CVE-2026-44244: GitPython Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-v87r-6q3f-2j67
CVSS 7.8
CWE-94
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-44244 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.8) remote code execution vulnerability (CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')) affecting GitPython libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves newline injection in config_writer().set_value() enables rce via core.hookspath. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.1.49.

CVE-2026-44244 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-44244
GHSA Identifier GHSA-v87r-6q3f-2j67
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.8
CWE Classification CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Affected Product GitPython
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.8

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Attack Vector Local (AV:L)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-44244

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected GitPython dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

GitPython fixed: 3.1.49
pip install GitPython>=3.1.49
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show GitPython

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-44244, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show GitPython

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of GitPython in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.1.49), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show GitPython command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'), where the product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. In GitPython, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

`GitConfigParser.set_value()` passes values to Python's `configparser` without validating for newlines. GitPython's own `_write()` converts embedded newlines into indented continuation lines (e.g. `\n` becomes `\n\t`), but Git still accepts an indented `[core]` stanza as a section header — so the injected `core.hooksPath` becomes effective configuration. Any Git operation that invokes hooks (commit, merge, checkout) will then execute scripts from the attacker-controlled path. The vulnerability is not merely malformed config output: GitPython's own writer converts embedded newlines into indented continuation lines, but Git still accepts an indented `[core]` stanza as a section header, so the injected `core.hooksPath` becomes effective configuration. This was found while auditing MLRun's `project.push()` method, which passes `author_name` and `author_email` directly to `config_writer().set_value()` with no sanitization. Both parameters cross a trust boundary — they are caller-supplied API inputs that end up in `.git/config`. PoC (standalone, no MLRun required): ```python import git, subprocess, os repo = git.Repo("/tmp/testrepo") with repo.config_writer() as cw: cw.set_value("user", "name", "foo\n[core]\nhooksPath=/tmp/hooks") r = subprocess.run(["git", "config", "core.hooksPath"], cwd="/tmp/testrepo", capture_output=True, text=True) assert r.returncode == 0 print(r.stdout.strip()) # /tmp/hooks os.makedirs("/tmp/hooks", exist_ok=True) open("/tmp/hooks/pre-commit", "w").write("#!/bin/sh\nid > /tmp/pwned\n") os.chmod("/tmp/hooks/pre-commit", 0o755) repo.index.add(["README"]) repo.git.commit(m="test") print(open("/tmp/pwned").read()) # uid=... ``` Tested on GitPython 3.1.46, git 2.39+. Impact: This is persistent repo config poisoning. Any user who can supply `author_name` or `author_email` to an application calling `config_writer().set_value()` can redirect Git hook execution to an arbitrary path. In a multi-user or hosted environment (e.g. a shared MLRun server where multiple users push to the same repositories), one user can poison the `.git/config` of a shared repo and have their hooks run in the context of every subsequent Git operation by any user. On single-user deployments, the impact depends on whether the application later invokes Git hooks automatically. Remediation: `set_value()` should raise on CR, LF, or NUL in values rather than silently pass them through: ```python import re if isinstance(value, (str, bytes)) and re.search(r"[\r\n\x00]", str(value)): raise ValueError("Git config values must not contain CR, LF, or NUL") ``` Rejecting is safer than stripping — a stripped newline might indicate the caller is passing unsanitized input at a higher level, and silent normalization masks that. Affected wherever `config_writer().set_value(section, key, user_input)` is called with external input.** GitPython is a dependency of DVC, MLflow, Kedro, and others — worth auditing their `set_value()` call sites for externally influenced inputs.

