow via SAML:\n\n\n\nAs shown in the diagram, the IdP, after verifying the user's credentials, generates a signed SAML response, this is propagated to the SP by the user's browser and the SP, after verifying the signature, can extract the data needed to build the user's session.\n\nThe signature validation logic is central as it ensures that you cannot craft a SAML response with arbitrary assertions and thus impersonate other users.\n\nThe following is the validation code implemented in `cie-aspnetcore`.\n\n```csharp\ninternal static bool VerifySignature(XmlDocument signedDocument, IdentityProvider? identityProvider = null){\n //...SNIP...\n SignedXml signedXml = new SignedXml(signedDocument);\n if (identityProvider is not null)\n {\n bool validated = false;\n foreach (var certificate in identityProvider.X509SigningCertificates){\n var publicMetadataCert = new X509Certificate2(Convert.FromBase64String(certificate));\n XmlNodeList nodeList = (signedDocument.GetElementsByTagName(\"ds:Signature\")?.Count > 1) ?\n signedDocument.GetElementsByTagName(\"ds:Signature\") :\n (signedDocument.GetElementsByTagName(\"ns2:Signature\")?.Count > 1) ?\n signedDocument.GetElementsByTagName(\"ns2:Signature\") :\n signedDocument.GetElementsByTagName(\"Signature\");\n signedXml.LoadXml((XmlElement)nodeList[0]);\n validated |= signedXml.CheckSignature(publicMetadataCert, true);\n }\n return validated;\n }\n else{\n XmlNodeList nodeList = (signedDocument.GetElementsByTagName(\"ds:Signature\")?.Count > 0) ?\n signedDocument.GetElementsByTagName(\"ds:Signature\") :\n signedDocument.GetElementsByTagName(\"Signature\");\n signedXml.LoadXml((XmlElement)nodeList[0]);\n return signedXml.CheckSignature();\n }\n //...SNIP...\n}\n```\n\nThe parameter `signedDocument` contains the SAML response in XML format, while the parameter `identityProvider` can contain the IdP info. If the parameter `identityProvider` has been specified, the public certificates of that IdP are extracted, so as to force their use during the signature verification, otherwise the certificates configured within the application are used.\n\nNext, a response envelope is generated nodeList within which all XML elements containing an XML signature of part or all of the SAML response envelope are saved.\n\nFinally, the first element of this list, i.e. the first signature found, is extracted and verified.\n\nIn a normal authentication flow, the SAML response looks like this (note that some fields and attributes have been omitted for ease of reading):\n\n```xml\n<samlp:Response ID=\"response_id\" IssueInstant=\"2025-01-07T13:37:00Z\" Version=\"2.0\" xmlns:saml=\"urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion\" xmlns:samlp=\"urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol\">\n <saml:Issuer Format=\"urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entity\">\n https://demo.spid.gov.it/validator\n </saml:Issuer>\n <ds:Signature xmlns:ds=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#\">\n <ds:SignedInfo>\n <ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#\"/>\n <ds:SignatureMethod Algorithm=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#rsa-sha256\"/>\n <ds:Reference URI=\"#response_id\">\n <ds:Transforms>\n <ds:Transform Algorithm=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature\"/>\n </ds:Transforms>\n <ds:DigestMethod Algorithm=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#sha256\"/>\n <ds:DigestValue>\n <!-- DIGEST -->\n </ds:DigestValue>\n </ds:Reference>\n </ds:SignedInfo>\n <ds:SignatureValue>\n <!-- SIGNATURE -->\n </ds:SignatureValue>\n <ds:KeyInfo>\n <ds:X509Data>\n <ds:X509Certificate>\n <!-- CERTIFICATE -->\n </ds:X509Certificate>\n </ds:X509Data>\n </ds:KeyInfo>\n </ds:Signature>\n <samlp:Status>\n <samlp:StatusCode Value=\"urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Success\"/>\n </samlp:Status>\n <saml:Assertion ID=\"assertion_id\" IssueInstant=\"2025-01-07T13:37:00Z\" Version=\"2.0\" xmlns:xs=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\">\n <saml:Issuer Format=\"urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entity\">\n https://demo.spid.gov.it/validator\n </saml:Issuer>\n <ds:Signature xmlns:ds=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#\">\n <ds:SignedInfo>\n <ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#\"/>\n <ds:SignatureMethod Algorithm=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#rsa-sha256\"/>\n <ds:Reference URI=\"#assertion_id\">\n <ds:Transforms>\n <ds:Transform Algorithm=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature\"/>\n </ds:Transforms>\n <ds:DigestMethod Algorithm=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#sha256\"/>\n <ds:DigestValue>\n <!-- DIGEST -->\n </ds:DigestValue>\n </ds:Reference>\n </ds:SignedInfo>\n <ds:SignatureValue>\n <!-- SIGNATURE -->\n </ds:SignatureValue>\n <ds:KeyInfo>\n <ds:X509Data>\n <ds:X509Certificate>\n <!