CVE-2026-44244 Affected GitPython Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
3.1.49
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
GitPython
PyPI
< 3.1.49
3.1.49

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-44244?
CVE-2026-44244 is a security vulnerability in GitPython involving Newline injection in config_writer().set_value() enables RCE via core.hooksPath under CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection').
Which GitPython versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 3.1.49 across affected packages: GitPython.
What version fixes CVE-2026-44244?
Upgrading to 3.1.49 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is GitPython affected?
Yes, GitPython is affected in releases prior to 3.1.49. Upgrade your dependency to 3.1.49 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-44244?
CVE-2026-44244 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-44244?
CVE-2026-44244 is classified under CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-44244?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show GitPython'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-v87r-6q3f-2j67",
  "modified" : "2026-05-08T21:52:28Z",
  "published" : "2026-05-06T21:58:00Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-44244" ],
  "summary" : "GitPython: Newline injection in config_writer().set_value() enables RCE via core.hooksPath",
  "details" : "`GitConfigParser.set_value()` passes values to Python's `configparser` without validating for newlines. GitPython's own `_write()` converts embedded newlines into indented continuation lines (e.g. `\\n` becomes `\\n\\t`), but Git still accepts an indented `[core]` stanza as a section header — so the injected `core.hooksPath` becomes effective configuration. Any Git operation that invokes hooks (commit, merge, checkout) will then execute scripts from the attacker-controlled path.\n\nThe vulnerability is not merely malformed config output: GitPython's own writer converts embedded newlines into indented continuation lines, but Git still accepts an indented `[core]` stanza as a section header, so the injected `core.hooksPath` becomes effective configuration.\n\nThis was found while auditing MLRun's `project.push()` method, which passes `author_name` and `author_email` directly to `config_writer().set_value()` with no sanitization. Both parameters cross a trust boundary — they are caller-supplied API inputs that end up in `.git/config`.\n\nPoC (standalone, no MLRun required):\n\n```python\nimport git, subprocess, os\n\nrepo = git.Repo(\"/tmp/testrepo\")\n\nwith repo.config_writer() as cw:\n    cw.set_value(\"user\", \"name\", \"foo\\n[core]\\nhooksPath=/tmp/hooks\")\n\nr = subprocess.run([\"git\", \"config\", \"core.hooksPath\"], cwd=\"/tmp/testrepo\", capture_output=True, text=True)\nassert r.returncode == 0\nprint(r.stdout.strip())  # /tmp/hooks\n\nos.makedirs(\"/tmp/hooks\", exist_ok=True)\nopen(\"/tmp/hooks/pre-commit\", \"w\").write(\"#!/bin/sh\\nid > /tmp/pwned\\n\")\nos.chmod(\"/tmp/hooks/pre-commit\", 0o755)\n\nrepo.index.add([\"README\"])\nrepo.git.commit(m=\"test\")\nprint(open(\"/tmp/pwned\").read())  # uid=...\n```\n\nTested on GitPython 3.1.46, git 2.39+.\n\nImpact: This is persistent repo config poisoning. Any user who can supply `author_name` or `author_email` to an application calling `config_writer().set_value()` can redirect Git hook execution to an arbitrary path. In a multi-user or hosted environment (e.g. a shared MLRun server where multiple users push to the same repositories), one user can poison the `.git/config` of a shared repo and have their hooks run in the context of every subsequent Git operation by any user. On single-user deployments, the impact depends on whether the application later invokes Git hooks automatically.\n\nRemediation: `set_value()` should raise on CR, LF, or NUL in values rather than silently pass them through:\n\n```python\nimport re\n\nif isinstance(value, (str, bytes)) and re.search(r\"[\\r\\n\\x00]\", str(value)):\n    raise ValueError(\"Git config values must not contain CR, LF, or NUL\")\n```\n\nRejecting is safer than stripping — a stripped newline might indicate the caller is passing unsanitized input at a higher level, and silent normalization masks that.\n\nAffected wherever `config_writer().set_value(section, key, user_input)` is called with external input.** GitPython is a dependency of DVC, MLflow, Kedro, and others — worth auditing their `set_value()` call sites for externally influenced inputs.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "GitPython"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "3.1.49"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 3.1.48"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-v87r-6q3f-2j67"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44244"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/releases/tag/3.1.49"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-94" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-06T21:58:00Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-05-07T19:16:02Z"
  }
}