-- CERTIFICATE -->\n </ds:X509Certificate>\n </ds:X509Data>\n </ds:KeyInfo>\n </ds:Signature>\n <saml:AttributeStatement>\n <saml:Attribute Name=\"spidCode\" NameFormat=\"urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:basic\">\n <saml:AttributeValue xmlns:xs=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\" xsi:type=\"xs:string\">\n AGID-001\n </saml:AttributeValue>\n </saml:Attribute>\n <!-- ... SNIP ... -->\n </saml:AttributeStatement>\n </saml:Assertion>\n</samlp:Response>\n```\n\nThe SDK code would get as the first element of the `nodeList`, that is `nodeList[0]`, the signature referring to the entire SAML response, in fact the reference of the first signature `<ds:Reference URI=\"#response_id\">` points to the root object `<samlp:Response ID=\"response_id\" ...>`. Therefore, verifying this signature will ensure that the entire content of the SAML response is intact and authentic.\n\nHowever, there is no guarantee that the first signature refers to the root object, so if an attacker injects a signed element as the first element, all other signatures will not be verified. The only requirement is to have a legitimately signed XML element from the IdP, which is easily accomplished using the public metadata of the IdP.\n\nThe SAML response would be structured like this:\n\n\n\n### Impact\nAn attacker could craft an arbitrary SAML response that would be accepted by SPs using the vulnerable SDKs, allowing him to impersonate any Spid and/or CIE user.\n\n### Complexity of the attack\nThe attacker needs an XML block containing a valid signature from one of the IdPs accepted by the SP. As described above, this requirement is satisfied by reading the public metadata of the IdP which is represented by a signed XML block of the IdP.\n\n### Related issues\nN/A\n\n### PoC\n\n1. Clone the repository https://github.com/italia/spid-aspnetcore.git\n2. From the root of the project, enter the folder relating to the example webapp: `samples/1_SimpleSPWebApp/SPID.AspNetCore.WebApp/`\n3. Change the value of the `AssertionConsumerServiceURL` key in the file `appsettings.json` to a custom domain: `https://$CUSTOM_DOMAIN:$CUSTOM_PORT/signin-spid`\n4. Compile and run the sample webapp using the following command, taking care to replace the placeholders with the same values used in step 3: `dotnet build \"SPID.AspNetCore.WebApp.csproj\" -o ./app/build && dotnet publish \"SPID.AspNetCore.WebApp.csproj\" -o ./app/publish && dotnet ./app/publish/SPID.AspNetCore.WebApp.dll -urls=https://$CUSTOM_DOMAIN:$CUSTOM_PORT`\n5. Visit URL: `https://$CUSTOM_DOMAIN:$CUSTOM_PORT/`\n6. Click \"Enter with SPID\" > \"DemoSpid\" (second IdP in the list)\n7. Visit the \"Response\" > \"Check Response\" section\n8. Insert the following string into the \"Audience\" field (right column): `https://spid.aspnetcore.it/`\n9. Click \"Send response to Service Provider\", note the redirect to `/home/loggedin` and consequently the correct execution of the login on the example portal\n\n\n\n10. Repeat steps 5 to 8 inclusive\n11. Intercept the HTTP request generated in step 8 via an HTTP Proxy, such as PortSwigger's BurpSuite\n12. Perform URL-decoding and Base64-decoding of the POST `SAMLResponse` parameter\n13. Insert the content present at the following URL in the second line of the XML: https://demo.spid.gov.it/metadata.xml\n14. Change the contents of the tag `<saml:Assertion>`, for example change the `email` attribute to an arbitrary value: `spid.tech@shielder.it`\n15. Run Base64-encoding and then URL-encoding the `SAMLResponse` parameter\n16. Send the request and note the redirect to `/home/loggedin` which demonstrates the correct identification and therefore also the verification of the arbitrary signature inserted in `SAMLResponse` despite the modification of the assertion\n\n\n\n### Recommended Solution\n\nVerify all signatures within the SAML response and do not accept unsigned XML elements.\n\n### References\n\n- https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/SAML_Security_Cheat_Sheet.html\n\n### Credits\n- [Abdel Adim `smaury` Oisfi](https://x.com/smaury92) di [Shielder](https://www.shielder.com)\n- [Paolo`paupu` Cavaglià](https://x.com/paupu_95) di [Shielder](https://www.shielder.com)\n- [Nicola `fromveeko` Davico](https://x.com/fromveeko) di [Shielder](https://www.shielder.com)",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "NuGet",
"name" : "CIE.AspNetCore.Authentication"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "2.1.0"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 2.0.4"
}
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/italia/cie-aspnetcore/security/advisories/GHSA-vq63-8f72-f486"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/italia/cie-aspnetcore/commit/e66b7f336ff5d4c69f95f197f27f3145f2484994"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/italia/cie-aspnetcore"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-290" ],
"severity" : "CRITICAL",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2025-02-18T19:25:19Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}